How much does genetics and biology help in modern warfare? For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive

How much does genetics and biology help in modern warfare?
For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if you look like that you will get shot in the back by seething beta cucks, unless you're a general with delta force bodyguards
    So its good for the average soldier to be slightly dysgenic

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Three Army doctors in Afghanistan who examined Tillman’s body thought he was murdered since he died from three bullet holes to the forehead, which was inconsistent with the explanation of the incident given by ranger officers.
      Hmm.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        source? how the frick do you get three bullets in the head and nowhere else from friendly fire?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >source?
          https://allthatsinteresting.com/pat-tillman-death#
          The short story is that he got hit in the armor, as well. The ensuing attempt to destroy the armor by burning only served to generate more evidence of a coverup.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Midgets are very unfair opponents in warfare because they can fully operate at a very low ceiling, making them very hard to hit targets. Furthermore, an average IIIA plate can work as a full body armor protecting their entire body, making shrapnel less likely to hit not only because of their stature and the fact that any cover is full cover for them, but in the case of a strike it will probably hit the hard armor dressed all around by the dwarf. Meanwhile, though, trenches can present themselves as a big challenge for them, and small obstacles such as garden fences might need full demolishing, making their advance slow. I'd say that having a chad spearhead assault group followed by a retenue of weaponized midgets would revolutionize modern warfare and present itself as an effective anti-drone tactics.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're that one butthole who always picked Oddjob, aren't you? Frick you.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    recurring spam
    https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/61166666

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
    but how? Don't they give a better target?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It comes down to nutrition. In WW1 taller soldiers were more likely to survive because their upbringing was less marred by malnutrition, which meant their general level of health was greater than their shorter compatriots. This healthiness tended to protect them from the panoply of diseases that resulted from squatting in ankle-deep water for weeks on end

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's bullshit because bigger people need more food for calorie maintenance

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah.
          They got that provided to them for most of their life so a relatively short period of malnutrition had less of an effect.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Manlets aren't threatening. So if you run across a 5'9" midge next to a 6'2" chad, the obvious choice is to shoot and kill the manlet. Shooting chadrick would just piss him off unless you've got .50 or bigger to get the job done.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >fall into zoo enclosure with a tiger and a housecat
        >good thing I have my handy CCW
        >remember PrepHole post
        >empty magazine into tabby

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
      Do you think they get extra HP or something

      https://i.imgur.com/DBZKWLs.jpg

      How much does genetics and biology help in modern warfare?
      For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive

      Its weird people talk about Audi murphy but in really most special forces the guys are all 6ft tall or even taller I think average height in the sbs was 6 5 or some shit but theres always that one tiny guy who is 5 2 or some shit but he can out wrestle everyone there and is tough as nails

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't know about the dwarf supersoldier recruitment program

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
    Do you think they get extra HP or something

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically yes

      It comes down to nutrition. In WW1 taller soldiers were more likely to survive because their upbringing was less marred by malnutrition, which meant their general level of health was greater than their shorter compatriots. This healthiness tended to protect them from the panoply of diseases that resulted from squatting in ankle-deep water for weeks on end

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Small men have a lighter logistical footprint

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they take drugs to look like that. Its there job so I undestand why they do it but they take drugs. So dont worry about it.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Taller are soldiers are more likely to survive because intelligent soldiers are more likely to survive and height correlates both intelligence because both are increased by good childhood nutrition. Intelligent soldiers are more likely to survive because intelligence negatively correlates with bravery and cowards take less risks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Makes sense you end up being tall due to having food when your developing so you get fed

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
    It was explained as basically "tall men are more likely to be promoted than short men because there are biases against short men that keep them in harms way longer"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All the greatest soldiers have been manlet tier, Simo Hayha was 5'3"

    Many such cases

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The finest soldiers are the manlets able to channel manlet rage into icy killer instinct and battlefield awareness IE Hayha, Murphy, Daley etc

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >how much does genetics and biology help in modern warfare.

    Bro, genetics and biology *is* modern warfare. See how identity politics of various stripes has been the de-facto fault lines of politics and therefore militarization. One could even argue that the U.S. military is like the old British Empire with a core of 'British regulars' and a large number of 'Hessian mercenaries' that are much more liable to being well, 'mercantile' if the hostile politics gets jockeyed in such a way to pit "western Europeans" versus some other identity group, particularly if its the one that they belong to.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the resident incel is back with the same thread
    John Moses Browning created all men equal. Also, as funny as they look, manlets are a harder target to shoot at.
    Sage goes in all fields as usual.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Also, as funny as they look, manlets are a harder target to shoot at.
      Only if you are using a standing position. If you are prone or crouched, that brings your eyeline level with manlet's vitals

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why was he murdered?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because the NFL didn't want to have to rig the Super Bowl for two different teams when he came back.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive

    that might be true, but what about it?
    you're not trying to imply that taller soldiers are BETTER soldiers?

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's a perception thing. Tall kings won't kill each other, they'd rather get rid of the nearby 5'11 dwarf

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >modern warfare
    The next gen of soldiers will be remote controlling air, sea and land drones. The desired attributes will be:
    1. Excellent hand eye coordination
    2. Fast 1000 APM click rate
    3. No vertigo while using VR
    4. High resistance to sleep deprivation
    5. Excellent multitasking ability, preferably able to use, digest, and act via multiple monitor setups
    6. Competitive personality

    In other words, gamers will be the near future's super soldiers. Scoff all you like. The future is here.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You think gw or the others ever feel bad or think of the people that died due to the gwot war?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        would you? I'm sure they don't view them as people.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You think gw or the others ever feel bad or think of the people that died due to the gwot war?

      GW does those veteran paintings, so maybe he feels bad? fricking delusional tbh, his family has been exploiting the working class that provide cannon fodder to the enlisted ranks for well over a century, sure bush sr was a combat veteran but that's about it, gw himself couldn't even hack it in the air national guard

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Theres a photo of gw meeting the burnt vet, it's so akward. Gw was also a vet but he didnt see combat

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Majority of veterans throughout history never see combat even during the Romans.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kinda feel bad for pat he gave up so much only to die and then get used for some political bull shit. He was a real hero if he was around today bet he would be trying to do some good.

    Truly a real american and a real human bean

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
    It's the opposite

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > bigger target
      > more likely to survive
      sorry, homosexual.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the frick up dicklicker

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what is going to save you in combat is probably not an extra pint of blood or slightly thicker bones.

    any of the following is more likely to save your life:
    it is your weapons
    your skills and your teams skills and weapons
    fitness (strenght, stamina, agility, deftness of action)
    >fitness allows you to stay at peak performance for longer, adrenaline does wonders but it can not overcome a lack of glycogen, disbalancing of electrolites, sleep deprivation and the buildup of lactic acid screwing with your biochemistry

    support
    cordination
    tactics
    strategy
    camuflage
    and personal protective equipement

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >For example Taller soldiers are more likely to survive

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not fricking much once you start getting loud about your opposition to the war you're being asked to fight and corresponding with prominent antiwar activists back home and someone decides to accidentally you in the back of the head from about 10m away then your government covers it up lol whoops

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Throughout history foot soldiers have experienced cycles where they were required to carry heavy loads followed by periods where loads were reduced.
    >Since the 18th century total loads have progressively increased far beyond those carried in previous times.
    >This may be due to technical developments that have increased soldier firepower and protection at the expense of the heavier load.
    >The height and weight of British and American soldiers appears to have increased since the Industrial Revolution possibly allowing heavier load carriage.
    >Loads currently recommended by the U.S. Army infantry school are 33 kg for an approach march load (45% of body weight) and 22 kg for a combat load (30% of body weight).

    Loads Carried by Various Units and/or Carried at Various Times
    French Poilu (WWI)
    39 kg
    British Infantry on the Somme (WWI)
    30 kg
    French Foreign Legion (WWI)
    45 kg
    Wingate's Chindits (WWII)
    32-41 kg
    U.S. Forces in North Africa (WWII)
    60 kg
    U.S. Marines in Korea
    38 kg
    U.S. in Vietnam**
    34 kg
    Falklands Campaign
    54 kg

    being big and fat will allow you to carry more ammo about, maybe this helps but you also need to carry more food and water.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nearly most of the greatest heros of ww2 had impaired vision and had to lie on their exams to join the military. Genetics dont mean shit

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That’s why America has curbed stomped every malnourished 3rd world peasant out there. Our success in Afghanistan and Vietnam really portray our superior gentetics nobody under 5’5 has every killed an American. Being a 6’5 giga chad gives you bullet proof skin I thought you knew that.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not much. Modern warfare is that you die if the enemy sees you. This is if you survived the air campaign.

    The only time is exceptioned is if you are fighting a non-1st world nation like Russia or Iran.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    correlation doesn't imply causation.

    wtf is the bro science? Did i stumble to PrepHole?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Correlation strongly implies causation.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not really

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    As a tall guy, we have been ducking and diving our whole lives avoiding manlet infrastructure (doors, hallways, showers,
    lamps). Our heads are constantly on a swivel so we are more aware of our surroundings which has a natural advantage on the battlefield. They’ll have you believe otherwise, but wienery manlets have the entire world built around them like it’s the shire. They’re more daring and arrogant which leads to a quick dirt nap.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's really important, because if you have a genetic predisposition to sudden boneitis you're not gonna be serving lmao

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >muh spurs
      Look up how many leftist political dodged the draft you homosexual.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't he get shot by National Guard soldiers who were panicked by taking some small arms fire?

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    taller soldiers cant utilize cover as well as shorter guys.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Taller soldiers are more likely to survive
    it's actually the opposite, lanklets suck for modern warfare

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *