I don't know. Argentina's army is a lot worse off compared to the previous attempt. UK's army might not be in the best shape possible currently, but it is still far superior in training, resources and tech. It would be an extremely short conflict unless Argentina's president is willing to genocide Argenitna's male population, Putin style
The only reason the Falklands were even remotely close was because there was mostly parity in the air with Harriers vs A-4s. Fast forward to 2023 and now it's F-35Bs vs the same shitty A-4s Argentina was using in the 80s
Falklanders while being a small population also are all armed to the teeth now and likely would put up way more of a resistance too. The guerilla activity would buy the UK plenty of time.
>A-4 as only jet >all AAVP gone >no aa capabilities.
with fucking what?
Brits could literary bomb Buenos Aires to the ground with only 1/3 of the RAF power and there would be no Bueno for Aires
Because its March
Anniversary of the war coming up, so a lot of newspapers are putting out articles saying a new war is imminent to get easy clicks, they do this every year
>Can Argentina take the Falklands again?
No. >Can the UK take them back again?
I'm not even convinced the garrison would lose them. >What would Falklands war 2 look like?
A murder-rape. The geopolitical conditions of the first war which caused the United States to sit it out no longer exist today. It would be a convenient excuse to force Argentina to sign some kind of treaty allowing British and American ships to base out of a leased plot of land, the war would be relatively one sided provided there was no massive occupation, and it would check Chinese influence in the country.
At this point I'm like 90% sure these threads are made by some brit that likes jerking off to "muh superior army".
They are always written in the same manner.
Everytime Argentina spergs about the islands, all you need to do is look up the value of the Peso to USD, that will answer the question every single time
I don't know. Argentina's army is a lot worse off compared to the previous attempt. UK's army might not be in the best shape possible currently, but it is still far superior in training, resources and tech. It would be an extremely short conflict unless Argentina's president is willing to genocide Argenitna's male population, Putin style
Argentina can't take a guess, let alone Falklands.
Ni en pedo.
>He was so happy back then
If I could turn back time...
He chose a mutt thot over guns, take this as a lesson lads.
Marryinf an American personal victim will do that for you.
It was good he left the pedo monarchy
Implying Hollywood any better.
Argentina had a navy ship sink in fucking dock a few years ago and haven't put any more money in since then, what do you think?
I've read about this incident, the ship wasn't part of the navy anymore, it didn't even have a crew or a commission, it was basically abandoned
Bad for both sides but at least the UK can project power at sea still.
>Bad for both sides but at least the UK can project power at sea still.
but would that Argentinians make a sequel to that Falkland war cartoon?
The only reason the Falklands were even remotely close was because there was mostly parity in the air with Harriers vs A-4s. Fast forward to 2023 and now it's F-35Bs vs the same shitty A-4s Argentina was using in the 80s
the argentinian navy and air force have disappeared since the 80s and britain has a much larger military detachment in the falklands so no chance
Falklanders while being a small population also are all armed to the teeth now and likely would put up way more of a resistance too. The guerilla activity would buy the UK plenty of time.
>A-4 as only jet
>all AAVP gone
>no aa capabilities.
with fucking what?
Brits could literary bomb Buenos Aires to the ground with only 1/3 of the RAF power and there would be no Bueno for Aires
Why so many Falklands war threads so lately?
Because its March
Anniversary of the war coming up, so a lot of newspapers are putting out articles saying a new war is imminent to get easy clicks, they do this every year
Falklands war anniversary coming up.
>Can Argentina take the Falklands again?
No.
>Can the UK take them back again?
I'm not even convinced the garrison would lose them.
>What would Falklands war 2 look like?
A murder-rape. The geopolitical conditions of the first war which caused the United States to sit it out no longer exist today. It would be a convenient excuse to force Argentina to sign some kind of treaty allowing British and American ships to base out of a leased plot of land, the war would be relatively one sided provided there was no massive occupation, and it would check Chinese influence in the country.
Basically, they'd have to be braindead to try it.
We have 4 threads about the Falklands up, can you fucking brits stop spamming them so we can get back to spamming the same Ukraine thread
Its not Brits posting all these threads.
>We have 4 threads about the Falklands up, can you fucking brits stop spamming them
Winning in the Falklands the last time the UK was truly happy.
At this point I'm like 90% sure these threads are made by some brit that likes jerking off to "muh superior army".
They are always written in the same manner.
Everytime Argentina spergs about the islands, all you need to do is look up the value of the Peso to USD, that will answer the question every single time
>Peso to USD, that will answer the question every single time
Fun fact. Mexican peso has more value than Turkey Currency.