Gentlemen I have found a solution to Ukraine's drone problem. >Cheap. >Reusable. >Can cover large areas

Gentlemen I have found a solution to Ukraine's drone problem.

>Cheap
>Reusable
>Can cover large areas
>Drones slow enough and big enough
>minimal collateral damage

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >a solution to Ukraine's drone problem
    picrel on the top floors of tall buildings en masse
    bonus points if the ukes could replace the human operator with artificial intelligence cameras w/ image recognition.
    /thread

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >USA pays for the ammo

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        still cheaper than a single a-29.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      pov btw

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I got a boner

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >one won't cut it, let's mount two

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's actually 4

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      pov btw

      >George Dillon also shared some details about the quad minigun system on Instagram, saying that each gun was firing at the Dillon factory standard rate of approximately 3,000 rounds per minute, for a combined rate of fire of 12,000 rounds per minute. Each Minigun was linked to a magazine that could hold up to 3,000 rounds, for a total of 12,000 rounds ready to fire before the system would need to be reloaded.

      >"We ended up 'only' shooting 24,000 rounds as loading the belts into the onboard magazines is very tasking," he wrote.

      >With each gun firing at 3,000 rounds per minute, it would only take 60 seconds of total firing time to let loose all 12,000 rounds in the magazines. Commercial ammunition prices in the United States vary widely based on type and quality, but at a price point of 75 cents a cartridge, firing this weapon system for a minute would cost $9,000.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >it costs four-hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon
        >for twelve seconds

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I love burgers

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Roll out the mustangs

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good enough for the RAF

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Have we considered a fleet of Spitfires? Would they do the job?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hurricanes would be better for this, better horizontal performance

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Can be affordably produced anywhere
    >Virtually no radar signature
    >Allows full birds-eye view of the ground
    >Can use any small arm or grenade
    Gentleman, I have found the solution to Ukraine's drone problem

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Virtually no radar signature
      How come?

      Also why not just make it RC? Could even make it an unpowered glider.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But what about the turn rate?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >fly me closer Archibald, I must parry that drone with my saber!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Vritish piloys in WW2 basically did this. They would pull alongside the rockets fired over the North Sea and use their wigtip to upset its trajectory and splash into into the water. (Because they didn't have the ammo to spare trying to do it the "normal" way)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Virtually no radar signature
      That engine block has a big ol' signature.

      >it costs four-hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon
      >for twelve seconds

      I read the original post in his voice.

      Vritish piloys in WW2 basically did this. They would pull alongside the rockets fired over the North Sea and use their wigtip to upset its trajectory and splash into into the water. (Because they didn't have the ammo to spare trying to do it the "normal" way)

      >They would pull alongside the rockets fired over the North Sea and use their wigtip to upset its trajectory and splash into into the water
      They just disrupted the air flow over the wing, causing unstable vortexes that killed the lift on that wing. It was a little dangerous because when the V2 rolls over, it could hit their wing if they weren't fast to get out of the way and the occasionally plane was lost that way.

      PrepHole is mostly interested in militaria they can conceivably own some day. Thats why light tanks and prop planes get as much attention as you see anon.

      >tucano
      Questionable radar, no gunpod able to airburst. Its DOA against drones.

      >Questionable radar, no gunpod able to airburst. Its DOA against drones
      It can be refit for targeting pods and you can stick a hydra pod with APKWS for minimum 36 laser-guided rocket funs.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The simplet and cheapest solution is a 37/40/57 mm AA gun with proximity or smart time fuze ammunition. An ukrainan S-60 gun and 2-3 57 mm HE shells with muzzle programmable fuzes + some kind of fire control radar is enough.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah let's burn fuel 24/7 and overextend pilots and risk the planes because anon had a really fucking stupid idea.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >risk the planes
      Wat

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Anti-air. It's like you get dumber with every passing moment. It's kind of uncanny.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What fucking anti air you goddamn moron brain. Check the fucking map and frontlines.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The drone has to get within range. You can only place it near the target. This would basically be used before the drone even gets close.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people so obsessed over this literal monkey plane

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Prop planes are back in style after jet fags took over the industry for the last 70+ years.
      Not everything needs a turbojet engine to perform aerial tasks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's so fucking stupid it's unreal

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What's stupid about being able to land on a dirt airstrip?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      PrepHole is mostly interested in militaria they can conceivably own some day. Thats why light tanks and prop planes get as much attention as you see anon.

      >tucano
      Questionable radar, no gunpod able to airburst. Its DOA against drones.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Everything points to small cheap missiles or lasers for anti drone weapons in the future
    >PrepHole continues to insist on BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT tier wastes of money

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Rule of cool, beeotch.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    aircraft to ukraine? holy shit anon, don't you understand this is literally WWIII?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *