How do you even use a three-section staff?

How do you even use a three-section staff?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You don't..

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why didn't the sword guy just rush in and stab him. He might eat a hit but that doesn't matter for as much as his opponent.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The whole engagement was idiotic, I assume the rules of engagement were that any strike scores and physical contact is not allowed. In a real fight you'd rush the staff guy, the weapon is an unwieldy baton at best at close range and you can grab it or just body the guy.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          first hit wins which leads to retarded meta

          look at fencing, everyone uses suicidal tactics there

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Carefully.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You accidentally invent it while fucking around in the garden with a bladed polearm and then use it's novelty to punk that guy who's been kicking your ass every month for five years.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fucking hell, unbelievably based 36 chambers of Shaolin reference

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hold 2 sections, whack with the third

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ideally, while firing your gun at the same time

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is this every single martial art? One guy just stands there mostly uselessly barely trying while the other awkwardly uses some uber technique that only works on someone awkwardly standing there.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Routines like you see in these kinds of videos are the equivalent of pad-work in boxing. Useful as part of a full training regimen, useless as a replacement for the rest of the martial art.
        A martial art decays when that becomes all that is practiced. It doesn't actually mean there wasn't originally a complete fighting system, just that it's been neglected and forgotten and crudely copied over time to the point of uselessness.

        The Chinese are just more psychologically prone to hucksterism and bullshit than other races, probably due to a thousand years of semi regular starvation (malnutrition can create inheritable genetic effects that effect psychology).

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It flaile! It whacke! It protec! It knocke your teethe thereout!

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Depends on what you're trying to do. Generally you can hold the end sticks and just strike like you're doing escrima, and use the middle section to block. You can hold one end and whip, the main advantage is letting the middle section hit the opponent's block and let the end part whip around past their block and strike them in the back.
    You can do half and half, hold one stick and strike with it, and hold the middle section and use the loose end like a flail.
    You can try to hold the middle section and strike with the outside sections loose, like in a demonstration, or hold all three parts together and swing it like a baseball bat, or you can catch the opponent and use two sections like a nutcracker to choke or crush a limb.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To thresh rice. It's a farming tool.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe it's one of those weapon that weren't meant to be used in... you know, warfare?
    It could have been just an efficient way to knock out peasant armed only with knife or stick themselves, maybe a pole-arm.
    Most of these weapon were invented because it was easy to make.

    Or in the case of ninja... stuff that look like gardening tool up to the moment they kill their target and go back to being a poor farmer who have seen the elusive kabuki-dressed assassin leave the room by turning into smoke.

    Alternatively,
    you hide a single shot gun into the two outer stick

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well actually a lot of the weapons you refer to were a) farming equipment and b) blunt. Blunt was vital because if a samurai or other state trooper of the time caught you with something resembling a sharp weapons, it was instant head chopping time. Tyrants fear rebellious peasants because there are so many of them, and will keep them as far from lethal weapons as possible. Sounds familiar, doesn't it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >will keep them as far from lethal weapons as possible. Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
        Indeed, civilization have only progressed after we've effectively kept the rebellious peasant away from proper weapons so they don't destroy the civilization feeding them trying to become tyrants.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >largest quantum leap in technology comes when a democratically elected country of white Europeans gets to exist beyond the influence of sisterfucking royals
          ur adorable

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *