Find a flaw

Protip: you can't

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is terrible bait and your still probably going to get hundreds of replies.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Ambi controls
    >Bolt catch/release in trigger guard
    Fuck we wuz ahead of the time thenz

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is terrible bait and your still probably going to get hundreds of replies.

      >bolt catch release in trigger guard KYS noguns
      and for all these people who care about lefties im one and you never cared before, I found plenty of ways to operate your right handed guns quit acting like youre a 10%er the mia is perfect you just need an adjustable gas plug and suppressor no one here owns an m1a

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Son, what is that abomination of a rifle?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          gotta find a black walnut(juglans nigra) m1a stock if i'm gonna go classic look or a sage for memes
          tan archangel to gay? post yours gay

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >pull trigger
    >it goes bang
    IT'S PERFECT!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >pull trigger
      >it goes bang
      G u n

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this but unironically

      >ergos
      skill issue
      >weight
      don't care
      >reliability
      TRB
      >serviceability
      not my problem

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck ya mudda

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Facts, as a rifle not an assault rifle it makes perfect sense. AR-10s break apart even knights armament can’t get the bolt release and firing pin not to break. FALs are heavier and less accurate, G3s are also heavier but badass G3 owners and Bula M14 owners can be buds

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ordinance Department hands typed this post

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So what? The M14 won the trial fair and square cope you FALchud. For your sake don’t even bring up that joke of an AR-10

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its fine, if the AR-10 won I'm sure they would have changed something about its power and cleaning kit at the last minute like they did with the AR-15 and then we'd have old boomers bitching about it instead.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >power
          Powder*

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They gave Knights motherfucking armament a chance to make a good AR-10 and that thing was a POS with the firing ping breakages, bolt hold open breakages, and other small parts breaking.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Considering that the powder was the one used in the 7.62x51mm as standard.....

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Only the Ordinance Department could fuck up putting a detachable box mag on a Garand.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        When non-whites can do it faster and better you fucked up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ordinance

      Only the Ordinance Department could fuck up putting a detachable box mag on a Garand.

      >Ordinance
      Dumbasses.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    mag insertion is cancerous

    >t. actually own a gun im talking about online

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As someone who owns a Bula, that’s fair but relatively minor for the accuracy, light weight, and durability

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You just need to break your mags in, every time I get a new mag for it I need to basically beat it in but after a dozen or so insertions it's fine.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Really, why can't Springfield make a compete stainless model like the mini-14?

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I saw a picture of a M1A with a Magpul SGA stock...anybody have one?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like M-14 and Mini-14's can finally be viable in the modern day without a pistol grip

      Really looks like a gun that belongs in Warhammer 40K

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >8 MOA IS WELL WITHIN THE RANGE OF COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >parroting lies
      The M14 was 5 MOA on the worst guns and most were between 1-2 MOA.
      You can literally look this up.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Report on Tests for Ad Hoc Committee on Accuracy and Testing of 7.62mm Ammunition and M14 Rifles. Report No. DPS-741, Dates of Test: 28 September 1961 to 30 January 1962.

        “All of the rifles from Winchester and H&R exhibited excessive headspace.

        All of the rifles had loose handguards.

        Ninety-five percent of the rifles had loose stock bands.

        Ninety percent of the rifles had loose gas cylinders.

        Seventy-five percent of the rifles had misaligned op rods and gas pistons.

        Fifty percent of the rifles had loose op rod guides.

        Fifty percent of the rifles had op rods that rubbed the stock.

        Three rifles had barrels that exceed the maximum bore dimensions.

        Only three rifles had an average bore diameter that fell below the accepted mean diameter.

        One rifle was found to have a broken safety, while another had a misassembled safety spring.

        One rifle had a misassembled flash suppressor, which was actually contacting bullets during live-fire tests.”

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Of course this exact bit gets posted.
          Where's the primary source? For something like this it's funny that there is no apparently version of the original online.
          It's also funny how the numbers simply don;t add up. 90% of 21 rifles, were they reporting partial failures or fractional rifles?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I am an armorer in the Old Guard and of the 105 M-14s in my Arms Room, literally zero have any of these issues.

          Of course this exact bit gets posted.
          Where's the primary source? For something like this it's funny that there is no apparently version of the original online.
          It's also funny how the numbers simply don;t add up. 90% of 21 rifles, were they reporting partial failures or fractional rifles?

          Smells like bullshit.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've got an M21 clone that performs identically to the one Henry uses on the 9hole reviews channel on youtube. It cost me about $3k without the scope. And just like Henry, my buddy's $1.2k AR-10 shot an identical group, right out of the box, as my M21 did. I love my M21. It's cool, but it's novelty.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The M14 and Mini-14 have one giant flaw, when the bolt goes back there's a giant fucking opening that crap can get into.
    Also, the M14's operating rod system is exposed, which can get jammed up if debris gets in it.
    The Mini-14 fares a bit better because it has a cover over it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This literally isn't an issue, you're not shooting it during a sandstorm and any other environment it will do just fine in.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but thats the fun part anon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      m1911 nibbas are the masterrace

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      m1911 nibbas are the masterrace

      What I never understood with retard caw ah dooty black ops zombies is that why does the M14 get only 8 rounds? Even packapunched you get 16 rounds, it comes standard with a 20 round mag why don’t you give me a 20 round mag?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gameplay balance

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gotta let Olympiatards feel slightly less inferior.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Balance carryover from WaW, same reason the 1911 does dick all for damage while the CZ blows bros away.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes but what if shorter

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where am I supposed to put the bayonet?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bayonet belongs on the end of the 590

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What if bullpup?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Find a flaw
    I don't own one. that's the only problem.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well for starters, that poor GI's fingers look like they're about to get smashed once it cycles.
    Anyways, perfect for it's intended role in a European ground war against a peer opponent. Not so perfect for some shithole jungle across the world.
    Same deal with the M16 and other assault rifles. Perfect for irrelevant terrorist-infested shitholes across the world, not so perfect in peer to peer combat across the open plains of Europe.
    The brass will, for some reason or another, never understand this and continue to flip flop that the old way was all wrong despite stellar service in previous conflicts and that the new way was something all those dead dipshits never coulda thought of. We did this with the M16, we're doing this now with the XM5, and we're going to do it again in another 50 to 60 years or so. It's like using horse archers on wide open plains and steppes to great effect, running into a jungle or thickly forested region they can't traverse and aren't effective at, and the generals giving the order to turn all their shitty useless horses across the empire into glue and restructure our forces around foot infantry only. Then when we get fucked up back on the plains, we buy more horses and scrap our footmen. Any sane person might just say "maybe each of these has a niche they fulfill" and assign them each their place.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Well for starters, that poor GI's fingers look like they're about to get smashed once it cycles.

      The manual of arms instructs you to hold those types of rifles like like that. Why? nobody knows but it's common sense to not touch the fast moving metal bit so you won't get hurt and make a mockery of fine American engineering by causing a stoppage (criticizing shit designs is anti American and a threat to our democracy).

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I was just commenting on how the guy's finger is on a moving part is all. Can't say I've shot an M14 or M1A myself, but I've been able to fuck with the action a little and I know that what his fingertips are on is part of the bolt. At the very least I can assume that raised section behind it with the charging lever is probably going to cut into something as it slams back home, or at least leave a bruise. Maybe it's nothing, but having body parts in a moving machine usually means bad things as far as I know.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I was just commenting on how the guy's finger is on a moving part is all. Can't say I've shot an M14 or M1A myself, but I've been able to fuck with the action a little and I know that what his fingertips are on is part of the bolt. At the very least I can assume that raised section behind it with the charging lever is probably going to cut into something as it slams back home, or at least leave a bruise. Maybe it's nothing, but having body parts in a moving machine usually means bad things as far as I know.

        It's fine, the most you might do if you're death griping the gun is slow down the oprod which might cause a jam but I never had it happen.
        The actual scary bit is far away from the hand.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Same problem on the garand. Rear sight is insufficiently protected.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like the M14 a lot, but it's gas system is pretty shitty. It's a tiny short stroke piston that can corrode, and you need a special wrench to access it, and it needs to be tightened with a specific torque. M14 is still my favorite of the big three.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >special wrench
      Uhhhhh no. A adjustable wrench is all you need.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Find a flaw
    >Protip: you can't
    Simple As This OP

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *