1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No
    Last time I watched this gay, he told me Ukraine had less than 60k soldiers on front, way less than Russia. Turns out Ukraine has thrice as much

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no one bats a thousand

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      26 of june dipshit. It may very well have been true at that point in time.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus you trannies are fucking retarded with your sacred cow, literally sjw tier, a little criticism and you go off.
      Hell not even 4chan chuds are this sensitive.
      Grow a pair or have a nice day.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I don't like bad analysis
        >CRINGE SJWS ARE CANCELLING LE BASED ME FOR SPEAKING LE BASED TRUTH AAAAAA THE garden gnomeS

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russian forces were and still are paper tigers, their numbers are heavily inflated. .

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And he was completely right at the time.
      UA are, to this day, still outnumbered and outgunned by the way. Russia having to resort to digging in and terror bombing is just a joke at this point.

      That said, this video is probably his weakest by far, probably because he rushed to cover recent events instead of waiting a month as usuall.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >UA are, to this day, still outnumbered
        Completely untrue, even in June they had more foot soldiers and only reason they lost sievierodonetsk-lysychansk was massive artillery fire they could not counter, which has dropped significantly due to lack of logistics and smooker events we have seen since GMLSRS came in play
        >outgunned
        yes

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >even in June they had more foot soldiers
          lol
          lmao
          If thay had 700k total it doesn't mean they had them all on the frontlines.
          They have thousands of km of border with russia which they required to guard equally because of defender disadvantage, + coastal defense, + belarus, + chudstria and + they need fuckton internal troops all over the country just to fight possible diversions and shit AND they obviously need to hold reserves for all these guys.
          At any given point of this war russia ALWAYS had local superiority, always. Even in kharkiv counter offensive ukies barely had an parity in numbers, not superiority.
          And that's just man, russian superiority in material always was so huge that we only now starting to talk about russia possibly running out of it some time in the future.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you gigamorons
      the german subtitle literally says the numbers are in discussion.

      oh nosy, no speaky arian.
      google translator anyone?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No shit everything he says is in discussion gay, he has 0 knowledge of actual situation. but saying Ukraine has 50k troops is no different from saying Ukraine lost 20k man in Kharkiv or believing in ghost on Kyiv

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he has 0 knowledge of actual situation
          nobody knows what's actually fucking happening, you are neither Ukie high command nor CIA.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Whats OPSEC, moron?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In the Donbass my man. Which is where they were severely outgunned even by their own admission.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ukraine soldiers who were trained in other nations come back to fight
      >OMG!!! HE'S SO BAD WITH EVERYTHING!!!

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers singing their national anthem before starting the offensive
    kino

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NOOOOO WHY ISNT AN UNALIGNED COUNTRY PEDDLING NAFO PROPAGANDA WE NEED MORE DISCORD TRANNIES SHUT IT DOWN

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >austria is neutral

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah sorry austria sucks big daddy putins cock

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          she is a persona non grata now in austria hiding somewhere in arabia crying around the gestapo is after her n shieeet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "Partnership for peace" member so not quite neutral. Just no access to NATO intelligence.

        Meanwhile in Germany
        >Tank autism continues

        >Our girl Kapitänleutnant Ehlers has an encounter with the rather dashing Lt General Von Sandart
        >Adjusts cravat, winks, extends pointer, smiles...oh Nana what have you got yourself into this time

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    here is what I recommend for daily updates

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this guy is a pro russian shill

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope. In a previous vid he mentioned that he has worked with ukie soldiers in the past and is personally friends with some of them. So I doubt he is rooting for russia.

      Plus austria might not be in the NATO but it's closely aligned to NATO countries.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nyet, in one of his videos he condolated to a fallen ukrainian officer who he befriended, pointing out he had to kiss some asses to be allowed to do so in the uniform of a neutral country.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why, because he is not repeating the narrative of either side?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He does keep repeating Russian narratives.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So he is only repeating russian narratives? Or is it more like he has a ballanced stance on the issue?

          • 2 weeks ago
            /out/ie

            I am a moderate and i say there is no balanced stance. Either you are with NATO or you get nuked soon enough.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Or is it more like he has a ballanced stance on the issue
            He doesn't. He reiterates Russian claims that have no basis in reality and no proofs whatsoever but only includes Ukrainian claims that were 100% proven by video evidence.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think he's a Russian shill, but one problem is that he half-heartedly accepts Russian and Ukrainian MoD statements as truth and tries to arrive at a conclusion using that terrible baseline, he subscribes to nonsense as long as that nonsense comes from an official source regardless of what side is making the statement, that's a terrible way to strive for neutrality, it's like taking Asterovych's and Lavrov's ramblings, putting them side by side and trying to paint a realistic picture while also accepting statements made by both of them as mostly factual, in reality you'll often find not one shred of truth in their statements so your entire picture is worthless since the baseline for it was so bad. He's also unwilling to entertain logical speculations that have sometimes proven to be more accurate than whatever each side was saying.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >in reality you'll often find not one shred of truth in their statements
          >Asterovych's
          Why do people keep bringin him up in a bad faith so much? I yet to see a single factual report of his that was wrong and he didn't corrected himself the next day. And when it comes to him making assumptions they turn out to be right more often than not, ironically he probably had more correct public predictions about this war than anyone else in this world did.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Neat, i like his videos very well done and informative
    The swiss army would never do something like this

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Kherson attack is not that effective
    >Kherson attack took heavy losses
    >Shows video of literally one guy getting hit by a shell
    What am I watching.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      An actual apolitical take on the war in Ukraine, which as this thread and manny before it prove, enrages the shills.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He is literally using the same OSINT as we are.
        The Brits, Americans and Ukrainians did this planning job not Austria.
        The guy making this analysis is not privy to any more information than we have at this point, it's like he's reading a Rybar map script, and only ignoring it in Kharkiv.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well, I mean, if he uses strictly osint you should understand him being a little bias, as only sources that talk about kherson are russian ones, ukies STILL hold pretty tight opsec on it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >apolitical take
        If it's apolitical why does he keep stating unconfirmed Russian claims as facts? On the other hand every Ukrainian victory needs video proof for him to mention.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Der ewige Österreicher (Germans who want to larp as Swiss but fail hard)

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >askhually ukraines attack wasn't effective
    >askhually they faked the flag raisings

    holy vatnik cope, whats the deal with this guy.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Top tier quality, stuff that hato will try to burry.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >scroll through comments
    >see someone praising the video for being "the only unbiased channel"
    >press profile pic
    >previous comments from account are crying about azov nazis and or praising putin
    Why are they like this bros? Whats up with this obsession to be percieved as unbiased while simultaneously rooting for the Russians? At least we are honest about our support for le nazi hohols.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I did the same, it's probably being shilled around Russian channels as a "HATO PROVES ITS NOT DOING SO WELL" video.
      The guy is so not important to even Austria he got taken off assignment to do fucking parades.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He got it wrong. The Kherson front is not a feint. In fact it's a much more serious operation.

Your email address will not be published.