>first war happened 13,000ish years ago. >horses were domesticated 6,000 years ago

>first war happened 13,000ish years ago
>horses were domesticated 6,000 years ago
>bronze age was also like 6,500 years ago
was it literally just dudes in loin cloths hitting each other with clubs?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Now, it's dudes hitting each other with chubs.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the loincloth was invested 8k years ago. dudes just let it swing before that.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The frick are you talking about? Clothing has been found as far back as fricking half a million years ago.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    More likely just rocks

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >clubs
    looks like they were using pencils

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The pencils are pointing at rocks that were embedded in their bodies

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Arrowheads/speartips maybe?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like the work of an old school sling. Quite devastating weapons, slings are.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Be me
      >Grug from 11000BC
      >No idea who Christ is, not sure why everyone keeps dating the year from when he’s supposed to show up
      >Ready to start this new invention called “war”
      >Gonna stab the Berry Tribe with our brand new sharpened sticks, shit’s gonna get real
      >Zoomer time traveller shows up and kills me by slingshotting pencils into my abdomen
      Why is life so hard fellow grugs

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Grug just want to hot-hot mammoth

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    more likely a sharpened spere

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lots of yelling and pooh flinging. Fricking abos.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The earliest probable arrowheads were found to be 48000 years old, so more than likely it was a guerilla war with small roving bands of footmen with spears and clubs, in conjunction with an equal amount of archers, dogs were also likely used as a means to flush out hiding enemies, they might have even equipped themselves with bone and hide armor/clothing

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tollense_valley_battlefield

      Yes.

      There is video footage of a couple of uncontacted tribes in New Guinea engaging in combat with each other. It resembles a deadly game of dodgeball, two sides piffing spears at each other and running around trying not to get hit. Very few actual casualties because nobody wanted to close the gap.

      I'm not a super expert in it, but when I looked into a dude's great thesis on South Italian warfare prior to the Roman conquest it seems this was very much the pre-Hellenized way of warfare in Italy. I'll look in a minute but it was something like a Greek made an equivalence that the spear to the greek and bow to the persian was the javelin to the Italian. And apparently it survived ritualized into some dueling form where two dudes face off and just throw javelins at one another.

      This whole tribalistic "Ceremonial" fighting is honestly big brain shit. It allows showcasing courage (more in facing danger than dealing it out), it doesn't lead to wholesale massacres or weakening yourself such that another tribe can come in, and it offers stress relief/communal bonding.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        God bless British academia as you can just download it, as I was not in the mood to upload it for you.

        https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1445381/
        >Burns, Michael; (2006) The cultural and military significance of the south Italic warrior's panoply from the 5th to the 3rd centuries BC. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), University of London

        And even more based, this is searchable by control F rather than in my image form. Annoyingly I(I cannot find the reference I remembered, save that it does mention javelins associated with Italians. 7.3 or page 181 has the amentum, which is the same principle as the atlatl but in this form a leather thong looped around the javelin which gives a rotation to the javelin and increases velocity and accuracy/power.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War

    • 11 months ago
      Asdfg

      I’m fine with recording ape thing on wiki.
      But
      How dare they use that sacred template for describing a animal war.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        that is the best part, the fact they used a war template and the fact the leaders were given monkey names and listed as killed in action

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >For several years I struggled to come to terms with this new knowledge. Often when I woke in the night, horrific pictures sprang unbidden to my mind—Satan [one of the apes], cupping his hand below Sniff's chin to drink the blood that welled from a great wound on his face; old Rodolf, usually so benign, standing upright to hurl a four-pound rock at Godi's prostrate body; Jomeo tearing a strip of skin from Dé's thigh; Figan, charging and hitting, again and again, the stricken, quivering body of Goliath, one of his childhood heroes. ...[21]

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >like 8 dudes killed
      >"war"
      anyone else wanna show these smug ass chimps what the frick a real war looks like? bunch of pansy ass b***hes

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Scale is only something of a diplomatic measure. The fundamentals of war happen so long as there are more than one individual. What happened was power was questioned, usurped and consolidated resources and breeding rights with a new hierarchical order passing down through family lines. Until another organized group of usurpers do it all again.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >first war happened 13,000ish years ago
        I'm going to need a source on that anon, I would be shocked if the first war was more than 100 years after "humans" were first recorded.

        The US lost 0.32% of their population in the American Revolutionary War, the Kahama chimpanzees lost ~50% of their population.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Bro even Australopithecus was killing each other with stone weapons and that was 3 million years ago and those motherfrickers hardly even looked human. Pic related is what we think Australopithecus may have looked like.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            he literally has a jawline like thunderchad from the meme

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The whole clan got wiped out. Nazis can only dream about such a success.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >en.m.wikipedia

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >.m
        kys yourself

        yeah homie, let me just bring my laptop to the loo

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          maybe that's why you post shit on MY PrepHole
          reflect on your life while genuflecting over the loo begging for mercy because I won't give you any

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            shitposting refers to more than the quality of the post anon.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >.m
      kys yourself

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/qVEGXkh.jpg

      >For several years I struggled to come to terms with this new knowledge. Often when I woke in the night, horrific pictures sprang unbidden to my mind—Satan [one of the apes], cupping his hand below Sniff's chin to drink the blood that welled from a great wound on his face; old Rodolf, usually so benign, standing upright to hurl a four-pound rock at Godi's prostrate body; Jomeo tearing a strip of skin from Dé's thigh; Figan, charging and hitting, again and again, the stricken, quivering body of Goliath, one of his childhood heroes. ...[21]

      Yet another example of "free & independent" white woman falling to the illness of Bambinism.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Throughout the war, Goliath had been relatively friendly with the Kasakela neighbors when encounters occurred. However, his kindness was not reciprocated and he was killed.
      Why did they do it bros...

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Drug retailing territory as usual.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      god I hate chimpanzees, they are the worst primates

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I feel like we should do some arclight bombing runs in west Africa so that chimps can experience the glory of true warfare in their otherwise brief and pointless existence as a species

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    pyramids wehre basicly UFOs so i guess they had beter stuff then cubs

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pyramids wehre basicly ufos
      Yes I saw that and also the ayyys made the first dildo and flush toilet. Much has been hidden that will be unveiled to the knowing (q)

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >was it literally just dudes in loin cloths hitting each other with clubs?
    Bows and arrows and spears ? Have you heard of these things anon?

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They literally had devices to aid in spear throwing at least 10k years before the first war.

    >Wooden darts were known at least since the Middle Paleolithic (Schöningen, Torralba, Clacton-on-Sea and Kalambo Falls). While the spear-thrower is capable of casting a dart well over one hundred meters, it is most accurately used at distances of twenty meters or less. The spearthrower is believed to have been in use by homosexual sapiens since the Upper Paleolithic (around 30,000 years ago).[12] Most stratified European finds come from the Magdalenian (late upper Palaeolithic). In this period, elaborate pieces, often in the form of animals, are common. The earliest reliable data concerning atlatls have come from several caves in France dating to the Upper Paleolithic, about 21,000 to 17,000 years ago. The earliest known example is a 17,500-year-old Solutrean atlatl made of reindeer antler, found at Combe Saunière (Dordogne), France.[13] It is possible that the atlatl was invented earlier than this, as Mungo Man from 42,000 BP displays arthritis in his right elbow, a pathology referred to today as the "Atlatl elbow," resulting from many years of forceful torsion from using an atlatl.[14]

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      fricking weird that in all those years guys still frick up their elbow from throwing

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You talking about baseball pitchers? The amount of throwing they do is obscene, not to mention the lifespan of a modern baseball player vs our far past ancestors involved in warfare. Not to mention I doubt they had recorded any mention of elbow blowouts back then if they did happen.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, the post I replied to said in the quote some caveman blew out his elbow throwing spears and that it was common enough to have a name

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Australian Aboriginals had "spear throwers" so could possible be older than that

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      fricking weird that in all those years guys still frick up their elbow from throwing

      Australian Aboriginals had "spear throwers" so could possible be older than that

      fricking weird that in all those years guys still frick up their elbow from throwing

      You talking about baseball pitchers? The amount of throwing they do is obscene, not to mention the lifespan of a modern baseball player vs our far past ancestors involved in warfare. Not to mention I doubt they had recorded any mention of elbow blowouts back then if they did happen.

      yeah, the post I replied to said in the quote some caveman blew out his elbow throwing spears and that it was common enough to have a name

      An interesting fact is that wheras bows almost totally supplanted atlatl in Eurasia well before urbanized civilizations became a thing, in the Americas both continued to be widely used even in Mesoamerica and the Andes when both had city-states, empires, etc.

      In Central Mexico during the time of Spanish contact for example, the Atlatl was seen as the more refined and cultured weapon to many Aztec city-states since it was associated with older civilizations like the Toltecs (who may or may not have been real) and Teotihuacan, wheras the bow was more associated with nomadic tribes in Northern Mexico who were seen as primitive. Mind you, not all "Aztec" groups had that cultural norms or to the same extent (The Aztecs also technically had chicbimeca ancestry so some of them intentionally worked that into their cultural identity as hardy warriors wheras others tried to establish themselves more as heirs to the Toltecs to have an intellectual image: The Mexica of the Aztec capital did both) so the bow still saw some use, but it wasn't the de facto ranged weapon of choice, and slings were also used.

      A key part of the reason the Purepecha Empire (in Western Mexico) btfo'd attempted Aztec invasions is that they made more extensive use of bows which combined with smart use of terrain allowed them to outrange Aztec armies, since Atlatl have more throwing power then simple bows but not as much range.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'll dump a few examples of Mesoamerican atlatl actually, since there's a handful of surviving ones

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/C7pQDhr.jpg

          [...]
          [...]
          [...]
          [...]
          [...]
          An interesting fact is that wheras bows almost totally supplanted atlatl in Eurasia well before urbanized civilizations became a thing, in the Americas both continued to be widely used even in Mesoamerica and the Andes when both had city-states, empires, etc.

          In Central Mexico during the time of Spanish contact for example, the Atlatl was seen as the more refined and cultured weapon to many Aztec city-states since it was associated with older civilizations like the Toltecs (who may or may not have been real) and Teotihuacan, wheras the bow was more associated with nomadic tribes in Northern Mexico who were seen as primitive. Mind you, not all "Aztec" groups had that cultural norms or to the same extent (The Aztecs also technically had chicbimeca ancestry so some of them intentionally worked that into their cultural identity as hardy warriors wheras others tried to establish themselves more as heirs to the Toltecs to have an intellectual image: The Mexica of the Aztec capital did both) so the bow still saw some use, but it wasn't the de facto ranged weapon of choice, and slings were also used.

          A key part of the reason the Purepecha Empire (in Western Mexico) btfo'd attempted Aztec invasions is that they made more extensive use of bows which combined with smart use of terrain allowed them to outrange Aztec armies, since Atlatl have more throwing power then simple bows but not as much range.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Here's a paper on the Aztec Atlatl in that last post which includes some diagrams of the engraving since it's a little hard to make out

            https://www.researchgate.net/figure/fig3_283093155

            Also choose a more zoomed in pic for the altatl pair in pic related to show the engravings better as well

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Don't have a better photo or diagram of this pair saved already sadly

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                There might be a few others but those are the ones I have saved.

                I know there's some from Andean (Inca, Nazca, Moche, Wari, Sican, Chimu, etc) civilizations too rather then Mesoamerican ones as well.

                In general I think these are a good example of how ornate Mesoamerican weapons can get. There's this idea of them being "stone age" which, while objectively wrong and fricking stupid to begin with since the region had bronze and since they had cities and aquaducts and other such things beyond anthing in Bronze age eurasia; is also dumb because it underestimates the complexity, variety, and quality of their weapons and tools: Even though stone and wood were the most common materials, high status or ceremonial Mesoamerican weapons could still be absurdly ornate with engravings, inlaid stone or metal pieces/mosiacs, etc.

                Honestly their feathered warsuits and shields are up there with those insane marble statues with sculptued cloth folds as some of the most impressive works of historical art ever to me, since the feathers were individually arranged to form patterns and designs. Not gonna dump a bunch of them since it's a tangent of a tangent, but pic related shows a feather mosiac "painting" made by Mesoamerican artists for the Spanish during the early colonial period, which uses the same technique as their prehispanic shields, warsuits, etc.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        neat

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You had villages pissed off at each other for minor shit. They would organize their men and attack with anything they had on hand. If the other village wasn't also organized and ready they'd be slaughtered.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      As far as anybody knows, we were all hunter gatherers pre 12,000 years ago. There might have been something similar to some kind of agriculture before then but it has yet to be proven definitively. Human society before agriculture was likely groups of 200-300 individuals living in nomadic tribes. If they had a "village" it was temporary.

      Funnily enough, most of our evolutionary psychology and many of our distinct physiological adaptations form during this very long period between homo-erectus and homo-sapien, 1.5 million years, judging from archeological findings, was most assuredly free from civilization.

      Before agriculture, there was likely no written language. With agriculture, there is documented examples of writing and the passing on of information from one generation to the next- and 12,000 years later here we are today.

      12,000 years certainly caused some changes in us- but we are still basically hunter gatherers trapped in a form of society and level of technology we are not truly adapted for.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only 13,000 years ago? seems kinda late tbh.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's racist to call them chimps, anon

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, war horses are relatively recent and also they were much smaller than the ones seen today. That's why at first they were used mostly for chariots, until they became big enough much later for altual cavalry.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I really want that India China border war to get hot, again. The melee weapon meta in 2023 sounds like it could be fricking wild.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty sure the first ones were ape dudes with a rock in hand, bashing the other one’s head open.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    According to wikipedia the first recorded battle that actually has an accurate record is the Battle of Megiddo in the 15th century BC.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Megiddo_(15th_century_BC)

    I mean obviously not the first major battle in human history, but the only one that is recorded at least.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being the first fricker to get like 500 guys together and just completely frick over everyone around you because they can only get about 100 dudes max.

    Yet nobody remembers because nothing was written down due to no language. The forgotten conquerors.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    War is older than the human race. Watch the Netflix series Chimp Empire, war parties over territory have always been a thing.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Naw mang they gave em mosins.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    missiles like slings, rocks, javelins, arrows and darts are your traditional individual ranged options.
    Fire, disease, flooding, looting, colonization are operational weapons.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      what would be the first strategic weapons used? breeding?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Genocide.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          breeding is a big part of genocide.
          just look at euope today.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is video footage of a couple of uncontacted tribes in New Guinea engaging in combat with each other. It resembles a deadly game of dodgeball, two sides piffing spears at each other and running around trying not to get hit. Very few actual casualties because nobody wanted to close the gap.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      kek, isn't that how pre miniball musket battles happened with both sides shooting, missing then a bayonet charge and someone flees?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      there were periods of time in prehistory where 'death by other human' was the most common cause of death for adult males, it mostly took shape like this with widespread frequent low intensity skirmishing

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >'death by other human' was the most common cause of death for adult males
        based

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I assume this is the one you are talking about. Interestingly the arrows are so slow that you can just dodge out of the way of them. Alot of primitive wars are like this, lots of noise and shit flinging but actual deaths are uncommon. IIRC there's an African region where tribes would take a few men to thrash eachother with long thin sticks until one side gave up, deaths could happen but we're uncommon.

      Part of it is due to live not being as expendable. Sure they could charge and hack at eachother, but even the winner would lose men, and in these relatively small groups that can have a big impact.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think this is where you can see the logical progression of warfare:
        Small tribes mean warfare is a skirmish affair. People can't really afford to lose lives, so you try to either get a lucky kill, or wound them so they frick off.
        But if you manage to get several tribes together, then the losses can be spread across them. You can also overwhelm the enemy with superior numbers (And number of missile weapons/arrows).
        And of course the only defense to this would be forming defensive alliances with other tribes who realize that divided they're going to get fricked up, or maybe they've all been affected by the enemy group's actions. Thus affiliations become psuedo nations, and so forth.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do you watch this without logging into youtube or some other gay shit?

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    /x/ here, there was another war 13k years ago. But it wasn't exactly us.

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The first wars were fought with UFO like craft that use spinning mercury as a power source and atomic weapons way more powerful than the ones we have now.

    t. Knower

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    13,000 years ago we were already starting to invent agriculture and founding the city of Jericho, pretty sure weapons would have evolved a little past "I picked up rock, now I hit you with rock."
    Hell, even fricking homosexual Erectus was already making rudimentary spears

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    didn't most societies do 'ritual' wars. Like you meet in a field and maybe one guy gets injured and his side is routed

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      there is strong evidence for this type of warfare being common in prehistoric societies. it survived in cultural memory for a very long time; there are mentions of this type of warfare in Rome's founding myths.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Romans in general waged warfare with a lot of weird quirks people generally wouldn't expect. Like Romans are supposed to be these turbo-autistic nation of road-building engineers who did most of stuff rationally, right? Well, wrong. For example, every single war Rome waged was also a religious war, they simply had no concept of war that wasn't also religious. They had whole lot of myths and rituals connected to it, including whack shit like commander's ritualized suicide that guaranteed victory, or cult of obedience and honor that put samurai acceptance of death to shame (like the famous Pompeii legionnaire, or scout centurion story). Romans were very spiritual, very religious, and lot of it was connected to war.

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Try 1.75 million, homie.
    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/essential-timeline-understanding-evolution-homo-sapiens-180976807/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acheulean

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >he doesn't know about the finno-korean hyper war

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      God, this must have been a deliberate choice.
      Ben must have approved that disapproving look before it was put on the 100.
      He knew that pursed mouth would make Americans think twice before dropping a tenth of a grand.

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >only 13,000 years ago
    but Venus de Willendorf was 60,000 years ago... I wonder why mankind suddenly becoming more warlike coincides with religious iconography and leaders becoming male instead of female? Hmmm... the over-aggressive disposable combat caste (males) could never aggression their way into leadership positions and derail the whole tribe and into a bunch of hypocritical killers and murdering rapist bandits styled as kings.. right??

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >mankind suddenly becoming more warlike
      There had never been a time when man was not warlike
      Before man was, War waited for him - the ultimate craft awaiting it's ultimate practitioner
      That is the way it was and will be, that way and not some other way

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ants came about 140,000,000 years before man, man mearly adopted war, ants were born in it, molded by it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          If ants are so good at war how come they've never defeated a human army?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Hahaha, you think any historian is going to risk angering the ants by talking about the true fall of Rome?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            they've survived for over a hundred million years, and will more than likely survive long after we are gone. so who's winning, anon?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          In terms of biomass weight there are more ants in world than humans. Spooky shit

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            In terms of biomass, beetles make up more than all other organisms combined

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      That might be the most moronic shit I've read on this site today. Hell I bet even crystalcafe doesn't come up with as much moronation.

      The Venus is considered to be only ca. 25.000 years old and we have no knowledge about its meaning and relevance.
      By virtue of it being prehistoric warfare we have very limited ideas what happened back then, leaving aside wether or not the definition of war could have even been applicable to circumstances back then.
      It is quite possible that solely due to the lower population density war as we know it was not a thing back then.
      Furthermore theories for the extinction of the Neanderthals did include not only interbreeding and a lack of resources but also targeted aggression by homosexual Sapiens.

      >mankind suddenly becoming more warlike
      There had never been a time when man was not warlike
      Before man was, War waited for him - the ultimate craft awaiting it's ultimate practitioner
      That is the way it was and will be, that way and not some other way

      Based blood meridian appreciator.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The Venus is considered to be only ca. 25.000 years old and we have no knowledge about its meaning and relevance.
        NTA, but false. Venus figurines were most likely fertility fetishes.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >archaeology gay
          lol, anything that archaeologists can't figure out is always classified as fetishes or cult/ritual objects

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            stop being a contrarian moron.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              i see I hit a nerve

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                man who throw own shit around and expect not be shout at, him not wise

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Men want to frick b***hes. Men want money. Women want money. Men use money to get b***hes to frick. Men go to war against competing men for more resources and more b***hes.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It kind of sucks that they already invented toxic masculinity and the patriarchy so early In our history and henceforth kept enforcing this type of behavior through social conditioning. Really shows how powerful social constructs are when they can be observed so early in our history. I'm positive, though, thst with enough feminist education and diversity we can finally out an end to this bloodshed.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/HvLNOlB.jpg

      >only 13,000 years ago
      but Venus de Willendorf was 60,000 years ago... I wonder why mankind suddenly becoming more warlike coincides with religious iconography and leaders becoming male instead of female? Hmmm... the over-aggressive disposable combat caste (males) could never aggression their way into leadership positions and derail the whole tribe and into a bunch of hypocritical killers and murdering rapist bandits styled as kings.. right??

      war is just part of who we are
      why fight it?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. Rambo 4

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Consider how much technique goes into a solid punch and good fighting form, the ass whooping era must’ve been insane. I doubt humans were immediately skilled boxers.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I doubt humans were immediately skilled boxers.
      see what chimps fighting looks like, that was more than likely our starting point as well.
      there's lots of hammer punches, biting and tossing rocks.

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >He doesnt know about SinoFinnish hyperwar
    NGMI

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >first war happened 13,000ish years ago
    Oh you naïve, happy child.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Sacrifice an entire ass hekatomb for victory in battle.
    >Get hit by a rock.
    Welp.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *