Good job

Good job

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All me btw

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based Boris Johnson. Thank you for posting here.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/Xr2tBz3.jpeg

        Boris Johnson has been quite busy with some russian bussy eh?

        Why do the Bongolans worship someone who helped make them a poor shithole because he’s above their gun bans?
        Basically Atlantic Russia

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They dont?
          Bongoloids don't worship their political leaders like over here, maybe cause they have a technically separate head of state?
          Well they never used to anyway, they probably followed us in becoming more partisan but the overwhelming feeling was UK voters were always just trying to stop their least favourites, nobody ever seems to have anything good to say about their PMs, not like morons in the US rallying behind some zog plant who hates them like they're best friends
          Ukraine loves Boris Johnson, and Russia fears him

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There we go. Idolizing someone who’s above your no gun laws the same way Russians worship leaders. It’s contemptible. And no, not even Ukraine gives a frick about bongolans when you have no military power and your equipment is useless.
            It’s mostly your gun laws and your villeins living vicariously through some fat oaf that annoy me.
            Also, it’s Americans and to a lesser extent euro weapons that carry them. You haven’t made a good tank or rifle in generations.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Most of the memes about Boris Johnson in the Ukraine war context came down to a statement from the Russians in 2022 that they'd repelled a raid of Ukrainian special forces trying to retake the Zapo power plant that was PERSONALLY led by Boris Johnson. It isn't that people in the West think he's some kind of badass, it's the opposite, he comes off as a chubby goofball so Russian media depicting him like that was really funny.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think originally it was just that he ordered the assault in order to create an emergency that would allow him to stay in power. Making him personally lead the attack was already a joke.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why "damaged" number so low?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lethality of the modern day HATO weapons. Completely unfair. We damage their shit and they push a whole pidor into our equipment. Eggs are boiled beyond fried.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      probably because of the proliferation of kill confirmation assets like drones. why leave a vehicle to be recovered when you could definitely blow it to pieces for a couple thousand dollars?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        from videos there's 14 damaged Russian transport vehicles per day, not month

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          because nobody gives a shit when they go back and nuke those vehicles with a grenade.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm talking about shit like this

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Bobik?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymoús

                If you don’t stop asking questions like that, you’ll get yourself into trouble.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                haha, I remember this little shitter from Operation Flashpoint

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Also gave us the best eternal flight video

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Probably a difference in accounting standards. Some lists will take an FPV cam cutting to static on contact as a "damaged at bare minimum", while others want an aftermath. Even within a list, that can vary depending on the vehicle in question, with trucks being taken at face value, while tanks get more scrutiny because they could conceivably survive a hit like that.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              NTA, but no kidding. These sheets come from observing a bunch of Telegram channels, but I don't know what WarSpotting's data set consists of.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Tree
              Huh?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He does this when Fedorov, Bobr, or whatever post a video implying Russia blew something up, but if you pay attention, you see they hit a tree beside the target.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Soviet shit isn't survivable design wise, they're disposable and cheap. The life of men in Russia is the property of the state: Serfs and slaves for eternity. Post-USSR Russia is run by a communist KGB colonel.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks to drones if you get a mobility kill you can easily turn it into a k-kill.
      Years ago armour might have the tracks broken by arty or get stuck in the mud and sit there behind the front to be recovered and repaired.
      Today a drone will spot it and it will be destroyed.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >truck or whatever is damaged
      >"I'M GONNA ABANDOOOOOOONNNNNN"
      >leaves out in open field
      >Ukrainians come by later and either tow it back or destroy it cause why not

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Boris Johnson has been quite busy with some russian bussy eh?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good lord what is happening in there

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    More.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I guess electric scooter is technically a vehicle

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's just one out of literally hundreds of storage sites

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >literally hundreds
        it's literally ones of storage sites for each major kind of equipment. they've got 18 months of tanks left at current consumption rates. they are on the last half of their stuff, which is the worse half.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he thinks that most of russian vehicles can be restored after 30 years of stealing and corruption
          lol
          lmao
          They are lucky if they can be cannibalized for parts

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >you do realize russia still has tens of thousands of vehicles, right?
    >vehicles
    So we've gone from "a tank is a tank" to "a vehicle is a vehicle" in just one short year? The absolute state.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China will always be willing to supply Comrade Mother Russia will bikes and golf carts; for as long as that is the case, the ass will continue to be in the glove department and the bear's eyebrows may raise at his prerogative.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >you do realize russia still has tens of thousands of vehicles, right?
    I'm no expert, but the hardware in picrel doesn't look like BMP-3s.

    [...]
    I guess electric scooter is technically a vehicle

    https://i.imgur.com/M9LuU1f.jpeg

    [...]

    Are those trucks in the upper left the ZIL commie ripoffs of the lend-lease Dodge? Does any Anon know how long ago that design was in production?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah they sort of look like weird 1950s era Power Wagons, don't they.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I'd say that 18 months is too long and that they have about 5-6 months left in them.
    I keep seeing estimates of 18-24 months, but perhaps there's some padding. Interestingly, the financial estimates on Russia's sovereign wealth fund and forex reserves also give a guess of about 18 months before running so dry that the ruble hyperinflates like it's the Weimar Mark 2.0.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I like this take.

    Although perhaps Russia doesn't truly see those entities as real threats.

    In a scenario where Russia does go up to the last tank. Russia could still maintain defense against Georgia/Chechnya. In a 2-3 year time frame, Russia's industrial capacity could allow it to go on the offense against both.

    China already has the ability to turn on Russia.

    Also I would say that instead of simply maintain the current pace until they run out, they will likely just slow down, and perhaps consolidate and wait for Ukraine's next move.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >be Russia
      >invade the smaller, poorer country literally next door to you
      >after 833 days, slow down and wait to see what their next move will be
      I missed the part where Sun Tzu recommends that the attacker surrender the initiative to the defender while drawing out the enormous expenses of war for as long as possible.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is more of a meeting the reality of the situation vs expectations sort of thing.

        Russian planned many things, but reality has been catching up.

        In the end though Ukraine still wishes to unify itself in whole or in part. This means that they must eventually go on the offensive.

        In this war, defense is much easier than offense.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >This means that they must eventually go on the offensive.
          That's the likeliest scenario, but it's not a certainty. If internal pressures result in Putin needing better regime security, keeping an occupying force becomes unsustainable. If Putin falls out of a window his successor might very well look at the economic situation and then decide to cut their losses by agreeing to withdraw in exchange for getting sanctions lifted.
          Look at Crimea, whose economy is heavily reliant on tourism: visitors in 2023 were half that of 2022, and right now it's a net economic drain on Russia. Putin needs international recognition (from nations that count, not just the Norks and Belarus) that the annexed territories are part of Russia. If Ukraine and the states backing it don't agree to it, he has to keep paying the expenses of an occupation.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If Putin falls out of a window his successor might very well look at the economic situation and then decide to cut their losses by agreeing to withdraw
            > in exchange for getting sanctions lifted.
            I don't think there'll be any negotiations on this or any points. It will be withdraw or die, you don't get any pudding or other treats ... except maybe not getting shot in the back as you run back across the border. Any talk about "lifting sanctions" will only take place after every motherfricking zigger is no longer on Ukrainian clay, just for starters.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If they're doing brute attrition, they can't match the west in eventual production but they might be able to match Ukraine in bodies they're willing to dispose of.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >they might be able to match Ukraine in bodies they're willing to dispose of.
          Ukraine only started to recruit from their prisons like a month ago.
          Russia on the other hand wishes it still had an extant prison population of semi-functional males.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how long until political prisoners can be sent to the front lines? they seem to be hesitant to do that so far, probably to avoid a possible mutiny, but there's likely enough people in jail for talking too much shit to bolster some numbers.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Ukies regularly hit abandoned vehicles with drones and release videos claiming them as kills.
    And if a vehicle is abandoned but only damaged, and Ukraine then hits it with a suicide drone full of explosives which total the abandoned vehicle... that doesn't count as a "kill" to you?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s misleading in a chart like in the OP because it makes it look like they’re destroying more in combat than they are.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it makes it look like they’re destroying more in combat than they are
        There's a disabled-but-recoverable vehicle that was abandoned on the battlefield. The drone operator puts it permanently out of commission. That vehicle is now a loss for the force that operated it.
        >nuh-uh, they need to charge it guns akimbo while dodging incoming fire or it doesn't count!
        You need to be 18 to post here.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The number destroyed are exaggerated.
    The number of visually confirmed losses is certain to be different from the actual number, but any double-counting in the visually confirmed losses is going to be more than counterbalanced by the number of losses that happened but didn't have visuals released. All these counts do is set a lower bound, not a total.
    The OSINT teams like Oryx aren't counting anyone's "claims" or the Russians would have destroyed 2,373 of the first 18 HIMARS systems, lmao. They look at what's released and if it cuts off without aftermath showing a destruction then they count it as damaged.
    Take another look at

    https://i.imgur.com/G3gRxqU.jpeg

    [...]
    >you do realize russia still has tens of thousands of vehicles, right?
    I'm no expert, but the hardware in picrel doesn't look like BMP-3s.
    [...]
    [...]
    Are those trucks in the upper left the ZIL commie ripoffs of the lend-lease Dodge? Does any Anon know how long ago that design was in production?

    and the alternate angle in the pic on this post. That's dirtbikes and ATVs for the assault, and some SUVs and so forth for logistics. Whatever the stated numbers of losses are, the simplest explanation for what's on display here is that Russia doesn't have enough BMPs to go around, full stop.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Humvee captured its so over

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Mom: "we have HMMWV at home"
        >the real thing vs. consumer-grade H3
        Didn't they have a plant for the Hummer SUVs in Kaliningrad like 15-20 years back? 2007 or something. Might be one of those, or maybe some enterprising silovik cobbled a few dozen together from spare parts stores as his gift to the war effort.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russians would have destroyed 2,373 of the first 18 HIMARS systems
      FWIW they weren't lying with the overblown himars tallies early in the war.
      They hit that many decoys and genuinely thought they were the real deal.
      Russians are special kind of stupid.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        its not decoys, they've been told that the trucks that the HIMARS can be installed on are HIMARS. kill one of these? it's a HIMARS, damage one of them? killed a HIMARS.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    04.06.2024
    Tanks — 7794 (+15)
    Armored fighting vehicle — 15020 (+18)
    Artillery systems — 13345 (+65)
    MLRS — 1092 (+2)
    Anti-aircraft warfare — 827 (+3)
    Planes — 357
    Helicopters — 326
    UAV — 10766 (+27)
    Cruise missiles — 2268
    Ships (boats) — 27
    Submarines — 1
    Cars and cisterns — 18228 (+69)
    Special equipment — 2211 (+12)
    Military personnel — aprx. 512420 people (+1290)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Total Artillery Death is on track.
      >Ukraine makes the numbers up
      Andrey Morozov confirmed they were legit before his bosses forced him to an hero, lmao

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Total Artillery Death is on track.
        very much this and that's Russia doomed unless it gets another 6000+ guns for 2025

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/ip0Z7gW.jpeg

          Total Artillery Death is on track.
          >Ukraine makes the numbers up
          Andrey Morozov confirmed they were legit before his bosses forced him to an hero, lmao

          There's a twitter autist who counted Russki arty depots.
          >newsflash: they're empty or well on their way to be emptied
          >some systems remain but increasingly older and older tubes
          https://nitter.poast.org/HighMarsed/status/1788151899360764038

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Most interesting thing about this count is that it is a month old and uses even older sayellite imagery.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Most interesting thing about this count is that it is a month old and uses even older sayellite imagery.

            05.06.2024
            Tanks — 7806 (+12)
            Armored fighting vehicle — 15036 (+16)
            Artillery systems — 13385 (+40)
            MLRS — 1092
            Anti-aircraft warfare — 830 (+3)
            Planes — 357
            Helicopters — 326
            UAV — 10805 (+39)
            Cruise missiles — 2270 (+2)
            Ships (boats) — 27
            Submarines — 1
            Cars and cisterns — 18297 (+69)
            Special equipment — 2223 (+12)
            Military personnel — aprx. 513700 people (+1280)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            66.67% destroyed, remaining 1/3 in service ~6000 just covers the front lines

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This is the hilarious part of the war. On one hand you have people like this

            [...]

            that's just one out of literally hundreds of storage sites

            On the other, there is enough information out there that with a few bucks and some spare time you can just count for yourself. It’s like watching someone scream that the sky has turned green for months on end.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >On the other, there is enough information out there that with a few bucks and some spare time you can just count for yourself.

              you can even check much of it on google maps

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >very much this and that's Russia doomed unless it gets another 6000+ guns for 2025

          and there is no way to get this many guns

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >and there is no way to get this many guns
            There's a chance that Putin could sweet talk Li'l Kim into parting with some artillery... that's all clapped-out commie monstrosities from the 1950s. For an exorbitant ripoff price, of course.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              At this point, all HIS guns are "clapped-out commie monstrosities from the 1950s" too.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                True. That means the Norks are going to have to step up their game and ship a bunch of irrigation pipe or something, because it's not like North Korea has ever resisted the temptation to pull a completely blatant swindle.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              i'm somewhat doubtful, most of the ukrainian arty is in use pointed at SK not stored. If NK is actually giving stuff up its either so shit even Russian's won't want to use it or it's easing up the number of arty pointed south which....... changes some math.
              If it ends up in a situation where the US slow rolling Ukraine being able to do anything offensive and Russia just keeps bringing shit in from the rest of the 'axis of evil' to the point that the Axis actually loses a significant chunk of their active military power (instead of only russia losing shit) it'd be fricking hilarious.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >125 tanks lost
    >226 IFVs lost
    >351 armoured vehicles lost in 1 month.
    >No real front line movement.

    I'm curious to know how dense the front lines are with wrecks of destroyed tanks. At a point, they're not going to need trenches, they can just move between the rows of destroyed vehicles.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What about bikes, golf carts, bathtubes and other stuff?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are the four old trucks on the left Don Fengs?.
      Most if the stuff looks like Chinese donations kek.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All I did was sit at home and pay taxes and I got a gold star?
    This war shit is easy

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A good start.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dear Russia,
    How you do war when all your artillery is going away?
    Yours,
    Civilization

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can keep sending a trickle of ziggers on various vehicles like bikes or just on foot. As long as they do that the war doesn't end.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Damn, it's true, orcs can't meme, only copy and make it worse.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yes comrade. We Amerikanski need to stop meddling in forever wars. The war is fricking with my ammo supply for superior Rossiyan weaponry like Kalashnikov and SKS. Joesko Bidenovich is a war criminal.

    t. Igor Smith from Atlanta oblast

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    lmao this bot is still running the 2022 narrative

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not a bot, that's a poo.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Have you looked at anything to do with the war in the last 2 years? Russia stalled, now they're in a stalemate they can't win.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It is in the wests interests to ensure that Russia takes all the losses they are willing to sustain and gets nothing to show for it.

    No refunds.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >They’ll have something to show for it though, they’ll have all of or a large chunk of Ukraine
    At the current rate they are advancing they'll have all of Ukraine sometime next century.
    Until then all they have to show for this is a bleeding catastrohpe.
    >and probably a guarantee that they won’t join NATO
    Who would give them such a guarantee and why?

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Trump pulling the plug on aid
    Where did this fricking meme come from?

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The only objective win for Russia at the moment is a land route to Crimea. With all due respect to the hundreds of thousands of dead slavs, nothing else in terms of territorial gains really mattered in the big picture.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    average (visually confirmed) tank losses per day for Russia

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn kharkiv did not go well for them did it? Or were there even that many tanks in kharkiv i only remember seeing 1 group of 4 get wiped.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        russians attacked everywhere even captured some flattened 3 house villages in donbas

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Stonks
      Invest in TZD

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It always surprises me how international "community" seems to be better at tracking the russian losses than ukraine actually realising them.
    Didnt the british glowie funded site by now tracked more tank losses than russia had tanks in total

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's almost like Russia had lots of tanks in storage that they could bring back to service or something.
      I wish you /misc/gays were not quite so moronic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *