How much truth is in this meme? And I don't mean if Muttmerica would win with Russia but if advanced technology gives women and gayy men a place in war.
How much truth is in this meme?
How much truth is in this meme? And I don't mean if Muttmerica would win with Russia but if advanced technology gives women and gayy men a place in war.
technology is a huge advantage but women will still fuck up
>so confident in the woman's inability to do her job he just walks in front of the muzzle
Based Italian
>Muttmerica
I sometimes wonder what the daily routine of a mindbroken 4chantard is. Do they seethe at the world around them at every waking moment, or is a mental illness that comes and goes?
>Do they seethe at the world around them at every waking moment, or is a mental illness that comes and goes?
The former. 4chan has gone full antisocial schizo. They live 100% in their echo chamber because they no longer have the skills to deal with the real world.
>Zigger doesnt remember when US trannies ripped wagner a new one...
Both, I find it funny how banana republic of ukraine lives rent free in their heads
>I sometimes wonder what the daily routine of a mindbroken 4chantard is.
1)Wake up.
2)Seethe at former colonial masters and America for creating money.
3)Carry buckets of water for mother
4)Check on visa application for USA/EU/UK/Australia/Canada etc.
5)Message random western women on social media with requests for boobs/vagine/feet
6)Tell mother they are on employment recruitment sites looking for important job in the eu. Go for appointment to suck off local police chiefs retard cousin because was caught stealing fruit again
7)Steal tourist mobile phone and sell it
8)Use money to buy laser print saying they have degree in motorsports and a qualified GP. Start using Dr prefix.
9)Go on 4chan and complain about garden gnomes and America and phone post in /chug/ about the glory of Russian rape and torture
10)Visit leftypol and beg for BTC gibs as a genuine brown socialist
11)Spam ransomware at a UN famine relief charity
12)Fap to western MILFS and white child actresses
13)Phone Post about SU57
13)Wait until it is dark and rape child/stranger/tribal/tourist/relative
14)Phone Post on 4chan about EU becoming hindu/muslim/brown/arab/Venezuelan
15)Go to sleeping place under galvanised sheet over hole in the dirt
16)Seethe at the first world. Pass out in a state of rage.
Not really. They literally put these people in supply or support divisions, they still give the frontline work to men and non-mentally ill people.
People on the right would oppose any war that wasn't waged against whities.
No…well, sort of. It’s usually a white straight guy pointing a gun at someone and it’s usually a white straight guy acting as the gun-pointer’s NCO. But there’s all sorts of non-combat and non-direct-combat roles you’ll find women, gays and minorities. So it’s typically a straight white guy pulling the trigger but it’s not uncommon for women / gays to be a part of the kill chain. Oh, and gays are VERY under-represent in the military for obvious reasons; that’s why those ads were put out to "fix" the "problem". It’s a Democrat / Liberal thing.
It's 100% true, maybe not the attack helo parts but CNN showed how a lot of the KINO footage of Cuckniks getting droned that gets reposted all the time was thanks to female drone operators, some even with pink hair lmao.
It is the truth shared by everybody
Russia is very embarrassed for seething about trannies when it’s just rent free for them. ziggers are getting very effectively remove by western hardwares despiteless of their seething about the AFU spokesperson being a trans.
The US never lost a single battle against the Afghans. You know who did? Pussia.
OP didn't ask about Russia though stop seething burger
So what is the Taliban doing in control of Afghanistan.
If Russia takes over Ukraine, does that mean America still won? Use your brain you retarded slavmoron.
Because America left Afghanistan
That's like saying you beat the police because you waited for the cop car to drive away before looting your Nikes
>If Russia takes over Ukraine, does that mean America still won?
Like there is any chance of that happening, the difference is Ukraine is willing to fight, Afghanistan wasn't and therefore the US stopped babysitting them.
You and I both know the US can drive the Taliban back to their caves and occupy indefinitely, they decided not too.
Least obvious glowie
Go talk your bullshit cope to someone who will actually listen
>Least obvious glowie
Being factually correct makes you a glowie now?
lmao, Glavset projection.
I'm inside your walls
What are you gonna do when I find you and punch you in your balls through the wall
I'm inside your other wall
that wall is concrete and unless you're a starved Ethiopian then you aren't fitting inside my walls
>that wall is concrete
>he doesn't know
Lmao
Is he wrong tho? You think the taliban won't just book it back up their caves if the US ever comes back?
because we got bored and went home
taliban wins by default, they get a bunch of shitty desert while the USA retains its spot as the only global superpower unlike the Soviets after their Afghan odyssey
Holy shit just admit the entire endeavor was a lost cause you coping little gay. Nothing was gained strategically and overall we left weaker than when we entered.
That’s all true but the US btfo the Taliban in every battle so the whole meme about le based trad mujahideen is bull
You're a superpower proud of winning battles against goat farmers.
>posts meme about the US loosing to talibs
>gets btfo’d
>lol you’re proud of winning how sad lolol
>winning a war > winning battles
Learn how to read.
>you coping little gay
>we left weaker than when we entered.
Projection.
At the rate we're fucking going the Hohols have a non-zero chance of marching on Moscow, which is one of many stark differences.
>So what is the Taliban doing in control of Afghanistan.
The goat fuckers basically voted them back in government when they did nothing to stop them.
>If Russia takes over Ukraine, does that mean America still won?
unironically yes, every dead Russian is a victory for the US
When and where?
Afghan War, learn history (and watch Black Lagoon)
/thread
North Vietnam blew you up with your own bombs. Yes literally, they extracted duds to blow up Americans.
>north Vietnam blew you up
Uhhhhhhh, are you memory holing line backer 1 and 2 along with the paris peace agreement? NVA wasn't able to do anything and was close to surrendering in 73.
>wow we can just win by the sheer force of bombs!
>wages war for decades
Tl;dr, line backer 1&2 absolutely devastated north Vietnam. Even with soviet support, they were considering surrendering due to their entire supply lines and operational capacities being annihilated.
Sure bro whatever the psilocybin tells you
>whatever
moron, the NVA had to wait 2 years after America left to conduct a big offensive. The NVA was in shambles after 73 and only relied on skirmishes to attack south Vietnam without US support.
I still haven't seen a source for this claim, and I suppose intervening in Cambodia was a clear sign that they were oh so devastated that they could "only just barely take south Vietnam" get real gay
moron, they had 2 years to rebuild their military without america bombing them. Even then, they still had to use south vietnamese surplus to invade cambodia, which showed that their reconstruction effort is off to a slow start.
Brooo how is this kind of cognitive dissonance possible?
>The US never lost a single battle against the Afghans.
>the entire conflict is a battle
Based retard. Now click on the links for the first 2 phase of the conflict.
>doesn’t prove the statement wrong
Nice wojaks but facts don’t care about your feelings
Doesn't matter how many battles you win if you lose the war.
Let's see Paul Allen's death toll
>how did you beat us after we left?
Seems like a local problem.
Kek yeah very “local” after we spent an entire generation socially engineering them, definitely worth the money and time.
>after we spent an entire generation socially engineering them
An entire generation is like 50 years tops
>How did you beat us after we ran away?
It do be a mystery
>gayy men
Male-on-male sex has been common in militaries since the Romans. I think you mean the 90lbs male registered Democrat.
Also "gay" was invented by the garden gnomes and the Mafia, Stonewall riots were about defending Mob-owned nightclubs, Vlad the Impaler's brother Radu fucked Ottoman crown princes in the ass etc.
he's whiter than you'll ever be
He's probably molested countless children.
>is there a place for gays in the army
Don’t tell this guy about ancient greece
Can you name a battle the Taliban won against the US though?
Operation Redwings.
>” Insurgent forces temporarily withdraw before returning three weeks later”
So they didn’t win.
SEALs got btfo.
Yea, and a few weeks later operation whalers started to finish the job. Jarheads only suffered 1 death
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Whalers
So US lost the first battle, but came back and won another one later?
>lost
Both groups decided to regroup and retreat from the area. But operation whalers was an immediate response to red wing.
SEALS still got cucked because they were retards. Marcus Lutrell hid and then ran and the US made up a BS story about a brave last stand.
>U.S. made
The U.S. didn't do shit. That was all on the navy, but even they were sceptical about it.
>US made a
The government/military were skeptical about his story. Its all on marcus and the Navy's PR department for letting marcus run his mouth.
>red wing
>few weeks later operation whalers started to finish off what red wing did not
Yea
>Only notable Taliban victory involved 20 US personnel in total
Yep. That's a battle, alright.
Where is the lie?
Despite what PrepHole would have you believe, being male is not necessary to be able to operate modern weapon systems. Given the Chinks outnumber us 3:1 you'd think they'd like that this gives us twice as big a manpower pool but of course it doesn't because chud logic.
Women buckle under pressure. but please put them in Frontline situations mutt it's sure to work out
You can't prove that statement
nta, but you'd know this if you've ever interacted with a woman IRL. When shit gets bad, they call a man to fix their problems. Especially the "strong and independent" type.
Have you ever interacted with any women?
yes, and that's how I came to this conclusion you retarded moron
There’s female fighter pilots in the Navy with more combat experience than any male in your shitty country’s military lmao
Yeah I imagine so my country doesn't have an airforce
>noguns from noguns country
Why are you here tourist? Lmao
We're so back.
Both Ukraine and the Taliban are justified
>Despite what PrepHole would have you believe, being male is not necessary to be able to operate modern weapon systems. Given the Chinks outnumber us 3:1 you'd think they'd like that this gives us twice as big a manpower pool but of course it doesn't because chud logic.
Yeah and we could take it back if we ever wanted it again to.
That’s the not the name of a battle anon. Come on, I’m waiting.
>20 years of occupation
My dude, they haven't occupied the country since 2004. America ceased their ground operations against the taliban in 2014 and the Taliban still wasn't able to take over the country until 8 years later when they begged for the air force to stop supporting the ANA. The taliban lost nearly all the big battles and conflicts against the americans and had to resort to IEDs and targeting ANA troops.
Yet this is a thread about US military might destroying its opponents, getting bored of winning every battle because the locals won't stand up for themselves doesn't change op' image.
So they never actually beat the US in battle? So the whole point of the meme saying le based taliban is better than the they/them army is wrong?
if the taliban are such ultra badasses, how come they only "took" the country back after we left? surely if they're the supersoldiers you retards say they are they wouldn't just be our bitch for 20 years.
forces take land quicker when it's undefended, I had no idea
>tfw the only person over 18 in the thread
>20 years of occupation
I swear to god, the people that make these memes just hear shit from the internet rather than doing their own research. There were barely any U.S. presence in the country after OEF ended and they weren't exactly fighting the taliban either. The taliban won against the ANA, but not against america because they both stopped fighting aside from the occasional airstrikes for the ANA.
>the US can’t fight counterinsurgency-
Not the point anon but good effort.
3-0 to third world shitholes mutt.
What was the last conventional battle the US lost?
Veteran suicide.
>can’t name a battle
El copeo maximo
what was the last war the u.s. won?
Oh wait it's ww2
>WW2
Holy mother of historylets
You have to be a zigger, no one could unironically beleive that.
Which war then gay? name it
I'm not gonna be your history teacher, if you can't find them (not it, THEM; they've won MULTIPLE wars you stupid fuck) you're literally braindead.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you are wrong but you won't admit AHAHAHAHAHAHA
First and second Iraq war
>brace for copepact
>A no fly zone, blockade, and sanctions
"The conflict ended"
a funny joke anon. and of course you'll call the second war a victory which I guess it is in some sense as some of the goals of it were accomplished anyway after mutts got btfo'd out of Iraq
And there’s the cope.
>goal of the 1st war: make saddam fuck off from kuwait
>end of the 1st war: saddam fucked off from kuwait
>goal of the 2nd war: depose saddam
>end of the 2nd war: saddam ded
Please explain how that’s anything but a victory?
Are you stupid the war was about more than just deposing sadaam. And I just agreed with you you fucking dreg
>guess it is in some sense as some of the goals of it were accomplished anyway after mutts got btfo'd out of Iraq
The U.S. didn't get btfo'd out of iraq. What are you smoking? The U.S. goal was simple
>regime change
>muh WMDs(partial failure on that part)
>rebuild the country
The U.S. left based on Iraq's wishes, which is to leave and they did. In 2014, iraq asked the U.S. to come back due to ISIS. America is not looking to annex countries, which would make "kicking them out" not make any sense.
if you agree that there were wmd's in iraq then you are a glowie and your opinions aren't worth considering. "The u.s. goal was simple" I wish there was a word for this kind of nonsensical argument you absolutely got btfo'd. Here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bKLFUMrNDpQ&t=46s I think this should suffice
You're fucking stupid that you started to take up a liberal talking point thats been spreaded around. One of the goals was to find an active WMD program, which was not there. Saddam, did, however had surplus of chemical WMDs laying around all over iraq and some soldiers got injured and was told to keep shut about it. The idea that saddam never had WMDs was so absurd because it started by a commie. Saddam also aluded that he had an active program and wouldn't let the UN do their jobs. The whole iraq war was incited by the stupidity of saddam and the reactionary actions of bush.
I'm gonna find the fucking cia memo that prove you wrong gay I'll be back
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.2968/060004013
Proof gay, not to of course mention the inability of the u.n weapons inspectors to find anything which the Bush administration rejected pushing for war anyway on the basis that here was a "secret wmd bunker"
Look at this fool finding shit from 2004 when there has been more developments regarding the war as the years went on.
You complete me glowie
>glowie
Whats with this deflection? Is everyone that disagrees with you a glowie now? Are the glowies in your walls anon?
no u
It's funny you say rebuild the country when you (mutts) destroyed it twice and didn't even attempt to rebuild it
The WMD theory was just that, conjecture based upon a grad students opinions. What are you going to tell me next that the bitch in Congress testifying on the babies in incubators was real as well. Fucking kek you retarded glowmoron stooge.
Stop samefagging, moron.
> Fucking kek you retarded glowmoron stooge.
Why is 4chan incapable of talking about things like normal people? They've always got to make up some vastly powerful yet stupid strawman they can attribute any dissenting opinion to?
I've heard people talk (on here) about though terminating cliches, basically a way to shield your id(?) from conflicting information, is this something like that? Attribute information you don't like to a designated hate group so it can be safely discarded?
Why would someone consciously maim their own mind like that?
4chan has made me almost start loving the feds. The way these third worlders piss their pants and widen their eyes like children telling ghost stories at any mention of “da See-Eye-Ayy” is just the best. I’m calling my congressman and demanding more drone campaigns first thing in the morning.
Replace the CIA with god or aliens and it'll quickly become obvious it's the typical sort of conspiratorial thinking the deeply unhappy live with. Protect the ego at all costs because that sucker's fragile when your life is otherwise empty.
So according to you, kicking Saddam's ass once, then kicking his ass again, and establishing a functional government and then leaving is victory to you?
Btw, how is communist Afghanistan coming along?
>Korea
>Iraq 1
>Iraq 2
>korea
>creates eternal enemy currently building nukes to presumably destroy mutts, cconflict is stalemate despite the north receiving saturation bombardment treatment equivelant to 5x the explosive power dropped on japan including two atomic bombs
How is that a victory?
Anon, what was the goal of korea? If we are basing war victories off of shit that happened years later, then the U.S. won Vietnam because it became a pro American country years later.
it's like you read the first part and ignored the rest, but you wouldn't do that would you anon?
By that logic, every war during the cold war is an automatic victory for america because america won the cold war. None of the results matter aside from the cold war. See how this work?
Except the cold war wasn’t a war, Korea is still split in two, the PRC still controls all of China except for Taiwan, Vietnam is still under the control of the government we fought against, and so forth
Its still technically a war, anon. The cold war is won by america, so that means every conflict during that period is a win for america. Like you said, the battles don't matter.
Literally not a war bt definition though
"Cold war" but it wasn't so cold was it?
>the PRC still controls all of China except for Taiwan
PRC was a proto-ally against Russia thanks to Nixon. They were on the winning team (our team). lrn2history.
>Korea is still split in two
Thats a failure of north korea, not america. America was following the UN resolution.
>china
A conflict that america wasn't directly involved in.
>Vietnam is still under the control of the government we fought against, and so forth
Yea, and they still are pro American lol.
>moving the goalposts
I salute you glowie
>the PRC still controls all of China except for Taiwan
We never attempted to change that through military force.
>kill so many morons 50 years later grandpa lights up with glee telling me stories of emptying machine guns on chinamen climbing the wire like bugs
>creates eternal enemy
>also creates eternal ally 10x more economically, militarily, and geopolitically relevant than commie shithole
>air, naval, and army bases right on china’s doorstep
You'll receive nuclear gifts anon and you can't stop em from coming
You'll have to invent solid fuel before that happens you coin slot eyed bitch
not paying attention to the news is good anon that way you can't be confronted by reality
What news? The Hwasong-17, North Korea's newest "quantum implessive american pig dog annihilating super nuke" is liquid fueled.
The news that Korean nukes can reach the west coast of United states
And? They'd be doing us a favor. American nukes have been able to reach North Korea for the better part of a century now, but we never felt the need to waive our dick beyond Douglas MacArthur contemplating the finer qualities of cobalt and gamma radiation. North Korea STILL does not have a second strike capability, and has so few warheads that multiple patriot launches basically guarantee interception.
It's like a kid who found his dad's gun thinking he can take on the SWAT team. He might surprise one, but the rest will annihilate him in under a second.
anon I.. this is the most deranged comment I've ever seen I hope you don't live on the west coast.
>advocating for the nuclear holocaust of california on PrepHole of all places is deranged
Okay tourist
Based
Fuck the West coast, I wish Russia would take out the upper East coast as well so America could finally prosper again
>muh nooks
Ohhhhhhhhhh noooo kwab hahahahahahahahah
>[Names war]
>i-it doesn't count!
We all know how this routine goes.
Wow sick own anon. keep going maybe you'll do better than a shitty strawman
1991 Gulf War
>i-it doesn't count!
I already agreed you basically won the iraq war calling it two conflicts is a stretch tho
>already agreed you basically won the iraq war
Show me where
Say it say you defeated that small carribien island gay
>sent from the saddam bunker
Would you not call desert storm the most decisive victory of the century?
>Century
It's a very strong contender even if it's not.
No there was a long preamble of intense bombardment, destruction of critical infrastructure some of the most severe sanctions in modern history resulting in the deaths of half a million, merciless slighter of their retreating and professional soldiers on the highway of death, then the pre invasion bombardment of even phone lines blown up for no tactical reason a third of all the cruise missiles ever produced I think it was hurled at them and then invasion so no the highway of death was more decisive
Sounds a lot like the Iraqis got a good taste of freedom to me.
Surrendering soldiers* footage shows them Surrendering the bodies were then just left there to decay
Uh, anon... Desert Storm was the 1991 Iraq War, not the 2003 one.
>phone lines blown up for no tactical reason
this is the 10th dumbest thing i've had to read in this thread
Tongo tongo
99.99% of Taliban supporters are brown.
That includes Russians because their minds are brown.
7 billion dollars of military equipment left in Afghanistan and somehow this isn't a loss.
oooooo a war with iran over water rights sounds good right now
>iraqis
The iraqis didn't do shit lmao. Despite those IEDs, only 4k died in the span of 8 years, while those insurgents dropped like flies. Iraq also begged America to come back and now there is a permanent base in iraq. The iraqis lost so hard that they had to resort to IEDs. IEDs, despite their effectiveness, are last resort tactics used by groups that know they can't win a direct battle.
>Say it say you defeated that small carribien island gay
Seems I forgot about Libya oh well
Case in point. Notice how the 4chanfag is incapable of handling any opinions that go against the general consensus of the board. Notice how his underdeveloped brain has to immediately lash out with identity politics insults.
Murrica!!
You prove his point harder than anyone else ever possibly could, kek. You're absolutely mindbroken
Cute, but that’s still not the name of a battle the Taliban won.
>You were fleeing. Please use appropriate wording next time. Thanks
What battle, anon? The U.S. and the taliban had a cease fire going on since 2020, and thats mainly between them and the air force. There were barely 2k troops left in the country by 2020.
So what was accomplished overall? What objectives did we achieve in exchange for 20 years, billions of dollars and a new generation of homeless vets.
>killed osama
>killed alot of al Qaeda leadership
The goal wasn't to oust the taliban lol. Why do people keep getting them messed up?
Mass replying fag. The US had only option to win in your mind which was to fucking glass the place.
>advanced technology gives women and gayy men a place in war.
Lolno
Heh, the taliban is currently begging the USA for gibes and getting laughed at while Afghans starve. Glorious victory, 4chan.
Absolutely, in a peer to peer symmetric conflict, joint operations, technology, and third party targeting reign supreme. Thirdies don't understand these tactics and can't use them, so they resort to saving face and presenting themselves as tough. As soon as shots are fired, we've seen how "3-Day Special Operations" go. As for China, the existence of Kinmen is enough to prove they do not have the capability to take Taiwan militarily and they understand that.
Where it doesn't work so well is asymmetric warfare such as insurgencies, because no amount of bombs will achieve political goals when there are restrictions in place to prevent the armed forces from going all the way. See for instance, Afghanistan and Vietnam. In every conceivable military way, the US military curbstomped both of those nations and killed hundreds of thousands more enemy combatants than US losses, but the initial entry goals were already extremely vague, poorly defined, and had no exit strategy or "We did it, we can go home" end goal. Those types of conflicts are completely unwinnable unless making Vietnam or Afghanistan the 51st US state is on the table.
fuck wrong meme
Botswana is based neoliberal chad country.
They do shockingly well for Africa. Benefits of democracy and a free press: less corruption.
Are those Barry Hussein's parents?
But africa is already an aids riddled continent. I don't think legalizing that shit will change anything.
>he doesn't believe in AIDSelleration
>conquer a country and control it for 20 years
>Kill bin Laden and his successor
>Disrupt al-Qaeda operations to the point that it's barely able to function even in lawless wastes like Somalia
>Tell the people of the country to get their shit together
>Leave
>Vatmorons and pajeets call this "losing"
People keeps conjuring both the taliban and al Qaeda together. They are both different organizations and the Taliban merely got toppled because of their affiliation with al Qaeda. al-Qaeda got so dysfunctional that the taliban disassociated with them and now they are asking iran for help.
>flee leaving 7 billion dollars of military equipment
>equipment meant for the ANA
Yea
Your point?
>flee
Yes, flee.
>occupy the country for 20 years
>whole big debate about staying v leaving
>we can leave because we built the ANA
>leave
>ANA crumbles
>re-enter the country for an evac, Taliban avoids conflict during evac
>"flee"
So basically you failed in establishing a vassal state. You spent enormous amounts of money just for afganistan to regain independence.
>enormous amount of money
My dude, 100 billion per year ain't shit lmao. Iraq was more expensive.
So, basically, you're pivoting away from "flee", bitch.
>enormous amounts of money
You fail to grasp just how wealthy the US, and its military, is. We spent $50 billion on Desert Storm, which lasted 6 weeks.
Adjust that for inflation, anon. It cost about $116,943,764.35 in todays money.
>Immensely wealthy but can't give proper pension to vets.
wow what immense wealth, they must really not like homeless veterans if they'd rather spend 60 billion on killing people rather than rather than helping them
>proper pension
Anon, the issue isn't money, but about management. You're worrying about the wrong thing because veterans are essentially the most pandered group when it comes to their benefits. Such as free college, healthcare and what not.
you can't MOG the costs face it anon u.s. industry is long gone
Lol, what? Veterans in the US have a better pension program than almost any regular blue collar worker in the entire world
wealthy but can't give proper pension to vets.
False. You get FANTASTIC benefits as a vet - from amazing deals on homeloans, loans to start up a buisness, student loans, student loan forgiveness, free medical for life and a half a dozen tax-breaks.
And thats for people who just sign on for eight years. Lifers get something in the region of ~100k pa in benefits.
>forget Korea, Japan, and Germany
>thirdworlders shitters still can't comprehend countries like the US can have mitually beneficial relations with the countries they invade.
The reason why the US failed to establish a functioning government in afghanistan is because thirdworld shitskins like you can barely function as human beings capable of civilization. All you retards do is seethe in your shithole at burgers and blame them for why you're shithole is a shithole. Thats why KDR is the only real objective measure when dealing with shithole countries.
this kind of duality isn't allowed you can't both be chads blowing up the third world and also have nothing to do with why most of those countries are shitholes
Except killing all the inbred, opium smoking, pedo worshipping shitskins would make it less of a shithole.
"Their actions totally didn't border on genocide" man those innocent Iraqi children must've really like opium then
>posts 23 minute video expecting me to watch it
retarded schizo. I'm not the one rooting for pedo worshipping terrorists that lord over territories while keeping them regressive and inbred for centuries.
is that a Freudian slip? Pretty sure that'd an exact description of the u.s.a
yet countries like South Korea, Japan, and Germany turned out fine while you continue to root for terrorists that worship pedos in the desert.
Germany is a retarded cuck country deindustrializing as we speak and Japan is cucked but also dystopian and South Korea is just a dystopia where slave contracts are possible or well near slave contracts far worse than any wagie job could ever be
Amazing how you just described Russia exactly
Pretty sure the Russians are fine as the sanctions continue to have no effect
Why is Gazprom losing money? Why does Putin want them dropped for the grain deal to continue?
Them? Gazprom? What does that even mean?
Why the fuck to pajeets shill so hard for things they don't know anything about? christ
>pajeet
no anon I white than u
ok great, just a downie
When you say them you mean Gazprom right?
Yeah germs are massive cucks, there's a reason nobody takes them seriously or wants them in charge of EU, them and retarded frogs.
Pozzia is the same shit but even worse kek, no wonder germs loved to suck puccian dick for decades and built them factories and military bases.
>Pozzia is the same shit but even worse kek
Ah, and so we should shill for Russia because?
bot broke?
>retarded schizo. I'm the one rooting for people that mutliate male genitals at birth, encourage sodomy and sex change in children, are so pathetic that they need ten different antidepressants to function as a human being, promote body positivity which stands for morbid obesity because they hate all beauty, have crime rates so high it's too funny to talk about.
We don't support those goat fucker. We just hate YOU and hope YOU fail.
>have crime rates so high it's too funny to talk about.
Nobody show him russian crime rates...OR russian HIV rates, or russian alcoholism rates, or russian suicide rates, or russian divorce rates.
Or russian HIV rates for children under 12
>russian HIV rates for children under 12
Jesus fucking Christ
You know, I used to think Japan was the land of the pedos, but fuck, maybe it was Russia all along.
What's interesting is that Russia is a poor shithole while Muttland is the richest country on the planet and yet it still is as fucking pathetic as Rus.
>yet it still is as fucking pathetic as Rus.
Nowhere even close. in fact russia is far closer to Somalia or some shit than to the US
Also you forgot to mention that mudslimes use children as shields and are okay with marrying them and fucking them.
Also les roberts
What's with these retards who seem to think the US was at war with the Taliban? Like you said, the US didn't care about the Taliban, they overthrew the government because it was between America and the Afghani terrorist networks.
/pol/tards actually believe if I showed up at their houses, fucked their wives, and punched their faces in, they win because I eventually decide to leave their houses and they reclaim their wives.
Great strawman glowie a+
>strawman
Anon, the entire thread is riddled with the idea that america was in there to defeat the taliban. Even though that was not the purpose of the invasion and the set up of the Afghan republic.
"We were in there to get osama"
And yet you stayed for another 12 years after he was killed
>you stayed
No, we did not lmao. After osama died, majority of U.S. troops left the country. Whats left was a skeleton crew manning bases and sof shit training ANA and dealing with IS-k
Nvm it was 2011
>Everyone smarter than me is a CIA operative
???
I was genuinely asking. Seems like WWI tactics of siege and bleed at the moment, but I know that Russia is all the stopped on all other fronts.
Where did Russia come into this? why are you Americans like this? you fucking lost no amount of cognitive dissonance will change that
And also the sublimating won't change it either
They weren't fleeing when they were following an AGREEMENT MADE 1 YEAR AGO. Despite the complications, both sides still went through with the cease fire and pull out.
actual chump change for the US military in the grand scheme of things. A lot of that was shit sold, or slated to be sold to the Afghan National Army, as well.
You'd be surprised how much equipment was left in Europe after WW2, and how much afterwards was "lent" to other countries with no real expectation of receiving it back.
>about 1.5 million people in uniform
>shockingly, among 1.5 million people there are degenerates
>the institution is thus worthless
Really dude
There are obviously a lot of good men and women in the US military. The point is that thet started embracing this gayry, not only that but encouraging it.
>some guy posts some degen shit in uniform
>THE ARMY IS LITERALLY ENCOURAGING IT
Okay dude
Cmon man you know they do
>they had a pride cake during pride month! literally sacrificing children to moloch
bruuuuh
I didn't say that.
You might as well have.
I think two men fucking eachother is disgusting don't know how you feel about it.
We all think that. However, and this may shock you, there have been men who fuck men in the US military since the US has had a military.
I know that. Gay men obviously want to be sorrounded by other men straight or gay. What I'm saying is it wasn't as common back then as it is now or encouraged.
>it wasn't as common
Uhhhhh yea sure anon lol.
You don't think that telling people "It's okay to be lesbo/gay sweetie!" is going to cause them to experiment and increase the amount of fags in society and as a result in military as well?
No, because people can make decisions by themselves. The main difference is that they are more open to it compared to before where they had to find some weird justifications to make it "not gay". "Nohomo" is still gay, dude.
Where were the transsexuals and furries in the 50s?
Nobody is talking about trannies, every country has them, including iran.
>people can make decisions by themselves
Gullible children can't.
>HOMG THEY DID A THING DURING PRIDE MONTH
If you celebrate pride month you are by definition a fag or a fag lover.
i don't think about men fucking each other at all, what the fuck is wrong with you two?
They're gays in denial. It's that simple
Yeah, I bet your passionate about sodomy, gay. Just suck a cock and move on to something productive in your life.
I'm into women. Homosexuality disgusts me.
Have you tried not thinking about sodomy on a daily basis?
I'm very passionate about eradicating sodomy so that's not possible.
What exactly did they win. They are the kings of a junkyard, and are begging the West for aid.
freedom
None? Women and fags will just crash the helicopter because they are stupid, and don't get me started on the chances of them entering a battlefield in the first place. There's a reason women aren't being drafted in Ukraine
But Pozzia does and I've seen their bodies.
>advanced technology gives women and gayy men a place in war.
the loss in afghanistan showed that you need both a big dick budget and big dick men, not one or the other.
It doesn't. If anything, it means that militaries will be more selective as the balance of power leans more towards quality than quantity.
The US military is the most advanced and powerful one on the planet and can wipe out any opposing force with ease, that doesn't mean it can't fuck up what comes after that.
I can't believe trad Christian Russian VDV super soldiers are marching in Kiev right now
>ITT pajeets, vatniks, and chinamen cope about the US and its allies running the world
the GWOT wasn't ever meant to be won. it was meant to drag on and enrich the coffers of the wealthy and ruling classes and be an excuse to erode freedoms domestically.
Sorry anon, this board is now all about eastern Euros flinging mud at each other and not the MIC fueling wars for profit.
Iraqis barely killed 2000 US servicemen in like 10 years. Meanwhile that's how many Pussians are getting killed by UkroGODS WEEKLY.
>MUH RUSSIA
Wtf???
I'd still wager there are more furfags and degenerates in the Russian armed forces than the American.
that's retarded anon
A repressed degenerate is still a degenerate
You're right but saying that a society that lynches fags will have a higher percentage of them than America is dumb.
Well one country has a well known tradition of ass rape and one doesn't so...
You have a tradition called pride month when sodomites start orgies en masse.
>pride month
As opposed to the Russian entire year?
are you implying they only fuck for one month like it's The Purge
>implying
No, I'm outright stating that they rape eachother the entire year
There are gay rapists in the russian army. Ok we already established that. What also holds true is that the entirety of american society embraces sodomy and what's also interesting it also encourages child abuse through sex-changing (supposedly) hormones and genital mutilation.
>What also holds true is that the entirety of american society embraces sodomy
Well how funny is it that the Russian society does too!
Compared to USA they don't
Too bad russian HIV statistics says otherwise
Straight people can spread hiv too. You think africans are gay too? They have it worse there. In Russia they get beaten. In africa they get stoned to death.
>it's totally the straight people and not the well-documented insitutionalized rape in the military that's mandatory for every male
You're not fooling anybody
You ignored my point about Africa and chuds.
Ziggers have such a bizzare alternative reality take when it comes to pride shit. I've lived my entire life in the US and have never seen a fag parade irl. Worst you'll ever see are some gay flags in the suburbs but according to ziggers there's trannies prowling the streets engaging in orgies on every street corner.
Either way my asshole would feel 100% safer in a fag parade than a Russian mobik unit.
>I've lived my entire life in the US and have never seen a fag parade irl.
I saw one one time. It was just a bunch of people waving and holding signs.
Right, I say death to chuds/fags but them marching down some street 1 day a year isn't as apocalyptic as they meme it out to be
Reynhard Tambos Maruli Tua Sinaga (born 19 February 1983)[3] is an Indonesian sex offender who was convicted of 159 sex offences, including 136 rapes of young men committed in Manchester, England, between 2015 and 2017, where he was living as a student. He was found guilty of drugging and sexually assaulting 48 men during this period, 44 of whom he raped, some repeatedly, although the police believe he was offending for years beforehand.
Did he do all that in the middle of a fag parade?
Rapes don't just happen in the open retard. You get raped when there's no one around to help you or when you get drugged like in pic related. That's basic rape math. The point I was trying to make is that you're not that safe in the west. There was a story in my country about an lgbt activist that threatened a man with a gun to have sex with him. Word got out and the he killed himself (the gay rapist).
cool so what's that have to do with fag parades
Why do you glowies seethe so much about your chosen enemy is it cause they developed better delivery methods for nuclear payloads when you withdrew from the IBM treaty
>better delivery methods
Enlighten us, anon? What delivery method hasn't been debunked when all those classified documents came out during the 90s about the state of Russian nuclear weapons?
the hypersonic glider for one or was it hypersonic I don't quite remember not that your arsenal id's doing any better
>HYPERSONICs
Holy mother of fucking cope? Remember when their hypersonics was supposed to be invincible when they got shotdown by a controversial AA battery that people kept shitting on? What happened to thise stealth aircrafts? What happened to the 2k armatas promised by 2020?
>as the conversation goes on the inevitability of the PrepHole degenerate bringing up Russia grows closer
The seethe is palpable anon
Anon, you're the one that brought up the absolute meme of the russian MIC. Tell me, what happened to those 2k armatas promised by 2020?
Do you have the memory of a goldfish? You brought up Russia
>id's doing any better
Bro, the Americans had maneuverable hypersonics small enough to be mounted on fighter jets in the fucking 70s
Prove it
But you won't anon cause it's bullshit
Read it and weep pidor
>The Phoenix has several guidance modes and achieves its longest range by using mid-course updates from the F-14A/B AWG-9 radar (APG-71 radar in the F-14D) as it climbs to cruise between 80,000 ft (24,000 m) and 100,000 ft (30,000 m) at close to Mach 5.
>Mach 5
>in service 1974
The avangard can travel Mach 10 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avangard_(hypersonic_glide_vehicle)
>Maximum speed: Mach 20–27[5][6](Claimed)
>(Claimed)
lol, meanwhile the phoenix has 50 years of proven effectiveness
>Proven mach 10
It's a glide vehicle the point made at the showing is that it can turn rapidly for an object moving at at least mach 10
And the point of my post was to say that the Americans had hypersonic technology that was small enough to fit on planes half a century ago.
You don't think Russians have it? They definately do
>They definately do
May I see it?
This technology is from the sixties what makes you think the Russians couldn't replicate it? they made the tsar Bomba as a response to castle bravo Russia isn't some technological backwater
>what makes you think the Russians couldn't replicate it?
Their proven historical and current inability to keep up with western technology
sounds like an awful lot of bullshit coming from you anon this isn't the 1890's and your claim that Russia can't keep up makes no sense since they definately are as you can see in my reply
>claim that Russia can't keep up
Where is Russia's 5th gen airplane then? America not only fielded not one, but two stealth bomber models, and TWO 5th gen airplanes.
Where is the modern Russian fire control system? Optics(ones bought from the west don't count)? Rifles? Carrier?
You still haven't posted an equivalent to the phoenix, a 50 year old design.
a plane that so far has only blown up a balloon I thought the su-57 or whatever it is was 5th gen.
>whatever it is was 5th gen.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
tell me anon, how many of these """5th""" gen planes does Russia have?
And how many does the us have?
pretty sure the numbers are close I don't really care tbh
I can almost taste the cope through the screen
I'm completely ignorant of this. sounds like you care way more than I do
Well now you know anon 🙂
I dont know you didn't even tell me the number
Well, the US has over 400 f-35s on its own, and counting it's allies it has over 900.
There are no more than like 4 confirmed su57s.
And russian AA has proven to be so effective, right?
Oh wait....
Nor that matters tbh I don't really care if America or Russia have more since it turns out both have aa making planes pointless
I found it for you anon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-77
>hypersonic
Anon, ICBMs have been "hypersonic" since the fucking 1960s....
Woah! A hypersonic nuclear warhead delivery system??? This is groundbreaking stuff
Actually, the US launched the world's first hypersonic missile in 1949.
Better than you have*
>today i will remind them
That they lost in 2 months and had their whole country occupied for 20 years?
>How much truth is in this meme?
I mean, considering that the modern Russian army has proven unable to have something as basic as air support, then I'd say it's true.
>People falling off plane mid-air
How many of them were Americans?
The more I watch schizoids shill against the United States, the more convinced I am that the United States unironically has no existential threats and probably won't in my lifetime. I mean ffs the biggest talking point is just spamming about chuds 24/7 and I'm supposed to take this seriously
Why do the pro-russian fags still harp on about Afghanistan? Their showing there was nothing enviable either.
>Why do the pro-russian fags still harp on about Afghanistan? Their showing there was nothing enviable either.
It's the only cope they really have since the US military is the best in the world bar none, since WWII
The thread didn't start pro-russian it was supposed to be about a theoretical scenario where weaklings get access to advanced weaponry and how it would affect war.
>where weaklings get access to advanced weaponry and how it would affect war.
Well I mean considering that the other side almost completely lacks the shit that the US has, my money is on the burgers
God the amount of brown people ITT is... unsurprising given the way they breed uncontrollably.
I don't really think that in a war a bunch of trans and gay people are vaporizing Russian divisions in the Suwalki Gap. I think a lot of liberal policies can be harmful for the military. That being said, a democratic government is inherently better at waging war than an authoritarian one and I'm tired of hearing repeated statements from leaders like Putin and Orban about the west being weak.
Why is this gay ass thread still up tbh
it's the required cumsponge for chink shills and 4chantards. I only wish we could keep the Ukraine bullshit down to one thread.
The problem with this is that the taliban never defeated americans. They simply defeated american proxies which were the ANA which isn't hard when the ANA were inbred, opium smoking pedos like the taliban were.
That's really the best thirdworld shitskins can hope for, is defeating themselves in battle and call it a victory.
>but if advanced technology gives women and gayy men a place in war
Did natural resources make Africa/Russia/UAE any less of a shithole? It inevitably comes down to the people operating said advanced technology.
ahhahahahahha PrepHole, plebbit and Cia glownis btfo
You don't have the right to be smug about Afghanistan vatmoron
You vatnigs lost way worse though
America spent 20 trillion dollars on wars in the middle-east since 2001. So what did we get out of all that money spent? Oil? Israel’s enemies disempowered in Iraq?
This was back in the early days of the invasion where people still mocked the US as having a they/them army, right? Where the VDV's manly axe throwing routines were failing left and right, good times.
No, they simply quit, sometimes this happens, main objective was to remove taliban from power and kill OBL, both objectives where accomplished.
What followed next was a unique political experiment, an attempt to build a functional democracy from people who still lived in a religious tribal society but without the will to do so.
The experiment failed.
But ultimately this wasn't US military's fault, they did all they were asked from them, on the other hand neocons and afghan elites and the rank and file afghan failed themselves, while the neocons paid this by falling once again into irrelevance and being sweep aside by the alt-right wave which propelled Trump into power it is the afghans the ones who had to pay the heaviest price for their own failures.
Attached picture gives you an idea of why taliban's take over was in the end as much of a hollow thing, they were born from barbarism, and they will live and die in barbarism, petty tormentors preying on their own for a false god.
And you would ask what about 4chan, well, what can we say? They are all that remain once people like the taliban are finally defeated by the march of history, pathetic bitter remnants who can't recognize it's their ugly selves the main reason why no woman is going to wait for them in their beds, and in the end natural selection finishes them off.
"U.s. attempting to create a democracy" that's a good one the u.s does not create democracies it destroyed them
Destroys*
>U.S. does not create
You're literally spouting leftist talking points lol. America creates democracies, but its up to those nations to uphold that democracy. America is not annexing land or taking charge of a nation. If they are taking charge, they wouldn't have set up government.
South Korea/Japan/Germany were all pretty successful democracies. At least more than North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia.
I will fight for homosexuality in Botswana - the post.
based furfag, imagine getting killed by this thing, embarassing!
those are your officers sending young men (soon to be draftees) to death for ZOG
yeah, remind them how glorious soviet motherland won in Afghanistan. Oh, wait.