I believe the drone attack on Kurk's airfield was a failure and the results are faked.
https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/ukraine-s-military-counterintelligence-launches-1693141130.html
>"16 kamikaze drones targeted 4 Su-30 aircraft and 1 MiG-29. Among the affected targets are the radars of the S-300 complex and 2 Pantsir systems,"
>Almost all of the SBU drones reached their targets, only 3 of them were shot down by Russian air defense.
>"even the Russians themselves recorded at least 13 explosions, the impact was impressive." the SBU added.
"According to the sources" The article doesn't link any source, only says SBU.
>Last night, explosions were heard in Kursk. Local residents reported on social media that they also heard automatic gunfire. Later, footage of the explosion moment appeared online, capturing a bright flash in the night sky.
>The governor of the Kursk region confirmed that there was an attempted drone attack in Kursk. However, he only mentioned that supposedly one drone hit a multi-story building.
https://nitter.net/front_ukrainian/status/1695811001969430729
>yesterday Ukraine attacked the airfield of the Russian Federation for the first time using disposable PPDS cardboard UAVs
So the source is just SBU and some blogger saying shit, and locals reporting about explosions and gunfire. There is no actual evidence of what SBU is claiming. We usually get evidence directly from Russians, like that burning bomber. Then you have a guy who allegedly got satellite pictures of the next day that show no damage.
https://nitter.net/Aviation_Intel/status/1696070712132612233
The reason I really believe this is SBU's fake is this. They are way too sure about this without showing any proof. When did the SBU said thing like this and just expected people to believe it? Just believe us, we don't need to show proof for our claims.
>16 kamikaze drones targeted 4 Su-30, 1 MiG-29, S-300 complex and 2 Pantsir
>Almost all of the SBU drones reached their targets
>I believe
Either way it's not great victory the West claims
>it didn't happen
Self explanatory
>it did happen
Only show that America is just as susceptible to drone assault as Russia
Imagine how difficult the invasion of Iraq would be if it occurred in 2023 with Russia backing Iraq with unlined military-technical aid, instead of 2003 with no Iraq ally. American invasionary force would be decimated by merciless drone attack and cyber warfare
So exactly the same but with some people in Iraq screaming “Blyat” as their last words?
>since the Russians failed that means Americans are vinegary too!
I don't understand this cope. Russians being incompetent has no bearing on whether an actual superpower is vulnerable to anything.
America actually uses hangars, Sasha.
>Only show that America is just as susceptible to drone assault as Russia
This is the weirdest cope of them all.
Not even Russia would be susceptible to this bullshit if they
>moved their aircraft out of the range of cheap bullshit drones
>put their aircraft into fucking hangars
>had appropriate spacing and embankments between aircraft
>put fucking SHORAD next to their airfields
Competent armies are still vulnerable to drone spam, but there are ways to mitigate it, if you aren't sleeping on the job.
Why would you think Russia would help Iraq? They can’t stop Syria from being bombed by Isreal and didn’t help Armenia when they got in trouble with Azerbaijan.
Also 2023 Russia is more pathetic now than ever.
>Only show that America is just as susceptible to drone assault as Russia
Holy cope
Well if that was the case than the Iranians would unironically help the Americans out and it would have ended up worse for the Iraqis as they would have to deal with being occupied by Iran and Saudi Arabia panic bombing every single on of their towns and villages because the Anti-Royalist religious fanatics now share a land border with them.
There'd just be more investment in Phalanx type defense, had those things against mortars and rockets in Iraq with C-RAM. It'd just be C-DRAM. This whole war thing is just Red Queen anyways, you think of one thing, I think of a countermeasure, you think of a counter-countermeasure, so on and so forth.
>I believe
Anon lacks critical information, you should follow a proper source.
>Pic related
This is actually pro Russian propaganda because I forgot they even had aircraft carriers.
Carrier*
Singular.
Casually following a few experts has led my recommended videos to contain all sorts of retarded clickbait videos from retards. "X is Collapsing" shit.
Switch to using Invidious, it doesn't do that shit and you can import your subscriptions
I believe you, Kumar.
show proof retard
>Noooooo Russia cant possibly be losing to cardboard!
Bing bing wahoo! Bonus points for the Su-27!
show proof retard
It's over, Ukraine is ded, gg
these things only have 3-5KG of explosives, so they better land really close to their targets. 100% success rate for the ones that didn't get shot down? doubt it
>3-5KG of explosives
from 13 drones it's enough to have at least one fire, but no reports on it
Haхpюкaл пiдop
Post # of 5th gen aircraft not made by the US
Growing by the day. Don't forget that the latest Russian and Chinese SAMs can easily neutralize an F-22 or F-35, negating the advantage US held previously
>growing by the day
>"So, how many operational Su-57s does Russia actually have? The short answer is between three and 15, depending on how we count."
>depending on how we count
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/31982-fact-check-how-many-su-57s-does-russia-have
the latest Russian and Chinese SAMs can't even kill a cardboard drone lmao