How did pike and shot formations work, why were they so effectively and why did they fall out of favor?

How did pike and shot formations work, why were they so effectively and why did they fall out of favor?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >How did pike and shot formations work
    hoplite formation on all sides. good luck stabbing me, I'm behind 7 pikemen

    >why did they fall out of favor?
    100 arquebusiers in a line shooting beats 100 pikemen in a square standing

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why were they so effective
    you could shoot pure pike formations while being safe from cavalry charges

    >why did they fall out of favor?
    eventually guns got long and light enough that you could put a bayonet on and no longer need the pikes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bayonet in no way is replacement for pike.
      Bayonet loses to infantry with pike in melee.
      Bayonet cannot stop charging cavalry.

      Pike was replaced by musket spam. make x20 times more musketeers and you will kill enemy before it can enter melee.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Bayonet cannot stop charging cavalry.
        lol, lmao

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Stopping cavalry with bayonets requires your infantry to hold their nerve, be brave and not run away at a horse coming at them.
          This is difficult for non-anglos.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            everyone used squares in the napoleonic wars

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's the same for pikes retard

            In the bayonet era infantry stooped cavalry with pistol range musket salvos. If the fucked up their salvo in some way cavalry butchered bayonet equipped infantry. Many such cases of cavalry cutting down infantry squares to the last men.
            There was even special tactics to deal with infantry square. Baiting the fire. When cavalry parades around 100-200 yards to bait infantry to unload salvo prematurely. Then cavalry went charging and were on infantry before they could reload and no bayonet could save them.
            Everything in bayonet era revolved around musket fire and musket was 70-80% of combat casualties (next casualty agent been cavalry sword).

            >t. dunning-kruger case study

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          In the bayonet era infantry stooped cavalry with pistol range musket salvos. If the fucked up their salvo in some way cavalry butchered bayonet equipped infantry. Many such cases of cavalry cutting down infantry squares to the last men.
          There was even special tactics to deal with infantry square. Baiting the fire. When cavalry parades around 100-200 yards to bait infantry to unload salvo prematurely. Then cavalry went charging and were on infantry before they could reload and no bayonet could save them.
          Everything in bayonet era revolved around musket fire and musket was 70-80% of combat casualties (next casualty agent been cavalry sword).

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything in bayonet era revolved around musket fire and musket was 70-80% of combat casualties
            >(next casualty agent been cavalry sword)

            I am always amazed at the ESL ability to be completely confident while also talking out of their ass and making shit up.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lads

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            every time

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It wasn't as good as a pike, but it was GoodEnough while giving your formation much more ranged firepower

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It wasn't good enough at all. Bayonet simply cant do do what pikes does in melee.
          Pike wins melee against everything not pike.
          Bayonet losses against everything not bayonet.
          Simple as.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it was good enough because it won

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Musket won. In bayonet era musket casualties like i said were 70-80%, bayonet like 5%
              Musket was The King.
              While eternal boomer historical revisionists like too downplay its role.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Also notice a trend of euros praising the effectiveness of bayonets and calling Americans retarded for not using more bayonet charges in the civil war, meanwhile the rifles were minute of man accurate to 300m

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well that's because bayonet charges were a huge part of warfare during that time.

                The French in the Napoleonic era made it into an art form with their infantry collum tactics

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the tercio stopped being effective in the 30 years war because of line tactics, not because of the bayonet which wasn't even widely adopted yet.

                the napoleonic wars were 50 years older than the american civil war with far worse technology

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >during that time
                anon, the ACW was forty years after Waterloo, cheap rifle-muskets firing the Minie bullet had quadrupled the effective range, and the lever-action repeater was introduced two years before the end
                that's a HUGE difference to ye olde Brown Bess
                >The French in the Napoleonic era made it into an art form with their infantry collum tactics
                only against undertrained Continental conscripts who couldn't platoon volley like a British infantryman

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but you can just shoot the pikes retard, while the pikes can't shoot you

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why did they fall out of favor?
    muskets and bayonets became the pike

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Someone made a joke about how they like handling long sticks

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Read up on the Spanish Tericos

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Chillin, takin potshots at enemy forces
    >They get mad and charge at you
    >Retreat into pikemen
    Shrimple as that

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The pike lasted until something, with a longer range that could be given to any retard, took its place. The bayonet simply gave them an option to fend for themselves if someone got close enough after being minced.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *