How many would you need to take down a carrier?

How many would you need to take down a carrier?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Sails outside your maximum range.
    You can't.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what if these things are deployed by a submarine?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The USN concluded one destroyer could take down about five or six suicide boats. Then they decided to beef up their defences so now it's probably more than that. And drones unlike suicide boats are susceptible to EW defences, so in short, the answer is: "a lot"

        The technical term for that is "a stupider torpedo"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          By now it's a lot more than that.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Helos can't be in the air at all times and can't react to how close you can get a cheap small narcosub to a ship before detecting it with any possible technology.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >nuh uh, my sub is immune to helicopters

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                nuh uh, my ship is immune to subs

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >any possible technology.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ALTO TO BARCO, AHORA.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Ports generally have netting and obstacles to prevent underwater infiltration, especially functional NATO-operated ones that haven't been gutted by corruption.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why wouldn't you just fire a volley of torpedos at that point?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Worse in every possible way than a torpedo.
        Modern torpedoes are faster, stealthier, can be wire guided (no EM signals), can carry bigger payload and detonate underneath the keel which is functionally unsurvivable.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        a torpedo would be better in that case

        this is similar to a torpedo boat, its meant for asymmetrical warfare

        you just know the Taiwanese are FURIOUSLY taking notes

        i swear every month the Ukis write another new chapter in the book of military operations, this level of audacity and ingenuity does not happen often

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The only reason Ukrainians are able to do this shit is because Russians are comically incompetent. This would -never- work against even a marginally professional military. Hell even fucking Sri Lanka was able to hard counter Tamil Tiger suicide boats.
          Russia is just shit.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mfw the schizoboat posters were right

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I knew it but I kept shilling that they were Turkish lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Apologize motherfuckers. Apologize to the Truck Cuck right fucking now. I called this from day fucking one.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The 1940s dropped by
    They said they came here to laugh at you

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    overall in terms of technology this war was a huge disappointment
    everything seems just so bad and rickety and DIY
    except for a few things like himars or pzh2000 theres just stuff anyone could build in their backyard

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you are way too stupid to realize versions of these technologies will be developed further down the line and with a much bigger budget

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Theoretically if it had a large enough payload, only one. Realistically you'd probably need at least a dozen to land a single hit and that's not accounting for the escort.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It would have to be a nuclear payload. You can't disable a carrier with a single conventional payload unless you detonate it under the keel.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    One to take down a vatnik one. Fuck you vatniks!

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ammunition count of carrier task force + 1

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Does this mean it was a bomb boat that destroyed the bridge and not a truck?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It will be game over for carrier groups, once they can lob 200 km+ range anti-ship missiles from these.

    Webm-related, Turkish USV lobbing 16 km+ range missiles

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      China already has Type-22 unmanned missile boats, they're a joke.
      >Tiny radars can't see anything.
      >Hum drum missiles can't sneed against Aegis.
      >No range, little air defense, and poor seaworthiness, so lol suck on JDAMs without ever getting within missile range of a USN ship.
      >Now have to contend with NSMs in the littoral zone on LCS and Connies.
      >Inb4 they're crewed, chinks aren't people.
      Against a competent enemy with a diverse range of options for close combat against small targets, this shit really only works if you get them into a port to attack immobilized ships under false pretenses. And that becomes more of a political conversation than a military or technological one.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Type-22's length overall is 42 meters. It's fuck huge compared to the webm related (10 meters).

        Turkey is working on small but long-range AShM, that can be lobbed from small & fast USVs or armed drones. With super sea skimming ability. It's going to redefine naval warfare.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe in limited coastal situations, but against a blue water navy you're still running into the same issues.
          >Radar, engines, fuel tanks, weapons, defenses, everything has to conform to the form factor.
          It's a neat trick that won't get any mileage without a real Navy to back it up, or they're just going to eat bottom bin PGMs without ever sighting their targets.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Thisfag adding, it's a good thing that Turkey is also a pretty big conventional ship builder. It's not like they're pulling the Iranian cope and pretending that drone tech can be their entire military.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A carrier of what country?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    well technically you could strap a nuke to one of those if you were say, China
    so one getting through would take out a carrier

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *