From all that I have seen, it seems very likely that FRTs will be deemed legal via the various court battles. What do you think the future holds on this front and what are the repurcussions?
Personally, I own registered machineguns and I'm considering selling them. They will lose 80$ of their value overnight if FRTs are everywhere and legal, IMHO.
>FRT
>FaRT 15
Uh oh!!
UH OH STINKY
when the trigger is $80 let me know
I think OP meant they would lose 80% of their value
>if FRTs are everywhere and legal
Should this happen, our ackchyually's will no longer be valid: https://youtu.be/haOneP_zc_Y?t=568
Not sure why he's worried, bump stocks, 3MR, SD3G, binary triggers, etc. did not affect MG prices
>bump stocks, 3MR, SD3G, binary triggers, etc. did not affect MG prices
None of those are close to the same thing. An FRT provides the same experience as FA.
It didn't have enough time to take effect. Binary triggers are gay and not even close to FRTs. I do own 2 SMGs, some of the cheapest FAs.
Yes, it would be unprecedented. So are FRTs.
>So are FRTs.
Holy shit you are new.
>None of those are close to the same
?t=0
?t=4
Unlike the FRT-15, the 3MR features a selector
scotus just took the cargill v garland case today speaking of, so we should have complete clarity on what is and is not a machine gun in the next year to year and a half depending on when they set arguments
Gonna be wild if they try to specify a firing rate. Between Miculek and fudd RSOs it would be the cultural dumpster fire of the decade.
I imagine they'll try to specify that if the trigger helps you shoot faster it's a machine gun, but scotus will say the atf can't redefine legislation set by congress. We might come out pretty great if scotus tells the atf their hands are tied to the letter of existing wordage, it would instantly undo the rulings on bump stocks, braces, and frts, along with any future homosexualry. I bet we'd get some mighty short reset triggers in the third mode.
the cargill ruling from the circuit seems to allow a distinction between a bump stock (which they said wasn’t a machine gun) and something like a forced reset trigger in discussion of what the operator manually has to do to make a bump stock work
there’s no discussion about rate of fire, everyone agrees that’s not what the law says, the case is about whether “a single function of the trigger [feom the shooters PoV]” is what’s implied by statute
>there’s no discussion about rate of fire, everyone agrees that’s not what the law says, the case is about whether “a single function of the trigger [from the shooters PoV]” is what’s implied by statute
yeah this, will also have implications for design of electronic firing and remote guns as well.
>We might come out pretty great if scotus tells the atf their hands are tied to the letter of existing wordage
The EPA ruling from earlier this year has far reaching implications for BS like this. tbh I'm surprised we haven't seem it used already. SCOTUS came down hard on the executive interpreting legislation.
>What do you think the future holds on this front and what are the repurcussions?
Select fire guns become the norm: Safe, Semi, Fart
The mods people were doing on these FRTs are insane, it's literally a Select Fire without all the bullshit. Without the mods it's just a gimmick like a bumpstock.
post the mods?
>I own registered machineguns and I'm considering selling them
Lol, no you don't. There was no devaluation in the transferable market when the FRT came out. Binarys either.
My FRTs should be deemed illegal. I startle the dog and become light headed sometimes if I eat the wrong things.
>transferable machineguns
>losing value
lol
lmao even
>80$
rough.
but I wouldn't be surprised if something like that happened. the Supreme Court pretty much promised to cocksmack grabbers if they did all the shit they did after Bruen was passed. and guess what case is going to the Supreme Court?
Garland v. Cargill got certiorari today.