Reminder that Argentina won politically. >Argentinian and British dictators go to war over some Islands in order to win popular support >Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive >Britain wins militarily, British dictator gains popular support and is reelected, British people suffer
>If I ran into some fucktard Brits helping to invade Guam or some shit I'd waste em too.
Are you Cuban or from Guam? Why would you waste em if they were helping you?
Fucking retard.
I don't know who's flag flies over Luhansk. You're asking how the bongs coped with their naval losses, I'm leading you to the answer. >They bayoneted Argentinian conscripts hiding in trenches and then hoisted their flag over port Stanley
>Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land
Okay Nigel Ivan Pilkingtonvich.
>Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land >Casualties >British: 255 killed, 775 wounded, 107 captured >Argentinian: Casualties:
649 killed, 1,657 wounded, 11,313 captured
My brown friend, are there any other copes you want vanquished or are we done here?
>British: 2 destroyers, 2 frigates, 1 land ship logistics, 1 merchant navy ship & 1 LCU sunk >Argentina: 1 cruiser, 1 transport ship, 1 armed coaster, 1 cargo ship sunk >Britain suffered nearly DOUBLE the naval casualties as Argentina
lol
lmao >Irish >brown
My complexion is literally whiter than yours, Sassanach.
>Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
So the Argentine state lost
Victory does not necessarily entail that the people enjoy a positive long-term outcome, only that the belligerent initially involved achieves the goals outlined at the beginning of the war. In this case, the Argentinian government that invaded the Falklands failed to retain control of them, and so they lost.
[...]
The two militaries were more evenly matched and were engaged in a naval war on the other side of the ocean rather than a ground war in their backyard.
>The two militaries were more evenly matched
Well that sure is some fine ass cope. Tantamount to Russia fighting all of NATO at once without even fully mobilizing.
>Brits suffer less casualties >B... But the ships
And?
>I'm Irish
You said you're American. So no. Not Irish.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Brits suffer less casualties
You'd figure an Englishman would be able to at least read fucking English.
See
https://i.imgur.com/RtCYCR5.png
>HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?
>getting Moskva'd
I'm clearly talking about naval casualties, retard.
Keep up the delicious cope.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>No! You're coping! You're losing according to the arbitrary goalposts I have set! The fact that the brits sailed across the planet, inflicted 2:1 casualties and recaptured the Islands is irrelevant!
Submitting such imbecility for my perusal leads me to believe you truly are Irish.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>fight third world impoverished dictatorship >lose 6 ships
kek
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Sail around the world >Put put two thousand argies in the ground >Capture 11 thousand more >Sink the Argentinian flagship (oopsie!) >Cause the Argentinian government to collapse
Kek indeed
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Falklands Status: Eternally British >Ireland Status: Eternally Divided
Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives, particularly in the case of nations with independent naval shipbuilding capabilities, unlike Argentina and your imagined homeland.
>Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
So the Argentine state lost
Victory does not necessarily entail that the people enjoy a positive long-term outcome, only that the belligerent initially involved achieves the goals outlined at the beginning of the war. In this case, the Argentinian government that invaded the Falklands failed to retain control of them, and so they lost.
https://i.imgur.com/RtCYCR5.png
>HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?
The two militaries were more evenly matched and were engaged in a naval war on the other side of the ocean rather than a ground war in their backyard.
>against the interests of your country,
Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.
[...]
The United States of America. I'm white, too.
If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit
At my word? Look into Pat Finucane your fucking self you invalid. Can you not read?
Here's your last spoonfeeding; a free fucking documentary on the assassination, watch it and fucking weep,
https://tubitv.com/movies/475694/collusion
>No! You're coping! You're losing according to the arbitrary goalposts I have set! The fact that the brits sailed across the planet, inflicted 2:1 casualties and recaptured the Islands is irrelevant!
Submitting such imbecility for my perusal leads me to believe you truly are Irish.
>Royal navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country >IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE [COPE] AND IT ISN'T COPE TO SAY SO!!
>Falklands Status: Eternally British >Ireland Status: Eternally Divided
Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives, particularly in the case of nations with independent naval shipbuilding capabilities, unlike Argentina and your imagined homeland.
>Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives,
Literally vatnik talking point on the Moskva lmao. Thank you so much, you're too retarded to know it, but your oblivious pathetic cope is so obvious and brings joy to many.
navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country
So they lost the war? They didn't project force onto the other side of the planet?
What's the argument here?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>So they lost the war?
Again, just like Russians, saying their losses are excusable because "Ukraine wont win the war."
Cope more, please. Keep dancing for our amusement you silly, silly monkey.
https://i.imgur.com/d2jDSFc.jpg
fuck off commie
Not an argument. I accept your concession to the existence of Thatcher's dictatorship.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>if you don't vote for labour, it's a dictatorship
jog on commie mong
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>If your prime minister frees terrorists from prison and pays them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer at dinner in front of his family, it's a dictatorship
Yes, absolutely. Do you have an argument to the contrary?
>Doesn't know what a dictatorship is >Doesn't know what victory is
Post hands.
't know what a dictatorship is
't know what victory is
Literal projection lmao
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Literally doesn't know what the word means. Not even in the slightest.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Doesn't know what a dictatorship is >Doesn't know what victory is
Post hands.
>against the interests of your country,
Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.
[...]
The United States of America. I'm white, too.
If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit
Even the Nazis held "elections" after banning all other parties and therefore getting well over 90% of the vote
Yeah Putin was "elected" but the election was designed for him to win it.
Friendly reminder if you go to war as a mercenary against the interests of your country, you might be legally executed on the spot as "it's not technically legal but since no one gives a fuck about you it might as well be"
>against the interests of your country,
Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.
>British dictators
What shithole do you hail from?
The United States of America. I'm white, too.
If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit
>HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK >HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK >HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK >HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK >SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK >RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?
I don't know who's flag flies over Luhansk. You're asking how the bongs coped with their naval losses, I'm leading you to the answer. >They bayoneted Argentinian conscripts hiding in trenches and then hoisted their flag over port Stanley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianna_Ortiz
The nun Dianna Ortiz always maintained that when she was kidnapped by the government security forces in Guatemala there was a man with a "North American accent" in the room while she was being raped and interrogated
Every war is fought over money. The reality is that you're either fighting for your own personal gain, or you've been convinced to fight for some abstract political ideology by others who stand to gain from your 'sacrifice'.
Argentina wasn't Rhodesia. When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
Two more likely scenarios:
1) US special forces trainers or intelligence attaches
2) American citizens that grew up in Argentina and were groomed for intelligence/military work because of their citizenship status - this was the case here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Orlando_Letelier
>When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
They probably weren't. It's much more probable that they were guys from argentinian families raised in the US that came back to fight for their old country, just like many "mercenaries" in Ukraine right now.
HMS Sheffield: rest in piss.
Now England is even bigger shithole than Argentina KEK.
Despite argies being poorer their culture and society is superior to the trashy brits dominated by secret society rothschilds and the paki prime minister. Look at the respective national teams of england and argentina, should tell you everything you need to know
>Implying Argentina was ever relevant in history
Piss poor cope Nigel, get over it
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Get over what?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
not even close. Argentina hasn't been relevant since the early 1800s LMAO
If anything this war exposed the british to be absolutely fallen from former glory for losing 6 ships against a poor latin american country
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Argentina >Ever relevant
Keep coping lmao
>Malding
Sorry Maggie mogged ur Junta m8.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Maggie's junta freed the Argentinian people after having her navy humiliated, then continued to assassinate British citizens
Now British citizens defend her honor, baka
Good job remembering English-speakers don't call them the Maldives OP. A quarter of a penny (i.e. one Argentinian funbuck) has been deposited in your account.
Cool. Mercenaries get zero protections, that's surely no secret to anybody. How did those dumb morons expect things to go? It would be like if a bunch of Americans were captured while fighting for the Russians, the state dept would probably tell the Ukrainians "ah fuckit, just make them go away ands make sure this doesn't get to the media". Probably happens more often than you think, regardless of the legality of it.
>Believing that a book about a war is 100% accurate >Believing that a book about a war written by a brit is accurate at all
I'd call you a retard, but that would be an insult to all the tards in the world.
Reminder that Argentina won politically.
>Argentinian and British dictators go to war over some Islands in order to win popular support
>Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
>Britain wins militarily, British dictator gains popular support and is reelected, British people suffer
>British dictators
What shithole do you hail from?
Honestly based. If I ran into some fucktard Brits helping to invade Guam or some shit I'd waste em too.
>Argentinian people thrive
lmao, yeah I'm sure you'll get those malvinas next time my "white" friend.
>If I ran into some fucktard Brits helping to invade Guam or some shit I'd waste em too.
Are you Cuban or from Guam? Why would you waste em if they were helping you?
Fucking retard.
>Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land
Okay Nigel Ivan Pilkingtonvich.
>Casualties and humiliation don't matter so long as I keep some land
>Casualties
>British: 255 killed, 775 wounded, 107 captured
>Argentinian: Casualties:
649 killed, 1,657 wounded, 11,313 captured
My brown friend, are there any other copes you want vanquished or are we done here?
>British: 2 destroyers, 2 frigates, 1 land ship logistics, 1 merchant navy ship & 1 LCU sunk
>Argentina: 1 cruiser, 1 transport ship, 1 armed coaster, 1 cargo ship sunk
>Britain suffered nearly DOUBLE the naval casualties as Argentina
lol
lmao
>Irish
>brown
My complexion is literally whiter than yours, Sassanach.
>The two militaries were more evenly matched
Well that sure is some fine ass cope. Tantamount to Russia fighting all of NATO at once without even fully mobilizing.
>Brits suffer less casualties
>B... But the ships
And?
>I'm Irish
You said you're American. So no. Not Irish.
>Brits suffer less casualties
You'd figure an Englishman would be able to at least read fucking English.
See
>getting Moskva'd
I'm clearly talking about naval casualties, retard.
Keep up the delicious cope.
>No! You're coping! You're losing according to the arbitrary goalposts I have set! The fact that the brits sailed across the planet, inflicted 2:1 casualties and recaptured the Islands is irrelevant!
Submitting such imbecility for my perusal leads me to believe you truly are Irish.
>fight third world impoverished dictatorship
>lose 6 ships
kek
>Sail around the world
>Put put two thousand argies in the ground
>Capture 11 thousand more
>Sink the Argentinian flagship (oopsie!)
>Cause the Argentinian government to collapse
Kek indeed
>Falklands Status: Eternally British
>Ireland Status: Eternally Divided
Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives, particularly in the case of nations with independent naval shipbuilding capabilities, unlike Argentina and your imagined homeland.
>Argentina loses militarily, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
So the Argentine state lost
Victory does not necessarily entail that the people enjoy a positive long-term outcome, only that the belligerent initially involved achieves the goals outlined at the beginning of the war. In this case, the Argentinian government that invaded the Falklands failed to retain control of them, and so they lost.
The two militaries were more evenly matched and were engaged in a naval war on the other side of the ocean rather than a ground war in their backyard.
>dictator
shut up brown retard
See
pink illiterate mutton chopped retard
I'm meant to trust you at your word when you're spouting bullshit? You're not believable.
At my word? Look into Pat Finucane your fucking self you invalid. Can you not read?
Here's your last spoonfeeding; a free fucking documentary on the assassination, watch it and fucking weep,
https://tubitv.com/movies/475694/collusion
>Royal navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country
>IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE [COPE] AND IT ISN'T COPE TO SAY SO!!
>Ships are expendable assets in the service of strategic objectives,
Literally vatnik talking point on the Moskva lmao. Thank you so much, you're too retarded to know it, but your oblivious pathetic cope is so obvious and brings joy to many.
navy, supposed to 'rule the waves,' suffers near 2:1 naval casualties to a latin american third world country
So they lost the war? They didn't project force onto the other side of the planet?
What's the argument here?
>So they lost the war?
Again, just like Russians, saying their losses are excusable because "Ukraine wont win the war."
Cope more, please. Keep dancing for our amusement you silly, silly monkey.
Not an argument. I accept your concession to the existence of Thatcher's dictatorship.
>if you don't vote for labour, it's a dictatorship
jog on commie mong
>If your prime minister frees terrorists from prison and pays them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer at dinner in front of his family, it's a dictatorship
Yes, absolutely. Do you have an argument to the contrary?
't know what a dictatorship is
't know what victory is
Literal projection lmao
>Literally doesn't know what the word means. Not even in the slightest.
>Doesn't know what a dictatorship is
>Doesn't know what victory is
Post hands.
fuck off commie
>pink illiterate mutton chopped retard
Weird thing for a totally white person to say
>three (3) votes for no
lmao that's so low I'm almost inclined to believe they were accidental
Don't you have a bottle of booze to drain?
>dictator
>reelected
Oh you're one of those people that thinks you can vote out a dictator.
Is Putin not a dictator, or was he not reelected?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Russian_presidential_election
You guys really are just English speaking vatniks.
Even the Nazis held "elections" after banning all other parties and therefore getting well over 90% of the vote
Yeah Putin was "elected" but the election was designed for him to win it.
Friendly reminder if you go to war as a mercenary against the interests of your country, you might be legally executed on the spot as "it's not technically legal but since no one gives a fuck about you it might as well be"
>against the interests of your country,
Killing Br*ts is always in American interests.
The United States of America. I'm white, too.
