Falklands War

Reminder British Paras summarily executed three US citizens who were captured as POWs during the Falklands War.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Argentina won politically.
    >Argentinian and British dictators go to war over some Islands in order to win popular support
    >Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
    >Britain wins militarily, British dictator gains popular support and is reelected, British people suffer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >British dictators
      What shithole do you hail from?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly based. If I ran into some fricktard Brits helping to invade Guam or some shit I'd waste em too.

      >Argentinian people thrive
      lmao, yeah I'm sure you'll get those malvinas next time my "white" friend.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >If I ran into some fricktard Brits helping to invade Guam or some shit I'd waste em too.
        Are you Cuban or from Guam? Why would you waste em if they were helping you?
        Fricking moron.

        I don't know who's flag flies over Luhansk. You're asking how the bongs coped with their naval losses, I'm leading you to the answer.
        >They bayoneted Argentinian conscripts hiding in trenches and then hoisted their flag over port Stanley

        >Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land
        Okay Nigel Ivan Pilkingtonvich.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land
          >Casualties
          >British: 255 killed, 775 wounded, 107 captured
          >Argentinian: Casualties:
          649 killed, 1,657 wounded, 11,313 captured

          My brown friend, are there any other copes you want vanquished or are we done here?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >British: 2 destroyers, 2 frigates, 1 land ship logistics, 1 merchant navy ship & 1 LCU sunk
            >Argentina: 1 cruiser, 1 transport ship, 1 armed coaster, 1 cargo ship sunk
            >Britain suffered nearly DOUBLE the naval casualties as Argentina
            lol
            lmao
            >Irish
            >brown
            My complexion is literally whiter than yours, Sassanach.

            >Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
            So the Argentine state lost
            Victory does not necessarily entail that the people enjoy a positive long-term outcome, only that the belligerent initially involved achieves the goals outlined at the beginning of the war. In this case, the Argentinian government that invaded the Falklands failed to retain control of them, and so they lost.
            [...]
            The two militaries were more evenly matched and were engaged in a naval war on the other side of the ocean rather than a ground war in their backyard.

            >The two militaries were more evenly matched
            Well that sure is some fine ass cope. Tantamount to Russia fighting all of NATO at once without even fully mobilizing.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Brits suffer less casualties
              >B... But the ships
              And?

              >I'm Irish
              You said you're American. So no. Not Irish.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Brits suffer less casualties
                You'd figure an Englishman would be able to at least read fricking English.
                See

                https://i.imgur.com/RtCYCR5.png

                >HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK
                >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK
                >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK
                >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK
                >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK
                >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
                How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?

                >getting Moskva'd
                I'm clearly talking about naval casualties, moron.
                Keep up the delicious cope.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No! You're coping! You're losing according to the arbitrary goalposts I have set! The fact that the brits sailed across the planet, inflicted 2:1 casualties and recaptured the Islands is irrelevant!
                Submitting such imbecility for my perusal leads me to believe you truly are Irish.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >fight third world impoverished dictatorship
                >lose 6 ships
                kek

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Sail around the world
                >Put put two thousand argies in the ground
                >Capture 11 thousand more
                >Sink the Argentinian flagship (oopsie!)
                >Cause the Argentinian government to collapse
                Kek indeed

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Falklands Status: Eternally British
                >Ireland Status: Eternally Divided

                Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives, particularly in the case of nations with independent naval shipbuilding capabilities, unlike Argentina and your imagined homeland.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
      So the Argentine state lost
      Victory does not necessarily entail that the people enjoy a positive long-term outcome, only that the belligerent initially involved achieves the goals outlined at the beginning of the war. In this case, the Argentinian government that invaded the Falklands failed to retain control of them, and so they lost.

      https://i.imgur.com/RtCYCR5.png

      >HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK
      >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK
      >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK
      >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK
      >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK
      >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
      How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?

      The two militaries were more evenly matched and were engaged in a naval war on the other side of the ocean rather than a ground war in their backyard.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >dictator
      shut up brown moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        See

        https://i.imgur.com/HiHMbjm.jpg

        >against the interests of your country,
        Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.

        [...]
        The United States of America. I'm white, too.
        If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit

        pink illiterate mutton chopped moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm meant to trust you at your word when you're spouting bullshit? You're not believable.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            At my word? Look into Pat Finucane your fricking self you invalid. Can you not read?
            Here's your last spoonfeeding; a free fricking documentary on the assassination, watch it and fricking weep,
            https://tubitv.com/movies/475694/collusion

            >No! You're coping! You're losing according to the arbitrary goalposts I have set! The fact that the brits sailed across the planet, inflicted 2:1 casualties and recaptured the Islands is irrelevant!
            Submitting such imbecility for my perusal leads me to believe you truly are Irish.

            >Royal navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country
            >IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE [COPE] AND IT ISN'T COPE TO SAY SO!!

            >Falklands Status: Eternally British
            >Ireland Status: Eternally Divided

            Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives, particularly in the case of nations with independent naval shipbuilding capabilities, unlike Argentina and your imagined homeland.

            >Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives,
            Literally vatnik talking point on the Moskva lmao. Thank you so much, you're too moronic to know it, but your oblivious pathetic cope is so obvious and brings joy to many.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country
              So they lost the war? They didn't project force onto the other side of the planet?

              What's the argument here?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >So they lost the war?
                Again, just like Russians, saying their losses are excusable because "Ukraine wont win the war."
                Cope more, please. Keep dancing for our amusement you silly, silly monkey.

                https://i.imgur.com/d2jDSFc.jpg

                frick off commie

                Not an argument. I accept your concession to the existence of Thatcher's dictatorship.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if you don't vote for labour, it's a dictatorship
                jog on commie mong

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >If your prime minister frees terrorists from prison and pays them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer at dinner in front of his family, it's a dictatorship
                Yes, absolutely. Do you have an argument to the contrary?

                >Doesn't know what a dictatorship is
                >Doesn't know what victory is
                Post hands.

                't know what a dictatorship is
                't know what victory is
                Literal projection lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Literally doesn't know what the word means. Not even in the slightest.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Doesn't know what a dictatorship is
                >Doesn't know what victory is
                Post hands.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              frick off commie

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >pink illiterate mutton chopped moron
          Weird thing for a totally white person to say

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >three (3) votes for no
        lmao that's so low I'm almost inclined to believe they were accidental

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/HiHMbjm.jpg

      >against the interests of your country,
      Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.

      [...]
      The United States of America. I'm white, too.
      If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit

      Don't you have a bottle of booze to drain?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >dictator
      >reelected
      Oh you're one of those people that thinks you can vote out a dictator.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Is Putin not a dictator, or was he not reelected?
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Russian_presidential_election

        You guys really are just English speaking vatniks.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Even the Nazis held "elections" after banning all other parties and therefore getting well over 90% of the vote
          Yeah Putin was "elected" but the election was designed for him to win it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Friendly reminder if you go to war as a mercenary against the interests of your country, you might be legally executed on the spot as "it's not technically legal but since no one gives a frick about you it might as well be"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >against the interests of your country,
      Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.

      >British dictators
      What shithole do you hail from?

      The United States of America. I'm white, too.
      If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Cute larp

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >American who's never stepped foot in a church, let alone Ireland
        I'm thinking 16-19, no gf, and certainly noguns.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Based Irishman

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Plastic paddies aren't Irish.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off mick
        Mick genocide

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK
    >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK
    >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK
    >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK
    >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK
    >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
    How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Falklands status?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Luhansk status?
        This is how you sound.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cool. Srs question tho, who's flag flies over the Falklands?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Cool. Srs question tho, who's flag flies over Luhansk?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't know who's flag flies over Luhansk. You're asking how the bongs coped with their naval losses, I'm leading you to the answer.
              >They bayoneted Argentinian conscripts hiding in trenches and then hoisted their flag over port Stanley

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What the frick are you even trying to argue here? Are you autistic?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >How did they cope with their naval losses?
              >By winning the war

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy.
    Filthy shit smearing monkey worshipper cope.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianna_Ortiz
    The nun Dianna Ortiz always maintained that when she was kidnapped by the government security forces in Guatemala there was a man with a "North American accent" in the room while she was being raped and interrogated

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i mean if they were mercenaries then frick em
    you don't just get to kill for money and expect to get away with it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Every war is fought over money. The reality is that you're either fighting for your own personal gain, or you've been convinced to fight for some abstract political ideology by others who stand to gain from your 'sacrifice'.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Argentina wasn't Rhodesia. When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
    Two more likely scenarios:
    1) US special forces trainers or intelligence attaches
    2) American citizens that grew up in Argentina and were groomed for intelligence/military work because of their citizenship status - this was the case here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Orlando_Letelier

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
      Do you know fricking nothing about Latin America during the Cold War or what?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        see 2)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
      They probably weren't. It's much more probable that they were guys from argentinian families raised in the US that came back to fight for their old country, just like many "mercenaries" in Ukraine right now.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good
    Death to amerimutts

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    HMS Sheffield: rest in piss.
    Now England is even bigger shithole than Argentina KEK.

    Despite argies being poorer their culture and society is superior to the trashy brits dominated by secret society rothschilds and the paki prime minister. Look at the respective national teams of england and argentina, should tell you everything you need to know

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >English get absolutely shit on by chad pilots with World War 2 tech at best flying too low for radar

    KINO. Sheffield rekt. Exocet missile for the win

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Jackass can't even get the launch platform right
      Post hands.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        post sheffield. Oh wait its at the bottom of the ocean

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          wog

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            but enough about England's national team, prime minister, and populace

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Post Falklands

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            imagine losing 6 british naval ships for some shitty rocks off the coast of one of the most irrelevant countries of all time

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              A country made irrelevant by the war 🙂

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Implying Argentina was ever relevant in history
                Piss poor cope Nigel, get over it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Get over what?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                not even close. Argentina hasn't been relevant since the early 1800s LMAO

                If anything this war exposed the british to be absolutely fallen from former glory for losing 6 ships against a poor latin american country

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Argentina
                >Ever relevant
                Keep coping lmao

                >Malding
                Sorry Maggie mogged ur Junta m8.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Maggie's junta freed the Argentinian people after having her navy humiliated, then continued to assassinate British citizens
                Now British citizens defend her honor, baka

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Doesn't know what Junta means either

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Argentina
                >Ever relevant
                Keep coping lmao

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good job remembering English-speakers don't call them the Maldives OP. A quarter of a penny (i.e. one Argentinian funbuck) has been deposited in your account.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    he genuinely doesn't know what a dictator is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Literally doesn't know what the word means. Not even in the slightest.

      >The state literally sponsoring the assassination of lawyers for serving the "wrong" clients isn't a dictatorship
      lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. Words have meaning.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    /misc/ is leaking but those guys had it coming. They were AWOL looking for fun iirc

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    sheffield status: cannot be redeemed, sir

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cool. Mercenaries get zero protections, that's surely no secret to anybody. How did those dumb Black folk expect things to go? It would be like if a bunch of Americans were captured while fighting for the Russians, the state dept would probably tell the Ukrainians "ah frickit, just make them go away ands make sure this doesn't get to the media". Probably happens more often than you think, regardless of the legality of it.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Believing that a book about a war is 100% accurate
    >Believing that a book about a war written by a brit is accurate at all
    I'd call you a moron, but that would be an insult to all the tards in the world.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Perfidy Argentinians and mercenaries were shot
        Based, maintaining only the sheer minimum necessary to keep it legal.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *