Having an argument with people. Is hydrostatic shock a real thing?

Having an argument with people
Is hydrostatic shock a real thing?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hillary?

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just say the round tumbles and gel tests have shown that you are moronic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >gel tests
      >accurate
      Lay people are so disgustingly stupid.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Please show me your articles from terminal ballistics experts that say 10% calibrated ballistic gel isn't an accurate test medium

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, it's a real thing, it occurs when bullets impact at roughly 2200 fps.

          Not that anon, but gel isn't supposed to be an "accurate" test medium. That ought to be obvious as it lacks any sort of fibers, tendons, bones, and so on that makes up a body. The purpose of gel is to be a **consistent** test medium to compare different bullets or cartridges relative to each other, and gel performance can be mathematically correlated to real-world shooting performance.
          For example you often hear the FBI penetration standard "requires 12" of penetration in gel", well, even on a really huge person the distance from their skin to their vitals is not a full 12 inches. Instead, loads which are known to be effective fight stoppers based on real-life shooting statistics also happen to penetrate 12" or more in gel. The 12" in gel figure is not "accurate" compared to the thickness of the average person's chest, instead it correlates with what works empirically.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know how a gel test would show you anything one way or another about hydrostatic shock other than demonstrating that the entire block of gel undergoes significant elastic deformation which is evidence for hydrostatic shock.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Drastic and sudden hemodynamic changes in intravascular and intrathoracic pressure cause neurovascular damage. I'm sure the Clinton's hitmen are familiar with it personally.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Vince Foster is.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Could you frick gel?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I've fricke a vaccuum cleaner, I didn't cum so it doesn't count as proper sex so i'm still a virgin

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      oh yes you can, not that i do that or anything

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Federal Arms video about static shock

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    lol no, temporary cavitation is a real thing, it generally doesn't happen with pistol rounds, and i've seen some morons try to call it hydrostatic shock, but the mythological transfer of energy to remote parts of the body due to water incompressibility is bullshit, if it wasn't all of your flesh would be too rigid to move.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Is hydrostatic shock a real thing?
    Shoot a squirrel with .223, and we'll see.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    would

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not with pistols.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Rifles, yes. Pistols, no.

    >but muh .454 ruhvover

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    bill did alright

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *