>HIMARs aren't a game chan

>HIMARs aren't a game chan–
Keep lining up the copes FSB, Ukraine will keep knocking them dowm

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if HIMARs are game changers

    why did america lose in iraq and afghanistan?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      war =/= counter insurgency

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Those were a different game altogether.

        How convenient

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          How disingenuous

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Counter insurgency is more like policing rather than actual field combat. You vatBlack folk need to really learn how to use propaganda.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >loses horribly against guys whose best kit is an 50 year old ak and some dirty robes
        >cope vicariously through Ukos getting btfo after retreating from said cavemen

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          horribly against guys whose best kit is an 50 year old ak and some dirty robes
          But enough about the Soviet Union in the 80s.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >cope

          We're not /misc/tards though

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Russians don't breed like roaches like the taliban
        America needs to lose to the Russians like they did the Taliban, maybe then we'd be rid of vatBlack folk.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Congratz to the most moronic take of the week. You really gave your best and it shows!

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Congratz to the most moronic t-ACK!

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Ez win against the vodkaBlack folk. What the matter? The phone call where the vatBlack person shat himself about the fighting was really entertaining 🙂

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Kek that fricking air support. They probably didn't even knew what hit them. Russia would be simply obliterated by NATO in such a manor that many generations afterwards would still laugh about it. Their airforce such a joke that it would be kind of like cheating if NATO uses its own.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >the cope
                >the seethe
                beautiful

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              lma fricking o
              just teasing them a bit with what a real war would be like, and this was but the slightest of appetizers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those were a different game altogether.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      insurgency vs field warfare
      the USA w/ NATO via Art 5 also won the actual war, but lost against the insurgency

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      SandBlack folk are better fighters and better equipped than the russian army of course.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      When did we "lose" Iraq, moron?

      >Today, the United States and Iraq both consider themselves as strategic partners, given the American political and military involvement after the invasion of Iraq and their mutual, deep-rooted relationship that followed. The United States provides the Iraqi security forces millions of dollars of military aid and training annually as well as uses its military bases.
      >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq-United_States_relations

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >no reply
        Vatniks are not human

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Iran has a great influence over Iraq now, they were enemies. This is how bad the US fricked up lmao

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >shitskins
          >working together
          Yeah, sure.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >US lost in Iraq
      how many layers of cope are we on here

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        A vatnik told me today that the US lost because we only 'hold' the green zone...
        Kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      We didn't lose either, or Vietnam since I know that will be your next move shill. Our politicians are weak not our soldiers or weapons.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      we didn't lose, it was a tactical retreat

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >AMERIKKKA LOST IN IRAQ
      t. Saddam

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Be dictator of shit arab nation that rules by fear and torture
        >doesn't have multiple opulent bunkers connected by underground rail network

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >doesn't have multiple opulent bunkers connected by underground rail network
          He'd have never reached the power of the Kims, but he did have a bunch of bunkers. Then the US figured out how to destroy them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJTq9yb_Zow

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Very neat, thanks anon

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        USA didn't win against Iraq, Iraq fell because of internal sectarian division

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        literally putin right now being bunker b***h lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not enough HIMARS obviously. Or maybe the Taliban are a stronger fighting force than Russia.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      But America won in Iraq.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Gesture of good will

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      How convenient

      Contrary to your Russian military tactics, you don't use rocket artillery like HIMARS against civilians and civilian targets. Though Obama decided using drones for that was totally okay for some reason

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >you don't use rocket artillery like HIMARS against civilians and civilian targets.

        So, what where they target in belgorod yesterday?

        And will we see an artillery duel between the HIMARS and the new TOS-2 Tosochka. With all the drone around the battlefield we might even see it soon after it happen.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >So, what where they target in belgorod yesterday?
          Removing russians is pest control

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >artillery duel
          >between western made MLRS and whatever the frick trash Russia can build
          lol, lmao even

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >what where they target in belgorod yesterday?
          There was no HIMARS rocket on Belgorod
          >And will we see an artillery duel between the HIMARS and the new TOS-2 Tosochka
          Four HIMARS already destroyed two military bases, several ammo dumps and train, how long we have to wait until TOS-2 arrives?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >HIMARS artillery duel
          >with a TOS-2
          >and its blistering max range of 10km
          Lol, in this duel is the TOS allowed to cross the frontline and drive 60 km into enemy territory to make it fair?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia also lost in Afghanistan

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Ukraine has the right to self-determination, then why did the US nuke Japan? Checkmate, atheists.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was a feint obviously.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They didn't. Iraq they left a democratic nation, even letting them elect a government that opposed them. Afghanistan they got tired of giving free shit and left, then their government - too cowardly to fight - surrendered to the Taliban who came out of the holes they'd been hiding in.

      Did you know that Russia took more dead in the first TWO WEEKS of Ukraine than the US did in the entire Afghanistan War? Of course you did.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        bump

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >America managed to capture 100% of Afghanistan and still lost in the insurgency phase
      >Russia only managed 15% of Ukraine and still hasn't made it to the insurgency phase yet, and somehow they'll win

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        America didn't lose the insurgency phase, it lost the domestic political phase. The American people saw no benefit to continuing to prop up the afghani government.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          the Afghans sucked. so few of them even wanted to defend themselves.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The bizarre thing was the expectation that the afghans would fight to the death to avoid being taken over by afghanistan

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the domestic political phase
          that's not a 'phase' numbnuts

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Iraq
      >Saddam is gone and now the U.S. will train Iraq security forces

      >Iraqi Security Forces are extremely moronic and have no concept of a country/state
      >'WHY IS MY SON DYING IN IRAQ STILL?!? THE BOYS NEED TO COME HOME'
      >Massive U.S. Troop withdrawal because soldiers need to come back home
      >2014
      >Holy frick, the Islam murder horde is here in Iraq and sweeping through the entire third world including Africa
      >Mass desertions see pic related
      >Soldiers literally stripping their uniform and gear so they don't get shot by ISIS literally strolling through towns and recruiting more fighters
      >Same soldiers who deserted the army are also now joining ISIS

      >Afghanistan
      >Coalition forces have destroyed the Taliban and will train the Afghani military to be self-sufficient when coalition forces leave
      >Afghani Security Forces are just as moronic except they are high on heroin and frick little boys
      >'WHY IS MY SON DYING IN AFGHANISTAN STILL?!? THE BOYS NEED TO COME HOME'
      >Massive U.S. Troop withdrawal because soldiers need to come back home

      >Afghani also have no concept of a country/state or the concept of 'democracy' and 'voting'
      >The military i.e. glorified police are paid $13 a week to get shot at and blown up by leftover Taliban cells
      >Identify more with their villages warlord who are also 86km away from the capital of Kabul and plumbing and electricity
      >Taliban take over the government again
      You can't help people who don't want to be helped

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      HIMARs entered service too late to see service in Iraq (the 2003-2011 war) and only saw extremely limited service in Afghanistan. When they were used though, they were used to great effect. For example, 50 Taliban officers died in a strike in Musa Qala in 2018 when a volley of HIMAR rockets struck the building they were meeting in at 14 second intervals.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      HAHAHAHAHA

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >why did america lose in iraq and afghanistan?
      We won those wars easily. We stayed in there for over 10years. Turns out, you can't rule a people that hate you and shoot at you. Should have killed 70% of their entire populations then inserted our own, in my humble opinion. That's how ancient civilizations did it and it WORKED.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Chewbacca is Wookie from the planet Kashyyyk

      why doe he live on Endor?

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Please send more!

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can't they shoot the bridge to Kherson?

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >HIMARS derails trains
    >vatniks derail thread
    I think the Russian prognosis is grim if their already sub-par logistics and rear area infrastructure is getting dunked on by a bare handful of modern western MLRS.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Enjoy your five month late day 1 objective, I'm sure the absolute ruin of that province was worth the hundreds of thousands of bodies you threw at it. Just make sure you actually hold on to it this time unlike what happened in Kyiv and Kharkiv!

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    More phantom trains destroyed? Russia is in trouble now!

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Your post is a sad cope for taking 6 months to capture a tiny border providence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      *tiny border province that they already controlled half of

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I know this is probably bait but not a single NATO soldier is on the ground in Ukraine, and Russia is still losing.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ukranian soldiers have been trained for 8 years by NATO and are equipped by NATO weapons so they're an excellent test of what would happen to actual NATO soldiers.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >so they're an excellent test of what would happen to actual NATO soldiers.
        Yeah, the special military operation really would've ended in two weeks if they were fighting actually NATO soldiers.
        Unfortunately, it would not be two weeks to Kyiv, it would be two weeks to Moscow.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Ukrianian soldiers have been trained by NATO soldiers and use the same equipment as NATO soldiers, actual NATO soldiers don't have any magical powers that would make them more effective.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >actual NATO soldiers don't have any magical powers that would make them more effective.
            They have more than 8 years of training, and complete access to the combined NATO air force and navies.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              no they don't

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >NATO doesn't have access to NATO
                ???

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >NATO doesn't have access to a fricking air force or navy
                holy shit anon please stop going onto /misc/, that board is destroying your brain.

                >not realizing that just like in ukraine, russia's hypersonic missiles will destroy 517% of NATO's air, land, and naval forces within the first 16 seconds of conflict

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                didn't one of russia's flagship literally ACK itself lol

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Can confirm. I am ebil HATO soldier and I already am dead.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >when the hypersonic travel so fast they fly through time and kill you in the future

                Terrifying.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >NATO doesn't have access to a fricking air force or navy
                holy shit anon please stop going onto /misc/, that board is destroying your brain.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >They have more than 8 years of training,

              8 years is more than enough, a soldier retires on average at 50

              Also Russians now have actual combat experience while NATO only has training experience.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >8 years is more than enough, a soldier retires on average at 50
                What of the officers? The commanders? The generals?
                >Also Russians now have actual combat experience while NATO only has training experience.
                Maybe so, but what NATO has that Russia doesn't at this point is a functioning army with abundant supplies, where as Russia is pissing it all away in Ukraine for minimal gain or even losses.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >What of the officers? The commanders? The generals?

                Ukrainians are commanded and advised by NATO officers and generals, it's an open secret, so it's basically the same

                >Maybe so, but what NATO has that Russia doesn't at this point is a functioning army with abundant supplies, where as Russia is pissing it all away in Ukraine for minimal gain or even losses.

                I wouldn't say their army isn't functioning, they're making gains while NATO is losing ground.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they're making gains

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                > while nato is losing ground

                Frick me the cope is unreal with this homosexual

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well then certainly you have captured one of these officers? To show the world? Or do they self destruct or something?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                NATO gained 2 whole countries

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not as of today.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Show me on the map the Nato units being pushed back in Ukraine.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Also Russians now have actual combat experience
                lol
                lmao

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You mean other than being 10x better equipped, 5x better trained, having complete air dominance, crushing advantage in firepower and 20x larger economy behind them?

            12 Caesars destroyed 84 russian SPAs with no casualties.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They have functioning air support, SEAD, and precision guided weapons that can be deployed on a tactical level. A NATO forward air controlman is functionally identical to a Battlemage from a Russian perspective.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >8 years of training a formerly (and for the most part still more than a little) Soviet-oriented military force
        >"Excellent test of what would happen to actual NATO soldiers
        >Actual NATO soldiers
        >Troops that are members of militaries whose doctrines have been steeped in *decades* of training to fight and dismantle Soviet-organized military forces in large-scale conventional war

        You're disrespectfully moronic and need to go leave.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          that are members of militaries whose doctrines have been steeped in *decades* of training to fight and dismantle Soviet-organized military forces in large-scale conventional war
          Lmao what nato country has active trained for fighting soviets for the past 30 years? They are all trained for fighting afghans who cant shoot back with anything bigger than an RPG and this is seen every time NATO forces train against Finland and lose miserably when they dont realise this time the enemy has sigint and artillery and modern antitank weapons.

          • 2 years ago
            Based Charlie Magne Poster

            Russia's threat is overrated. They're reliant on foreign components for their war machine, and we will deprive them of such. Their economy needs energy sales to survive. We will gradually take that from them.

            All the nukes in the world can't stop the Russian economy from collapsing.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Oh yea we are really gonna topple russia when the price of electricity has tripled and the price of gasoline almost doubled thanks to us sanctioning russia. Meanwhile they sell their oil to third world countries which sell it then to europeans for inflated prices. The sanctions are really really not working and will end up destroying the economy of europe (european leaders dont care because they take their marching orders from US and the sanctions arent affecting the americans nearly as hard). Its a fricking joke the ruble has only gotten stronger. Maybe eventually cutting them off from high tech imports will slow their weapons production but for now they have giant piles of soviet junk warehoused for a real ww3 scenario and we are looking at real possibility energy rationing and 10x increase in energy prices come winter.

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                Then the incentive is on crushing Russia faster.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >doubled
                It hasn‘t ,here in germany the price has been going down again and it was never close to being double.Diesel is still really fricking expensive but it‘s not doubled either.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >European leaders don't care about their own nations they're just US puppet states
                Did you fall on your head this morning or something.
                They might be pro globohomosexual but they're not US puppets that don't care about their countries you mongoloid.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they're not US puppets that don't care about their countries you mongoloid.
                Yeah, they really showed us that.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >"we"
                > "us"
                Shut the frick up, vatBlack person. You have nothing to contribute here.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Russia is flush with cash thanks to high energy prices right now and can thus endure years with disrupted exports. China can absorb everything Russia exports as soon as they can reconfigure the export infrastructure. China should be able to substitute almost all machinery and electronics that Russia needs with the sanctions-proof supply chains China is building thanks to Trump's export controls. Russia will get a worse deal due to reduced bargaining power, however their economy will hardly collapse. Chinese sanctions-proof semiconductors might be 15 years behind state of the art, still that is good enough for 99% of industrial and military needs.

              I'd be more worried about Germany, and by extension the EU. German industry will likely wither and die as it tries to compete internationally while powered by windmills and expensive LNG deals they have to take under duress.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >powered by windmills and expensive LNG deals
                lignite mines are being restarted - cheaper fuel than gas... they will burn it to get cheap and dirty electricity and reduce gas consumption...

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It is a temporary solution only. Coal or nuclear is to be phased out. This is an ideological imperative. Wind is the long term solution, and gas is needed when wind doesn't blow enough.

                Also gas is needed as chemical industry feedstock.

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                And when Putin's regime collapses due to losing the war?

                All the Russian artillery on Earth can't undo a simple fact.

                When HIMARS wipes out all Russian ammo supplies, their advances die. They're totally reliant on massed artillery spamming.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't that just mean the offensive will slow down due to needing to distribute and hide the ammunition stores more and use more of a "just in time" approach to logistics?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >switch to a distributed distribution system
                >also switch to JIT logistics
                serious question: does this sound like something the russians are capable of doing? does this sound like anything any country that didn't invent waffle house, wal mart, fed ex, ups, and amazon could pull off?

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                The Russian military doesn't even have fricking pallets. They have to load everything by hand, as time-consuming as that is.

                It's also far more manpower intensive. Keep in mind, the Russians need manpower to advance BUT that means handicapping their logistical section to scavenge up manpower there.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >time-consuming
                only if you're an estrogen-soaked western woman. real men can toss those shells around like they're babies.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine is playing for time and you want Russia to slow down? The Russian war machine is on a clock. Wrecking the ammo supply distribution will seriously mess that clock up.

                The Ukrainians learn much faster than the Russians. Benefits of a decentralized command system.

                Frick off back to PrepHole namehomosexual, I heard there are a lot of vatniks there for you to troll
                Just look at this thread lmao
                https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/129795339/#129799894

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                Ukraine is playing for time and you want Russia to slow down? The Russian war machine is on a clock. Wrecking the ammo supply distribution will seriously mess that clock up.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Why would Putin's regime collapse from a bad performance in the war? Germany almost reached Moscow, was Stalin overthrown by that?

                Especially when Putin can say, as an excuse, that he is fighting all of NATO, not just Ukraine.

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                Because Russia has lied to its people non-stop about the progress of the war.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                What intolerable lies have they told? Are they claiming territorial gains where there are none? And even if they have lied, so what? Why can't they just make up new lies to explain the previous lies' incongruence with reality? Is Stalin known for his strict adherence to the truth? Is lying not what politicians everywhere do all the time?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't matter.
                Saddam lost 2 wars mounting 10 times more lies than Putin. And Saddam did fine. Fighting unarmed protesters is so much easier and fun than enemy military. And dictatorships has no moral obstacles to mowing down civilians.

              • 2 years ago
                Based Charlie Magne Poster

                Then the Ukrainians have zero incentive not to try to kill all the Russians, since the Russians plan to exterminate them anyway and take their land from them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And when Putin's regime collapses due to losing the war?

                All the Russian artillery on Earth can't undo a simple fact.

                When HIMARS wipes out all Russian ammo supplies, their advances die. They're totally reliant on massed artillery spamming.

                Russia will eventually end up like Venezuela or North Korea, fully depending on resource exports to maintain a certain standard of living for the elite.

                But the Russians won't do anything. 70% support the war, probably more, and the whole nation never knew democracy or individualism. You live, work and suffer for the emperor and endure it because 'he knows what he is doing' has been the Russian way of life since the first Rus looked at the Moscow area.
                With enough propaganda and drugs you can even feel happy and pretend like the world is just how it's supposed to be.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Putin has nowhere near the power of Stalin.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The Russian economy is already collapsing. China will pay monopsony prices for their resources while any high tech imports to Russia will no longer be possible in high quantities.
                Having a pentium 2 copy is fine for your washing machine, it's not for your fighter jet, server or cloud computing needs.

                Russia doesn't produce the necessary vehicles, machines or tools to maintain a manufacturing industry that could maintain losses or even build military equipment in peace time. There is a reason we see T-62s and not T-14s in Ukraine. A lack of sanctions and essential imports are not part of this reason.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://hindustannewshub.com/russia-ukraine-news/1-6-trillion-ruble-hole-in-russian-budget-the-moscow-times/
                https://www.oreanda.ru/en/finansy/the-ministry-of-finance-proposed-to-reduce-budget-expenditures-on-state-programs-/article1436528/
                Record Oil Revenues (In Euros) and losses.
                Revenues are not Profits

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So flush with cash they cant pay their MIC companies and had to pass a law forcing to work once they refused to work until paid
                >The Kremlin proposed an amendment to federal laws on Russian Armed Forces supply matters to the Russian State Duma on June 30, that would introduce “special measures in the economic sphere” obliging Russian businesses (regardless of ownership) to supply Russian special military and counterterrorist operations. The amendment would prohibit Russian businesses from refusing to accept state orders for special military operations and allow the Kremlin to change employee contracts and work conditions, such as forcing workers to work during the night or federal holidays. The Kremlin noted in the amendment’s description that the ongoing special military operation in Ukraine exposed supply shortages, specifically materials needed to repair military equipment, and stated that Russian officials need to “concentrate their efforts in certain sectors of the economy.
                >Russian government’s inability to pay Russian firms supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine is degrading Russia’s ability to repair damaged vehicles. The GUR reported that the directors of Russian military vehicle repair centers are not accepting new Russian equipment for repair because the Russian military has not paid these centers for previous work.[7] Recently proposed Russian legislation suggests that Kremlin leadership shares GUR’s assessment. Russian legislators in the Russian State Duma submitted a bill on June 30 that would empower the Kremlin to introduce “special measures in the economic sphere” enabling the Russian government to force private Russian companies to provide supplies for Russian military operations. The bill prohibits Russian businesses from refusing to fulfil Russian government procurement orders connected to Russian military operations.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It would be over in no time since they would reign the skies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Actual NATO soldiers would be taking dancing tiktoks in all major cities in Russia 2 months ago if they went to war 25th of February.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Vatnikbros, its over, cuckrainians won in twitter again...

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    To be a true game changer it should have been introduced on mass. The Russians will just adapt to it quickly and the effect of the HIMARs will be quickly nullified.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't you lads go post on r/Ukraine. Same moronic wonder weapon post over there

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you first

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Same moronic wonder weapon post over there
      i wouldn't know, why do you? go back

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why do you /misc/Black folk post the dumbest picrels on PrepHole. You have no idea how much you skyline yourselves with this cringe shit.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        DUDE THE UKRAINIANS JUST GOT THE RAYGUN IN THE MYSTERY BOX THEY WILL SURELY WIN NOW

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Your mom got a taste of Ukrainian wonder weapons last night.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    they would be in large numbers. Ukraine has what, 4 of them right now?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >OPSEC [ *redacted* ]
      It's unclear. It seems at least six have already been delivered, and between 14 and 20 are the total number pledged. With substantial amounts of ammo, training, and spare parts. At least three countries have each given or pledged, and they all seem a bit spooky about exactly how many and actual date of delivery. The U.S. has also pledged even more to come, but is being coy about how many and when.

      Belgorod and Melitopol in the past 24 hours look like they may be the first use on the battlefield. Melitopol specifically reported both missile strikes and artillery strikes in combination, meaning HIMARS may have been coordinated with something like the m777s. The number of missile strikes reported suggests that accounts for 4 platforms, two for each target. The rout at Snake Island suggests that Russia noticed something that would wipe the island clean was being put in place, and that suggests HIMARS as one very high probability.

      Anecdotal evidence of already deployed units, and we know for a fact that Ukrainians are training in Germany and Poland, and have been for a while. So, they're probably being deployed or about to.

      Safe to say 10 at minimum are physically in Ukraine and being positioned for specific missions, maybe as many as 20 within another two weeks or so. Might be 50-ish by September or October ..? We'll just have to keep watching the news.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Belgorod was single Tochka, not HIMARS

    • 2 years ago
      Based Charlie Magne Poster

      Russia blasting every city it captures to hell (i.e no infrastructure) should be exploited by the Ukrainians.

      Without any surviving local infrastructure, the Russians are totally dependent on concentrations of supplies just for the occupiers to survive among piles of rubble.

      Wreck it all, and the occupiers will be forced to move for simple lack of supplies (including food).

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Probably the plan. There's already a cholera outbreak in Mariupol because the water infrastructure got destroyed. The Russian soldiers are dependent on water trucks and cholera meds (that the locals don't get access to)

        • 2 years ago
          Based Charlie Magne Poster

          Disease is going to become rampant among the Russian ranks. The fools blew up everything. That includes the hospitals.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >face it, you're nation wreckers serving the israelite
    Remind me again who had to publicly apologize to Israel over words and actions, and who went on stage during their biggest national holiday to speak about how diversity is their strength?
    I'll give you a hint, it wasn't the Americans

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not him but both Russia and America constantly grovel in front of Israel. America is definitely worse, though.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >laughing at these mutt replies
    >face it, you're nation wreckers serving the israelite

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I cant think of a more horrible fate than being an brown-skinned person talking some sort of twisted SEAmonkey language or bastardized spanish, while simping for russia of all places.
    t. not american

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >t. not american
      Yeah, we get it. You're an Eastern Euro butthurt belter.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        At least he can afford a belt, Igor Somekikkovich.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not worth much, if it's made out of butthurt.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, Russia's, from lossing them after the USSR. You still seethe to this day, and you weren't even born then.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >You still seethe to this day, and you weren't even born then.
              You don't know shit about who I am or where I'm from. You however, outed yourself pretty clearly.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    To be a true game changer it should have been introduced on mass. The Russians will just adapt to it quickly and the effect of the HIMARs will be quickly nullified.

    Lmao

    Ukranian soldiers have been trained for 8 years by NATO and are equipped by NATO weapons so they're an excellent test of what would happen to actual NATO soldiers.

    >Begging for nato scraps
    >Literally like 10 himars and zero air power
    At this point it's obvious fricking poland would absolutely curb stomp Russia 1v1, if anybody else joined in it'd just be sad. You shills are pathetic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Dunno about that since they havent mobilized yet and a mobilized Puccia might be another beast.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They said that about mobilizing for Ukraine and now it's four months later and nothing has happened.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          But they havent mobilized yet since they dont declare it as a war. moronic, I know, but remember that Puccia has like 140 mil people as a population.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >2 million of untrained, moronic alcoholics running around with Mosin-Nagants screaming URAAAAA
        Yeah, I wouldn't want to meet this "beast"

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >facing NATO
    U wot mate? NATO has supplied:
    >couple thousand antiarmor missiles
    >handful of artillery
    >small arms
    >whatever intelligence we feel comfortable releasing
    But also
    >no air support
    >no troops
    >no naval assets
    >no western tanks
    >no medium range missiles
    >no EW assets
    Thinking this says anything about NATO capabilities you are delusional. If Russia is fighting with one hand behind their back, NATO is throwing rocks offhand from the other room while watching Sopranos reruns on TV.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >surely this piecemeal modern lend-lease act of equipping Ukraine is how the full force of NATO would act in an actual conflict.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is winning. When you push out defenders and take the land they were holding that’s called a "victory". When you pile up victories that general trajectory is called "winning". It’s honestly not hard to understand.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Wehrmacht is winning. When you push out defenders and take the land they were holding that’s called a "victory". When you pile up victories that general trajectory is called "winning". It’s honestly not hard to understand.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That’s correct, although I don’t understand your point. From June until December 1941, roughly, Germany was winning.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That’s correct. While France was advancing they were winning.

          The difference between 1941 Wehrmacht & Napoleonic France and Russia is that the Wehrmacht and French were actually moving forward, and the Russians are moving backwards

          https://i.imgur.com/Bb6cjDJ.jpg

          >they're making gains

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yep, and yet all their logistical problems that everyone knew would show eventually, fricked them.

          Also, Russia isn't exactly making advances, kek

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They got through after being stuck for a long time. Now it's moving again and we'll just have to wait and see if they get stuck like that again.
            Now Ukraine won't face the same threat of enrciclement so they won't just leave the same way they did in Lysychansk

            • 2 years ago
              Based Charlie Magne Poster

              The Ukrainians learn much faster than the Russians. Benefits of a decentralized command system.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          We didnt know that back in 1941, but Germany effectively lost the war by Sept 1941 (conclusion of the Battle of Smolensk), as it became apparent that they failed to complete the campaign before winter started and didnt even plan for it to last longer than few month. As soon as Soviets absorbed the first blow they wouldnt surrender no matter what, and it was a matter of time for allies to ramp up the military production and overwhelm Nazis.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The difference is that they made advances of thousands of kilometers in the same timeframe Russia went a few kilometers.

          And the war was lost by fall as Russia got western land lease and aid and Germany was not prepared for a war lasting longer than a year.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia is winning.
      >When you push out defenders and take the land they were holding that’s called a "victory"
      >When you pile up victories that general trajectory is called "winning"
      Damn, just look at all of these victories

      https://i.imgur.com/Bb6cjDJ.jpg

      >they're making gains

      !

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >La Grande Armée is winning. When you push out defenders and take the land they were holding that’s called a "victory". When you pile up victories that general trajectory is called "winning". It’s honestly not hard to understand.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That’s correct. While France was advancing they were winning.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Literally should have been targeting trains since day 1. Vatnigs have zero logistics without them.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME?

    I'VE MADE MY MISTAKES

    >GOT NOWHERE TO RUN, THE NIGHT GOES ON AS I'M FADING AWAY

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That project money must have funded a nice mansion for someone.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yachts and private jets are more their thing, mansions can't be moved to other countries to avoid seizure.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Yachts and private jets are more their thing

          Hasn't stopped the west from seizing them kek. Italian authorities grabbed this $600 million Russian yacht in March

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They should give the yachts to Ukraine on the condition that they be used as vacation boats to give Ukrainians cheap Black Sea cruises.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yachts and private jets are more their thing, mansions can't be moved to other countries to avoid seizure.

            Before 2022 oligarchs were more worried by their wealth being taken by russia in case of falling from putin grace.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the "robot" has no gloves.

      the world will soon tremble at Russia's might.

  22. 2 years ago
    Based Charlie Magne Poster

    Russia is excessively dependent on trains for logistics.

    Destroy. Them. All.

  23. 2 years ago
    Based Charlie Magne Poster

    The real fun begins when the HIMARS begin blowing up the Russians up along the Eastern Front.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Got any more charlie magne images? I love that semen demon

  24. 2 years ago
    Based Yankee Fitted Timberland Boot Wearer

    RUSSIA YOU THINK ITS A GAME, ARF ARF ARF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90UjN98yzxc

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For having supposedly absolutely zero effect the russian fanboys (maybe it is Hugh from Manchester oblast?) sure seems adamant about the sanctions having to be lifted.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm more interested in that gorilla action.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    i-i-im not even g-g-going to reply
    its because y-y-y-you lost ok

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I get more (you)s here than I do on /misc/ it's actually fun
    I can't tell if it's moronic Americans or butthurt belters

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "butthurt belter" here. laughing as you scum get butchered (and have a nice day) in Ukraine. i do hope you come here as well, I've always wanted to kill Russians

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Reminder - that babushka quite literally worships Pootin. They all have to die from toddlers to elders, all of them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The contents of her plate always crack me the frick up. We have:
        - bread
        - buckwheat
        - slimy, curling grey strips of God fricking knows what

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Reminder - that babushka quite literally worships Pootin. They all have to die from toddlers to elders, all of them.

        That's tragic. Not her fault, it's all she knows from the local media/gossiping on the street. Never blame the people of a nation, especially the elderly who literally can't know better because they have no access to other info

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > Never blame the people of a nation
          Bullshit. People get the government they deserve.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    54281971
    I did it again mom, I replied to every post

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    I get more (you)s here than I do on /misc/ it's actually fun
    I can't tell if it's moronic Americans or butthurt belters

    >it's just ironic (you) farming, this is a great way to use my time
    lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I spend my time shitposting endlessly about muh vatniks and giving (you)s to people looking for a laugh
      >I'm not mad lol

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Its not shitposting about vatniks. Just saying they are inbred asiatic mutts incapable of warfare. U mad shitskin? :^)

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So how fast does the Russian Offensive begin to collapse when the supplies of ammo go up in flames?

    Speculate.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Two more weeks

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Take your moron posting back to r3ddit.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    My favorite are the 500 word long rationalizations about how Russia taking their objectives means russia is really losing.

    And also the the shill posts about how America didn't lose in the GWOT, but America losing in the GWOT proves that Russia will also lose to insurgency in Ukraine.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If this is what vatniks consider a victory, I'm scared to what a defeat would be.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Napoleon is taking territory at breathtaking pace, won at Borodino and took Moscow, only frog shills will say Russia is winning

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Twitter

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gonna get this thread back on track cuz shills keep trying to derail it.

    Here's what our beloved HIMARs have been doing the past couple days:

    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543145454829031425
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543147263345696768
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543410720330637313
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543506312788590596
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543853627470761984
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543853627470761984
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543862190104608768
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1543925688020996097
    https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1544004121660952577
    https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1544004931161669635
    https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1544006097127849985
    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1544019854256119813

    PS: just now, Donetzk railway burning, think's fricked

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >50, paragraph long responses
    If you say something that is so foundationally and fractally wrong, that it takes that many words to correct you, that means you are being the obtuse dumbass not us.

    Pro-tip: pretending to be a weetodded dumbass (for willful, political reasons) can be indistinguishable from being a weetodded dumbass (for uncontrollable, neurological reasons.)

    >every time. you people are automatons
    No. We are kindly trying to educate your trifling ass, you smooth-brained chimp.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good on the UAF. Frick infantry combat when you are outshelled 10 to 1. Pull out and blow up all of their ammo and supply lines.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Iraq's transition to sovereignty has been one of the few bright spots of the 2003 Invasion.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    "HEY GUYS I SAID SOMETHING STUPID AND YOU CORRECTED ME, LOOK HOW STUPID YOU ARE I'M SO GOOD AT BAITING AND TROLLING"

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *