HIMARS?

Remember that time Ukraine claimed they've HIMAR's an entire Russian train with 40 wagons of ammo, 80 killed, 200 wounded?
Turns out it's all true: https://twitter.com/Flash43191300/status/1554904016940851210

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Prettier than the fourth of July. God bless em.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I love HIMARS and I love seeing Russians get hit by GMLRS.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    but vatniksisters told me it was a lie.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes i remember. It sounded too good to be true at that time. Burn 'em all.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Impossible!
    Russia have already destroyed 800% of Ukrainian HIMARS, so this can't possibly be true!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >https://twitter.com/Flash43191300/status/1554904016940851210
      By now GLORIOUS MOTHER RUSSIA has destroyed EIGHT GORILLON HIMARS! They are bleeding HATO dry!

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    NONONONO NOT MY ORPHANS AND DIAPERS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      THEIR FECES SPONTAINIOUSLY CAUSED A FERTILIZER EXPLOSION

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why were you transporting used diapers tho'?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no, not the diapers!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Please no

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is ARMA 2 footage, blyat! All HIMARS are of being destroyed already!

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I love the smell of crispy russian in the morning.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Bridge disabled? But what if we send everything by tra-ACK

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >chernobaivka in all directions
          timewarp

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          wow russians weren't lying there really are american troops in ukraine

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            what the frick is that huge thing bolted onto the end of the rifle

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              bipod most likely

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Tactical box cutter

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hey to be fair, he would've died next to a bottle of vodka in Russia too

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Get fricked.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          god damn this clip is still so fricking cool. the early stages of the war when more and more footage of russian losses started materializing was so fun to watch in real time.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    THIS IS TRAIN SIM WORLD 2 DIESEL LEGENDS OF THE GREAT WEST ADD-ON FOOTAGE

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    DEAR FRICK
    I AM SO FRICKING JEALOUS OF THE HIMARS TEAM THAT GOT TO MAKE THAT SHOT

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    HIMARS means freedom.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How does it make Americans feel to be the big Willy again? Like after decades of humiliations by camel jockeys, suddenly they are the defenders of freedom and leaders of the free world again and their weapons strike the fear of god into the Russian army and probably make the chinese shit their pants too.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's definitely gratifying seeing our shit blowing up an actual aggressor in the defense of a sovereign nation instead of us blowing up mud huts to steal oil.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes and no, even back then we only imported 6% of our total yearly oil from Iraq. It was just one of many pieces of why we invaded. All moronic as frick.
          https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MTTIMIZ1&f=M

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Sssh, no tears, only dreams now.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What was the dumbass response? I said nothing about vatBlack folk or slavBlack folk.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're still trapped in Dick Cheney's world.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Pass the drugs, I'm not on your level for whatever this conversation is becoming.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Feels fricking great to see glorious American engineering strike fear into the hearts of our enemies. Now we need to make sure Pooh learns his place.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          what would the equivilant to a HIMARS be for the south/east-asian pacific theater be?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Hopefully we finally get to see this bad boy fricking up Changs.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              what would be the use case for something like this?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Putting large holes in paper tiger ships in The Taiwan Strait

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            F-22

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >older system that still is so massively disruptive to enemy operations that they're forced to change the very way they plan and supply things

            Probably USN submarines and anything flying off a carrier that isn't an F-35.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            HIMARS, But with anti shipping missiles

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            HIMARS is why the USMC has already given up on having tanks and is going to just missile-spam PLA-N naval landings
            >Ukraine is just another test bed

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            LRASM

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Tигp

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Feels good to do good!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        how do they actually work? do they just get launched off quickly in the general direction and then self-correct via GPS to land with pinpoint accuracy?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, you program in the target on your way to the launch site so as to minimise the time you spend firing and thus the time you are vulnerable to cbf
          The americans call it "shoot and scoot", the russians call it "ISIS-American tactics"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        wait that's a HIMARS? it's just a truck with missiles wtf?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The missiles are very good

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The missiles outrange anything in the Russian arsenal and are more accurate. Wanna destroy that ammo dump 200km away? Done. Got intel on Russian troop concentrations? On the way. Two dozen vatniks shitting on a field? Just use a switchblade :3

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The camel jockeys never humiliated us. They were kinda like wienerroaches where no matter how much you spray and how often you kill them as soon as you leave they just come crawling right back.
        But the Russian, ah the Russian is a snake. And it feels great to see a snake get its head cut off trying to sneak into the chicken coop

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Man dont be like that, I LIKE snakes
          Little fellah is just trying to do his thing he doesn't mean anything by it, call a snake catcher next time and put up some better wire

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is what happens when you let the Democrats lead rather than Republicans.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          kinda true, albeit Bush senior wasn't that bad.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            To be fair that was more Kuwait renting out the US military for the 1st Golf War.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The further back in time you go, the better Republicans become.

            True, all Republicans are evil nazis sucking putin wiener
            Democrats have never started any wars, and even if they have they are completely justified cause Obama
            Drumpf started so many conflicts, he's the reason putin could invade Ukraine, literally hitler

            I don't mind the conservative, warhawk republicans. I also don't mind the liberal warhawk democrats.
            It's strange that you bring up Obama, when his squeamishness and passivity is to blame for almost every problem the world faces today. If he had acted as decisively and ahead of time, ISIS would have been a non-event and Russia wouldn't be bold enough to ape out right now.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Obama only was a warhawk when it benefitted Islamic radicals.
              He had no qualms bombing Libya or Syria on behalf of islamists

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That was more Hillary Clinton than him.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          True, all Republicans are evil nazis sucking putin wiener
          Democrats have never started any wars, and even if they have they are completely justified cause Obama
          Drumpf started so many conflicts, he's the reason putin could invade Ukraine, literally hitler

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Keep seething vatnik

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I've fought Russians longer than you ever will Black person loving homosexual. I just don't switch between being pro or anti Russia depending upon what a specific political party tells me.
              Your homosexual ass is as much of a threat to America as the russians

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So you're a useful idiot, that makes you even worse.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Technically you'd be the useful idiot for caring about partisan politics.
                Remember that just 10 years ago the democrat president mocked his opponent for being anti Russia.
                People need consistent beliefs rather than letting politicians tell them what to think.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What, you mean dictators around the world are emboldened into starting wars, rather than cowering in fear?

          >Obama: Russia attacked Ukraine
          >Trump: Russia hid in its cave
          >Biden: Russia attacked Ukraine
          it's almost as if everyone knows the Democraps are pathetic.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Hey man, Obama and Hilldog sure showed Libya

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Libya was more of a French and British effort than American. The US only played a support role because the europeans couldn't airlift and sea lift enough equiptment and men.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia hid
            More like let Trump be a moron, laughed at him, and let him weaken the US.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking beautiful. God bless the guys who got that shot.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder how many trains and wagons exist in Russia at this point.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Who need train when we have manpower?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        But do you have pallets?!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Who cares about the trains, the tracks there were vaporized. Even if they bring up another train with supplies (they won't because the wreckage will block the path) there would be nothing to drive the train on.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        After clearing the UXO and train wreckage, replacing the tracks isn't that difficult a task.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          replacing the trackbed is the tricky part. turns out a trainload full of ammo exploding leaves a big fricking crater.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not unless that ordnance exploded underground it doesn't. There was no big smoking crater at either Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Might have had something to do with them going of at 500 feet above ground, anon

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              weren't those airbursts?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Do you think a 152mm howitzer shell in a train car 1m off the ground will make a bigger crater than a nuke going off 30m in the air?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >a 152mm howitzer shell in a train car 1
                how about 700 metric tons of them in a two dozen boxcars? that would make a nice crater.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                One reference would be the 100 tons of TNT that they set of during Trinity. At 6m of the ground it created a 1,5x9m hole in desert sand

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >full damage control
                >trackbed is totally fine
                >w-we're totally not cut from supply by rail
                That was an airburst on a large mast, 30 meters above ground. Have fun believing a trainload of ammo detonating doesn't leave a huge crater

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you flailing at me, i just described a similar incident and the frickhuge crater that it left

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Because I'm drunk and I want tot fight!

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Fair enough, meet me behind The Blue Oyster Bar in 20min and il give you a round

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                More like a few trainloads of 152mm shells 1 meter of the ground vs a nuke at 600m

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It was like 150 meters and yes.
                The explosive blast gets weaker by the square of the distance. If you put an arbitary reference unit of explosive at 1 meter then at 150 meters it will be 22500 times weaker.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              There was a huge one at one of the weapon depots that exploded

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                God DAMN what the frick were they storing in there?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cum reserves for the Serbs. It's why they're so cranky lately.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Cleaning up and repairing tracks will take a while though, especially after that big of an explosion. Though if that happened on the 29th then I imagine they already got it all fixed up, or it's about to be fixed.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          russia is very heavily invested into train logistics. They have specialized railway brigades, underestimating their capabilities would be a mistake.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What stops HIMARS from firing at those railway brigades trying to repair it? This looks like much bigger problem than just repairing damaged tracks as you need to clear wrackage+repair bed+ set up new tracks, hard to do that quickly

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              maybe nothing, maybe there's dozens of higher priority targets than a couple of engineering vehicles.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              There are better targets than repair crews. I imagine it's better to let them repair it, drive a new train in, and just blow it up again. More bang for your buck

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              That's a very low priority target to be shooting million dollar salvoes at.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There are better targets than repair crews. I imagine it's better to let them repair it, drive a new train in, and just blow it up again. More bang for your buck

                Its about sending a message

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Full HIMARS salvo doesn't even cost million dollars though

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Several trained workers and some engineering vehicles are well worth a million dollar.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Who gives a frick its not like Ukraine is paying for it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                What about cutting Kherson of any possible resupply routes? Sounds like high priority mission

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia has 10 technicians
                >Lose half of them from a himars attack
                Sounds worth it. Technicians and engineers are very precious resources as they require far more training than a conscript and since as it also requires above room temperature IQ, the pool of candidates is also smaller.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I still can't believe Russians transport troops by fricking TRAINS. Can't these barbarians pave roads?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Stop yourself before you embarrass yourself further.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >concern trolling about financial reasons
                >as if the US ever has even hesitated spending 500k on a single kill
                You lack fundamental knowledge about war.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And then there's people who were surprised about January 6th ...

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy
                Holy fricking facepalm. You just make up shit as you go along. moron

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not an argument.

                >lost over 500,000
                Proof? Or are you pulling this figure out of your lying vatnik ass like usual?

                It's very simple - let's start with Russian casualty numbers: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-62259319
                4940 Russian soldiers have died.

                "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Russians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 50,000".
                I could argue against that, but you know what? I'll just accept it.

                Then have a look at Oinkrainian casualties, which are 28,300 civilians and 23,000 according to the Oinkrainians themselves. That's ~50,000.
                "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Oinkrainians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 500,000".
                And now I'm glad I accepted it.

                Wait, what? Russians are lying, but Oinkranians are not? Hold on, let me call the Ghost of Keef and ask him what he thinks about this situation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >muh strawman about what the average /k/oper claims are Russian casualties, has bearing on what are the actual Russian csualties.
                >I will also be conflating casualties and KIA because I do not know the difference
                >I do not have a dictionary
                More moronation

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >muh strawman about what the average /k/oper claims are Russian casualties
                Nah, I've seen people claiming just that. So it's not a strawman. And about the rest:
                >no arguments
                I accept your concessions.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Are you literally arguing with a fictional person right now?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If you claim that Russia's had substantially more than 5000 casualties, no.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If you ignore cuck's people's republic cannon fodder and "missing" in action I guess that might be accurate lol

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then Oinkraine had more than 500,000 deaths too.
                >inb4 well actually

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I guess germany lost 50 million people in ww2 as well? Since we have to makes thing "fair" for some reason?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                What were their official casualty numbers during the conflict?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                SU lost about 25 million, if you double that, you get 50 million, that's how war statistics work according to vatniks

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Just by taking every video or picture with a dead or dying russian you get more than that.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then Oinkraine had more than 500,000 deaths too.
                >inb4 well actually

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's fairly normal for schizos.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I am

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, argued.
                However, Russia has lost over 5 million since 2014, so they are clearly losing it you only look at manpower losses (which you should not).

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia has lost over 5 million since 2014
                Source? Neither Oinks nor Russians claim any such numbers.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >muh statistical analysis
                Doesn't matter; Russia is still losing, has already lost, actually lost in the first 3 days.
                >Ghost of Kiev
                Rent free lol

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia is still losing, has already lost, actually lost in the first 3 days.
                Is that your daily prayer? Either way you're just coping.

                SU lost about 25 million, if you double that, you get 50 million, that's how war statistics work according to vatniks

                >during the conflict
                Are you illiterate?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Russia currently is losing far more equipment then they are capable of replacing. Not even to begin mentioning the amount of skilled manpower for operating vehicles.

                Yes. This is a strange concept I know, but pilots and tank crews are pretty hard to replace on a moments notice. Especially ones that are actually trained/battle hardened.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia currently is losing far more equipment then they are capable of replacing
                Source?
                >inb4 Oryx
                No one cares about their quadruple counting. Meanwhile Oinkrainians still get shelled to death, even with the recent smoke incidents around ammo dumps and supply trains.

                >Not even to begin mentioning the amount of skilled manpower for operating vehicles.
                Comrade colonel to Conscript moron:
                >You drive the tank now.
                Conscript moron fricks it up, tank lands in ditch
                Comrade colonel to Conscript moron:
                >You are supper now. For the rest: you hopefully learn from his example.
                Problem solved

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >quadruple counting
                post a single instance of this happening.
                seriously, I will pay you if you can.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Russians lost only 1598 soldiers, according to them. Never confirmed that Moskva was sunk. Claimed bullshit day after day. Keep on trusting them if you're in the same flying boat with them, but don't expect anyone else with at least half a brain to join you in the delusion.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >democracy is more transparent than dictatorial shithole
                This confuses you why?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Don't ... just ... don't.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                but i thought ukrainians celebrated trannies, which one is it?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Who told you that, Oinkrainians?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                your mom when i climbed off of her last night

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No, Russians did. That was their whole causus belli, that they were gonna remove the nazi trannies from power.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >that they were gonna remove the nazi trannies from power.
                >Its goal is to protect people who have been subjected to bullying and genocide ... for the last eight years. And for this we will strive for the demilitarisation and denazification of Ukraine. And to bring to court those who committed numerous bloody crimes against civilians, including against citizens of the Russian Federation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >subjected to bullying and genocide ... for the last eight years
                which never happened. frick off you lying piece of shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Guess you ran out of arguments there, mate.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >vatnik resorting to quoting Guardian and Vox
                Love to see it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I've been quoting BBC from the very beginning:

                https://i.imgur.com/UjxBlkk.gif

                Not an argument.

                [...]
                It's very simple - let's start with Russian casualty numbers: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-62259319
                4940 Russian soldiers have died.

                "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Russians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 50,000".
                I could argue against that, but you know what? I'll just accept it.

                Then have a look at Oinkrainian casualties, which are 28,300 civilians and 23,000 according to the Oinkrainians themselves. That's ~50,000.
                "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Oinkrainians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 500,000".
                And now I'm glad I accepted it.

                Wait, what? Russians are lying, but Oinkranians are not? Hold on, let me call the Ghost of Keef and ask him what he thinks about this situation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh frick you had me going for a sec, 7/10

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Post moskva, kiev front, snake island, butter, hiv negative test, etc.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >kiev front
                Sure.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Look they hit a hecking ukie civilian building with artillery so based vatBlack personinos are winning!
                Inb4 feint yadda yadda. Pathetic
                Also, still waiting for the rest. Im a fair man, i give up on the hiv negative test and the butter thats too much to ask, just post a picture of the moskva as it current status

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                OK, sure.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The absolute state.
                No more questions, here, have a rare zelensky.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You wanted
                >a picture of the moskva as it current status
                , and you got it. Don't you fricking dare complaining.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Did i complain?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                im not reading all that for 0 pay off

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >im not reading all that for 0 pay off
                then imagine what Putin feels like reading reports from his generals

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Its a meme you dip

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then it can only be a lefty meme, and those are shitty.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Seethe

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >meanwhile
                >in reality

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                denis

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cope

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                denis obsessed as frick

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              that's more of a drone job

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >They have specialized railway brigades
            Had, anon. They had specialized railway brigades. Now they have slighty charred compost with traces of HIV and broken imperial dreams

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Those units weren't VDV getting thrown into the Hostomel meat grinder. Or part of the convoys in the blyatzkrieg. Their rail units are likely still at nearly full manning. Their capacity to do their job? Debatable, of course. I'm extremely doubtful once they've blown up a rail that they're fine with just leaving it be for the vatniks to repair uncontested.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >After clearing the UXO and train wreckage, replacing the tracks isn't that difficult a task.
          It will if the repair brigade is gettin' HIMAR'd into grease spots.

          russia is very heavily invested into train logistics. They have specialized railway brigades, underestimating their capabilities would be a mistake.

          >They have specialized railway brigades, underestimating their capabilities would be a mistake.
          Overestimating their competence also appears to be a mistake.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Don't forget all the ammunition that won't reach Kherson. I really hope it was crucial to defense of it

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Those rocket cookoffs
    >That frickhuge blast towards the end.

    /K/ino

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nice try, but that is actually the Russian Victory Fireworks celebrating another failed HIMARS strike

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    those rocket cook-offs sound fricking sweet, but i'd be shitting myself being that close. god forbid one of them takes a wild angle straight at you

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit a Ukrainian government claim turned out to be true and not a pack of fricking lies like the Russians routinely spew? Fancy that.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >OMG did you see the hohols just confirmed what the hohols originally claimed a few days ago
    Congratulations for gagging on that Ukrainian cum, I suppose.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What's your point?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      to be clear: you're being disparaging about honesty?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukrainian claim
      No evidence, just baseless claims
      >Proof comes out
      That happened days ago, get over it, do we really need more Ukraine threads? Ukraine is nearly finished

      How many times do we need to repeat this cycle?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you turboBlack folk keep posting twitter links? You're as smart as a box of hair OP.

    https://nitter.net/Flash43191300/status/1554904016940851210

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >shrieks autistically about twitter link
      >changes four characters and removes one to make it a nitter link instead

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So what happens when word reaches the new recruits that they may or may not be obliterated before even setting foot at the Ukrainian station. What a mindjob.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >when word reaches the new recruits
      It won't

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It absolutely will. Rumors spread extremely fast in the military.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They'll tell them it was a Ukrainian train.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >when word reaches the new recruits
      I don't think word is even going to reach Putin let alone the conscripts.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If the new recruits haven't been dissuaded from the last 5 or whatever months of very special military operation, then nothing will.
      They're like lemmings.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's a lot of booms

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Beautiful :')

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >where are the 40 wagons 80 killed
    dissipating through the atmosphere, probably

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ok, i'll take your word for it that there was a russian train with 300 men and dozens of tons of explosives in the same cars

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cool 🙂

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        good, I acquired the knowledge through esoteric means, so it's pretty much 100% solid

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What else was exploding there then? A massive pile of fireworks that all happen to explode with the same color? No cope will get you out of this one ivan.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This cant be happening! Man Dick, that one anon counting hours and Vatnik Charlie Magne were laughing and saying it was just hohlo fake news!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i'm pretty sure that both the soldiers and wagons were more than 20 years old and thus obsolete

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Hundreds of soldiers wounded because of bad logistics?

    You're right. It happened

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As much as I hate rusBlack folk, it kinda feels like one of those vids where it's a white dude against a black dude and then he gets jumped by a group of nogs with chairs

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ...what?
      They are at war, anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's what Black folk say

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, are you mad that other parties are sending weapons to Ukraine? Are you familiar with warfare at all, anon?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not mad, just reminds me of nog behaviour. Explain, what's the difference?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >The world-wide coalition of defense of a sovereign nation's independence being threatened by a violent invader is "nog behavior"
          You should really stop browsing /misc/, it's turning your brain to mush.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You're asking what's the difference between of nogs jumping random guy minding his own business and drug addict attacking his neighbor and other people in the house standing up for guy who didn't do anything wrong?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            I don't understand this equation since Russia jumped Ukraine out of nowhere like a nog mugging someone who turned the wrong corner.

            No that's not what I meant. I mean it's a 1v1 and as soon as they lose they jump him.

            >The world-wide coalition of defense of a sovereign nation's independence being threatened by a violent invader is "nog behavior"
            You should really stop browsing /misc/, it's turning your brain to mush.

            The difference is that nogs would give weapons to the one who started the fight because they're furious that the victim is trying to defend himself.
            Giving weapons to Russia would be nog behaviour.

            Morals aren't real

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >I mean it's a 1v1 and as soon as they lose they jump him.
              But no one's "lost" yet?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I meant losing, you know, like blacks do

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                But no one is "losing" either, they're stalemated.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And why is that?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Because no one's moving. Russia's east advance has been called off because of HIMARS and they're just entrenching, meanwhile Ukraine has been calling for DAY OF THE SICKLE on Kherson and they haven't done anything yet. Both sides are just standing still and lobbing artillery at each other, no advancements are being made, they're in a stalemate like it's World War 1

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Which is why Ukraine needs to break through the South.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And the himars fell out of the air? Made by elves? Gnomes?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The movement is localized but exists. For example Russia failed to retake Lozove and Andriivka that creates another possible way to attack. Is this movement? Yes, is it slow? Yes

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You are right that they are stalled, but neither side is entrenching.
                Russian forces today attempted multiple pushes, including several counter-attacks in Kherson from the newly arrived reinforcements.
                Meanwhile Ukraine made some gains around Izyum, following their traditional tactic of trying to identify weak points and avoiding decisive engagements against massed enemy artillery.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine is technically already entrenched, they have constructed multiple defensive lines between the Donbass and the Dnieper.
                However the russians cleverly defeated this strategy by failing to penetrate any further than the first one, making the rest largely useless

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Russia is losing, they've been losing ever since they failed to take Kyiv.
                Just like how the germans lost the eastern front in '42 but kept fighting for several more years, the russians lost the battle for Ukraine in February but will likely continue fighting for some time yet

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Can't believe they're falling for your desperate "just call them nignogs!" out of nowhere tactic. In droves no less. 8/10 enjoy your zero effort (You)s.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The difference is that nogs would give weapons to the one who started the fight because they're furious that the victim is trying to defend himself.
          Giving weapons to Russia would be nog behaviour.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          "nog behaviour" according to /misc/troons who are too chickenshit to type of Black and has a UK spelling style
          >helping the unfortunate
          >helping their neighbor against a violent and cowardly attack
          >banding together against an agressor
          I am curious what else is "nob behaviour".
          >cooperation
          >charity
          >hard work
          >loving your neighbour
          >other, unrelated virtues of traditional Christian society

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not mad, just reminds me of nog behaviour. Explain, what's the difference?

      I don't understand this equation since Russia jumped Ukraine out of nowhere like a nog mugging someone who turned the wrong corner.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry you hate winning I guess.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Downie intern starts chimping out at engineer
      >program manager hands the engineer a Glock
      >engineer shoots intern
      oh no, he wuz a good boy and all that shit

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I always thought that war is a tragedy. Now I know it's comedy.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >where are the 40 wagons
    Exploding on video
    >80 killed
    Dying around those explosions
    >200 wounded
    Getting amputated in closest hospital

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit oh lord jesus jesus jesus lord jesus oh jesus oh jesus christ lord ohh jesus jesus oh lord jesus lord jesus ohh shit ohh woahhhh that was awesome that was awesome right there dog dog wowww shit oh OH SHIT oh lord jesus oh jesus get the water homie jesus christ lord have mercy get the water homie it's goin down ahhh these muthafrickin bootleg fireworks shit!!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of that.
      I watch that shit every 4th of July.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      kek, reminds me of the webm of 3 nogs trying to rob a store owner
      >AWW SHIIT HE SHOTU MUH ARM UFF

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you're a moron

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          neck+rope homosexual

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            lrn2internet

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >suddenly oryx is a trustworthy verifier of claims

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like the ferries got bombed just now.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Looks like the ferries got bombed just now.
      Forgot pic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >no ferries
        >no bridge
        >no trains
        Vatniksisters, I don't feel so good

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Seriously? Hahahaha

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They had two sets of ferries, one in the south for civilians and that they’ve taken picture of, and another in the north for strictly military use that has never been photographed except by satellites. Either the one on the south is just for propaganda or Ukraine didn’t want to risk killing civilians. Makes sense why the one in the north would be for military use. Less populated area with less people to snoop on them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Approximately 20-30k vatniks across the river without adequate means of supply
        I am erect.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Nice. Now stop the Russian reinforcements. Blast them.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Kill em' all. Make like the Bulgar Killer and burn out the eyes of any of them that you capture.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        At this rate their only option will be to swim across kek.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Every fricking day I see more and more evidence of HIMARS attacking Russians and every time I ask /chug/ they keep just saying that all the HIMARS were sold or destroyed weeks ago with no evidence as if circle jerking will eventually make the HIMARS poof from existence.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "HIMARS were sold to Russia" "HIMARS is just wunderwaffe, the West only has like ten of them" and "it has to be a part of a system, HIMARS only works if it's integrated into a division level unit" are the hot takes of midwits and vatniks everywhere

      ?t=1194

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Here's the HD proof the west doesn't want you to see.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I cry everytiem

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >"Ukraine part of Russia forever! We'll never break up!"
    >HIMARS blow up Russian military

    >"Ukraine part of Russia! Ukraine Russia forever!"
    >HIMARS blow up Russians

    Hey Vatniks......hear those explosions?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this has to be a false flag, it's just so... pathetic. Like a video link instead of a reaction image pathetic.

      After clearing the UXO and train wreckage, replacing the tracks isn't that difficult a task.

      I think the Ukkie military agrees with you, that's why they targetted a train, not the tracks.
      Although damage to the station itself shouldn't be underestimated. Laying down straight tracks is simple - laying down interconnectors for a big station that should handle quick loading and unloading isn't as simple.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the same train that the russians claim exploded because they used smoke to cover it's trail or whatever?

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    cry some more falseflaggot

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      cope and seethe ivan. all of you homosexuals are going to cleansed from ukrainian soil

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >posts the falseflag

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          based

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you already got btfo when it was pointed out what parts of the image are shooped
            yet you persist

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >when it was pointed out what parts of the image are shooped
              this the new cope?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >oh no, I've been found out

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Kinda impressive how stubborn Russians are, they're going to drag this for years, living in their imaginary world where every massive loss like this is perfectly acceptable.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      At some point, they physically won't be able to continue. It'll be like Downfall.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are the Russians using the dam at Nova Khakova to cross the river?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      To get yo Kherson they need to cross another river with nonexistent bridge

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Kherson rail bridge HIMARSED.

    https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1554949093595791361?s=20&t=OUtHcvn3me_JO_dFX56wBA

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Most likely not the bridge, but the ferry next to it.

      https://i.imgur.com/eXMUNu0.jpg

      Are the Russians using the dam at Nova Khakova to cross the river?

      Yes. But the bridge at Darivka also got hit. Six holes, straight line, evenly distributed across just the inbound traffic lane. Too bad vatniks are too dumb for such subtle hints.
      Currently they are operating a pontoon bridge across the Ingulets and two ferries (pontoons dragged around by tugs) across Dnieper.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is leftover fireworks from may day and fertilizer storage, nothing to see here tovarisch

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Shit it must feel amazing to be an American and be constantly flooded with videos of your equipment BTFOing helpless RussBlack folk for a greater good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Feels great to be the good guys again.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Burgers once again stomping on the reds,, instead of mucking around in the sand in search for oil or bearded men. Feelsright 🙂

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Its like putting on a suit that you forgot in your closet, only to realize it fits better than anything youve worn in 30 years

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Welcome home burgers.

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >/k/ino
    >no webm
    Anon, why?

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    love waking up to the sight of a new HIMARS ammo dump video in the morning.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >American equipment rapes Russia
    >China has no way to compete against it and cannot challenge the US military directly.
    >North Korea and Iran have recently shut the frick up about the US.
    God it feela good.

    >Serbs are chimping out about Kosovo
    God they want round 2. It will be an absolute CLAP by the US, but this tume Biden won't pull out like Clinton.

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Time to bomb this hospital.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that's bait. once it's hit they will clear out all the dead and equipment, photograph the rubble and get their babushkas to cry about, assuming they don't just do it all themselves like the prison complex

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >local residents
      I thought they received russians with open arms?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not even people in Rostov welcome vatnik troops with open arms.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      remember early in the war when some Ukrainian soldiers were using an empty school as a base and the Russian media lost their shit about it and acted like the UA were using children as human meat shields (as if the kids were still going into school while their city was being invaded)?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If Russians are screeching about someone else doing something it means they're doing it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It was dumb of the ukranians to cover in hospitals because that's the first place the Russians flatten

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >vatniks mass replying and seething
    So it's confirmed then

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    40 wagons are not even worth one day of ammunition. Oinkraine would need to keep hitting two to three trains every day for at least a month to make Russia halt.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >more than 3 megatons of ammunition in just one direction
      >per day
      >still giving up ground
      Ukkies must be superhuman.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oinks really fling themselves at the enemy, that's all. It's how they racked up 500,000 people dead, and there's more to come.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Giving up ground in exchange for enemy lives makes perfect sense. War is not a game of Risk. You do not collect points for the amount of ground held after each round.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Giving up ground in exchange for enemy lives makes perfect sense.
          Only if the enemy loses so many people that the army will stop functioning. Despite all /k/ope Russia is nowhere near the historic threshold of 500,000 dead soldiers that need to be reached before they even start thinking about peace.

          Meanwhile Oinkraine has lost over 500,000.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >historic threshold

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yup.

              >muh false dilemma
              >Only if the enemy loses so many people that the army will stop functioning.
              Look at von Clausewitz over here.
              There are farm animals that are brighter than you. I am saying this without a hint of irony.

              It takes a special mind to understand farm animals, and I'm absolutely saying this with irony.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >muh false dilemma
            >Only if the enemy loses so many people that the army will stop functioning.
            Look at von Clausewitz over here.
            There are farm animals that are brighter than you. I am saying this without a hint of irony.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >lost over 500,000
            Proof? Or are you pulling this figure out of your lying vatnik ass like usual?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Giving up ground in exchange for enemy lives makes perfect sense.
          Only if the enemy loses so many people that the army will stop functioning. Despite all /k/ope Russia is nowhere near the historic threshold of 500,000 dead soldiers that need to be reached before they even start thinking about peace.

          Meanwhile Oinkraine has lost over 500,000.

          Looks like the bots got their wires crossed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Blowing up ammo dumps isn't even slowing down Russias Donbass offensive
      >we didn't need the ammo on that train, its only 1 days worth

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. At this rate oinks will run out of cannon fodder faster than the Russians will run out of ammo.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      hello again denis

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I got the reference, the morons here didn't.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        We got it, we're just not sure if he was serious or joking.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Given the picture he used I'd say it's pretty obvious which one it is. To think he's serious would be like assuming someone saying "Two more weeks" would still actually mean it today.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >not the same filename
        And I deny it's me.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://nitter.it/bayraktar_1love/status/1555196225720401920#m

    Series of explosions in Nova Khakovka.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russians are allegedly using the same locations for their ammo dumps
      Guess the oinkrainians ran out of sets, huh.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        hi denis

        https://i.imgur.com/UjxBlkk.gif

        Not an argument.

        [...]
        It's very simple - let's start with Russian casualty numbers: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-62259319
        4940 Russian soldiers have died.

        "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Russians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 50,000".
        I could argue against that, but you know what? I'll just accept it.

        Then have a look at Oinkrainian casualties, which are 28,300 civilians and 23,000 according to the Oinkrainians themselves. That's ~50,000.
        "But", your average /k/oper will exclaim, "the Oinkrainians are lying about their numbers, they're ten times as high, it's at least 500,000".
        And now I'm glad I accepted it.

        Wait, what? Russians are lying, but Oinkranians are not? Hold on, let me call the Ghost of Keef and ask him what he thinks about this situation.

        hi denis

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/dOH69ei.jpg

      cuka blyat, right into my Nova Kakhovka, again!

      It’s being said that the bridge dam has been hit, along with a warehouse next to it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The bridge isn't on the dam, it's next to it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Kherson road bridge
        Inoperable
        >Kherson rail bridge
        Inoperable
        >Inhulets River bridge
        Inoperable
        >Nova Kakhovka bridge
        >Inoperable
        What the frick are the Ukrainians doing? Stop twiddling your thumbs and start your counteroffensive before we have an economic downturn and we all forget about this silly slav squabble.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          moron, time is what Ukraine has an abundance of.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >abundance of time
            For what? Next year? Are they going to do a counteroffensive in the winter and get massacred like Russhits did in Kiev?

            Its easier to just sit back and throw rocket artillery, no need to counteroffensive until you’re sending GMLRS at a single moron with a moisin. Russia can’t mass armor/troops to conduct breakthroughs due to unbelievably good SIGINT driving the most effective killchain that has ever existed.

            >just throw missiles bro
            That didn’t work during the Iran-Iraq war and it didn’t work so far for Russia either. You need infantry, tanks, and logistics to get back your territory.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the problem was that the russians DIDN'T attack in winter, they attacked in spring when the ground was thawing and becoming muddy. You either attack in summer when the ground has been baked dry or winter when it's frozen solid.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Its easier to just sit back and throw rocket artillery, no need to counteroffensive until you’re sending GMLRS at a single moron with a moisin. Russia can’t mass armor/troops to conduct breakthroughs due to unbelievably good SIGINT driving the most effective killchain that has ever existed.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          no idea. this could be tenderising the area for an operation. but i have no idea. fog of war innit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The Ukrainians up against a force with much, much more weapons and equipment. They _have_ to be methodical or their counteroffensive will get pummeled to dust by artillery

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          is all about starving the vatniks

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    cuka blyat, right into my Nova Kakhovka, again!

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i think denis is actually responsible for 90% of vatnig posting and 25% of /k/ traffic

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You do me too much honor.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And to think that the vatnik shills were shrieking autistically about how it was all Ukrops lies.

    Same as when the Moskva got SINKEXed, come to think of it.

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's multiple reports of Russian deployment of radar reflectors on bridges already hit; my understanding was that himars used gps, so this is pointless, right ?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, they obviously fear other weapons.
      It is ancient tech. Germans put radar reflectors all over Berlin area lakes to confuse allied bombers.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Thx fren.

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm thinking Russia should just cut their losses and GTFO of Ukraine like yesterday.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why don't you write a strongly-worded letter and send it to Putin? I'm sure you'll have a nice day in the back of your head with your hands died behind your back whilst dying from the tea he offered you and also falling out of a window.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        does big strong putin arouse you?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not really, no.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *