>video title says AK-47 >go through the video >"that's not an AK-47" >article title says "AK-47 style rifle"
what
how do you get the article title right, but fuck up the video title
I have no idea what you are getting at with that comment.
Yes, Type 1 receivers were stamped. Your image shows prototypes of Type 1 receiver 47s
The gun was even originally designed with a stamped receiver in mind.
But they couldn't mass produce reliable stamped receivers because of industrial limitations.
Which is why they decided to do milled receivers (2/3), which take more time and material but they COULD mass produce right then and there as a stopgap until they could figure out the mass production for stamped receivers and they did, those mass produced stamped are Type 4 receivers
>Cop attempts pit maneuver over 60mph (use of deadly force) over a simple speeding infraction >driver then unloads the Draco in self defense >manages to dome a pig, and hit a few others >dies in a blaze of glory
PITTing is banned most places because it's lethal force.
Failure to yield is a misdemeanor.
The suspects have the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. The cops are not allowed to execute you because you broke a law and didn't "respect their authority."
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure there are rules about how hard they can try to apprehend you, including trying to crash your car even though that's potentially deadly.
I know a lot of our law is based on English and French law which is based on centuries of precedent of basically wise people deciding what makes sense. In a case like this I imagine some rascal with a horse cart in the 15th century causing trouble or whatever and not stopping for the gendarmes. In that situation I think they take the cart out.
Sounds silly but it's how almost all our laws work.
Evading in a vehicle is a felony offense in most places. The way this person was driving was an eminent danger to the public, so pitting the suspect vehicle is totally rational. The suspect had a cascade of poor decisions that lead to this end, literally everything that happened was his own fault.
I have no idea what you are getting at with that comment.
Yes, Type 1 receivers were stamped. Your image shows prototypes of Type 1 receiver 47s
The gun was even originally designed with a stamped receiver in mind.
But they couldn't mass produce reliable stamped receivers because of industrial limitations.
Which is why they decided to do milled receivers (2/3), which take more time and material but they COULD mass produce right then and there as a stopgap until they could figure out the mass production for stamped receivers and they did, those mass produced stamped are Type 4 receivers
Can you link this video? That last shot was glorious
>I thought Type 4 was referred to as the AKM
Yes but Type 4 receivers were originally intended for use in improved 47s before the soviets decided to make the project a little bigger and standardise a new weapon type due to stacking incremental upgrades to various batches of 47s, and pushed out the AKM which is just a modernised 47
I mean even the name, AKM, translates to "ak modernised" and the gun shares some improvements in common with late production Type 3 47s like the furniture iirc
If you're familiar with the M4 and how it has A1, mk18, mk12, block 2 etc AKs during the soviet era are a lot like that except mostly unnamed.
And that's just the soviets, not including the rest of the countries behind the iron curtain that had their own fuckery going on
Ah yes, much like AR-15 PIP over the years/decades. Thanks for the explanation, anon!
>I thought Type 4 was referred to as the AKM
Yes but Type 4 receivers were originally intended for use in improved 47s before the soviets decided to make the project a little bigger and standardise a new weapon type due to stacking incremental upgrades to various batches of 47s, and pushed out the AKM which is just a modernised 47
I mean even the name, AKM, translates to "ak modernised" and the gun shares some improvements in common with late production Type 3 47s like the furniture iirc
If you're familiar with the M4 and how it has A1, mk18, mk12, block 2 etc AKs during the soviet era are a lot like that except mostly unnamed.
And that's just the soviets, not including the rest of the countries behind the iron curtain that had their own fuckery going on
so at roughly 8:56 you can see the guy and the gun
there's a good frame with high visibility/contrast where the cop light flashes him that I can't post because lul rangebanned from imageposting
he seems to have some kind of ghetto blaster with a short gas tube and an extended barrel?
can you americans explain what the fuck I am looking at?
I'm european so used to AKs having full length gasblocks, is this some kind of modification of a carbine length AK to meet the 16" barrel requirement you guys have or what?
>1 headshot (while in motion during a chase) and 2 other officers shot
Surprisingly above average accuracy for a ghetto blaster that's likely abused with no cleaning running with the shittiest of steel cased ammo.
>cop tries to extrajudicially execute them for speeding
Self-defense.
>video title says AK-47
>go through the video
>"that's not an AK-47"
>article title says "AK-47 style rifle"
what
how do you get the article title right, but fuck up the video title
>AK-47 style rifle
Incorrect too, it's just all just AK
I'm going to demand we differentiate atleast between stamped (Types 1/4) and milled (Types 2/3)
>differentiate atleast between stamped
Always has been
I have no idea what you are getting at with that comment.
Yes, Type 1 receivers were stamped. Your image shows prototypes of Type 1 receiver 47s
The gun was even originally designed with a stamped receiver in mind.
But they couldn't mass produce reliable stamped receivers because of industrial limitations.
Which is why they decided to do milled receivers (2/3), which take more time and material but they COULD mass produce right then and there as a stopgap until they could figure out the mass production for stamped receivers and they did, those mass produced stamped are Type 4 receivers
why the fuck does this retarded bitch keep pausing the video and replaying the same clip multiple times just to add her retarded commentary inbetween
>Cop attempts pit maneuver over 60mph (use of deadly force) over a simple speeding infraction
>driver then unloads the Draco in self defense
>manages to dome a pig, and hit a few others
>dies in a blaze of glory
>>Cop attempts pit maneuver over 60mph (use of deadly force) over a simple speeding infraction
you're a retard
PITTing is banned most places because it's lethal force.
Failure to yield is a misdemeanor.
The suspects have the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. The cops are not allowed to execute you because you broke a law and didn't "respect their authority."
>PITTing is banned most places because it's lethal force.
god you're retarded
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure there are rules about how hard they can try to apprehend you, including trying to crash your car even though that's potentially deadly.
I know a lot of our law is based on English and French law which is based on centuries of precedent of basically wise people deciding what makes sense. In a case like this I imagine some rascal with a horse cart in the 15th century causing trouble or whatever and not stopping for the gendarmes. In that situation I think they take the cart out.
Sounds silly but it's how almost all our laws work.
>retard alert
Evading in a vehicle is a felony offense in most places. The way this person was driving was an eminent danger to the public, so pitting the suspect vehicle is totally rational. The suspect had a cascade of poor decisions that lead to this end, literally everything that happened was his own fault.
>please_comply.jpeg
Literally too dumb to live.
>cousin gets charged for his death
lel
I thought Type 4 was referred to as the AKM
>vid
Brutal. Was everyone else okay?
Yep, lady was spooked, but alive and well
Ah yes, much like AR-15 PIP over the years/decades. Thanks for the explanation, anon!
Can you link this video? That last shot was glorious
>I thought Type 4 was referred to as the AKM
Yes but Type 4 receivers were originally intended for use in improved 47s before the soviets decided to make the project a little bigger and standardise a new weapon type due to stacking incremental upgrades to various batches of 47s, and pushed out the AKM which is just a modernised 47
I mean even the name, AKM, translates to "ak modernised" and the gun shares some improvements in common with late production Type 3 47s like the furniture iirc
If you're familiar with the M4 and how it has A1, mk18, mk12, block 2 etc AKs during the soviet era are a lot like that except mostly unnamed.
And that's just the soviets, not including the rest of the countries behind the iron curtain that had their own fuckery going on
so at roughly 8:56 you can see the guy and the gun
there's a good frame with high visibility/contrast where the cop light flashes him that I can't post because lul rangebanned from imageposting
he seems to have some kind of ghetto blaster with a short gas tube and an extended barrel?
can you americans explain what the fuck I am looking at?
I'm european so used to AKs having full length gasblocks, is this some kind of modification of a carbine length AK to meet the 16" barrel requirement you guys have or what?
Yes, looks like it. But I couldn't identify the model. But that is not atypical for us.
>thread ultimately about self defense and laws surrounding it
>involves cops
>"REEEEEEEEEEEE GO TO /misc/ REEEEEEEEEEEE"
I have never called anyone a boot licker before tonight. But god damn anon...
>1 headshot (while in motion during a chase) and 2 other officers shot
Surprisingly above average accuracy for a ghetto blaster that's likely abused with no cleaning running with the shittiest of steel cased ammo.
God probably noticed and nudged the bullets towards their targets. He's not a fan of satanists or their collaborators.
What’s going to happen to him next?