If you release protestant terrorists from prison and pay them to assassinate a civil rights lawyer in front of his family at the dinner table, you are a dictator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane#Killing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Research_Unit
Cute larp
>American who's never stepped foot in a church, let alone Ireland
I'm thinking 16-19, no gf, and certainly noguns.
Based Irishman
Plastic paddies aren't Irish.
Fuck off mick
Mick genocide
>HMS Sheffield (D80): SUNK
>HMS Coventry (D118): SUNK
>HMS Ardent (F184): SUNK
>HMS Antelope (F170): SUNK
>SS Atlantic Conveyor: SUNK
>RFA Sir Galahad (1966): SUNK
How do Br*ts cope with getting Moskva'd 6x by a Latin American country?
Falklands status?
>Luhansk status?
This is how you sound.
Cool. Srs question tho, who's flag flies over the Falklands?
>Cool. Srs question tho, who's flag flies over Luhansk?
I don't know who's flag flies over Luhansk. You're asking how the bongs coped with their naval losses, I'm leading you to the answer.
>They bayoneted Argentinian conscripts hiding in trenches and then hoisted their flag over port Stanley
What the fuck are you even trying to argue here? Are you autistic?
>How did they cope with their naval losses?
>By winning the war
Oh boy.
Filthy shit smearing monkey worshipper cope.
Good.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianna_Ortiz
The nun Dianna Ortiz always maintained that when she was kidnapped by the government security forces in Guatemala there was a man with a "North American accent" in the room while she was being raped and interrogated
i mean if they were mercenaries then fuck em
you don't just get to kill for money and expect to get away with it
Every war is fought over money. The reality is that you're either fighting for your own personal gain, or you've been convinced to fight for some abstract political ideology by others who stand to gain from your 'sacrifice'.
Argentina wasn't Rhodesia. When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
Two more likely scenarios:
1) US special forces trainers or intelligence attaches
2) American citizens that grew up in Argentina and were groomed for intelligence/military work because of their citizenship status - this was the case here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Orlando_Letelier
>>When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
Do you know fucking nothing about Latin America during the Cold War or what?
see 2)
>When, how, and why would they have mercenaries?
They probably weren't. It's much more probable that they were guys from argentinian families raised in the US that came back to fight for their old country, just like many "mercenaries" in Ukraine right now.
Good
Death to amerimutts
HMS Sheffield: rest in piss.
Now England is even bigger shithole than Argentina KEK.
Despite argies being poorer their culture and society is superior to the trashy brits dominated by secret society rothschilds and the paki prime minister. Look at the respective national teams of england and argentina, should tell you everything you need to know
>English get absolutely shit on by chad pilots with World War 2 tech at best flying too low for radar
KINO. Sheffield rekt. Exocet missile for the win
>Jackass can't even get the launch platform right
Post hands.
post sheffield. Oh wait its at the bottom of the ocean
wog
but enough about England's national team, prime minister, and populace
Post Falklands
imagine losing 6 british naval ships for some shitty rocks off the coast of one of the most irrelevant countries of all time
A country made irrelevant by the war 🙂
>Implying Argentina was ever relevant in history
Piss poor cope Nigel, get over it
Get over what?
not even close. Argentina hasn't been relevant since the early 1800s LMAO
If anything this war exposed the british to be absolutely fallen from former glory for losing 6 ships against a poor latin american country
>Malding
Sorry Maggie mogged ur Junta m8.
Maggie's junta freed the Argentinian people after having her navy humiliated, then continued to assassinate British citizens
Now British citizens defend her honor, baka
>Doesn't know what Junta means either
>Argentina
>Ever relevant
Keep coping lmao
Good job remembering English-speakers don't call them the Maldives OP. A quarter of a penny (i.e. one Argentinian funbuck) has been deposited in your account.
he genuinely doesn't know what a dictator is
>The state literally sponsoring the assassination of lawyers for serving the "wrong" clients isn't a dictatorship
lmao
Yes. Words have meaning.
4chan is leaking but those guys had it coming. They were AWOL looking for fun iirc
sheffield status: cannot be redeemed, sir
Cool. Mercenaries get zero protections, that's surely no secret to anybody. How did those dumb morons expect things to go? It would be like if a bunch of Americans were captured while fighting for the Russians, the state dept would probably tell the Ukrainians "ah fuckit, just make them go away ands make sure this doesn't get to the media". Probably happens more often than you think, regardless of the legality of it.
>Believing that a book about a war is 100% accurate
>Believing that a book about a war written by a brit is accurate at all
I'd call you a retard, but that would be an insult to all the tards in the world.
>Perfidy Argentinians and mercenaries were shot
Based, maintaining only the sheer minimum necessary to keep it legal.