Fuck you. I love her.

>sexy slopped armor
>low profile
>invulnerable during her time
>122 mm cannon
>so cramped only midgets can crew her
SOVL

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One heavy piece of shit.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I agree it's very VGH worthy, but not really good in any practical manner

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Gets btfo'd by old bong and frog tanks
    Muh paper stats fail once again.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thicc turret

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I still have PTSD from watching every Men of War match decide into these things plinking shots off Tiger IIs while the Tigers returned in kind.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Gets forcibly converted to Judaism by the Israeli bvll
    She's a garden gnome Lover anon, you dont want her.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we need a sequel to our highly workhorse heavy tank, the IS-2

    >replace the gun, which is literally just a howitzer? no
    >future proofing? no
    >better engine? no
    >crew comfort? no
    >safe ammunition storage? no
    >technical features such as stabilizers? no

    >make tank really short and change the hull a little? yes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but it looks sick. Shame about the gun, but the T-10 got a slight update there. Its definitely not ergonomic, but it has a very good armor profile for its weight class, offering similar or better frontal armor than a Tiger II while weighing 20 tons less.

      IS-7 shouldve been produced.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was a rushed ww2 design, they even had a huge expensive modernization program that was practically a rebuild for them

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I know she's a hacked rushjob only meant for a RUSSIA STRONK moment but I can't bring myself to hate her. Damned Russians, do they have some Italian genes mixed in with them because they seem to share their trait of making things that look cool but don't work

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HESHes u

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Although bong tank designs have been utter dogshit in general thorough the past 100 years, the Conqueror and Challenger are alright in my books

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How the fuck can you say that when the centurion exists?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oversized wannabe mbt boxes with boring ap & apds as main ammo compared to Chadqueror with 120mm hesh

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ehh, I prefer the Chieftain myself

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >invulnerable during her time
    but it wasn't even when it was first unveiled. If we go further for when it was actually fielded after years of fixes, it was now even more vulnerable

    It sure does look cool though.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When is it getting deployed to Ukraine though

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It looks like that one fat dude with no neck.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I get you annon, I love her too, Yes I know its typical slavshit, and have no illusions on what it is or what it's shortcoming are. I know its sucks, and where it sucks... I just like it and anyone who would say they would turn down a chance to own one or drive one is lying.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >anyone who would say they would turn down a chance to own one or drive one is lying.
      yeah but you can say that about just about any tank

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if Object 770 or Object 277 were completed and put into mass production.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *