I’m sure if you built a fuckhuge bunch of electromagnets and put an entire nuclear reactor’s worth of power through them (provided you have enough cooling systems they don’t just melt) then the field produced could deflect or stop bullets and shells, sure
Magnet brakes are already a thing. Make them more powerful and they could probably also stop bullets mid-air.
...until bullets are made from ceramics or plastics, then you're fucked.
We could've had them in the 1980's, if 3M had realized the potential of what they had in their possession.
https://www.weirduniverse.net/blog/comments/3m_force_field
>they create a "force field" out of rolls of plastic
I'm skeptical about this, if this had any potential you bet your left nut DARPA would have jumped on it faster than kids in a bouncy castle.
I don't follow.
[...]
Pretty crazy to stumble into that. Unironically what kind of stuff could DARPA have been messing around with in this field since? Could be some interesting stuff
Let's not pretend to know what's in DoD/Darpa's basement. I'm sure there's plenty of goodies squirelled away for the day that a motherfucker tries and we need to extend more than 1% of our dong to fuck them raw.
We could've had them in the 1980's, if 3M had realized the potential of what they had in their possession.
https://www.weirduniverse.net/blog/comments/3m_force_field
Pretty crazy to stumble into that. Unironically what kind of stuff could DARPA have been messing around with in this field since? Could be some interesting stuff
High EMF/RF exposure on a regular basis has been shown to damage DNA in human beings.
Presumably most of what you'd want to protect with a force field will be operated by humans within, and this exposed to some significant energy on a regular/continuous basis, even with shielding.
In short if you fire up a "force field" with commonly understood physics principles ruling over whatever technology you're utilizing, with members of humanity nearby, you're going to start turning DNA into soup.
Thus, tumors and cancerous growth.
Could have a radiation shielded cockpit, or design the shields in a way that any radiation is only emitted outwards and set rules that shields can only be activated after takeoff/deactivated before landing to protect ground crews.
I think those rules are already in place for certain active radars on jets. Not sure if this is true or just airforce spooky stories but I've heard claims that if you walked in front of a fighter jet with it's active radar array turned on you're basically guaranteed cancer.
>wave resonates with molecule >heats it up >it hits stuff >stuff breaks >free radicals n sheit >????? >cancer?
1 month ago
Anonymous
It would have to be emitting huge amounts of power to have a significant effect in this way
1 month ago
Anonymous
I mean we're talking about an energy level that would be expected to slow or stop incoming projectiles traveling above mach.
It would probably be enough energy at such a high freq that it would turn soil around it on the ground into glass.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Like the amount of power you'd need for an energy shield capable of stopping kinetic impacts? It's amazing how you're intelligent enough to form a response but too stupid to retain the context. Almost like an npc in a video game
1 month ago
Anonymous
>like the amount to stop an impact
No, much more still
Sure, but what I'm saying is that it would be such an unbelievably overwhelming amount of directed energy that it wouldn't be easy (if possible at all) to overcome even it's leakage with shielding.
Like even with active radar if you get a large object like a balloon with a piece of aluminum foil on it or something too close to the emitter suddenly, the backscatter could damage your receivers.
For something like a shield you're taking about orders of magnitude more energy, at SUPER high frequency to prevent it from emanating too far off into the distance and causing unintentional conflicts.
>high end/rf can damage DNA
Nah, at least not conclusively shown to be the case. There have been all sorts of papers on this exact subject. Until you get into ionizing radiation levels, emf isn't going to kill you
High EMF/RF exposure on a regular basis has been shown to damage DNA in human beings.
Presumably most of what you'd want to protect with a force field will be operated by humans within, and this exposed to some significant energy on a regular/continuous basis, even with shielding.
In short if you fire up a "force field" with commonly understood physics principles ruling over whatever technology you're utilizing, with members of humanity nearby, you're going to start turning DNA into soup.
Thus, tumors and cancerous growth.
Yeah, but a machine could still run it. Right? Slap it on a drone and it'll do wonders.
Define a "shield".
If you put that word to the dissection table, we have shields fielded by militaries right now, they are called armour protection systems or APS.
If you are talking about things like in your OP, which you are, then the closest thing we have are British prototypes that turn armour into batteries which discharge into the projectile whem hit.
>Define a "shield".
I'd say some sort of projected field or region of space surrounding an asset that can capture or safely dissipate energy without contacting or otherwise causing damage to the asset.
>People used to cry about cavalry same way we cry about battleships, they ain't coming back.
Cavalry may be gone but at least we have a modern successor to Dragoons (teams using dirt bikes and atvs). Although some might argue that light vehicles with mounted guns, and I mostly mean here that there's still a man on top exposed and firing while charging into enemy lines, like we've seen in that past year
But they did come back, we just use vehicles instead of horses now. But there is no equivalent to a machine whose main way of fighting is big fuckoff guns
>What is this weebshit revenge wet dream
Revenge? Pretty sure that scene includes lots of nip ships getting sunk too, some final global last stand. IIRC that weird manga humanity was shut out of the seas worldwide, and there are WW2 ships featured from everyone Allied or Axis. Haven't read it in a few years though and anime looked like trash so never watched that at all beyond the trailers.
>At first glance it looked like a bunch of imperial Japanese ships using magic shields and beams to destroy a modern navy
That is correct, enemy ships are old IJN ships. Later one US, Royal Navy, and Kriegsmarine ships are confirmed so its just that each nation is attacked by copies of their own old ships.
Why does anime always have to have the most retarded settings
1 month ago
Anonymous
to be fair the ships were meant to activate in 1945 but something put them into a suspended state for almost a century and then they attacked and blockaded the worlds oceans.
So presumably at the time of their creation the ships were just copies of contemporary designs.
Never with any known current tech. Advanced APS is not only attainable but probably fundamentally more efficient anyway since only the energy needed to intercept a given incoming object is expended.
Hawaii is the mecha of right wing boomers and they don't believe any ills could ever befall their paradise of tourist traps without """"interference """"
They've done it before. It's not really a question since it's a well documented fact. That's not to say it's easily done or decided on lightly, though. I don't see how starting a fire in Hawaii could sway public opinion any which way on any given subject, though
1 month ago
Anonymous
From what I understand the conspiracy theory-position is that there a multiple theories why:
-Make the owners sell their burned down homes to blackrock adjacent companies.
-Convince the general population that "Climatechange bad" is the next big thing to really around
I have no opinion on it other then generally being distrustful of governments, be it russia or the US or any other.
I think you're a fucking moron if you think Hawaiian wildfires or really any other natural disaster are staged. I love how contrarians think everyone else is sheep for not reflexively believing that everything is a conspiracy when they themselves are the ones blindly believing the opposite of what they're told
https://i.imgur.com/PEr78f6.jpg
It’s true. The US government turned on the wind machines to make 30mph winds, turned off the rain machines so there would be no moisture, and built a mountain to block clouds from reaching western maui. They also stole fire from the gods.
Your spergout about a simple hypothetical question is noted.
Make you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
1 month ago
Anonymous
*maybe
1 month ago
Anonymous
>blackrock
Eh, maybe but blackrock hasn't needed to do anything to get what they want in the past. They'll get theirs no matter what, unfortunately >climatechangebad
People already think this and they're right to. A fire in Hawaii isn't convincing anyone except maybe Hawaiians? Seems more believable to me that, aside from the obvious answer that it's a natural phenomenon, it's some isolationist group of natives trying to tell whitey to go home
1 month ago
Anonymous
>it's some isolationist group of natives trying to tell whitey to go home
Not super uncommon sentiment in Hawaii, but Lahaina is mostly local. If this were an act of anti colonizer arson, you would want to target resorts, condos, etc. Not your own houses.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>wildfire? da gubbermint did it >hurricanes? Gubmint. >tsunami? Gubmint antarctic superweapon testing >lighting strikes? Secret gubmint assassination too >landslides? Avalanches? Earthquakes? Rain? Wind? Sun? Moon? Stars? Sky? Planet? Reality? Gubbermint simulation, believe it or not
medication
1 month ago
Anonymous
Again: Your spergout about a simple hypothetical question is noted.
Maybe you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
Conspiracy theories often employ a throw everything at the wall strategy.
You can't possibly deboonk every theory and some deboonkings will be mutually exclusive with other deboonkings.
It's only the mental illness of people trying to project control onto an uncontrollable world.
>It's only the mental illness of people trying to project control onto an uncontrollable world.
Its kinda funny with how rapidly conspiracy theories turn out to be true.
Like, how is something a conspiracy theory if you have people at the WEF admitting that this is what they actually want?
Would you agree that someone walking up to you, telling you they want to kill you and your family and then you saying "Thats not true, thats a conspiracy theory" is sign of a mental illness?
Again, hypothetical question.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Maybe you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
Because braindead retards like yourself get a vote that counts just as much as someone with even the room temperature IQ that you aspire to have someday.
1 month ago
Anonymous
3rd post full of butthurt where you refuse to entertain a simple hypothetical.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Conspiracy theories often employ a throw everything at the wall strategy.
You can't possibly deboonk every theory and some deboonkings will be mutually exclusive with other deboonkings.
It's only the mental illness of people trying to project control onto an uncontrollable world.
I think you're a fucking moron if you think Hawaiian wildfires or really any other natural disaster are staged. I love how contrarians think everyone else is sheep for not reflexively believing that everything is a conspiracy when they themselves are the ones blindly believing the opposite of what they're told
It’s true. The US government turned on the wind machines to make 30mph winds, turned off the rain machines so there would be no moisture, and built a mountain to block clouds from reaching western maui. They also stole fire from the gods.
1 month ago
Anonymous
The geography of maui is actually pretty interesting and it leads to precisely this situation. Basically the entire central valley is a massive wind tunnel and gets very little rain. Then the southern portion of west maui up through lahaina is in the rain shadow of the volcano. But as you go north it very quickly gets cooler and wetter.
Creating a shield with electromagnetic fields is actually pretty simple, and most militaries already use them. Basically, you take some positively charged particles (like protons) and cover them with electrons. The electrons will form a negatively charged cloud around the positive particle. You can attach many of these electron-covered protons together and form a continuous sheet of them. The sheet will be held together by electromagnetic forces between the electron clouds and nearby protons. Now, if you cover your vehicle in such a protective sheet, it can withstand pretty energetic impacts, as long as it's weaker than the electromagnetic forces holding the sheet together.
It describes ordinary armor. Ordinary solid matter is held together by electromagnetic forces. When two bodies collide (like a bullet with an armor plate), it's the electromagnetic repulsion of their atoms' electron clouds that prevents them from passing through each other. That's why neutrons can penetrate solids, because they pass freely through the electron cloud, and only get stopped if they hit another nucleus by chance, which are very-very tiny compared to the electron cloud.
>force field
depending on what kind of field and how much force, like 70 years ago, except the amount of force you can generate is immaterial so almost useless for creating kinetic effects >energy shields
literally never. unless we're basically 100% wrong about basic aspects of physics, there is no pathway for something like picrel to exist. ever.
the likelihood of us being sufficiently wrong about the physics is about the likelihood of finding out that 2+2 is actually 4.5.
>finding out that 2+2 is actually 4.5.
IRL 2+2 = 3.(9) because lul entropy, but nobody accounts for that, because it would make mathematics literally unworkable.
We have Time travel technology we have the cure to aids cancer and aging. We have energy weapons, and we have energy shields. We have the ability to do more than you could even imagine. AND the only reason I can say all of this is because you will believe me but nobody else will. They'll think I'm a pyscho talking on the internet and if you tell them what I told you, they'll think you're crazy. And you know something, if it exists but it doesn't impact our direct life then it doesn't even fucking matter. Look man you already know about the worlds most powerful weapons, the world ending nuclear fusion bombs. Everything else is just a small deal compared to those. If you ask anything specific you didn't hear it from me kid.
Isn't CIWS essentially going to fill that role in the future.With advanced enough computing you can counter most projectiles, at various ranges. Force field requires compact energy sources and some advancement in physics. CIWS requires further advancement of tech that is already advancing very fast.
When they become cheaper than just replacing things that get hit
>cheaper
are you saying they're possible now but just overly expensive?
I’m sure if you built a fuckhuge bunch of electromagnets and put an entire nuclear reactor’s worth of power through them (provided you have enough cooling systems they don’t just melt) then the field produced could deflect or stop bullets and shells, sure
Unless the projectile is not magnetic.
Time to invest into trebuchets.
Plasma windows can literally prevent air from escaping into vacuum. I'm assuming a fuckhueg enough plasma window can stop a fucking rock
all things are magnetic, you just need a strong enough magnetic force.
gonna shoot my superconductor bullets at your strong enough magnetic force and see what it does
Wouldn't the magnets just attract whatever metalic object flies at them?
>i'll take electromagnetic particles of a specific charge for 500 alex!
It wouldn't necessarily need to deflect or stop anything. Just inducing a tumble in a projectile would be enough to severely reduce damage potential.
Magnet brakes are already a thing. Make them more powerful and they could probably also stop bullets mid-air.
...until bullets are made from ceramics or plastics, then you're fucked.
We could've had them in the 1980's, if 3M had realized the potential of what they had in their possession.
https://www.weirduniverse.net/blog/comments/3m_force_field
>they create a "force field" out of rolls of plastic
I'm skeptical about this, if this had any potential you bet your left nut DARPA would have jumped on it faster than kids in a bouncy castle.
Let's not pretend to know what's in DoD/Darpa's basement. I'm sure there's plenty of goodies squirelled away for the day that a motherfucker tries and we need to extend more than 1% of our dong to fuck them raw.
This sounds like some dork just trying to live his SciFi fantasies
When we figure out how to prevent cancer in human beings probably.
I don't follow.
Pretty crazy to stumble into that. Unironically what kind of stuff could DARPA have been messing around with in this field since? Could be some interesting stuff
High EMF/RF exposure on a regular basis has been shown to damage DNA in human beings.
Presumably most of what you'd want to protect with a force field will be operated by humans within, and this exposed to some significant energy on a regular/continuous basis, even with shielding.
In short if you fire up a "force field" with commonly understood physics principles ruling over whatever technology you're utilizing, with members of humanity nearby, you're going to start turning DNA into soup.
Thus, tumors and cancerous growth.
Could be a good time
Could have a radiation shielded cockpit, or design the shields in a way that any radiation is only emitted outwards and set rules that shields can only be activated after takeoff/deactivated before landing to protect ground crews.
I think those rules are already in place for certain active radars on jets. Not sure if this is true or just airforce spooky stories but I've heard claims that if you walked in front of a fighter jet with it's active radar array turned on you're basically guaranteed cancer.
I don't think radars cause cancer like that. They don't emit ionizing radiation. It's more like being cooked in a microwave.
>wave resonates with molecule
>heats it up
>it hits stuff
>stuff breaks
>free radicals n sheit
>?????
>cancer?
It would have to be emitting huge amounts of power to have a significant effect in this way
I mean we're talking about an energy level that would be expected to slow or stop incoming projectiles traveling above mach.
It would probably be enough energy at such a high freq that it would turn soil around it on the ground into glass.
Like the amount of power you'd need for an energy shield capable of stopping kinetic impacts? It's amazing how you're intelligent enough to form a response but too stupid to retain the context. Almost like an npc in a video game
>like the amount to stop an impact
No, much more still
Sure, but what I'm saying is that it would be such an unbelievably overwhelming amount of directed energy that it wouldn't be easy (if possible at all) to overcome even it's leakage with shielding.
Like even with active radar if you get a large object like a balloon with a piece of aluminum foil on it or something too close to the emitter suddenly, the backscatter could damage your receivers.
For something like a shield you're taking about orders of magnitude more energy, at SUPER high frequency to prevent it from emanating too far off into the distance and causing unintentional conflicts.
not great not terrible
>high end/rf can damage DNA
Nah, at least not conclusively shown to be the case. There have been all sorts of papers on this exact subject. Until you get into ionizing radiation levels, emf isn't going to kill you
Yeah, but a machine could still run it. Right? Slap it on a drone and it'll do wonders.
There is no money in preventing or curing cancer. Plenty to be made in research though
Define a "shield".
If you put that word to the dissection table, we have shields fielded by militaries right now, they are called armour protection systems or APS.
If you are talking about things like in your OP, which you are, then the closest thing we have are British prototypes that turn armour into batteries which discharge into the projectile whem hit.
>Define a "shield".
I'd say some sort of projected field or region of space surrounding an asset that can capture or safely dissipate energy without contacting or otherwise causing damage to the asset.
Will it bring back battleships?
People used to cry about cavalry same way we cry about battleships, they ain't coming back.
>People used to cry about cavalry same way we cry about battleships, they ain't coming back.
Cavalry may be gone but at least we have a modern successor to Dragoons (teams using dirt bikes and atvs). Although some might argue that light vehicles with mounted guns, and I mostly mean here that there's still a man on top exposed and firing while charging into enemy lines, like we've seen in that past year
Arpeggio
Kino footage, haven't seen that.
I believe, and many in the military, is that rotary wing forces are the modern cavalry.
>Kino footage, haven't seen that
That's nuckingfuts iirc
The AT4 guy
Where to cop the version with the Halo 3 warthog run score?
But they did come back, we just use vehicles instead of horses now. But there is no equivalent to a machine whose main way of fighting is big fuckoff guns
What is this weebshit revenge wet dream
>What is this weebshit revenge wet dream
Revenge? Pretty sure that scene includes lots of nip ships getting sunk too, some final global last stand. IIRC that weird manga humanity was shut out of the seas worldwide, and there are WW2 ships featured from everyone Allied or Axis. Haven't read it in a few years though and anime looked like trash so never watched that at all beyond the trailers.
At first glance it looked like a bunch of imperial Japanese ships using magic shields and beams to destroy a modern navy
>At first glance it looked like a bunch of imperial Japanese ships using magic shields and beams to destroy a modern navy
That is correct, enemy ships are old IJN ships. Later one US, Royal Navy, and Kriegsmarine ships are confirmed so its just that each nation is attacked by copies of their own old ships.
Why does anime always have to have the most retarded settings
to be fair the ships were meant to activate in 1945 but something put them into a suspended state for almost a century and then they attacked and blockaded the worlds oceans.
So presumably at the time of their creation the ships were just copies of contemporary designs.
It was just the world navy picking a fight with what's called the Fleet of Fog that's camping Japanese water that's comprised many of Japanese ships.
There's also a Fleet of Fog in the Atlantic made up of Axis and Allied ships, so you get the see the Bismark and Prince of Wales team up.
Never with any known current tech. Advanced APS is not only attainable but probably fundamentally more efficient anyway since only the energy needed to intercept a given incoming object is expended.
Already here
It still needs to be extensively tested on paper bags for a successful tuning
How is the Lahaina fire some sort of conspiracy now?
>t. Was there
Hawaii is the mecha of right wing boomers and they don't believe any ills could ever befall their paradise of tourist traps without """"interference """"
>Hawaii is the mecha of right wing boomers
..Are you pretending to be retarded?
Hawaii is one of the most left-wing places in the US.
>mecha
He’s saying that boomers idolize Hawaii as a vacation spot, not that they live there.
It was actually an autocorrect but I left it because it was hilarious
Well then the question of "muh conspiracy theories" is really simple:
Do you put it past the US government to stage a crisis if doing so could sway the public opinion on some issue a certain way, yes or no?
They've done it before. It's not really a question since it's a well documented fact. That's not to say it's easily done or decided on lightly, though. I don't see how starting a fire in Hawaii could sway public opinion any which way on any given subject, though
From what I understand the conspiracy theory-position is that there a multiple theories why:
-Make the owners sell their burned down homes to blackrock adjacent companies.
-Convince the general population that "Climatechange bad" is the next big thing to really around
I have no opinion on it other then generally being distrustful of governments, be it russia or the US or any other.
Your spergout about a simple hypothetical question is noted.
Make you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
*maybe
>blackrock
Eh, maybe but blackrock hasn't needed to do anything to get what they want in the past. They'll get theirs no matter what, unfortunately
>climatechangebad
People already think this and they're right to. A fire in Hawaii isn't convincing anyone except maybe Hawaiians? Seems more believable to me that, aside from the obvious answer that it's a natural phenomenon, it's some isolationist group of natives trying to tell whitey to go home
>it's some isolationist group of natives trying to tell whitey to go home
Not super uncommon sentiment in Hawaii, but Lahaina is mostly local. If this were an act of anti colonizer arson, you would want to target resorts, condos, etc. Not your own houses.
>wildfire? da gubbermint did it
>hurricanes? Gubmint.
>tsunami? Gubmint antarctic superweapon testing
>lighting strikes? Secret gubmint assassination too
>landslides? Avalanches? Earthquakes? Rain? Wind? Sun? Moon? Stars? Sky? Planet? Reality? Gubbermint simulation, believe it or not
medication
Again: Your spergout about a simple hypothetical question is noted.
Maybe you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
>It's only the mental illness of people trying to project control onto an uncontrollable world.
Its kinda funny with how rapidly conspiracy theories turn out to be true.
Like, how is something a conspiracy theory if you have people at the WEF admitting that this is what they actually want?
Would you agree that someone walking up to you, telling you they want to kill you and your family and then you saying "Thats not true, thats a conspiracy theory" is sign of a mental illness?
Again, hypothetical question.
>Maybe you should ask yourselves instead why it triggered you so.
Because braindead retards like yourself get a vote that counts just as much as someone with even the room temperature IQ that you aspire to have someday.
3rd post full of butthurt where you refuse to entertain a simple hypothetical.
Conspiracy theories often employ a throw everything at the wall strategy.
You can't possibly deboonk every theory and some deboonkings will be mutually exclusive with other deboonkings.
It's only the mental illness of people trying to project control onto an uncontrollable world.
I think you're a fucking moron if you think Hawaiian wildfires or really any other natural disaster are staged. I love how contrarians think everyone else is sheep for not reflexively believing that everything is a conspiracy when they themselves are the ones blindly believing the opposite of what they're told
It’s true. The US government turned on the wind machines to make 30mph winds, turned off the rain machines so there would be no moisture, and built a mountain to block clouds from reaching western maui. They also stole fire from the gods.
The geography of maui is actually pretty interesting and it leads to precisely this situation. Basically the entire central valley is a massive wind tunnel and gets very little rain. Then the southern portion of west maui up through lahaina is in the rain shadow of the volcano. But as you go north it very quickly gets cooler and wetter.
APS is a bit like that if you think about it.
Creating a shield with electromagnetic fields is actually pretty simple, and most militaries already use them. Basically, you take some positively charged particles (like protons) and cover them with electrons. The electrons will form a negatively charged cloud around the positive particle. You can attach many of these electron-covered protons together and form a continuous sheet of them. The sheet will be held together by electromagnetic forces between the electron clouds and nearby protons. Now, if you cover your vehicle in such a protective sheet, it can withstand pretty energetic impacts, as long as it's weaker than the electromagnetic forces holding the sheet together.
for what purpose?
i'm pretty sure project gateway proved to be of little use in real life.
i love these little guys
Well played, nerdbro. I chuckled.
It took me a minute, but very clever
I keep staring at it, but I don't get it
It describes ordinary armor. Ordinary solid matter is held together by electromagnetic forces. When two bodies collide (like a bullet with an armor plate), it's the electromagnetic repulsion of their atoms' electron clouds that prevents them from passing through each other. That's why neutrons can penetrate solids, because they pass freely through the electron cloud, and only get stopped if they hit another nucleus by chance, which are very-very tiny compared to the electron cloud.
I only want forcefields if they work like Dune and bring back sword fighting
Kek, I watched this like almost two decades ago and still remember the sound of the shield stopping the missiles.
by the time energy shields become feasible they would have already been rendered obsolete by lasers
>force field
depending on what kind of field and how much force, like 70 years ago, except the amount of force you can generate is immaterial so almost useless for creating kinetic effects
>energy shields
literally never. unless we're basically 100% wrong about basic aspects of physics, there is no pathway for something like picrel to exist. ever.
the likelihood of us being sufficiently wrong about the physics is about the likelihood of finding out that 2+2 is actually 4.5.
>finding out that 2+2 is actually 4.5.
IRL 2+2 = 3.(9) because lul entropy, but nobody accounts for that, because it would make mathematics literally unworkable.
I got two questions
1) Is it possible to make a bullet explode just with microwaves
2) How much energy would you need for it
We have Time travel technology we have the cure to aids cancer and aging. We have energy weapons, and we have energy shields. We have the ability to do more than you could even imagine. AND the only reason I can say all of this is because you will believe me but nobody else will. They'll think I'm a pyscho talking on the internet and if you tell them what I told you, they'll think you're crazy. And you know something, if it exists but it doesn't impact our direct life then it doesn't even fucking matter. Look man you already know about the worlds most powerful weapons, the world ending nuclear fusion bombs. Everything else is just a small deal compared to those. If you ask anything specific you didn't hear it from me kid.
Anyone ever thought about having some sort of electromagnetic shield to deflect radiation in space? Similar to how earth's own EM field worksd.
Probably the closes we'll ever get to space ships with actual shields.
https://www.sciencealert.com/there-is-a-human-made-barrier-surrounding-earth-and-we-can-detect-it
Isn't CIWS essentially going to fill that role in the future.With advanced enough computing you can counter most projectiles, at various ranges. Force field requires compact energy sources and some advancement in physics. CIWS requires further advancement of tech that is already advancing very fast.
maybe sometime after we get defensive lasers working
10 years ago