Preparedness & self-sufficiency community
Last time I watched this gay, he told me Ukraine had less than 60k soldiers on front, way less than Russia. Turns out Ukraine has thrice as much
no one bats a thousand
26 of june dipshit. It may very well have been true at that point in time.
Jesus you trannies are fucking retarded with your sacred cow, literally sjw tier, a little criticism and you go off.
Hell not even 4chan chuds are this sensitive.
Grow a pair or have a nice day.
>I don't like bad analysis
>CRINGE SJWS ARE CANCELLING LE BASED ME FOR SPEAKING LE BASED TRUTH AAAAAA THE garden gnomeS
Russian forces were and still are paper tigers, their numbers are heavily inflated. .
And he was completely right at the time.
UA are, to this day, still outnumbered and outgunned by the way. Russia having to resort to digging in and terror bombing is just a joke at this point.
That said, this video is probably his weakest by far, probably because he rushed to cover recent events instead of waiting a month as usuall.
>UA are, to this day, still outnumbered
Completely untrue, even in June they had more foot soldiers and only reason they lost sievierodonetsk-lysychansk was massive artillery fire they could not counter, which has dropped significantly due to lack of logistics and smooker events we have seen since GMLSRS came in play
>even in June they had more foot soldiers
If thay had 700k total it doesn't mean they had them all on the frontlines.
They have thousands of km of border with russia which they required to guard equally because of defender disadvantage, + coastal defense, + belarus, + chudstria and + they need fuckton internal troops all over the country just to fight possible diversions and shit AND they obviously need to hold reserves for all these guys.
At any given point of this war russia ALWAYS had local superiority, always. Even in kharkiv counter offensive ukies barely had an parity in numbers, not superiority.
And that's just man, russian superiority in material always was so huge that we only now starting to talk about russia possibly running out of it some time in the future.
the german subtitle literally says the numbers are in discussion.
oh nosy, no speaky arian.
google translator anyone?
No shit everything he says is in discussion gay, he has 0 knowledge of actual situation. but saying Ukraine has 50k troops is no different from saying Ukraine lost 20k man in Kharkiv or believing in ghost on Kyiv
>he has 0 knowledge of actual situation
nobody knows what's actually fucking happening, you are neither Ukie high command nor CIA.
Whats OPSEC, moron?
In the Donbass my man. Which is where they were severely outgunned even by their own admission.
>ukraine soldiers who were trained in other nations come back to fight
>OMG!!! HE'S SO BAD WITH EVERYTHING!!!
>hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers singing their national anthem before starting the offensive
NOOOOO WHY ISNT AN UNALIGNED COUNTRY PEDDLING NAFO PROPAGANDA WE NEED MORE DISCORD TRANNIES SHUT IT DOWN
>austria is neutral
yeah sorry austria sucks big daddy putins cock
she is a persona non grata now in austria hiding somewhere in arabia crying around the gestapo is after her n shieeet
"Partnership for peace" member so not quite neutral. Just no access to NATO intelligence.
Meanwhile in Germany
>Tank autism continues
>Our girl Kapitänleutnant Ehlers has an encounter with the rather dashing Lt General Von Sandart
>Adjusts cravat, winks, extends pointer, smiles...oh Nana what have you got yourself into this time
here is what I recommend for daily updates
this guy is a pro russian shill
Nope. In a previous vid he mentioned that he has worked with ukie soldiers in the past and is personally friends with some of them. So I doubt he is rooting for russia.
Plus austria might not be in the NATO but it's closely aligned to NATO countries.
nyet, in one of his videos he condolated to a fallen ukrainian officer who he befriended, pointing out he had to kiss some asses to be allowed to do so in the uniform of a neutral country.
Why, because he is not repeating the narrative of either side?
He does keep repeating Russian narratives.
So he is only repeating russian narratives? Or is it more like he has a ballanced stance on the issue?
I am a moderate and i say there is no balanced stance. Either you are with NATO or you get nuked soon enough.
>Or is it more like he has a ballanced stance on the issue
He doesn't. He reiterates Russian claims that have no basis in reality and no proofs whatsoever but only includes Ukrainian claims that were 100% proven by video evidence.
I don't think he's a Russian shill, but one problem is that he half-heartedly accepts Russian and Ukrainian MoD statements as truth and tries to arrive at a conclusion using that terrible baseline, he subscribes to nonsense as long as that nonsense comes from an official source regardless of what side is making the statement, that's a terrible way to strive for neutrality, it's like taking Asterovych's and Lavrov's ramblings, putting them side by side and trying to paint a realistic picture while also accepting statements made by both of them as mostly factual, in reality you'll often find not one shred of truth in their statements so your entire picture is worthless since the baseline for it was so bad. He's also unwilling to entertain logical speculations that have sometimes proven to be more accurate than whatever each side was saying.
>in reality you'll often find not one shred of truth in their statements
Why do people keep bringin him up in a bad faith so much? I yet to see a single factual report of his that was wrong and he didn't corrected himself the next day. And when it comes to him making assumptions they turn out to be right more often than not, ironically he probably had more correct public predictions about this war than anyone else in this world did.
Neat, i like his videos very well done and informative
The swiss army would never do something like this
>Kherson attack is not that effective
>Kherson attack took heavy losses
>Shows video of literally one guy getting hit by a shell
What am I watching.
An actual apolitical take on the war in Ukraine, which as this thread and manny before it prove, enrages the shills.
He is literally using the same OSINT as we are.
The Brits, Americans and Ukrainians did this planning job not Austria.
The guy making this analysis is not privy to any more information than we have at this point, it's like he's reading a Rybar map script, and only ignoring it in Kharkiv.
Well, I mean, if he uses strictly osint you should understand him being a little bias, as only sources that talk about kherson are russian ones, ukies STILL hold pretty tight opsec on it.
If it's apolitical why does he keep stating unconfirmed Russian claims as facts? On the other hand every Ukrainian victory needs video proof for him to mention.
Der ewige Österreicher (Germans who want to larp as Swiss but fail hard)
>askhually ukraines attack wasn't effective
>askhually they faked the flag raisings
holy vatnik cope, whats the deal with this guy.
Top tier quality, stuff that hato will try to burry.
>scroll through comments
>see someone praising the video for being "the only unbiased channel"
>press profile pic
>previous comments from account are crying about azov nazis and or praising putin
Why are they like this bros? Whats up with this obsession to be percieved as unbiased while simultaneously rooting for the Russians? At least we are honest about our support for le nazi hohols.
I did the same, it's probably being shilled around Russian channels as a "HATO PROVES ITS NOT DOING SO WELL" video.
The guy is so not important to even Austria he got taken off assignment to do fucking parades.
He got it wrong. The Kherson front is not a feint. In fact it's a much more serious operation.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save name for the next time I post.