FA/181 Blackwasp

Would it work?
How would it compare to other 5th gens?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it certainly does a good job making me rock hard

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    that’s some pure F15EX right there if you catch my drift 🙂

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *Swoosh*

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, this thing looks cool.

        realistically speaking how hard would it to be to retool an f-18 production line into something that would create this. essentially it's the same airframe underneath of the stealth exterior correct? i understand that it would be a hassle but maybe worth it when you've got a proven platform to base it off of?

        It would be equivalent to designing and building a new airframe from scratch and re-using the current engine and electronics from an F-18E/F.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    realistically speaking how hard would it to be to retool an f-18 production line into something that would create this. essentially it's the same airframe underneath of the stealth exterior correct? i understand that it would be a hassle but maybe worth it when you've got a proven platform to base it off of?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Very hard

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >puts Ferrari body kit on Fiat Panda
      >expects to be knee deep in poon

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Don't you mean the Super Duper Hornet?

        Listen man bitches go crazy for the Panda

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >same airframe underneath of the stealth exterior
      No, it's a monocoque airframe like essentially all modern aircraft. The skin is the structure.
      The real question is why bother? The stealth upgrade to consider should be RAM coatings, not geometry.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's semi-monocoque. Ignoring internal structure is pure retardation.
        I've put you in your place before. So I'm not going to spell it out for you again.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's the problem the bugs have. They think it's about the shape of the thing. That's 1/100th of the process. The stealth 'coating' is a big misnomer. As if it's just something you can spray on some titanium and call it a day. No, the big thing about these birds is the materials that skin is actually made of. That's why we LOVE seeing those goofy case mods the bugs and vatniks put out. They glow like feds on radar.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I just wonder if those "radar blockers" inside the intakes of the Su-57 do jack shit compared to a proper S-duct.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They have to allow air in at enough speed and volume to keep the engine from choking, they cant possibly be as effective as a normal S-duct. This means even if they do reduce the Felon's RCS, it will be spotted significantly sooner than a US stealth jet.
          Assuming of course it isn't the stealth version of a cope cage and is actually useless and possibly even a hinderance.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Radar blockers in the air intakes is an idea "borrowed" from the super bugs. They work, but are by no means as effective as a true s-duct. I believe the rafale utilizes them as well.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The F-35, and F-22 use S-ducts for frontal RCS, and "stealth augmentor" after burners for rear RCS reduction. Along with ample RAM inside the intake ducts. They're the only fighter engines to focus on the reduction rearward engine RCS.

            >Pratt points out that the F119 and F135 are the only production engines with stealthy augmentors. Their design eliminates conventional spray bars and flame holders and integrates multi-zone reheat fuel injection into curved vanes that block the line-of-sight to the turbine.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        CCP/PLA have the relevant materials technology to fabricate and mass produce stealth airframes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You would be shot by the engineers immediately after you green light that shit

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    already low observable, would need internal weapons to be 5th gen.

    range too low to be useful, even with new generation engines.

    bays would be very small due to engine placement, unless you lengthened the airframe.
    Any new naval stealth planes will need massive bays for aim260 and jassm. in fact, the f35c has this problem right now.

    the growler is a better use of the airframe.

    It's beautiful, though.

    A stealth variant with the wide body and speed/range profiles is likely closer to what the navy needs. It's a shame the F-14 was put to pasture.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >already low observable, would need internal weapons to be 5th gen.
      The enclosed weapons pod on the block III will help with this - as much as it can. Just need to give it the Have Glass V treatments to really finish it off. Hopefully they get the conformal fuel tanks worked out soon.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's a very pragmatic solution

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why don't we just make the missiles stealthy instead?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          here you go

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What a malicious looking weapon.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why, because it's black? Racist shitlord.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can, but, you would need to make individual stealth variants of the same missile of each and every airframe you plan to put in on. The interaction between the missile, the pylon, wing, fuselage, etc. all play a huge role in the resulting RCS. That's why you couldn't just bolt the enclosed weapons pod onto an F-22, or F-15 and get the same RCS reduction percentage you did on the F/A-18 Super Hornet block III. In some cases, it may actually increase your RCS from your starting baseline. That's not even getting into the aerodynamic interaction, though, it's just like RCS. There's no one size fits all.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They've done wind tunnel testing on stealthy enclosed weapons pods for the F-22. You have to pay very close attention to not have negative aerodynamic interactions between them and the airframe, or their ability to accurately fire/drop the munitions being carried.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This sounds like a thing for smart people

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty much wizards, really.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          can you even make an AA missile stealthy? IIRC the rounded cone shape of the radome returns radar energy. have a more pointed asymmetrical shape would fuck up the aerodynamics. for an IR missile with a seeker head you'd need a special coating, maybe what they use on the F-35 EOTS or the cockpit glass?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >can you even make an AA missile stealthy?
            They kicked around the Loral HAVE DASH II stealthy air-to-air missile to replace the AIM-120. The problem isn't really making the missile stealthy. It's the interaction between the missile, the pylon that attaches the missile to the wing, the wing, and even the fuselage. That's why they planned conformal carry for it, as not only would it reduce drag, it would reduce the amount of surface area and angles the radar emissions would have to negatively interact with.

            http://designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/have-dash.html

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They need stealth drone missile trucks to stay super high and out of the way. Didect link it to the plane so that whether pilot presses the button, a missile fires from the other craft

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Concept somewhat related.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Didect link it to the plane so that whether pilot presses the button, a missile fires from the other craft
          WSO and the pilot, this is the hornet we're talking about, unless this version deleted the WSO.

          2 Guys firing shit would be cool though I think, Pilot worries about aerial threats mostly and the WSO focuses on ground threats, maybe with either having their own drones.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sure, and keep some Sidewinders in the bay for close-in protection, but otherwise use the stealth piloted plane as essentially a forward observer to direct radar-guided missiles, carried by a stealth drone, to the target. You could link a missile drone to follow the flight path of the parent plane and act as a little brother.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              DARPA is taking the stealthy missile pods armed with air-to-air missiles and strapping wings to it. They call it the flying missile rail, or project LongShot.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no fucking way this is real

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not ready yet, but coming.
                https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2021-02-08

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like a job for the A-12.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A plane's exterior profile isnt something you can just bolt shit on, they have to do calculations in a wind tunnel to make sure it wont just randomly spin out of control because some random corner or crevice creates turbulence or some negative pressure pocket or any amount of random shit that could happen, and THEN you'd be busy figuring out if it actually reflects radar waves away from the source. There is a reason why nobody does stealth body kits, its fucking dumb, better to just build a new one.

    The stealth A-10 is so fucking dumb i dunno where to even start.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A real-life model has flown before. Why won't it work

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doubly so with the F-18, which already has a severe unresolved aerodynamics issue with ordinance separation. Boeing couldn't fix it so their "solution" was to cant all pylons outward, making the Hornet/Super Hornet one of the draggiest airframes out there if heavily loaded. This also destroys edge alignment for stealth.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Boeing couldn't fix it so their "solution" was to cant all pylons outward
        I knew about the canted pylons but I never knew why. Fucking Boeing, that's such a fucking Boeing solution.
        >F-18X Hornet Max

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh, so that's why they do that?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The stealth A-10 is so fucking dumb i dunno where to even start.
      that fucking thing makes me so mad. it makes me mad everyday.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The stealth A-10 is so fucking dumb i dunno where to even start.
      I saw the game's design, but what about this?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >giant flat sided non-conformal engines with round openings
        >where the fuck are the internal bays going to go

        Bohemia got pretty gay after A2 with names
        ZSU-2-39, FA/181, "slammer" tank, etc

        i am angry. angry about elves.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The engines need serpentine ducts or it will be easily detectable from the frontal arc. Also can't carry external stores without compromising its radar signature and an A-10 that defeats the purpose of an A-10.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    BIS copied all other aircraft off of existing ones, but their grand idea for a new fictional fighter is an F18 mashed with an F22?
    Meanwhile they came up with the MX series which would've been the NGSW of the century.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The MX rifles are kinda fucking shit at killing armor and i always run out of ammo with them trying to put down enemies properly so they are probably outright worse than the real NGSW. They always come with disappointing optics too.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can blame BI's health and damage system in the vanilla experience. It favors heavy calibers like .308, 7.62x54, and .338 while reducing intermediate cartridge damage. I also think that the armor in the vanilla experience overperforms. The MX's and other 6.5 caseless rifles do pretty good with ACE's damage and medical system.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          also the fact that CSAT uniforms give them ludicrous amounts of ballistic protection

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Shove it up your own, moron

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >F-35 is too expensive, we'd rather buy Super Hornets instead
    >okay but what if you could have both?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the F-18 super horny block ii

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I like how little making the Draken stealth actually changes. What a sexy airframe.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like it's structurally suitable for enclosed weapons & stealth too. Looks like it would be easy not to have a direct line of sight from the intakes to the engine fans.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think the Draken already has a similar Y-shaped air intakes as the F-35 with no line of sight to the engine.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is literally the korean "5th gen" that has been shilled recently, but bigger.

    • 3 weeks ago
      afatoldman

      No one is claiming the initial variants of the KF21 are Gen5. Instead there is a possibility later iterations, built sometime after 2030, could be Gen5.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You've got your hands on my white boy butt cheeks and it's turning me on!

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    missed the mark bro. Should have called it the F/A-18E2 Murder Hornet

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Take very capable 4.5gen plane
    >Cover it in the silly willy radar paint
    >trim some angles here, cover some screws there
    >Now have harder to detect 4.9 gen plane
    Why is this literally any harder then doing exactly that? Its a cheap improvement that gets it a bit closer to the baddies and a bit harder to lock.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're getting mad, so I say it's a win

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can't manufacture a line of multimillion dollar aircraft on the basis that it makes an anonymous poster on PrepHole.org mad. This just isn't a feasible thing people can be doing with their time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why is this literally any harder then doing exactly that?
      Cause you have to design a new airframe from scratch.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's exactly what they did with the F/A-18 Super Hornet block III.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They tried to sell the Air Force on the F-15 Stealth Eagle years ago, that had canted tails, internal weapons bays and RAM.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't know why everyone is getting upset over this, Bohemia clearly didn't want to use the F-35 (despite having a port in the game files from ArmA 2) so they hacked a gen 4.75 "stealth" F-18EX. There are several mods to get F-35s, including AEGIS and FIR AWS F35 pack.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You should be upset. The base game went 4 years of only have three CAS jets, and then when more aircraft are released you have to pay $10 for the clunky hunk of junk Blackwasp and there's no F-35 multirole option that could take off from any airfield on the map and compliment the wasp. For ten bucks why not get both? It's lazy. This creator dlc nonsense they've been shoveling out is only more evidence of their laziness and incompetence. Don't even get me started on how the disaster that was Reforger crushed all hope of A4 surpassing A3. The reality is AEGIS should've been implemented into the base game.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's silly but A3 was already entering its end of life phase in 2018. Creator DLC was just the handing off of the game to increasingly smaller portions of the studio and third parties.
        As for AEGIS - It should be part of the base game, yes. For what it is - a mod that "reveals" hidden textures and weapons like the Punisher 25mm - AEGIS is extremely high quality.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The game had a meager lifespan because without paying for the dlc pack and downloading 100 gigabytes of conflicting mods that butchers your performance it's bare bones and lifeless. Simple free additions of different uniforms, textures, helmets and weapons would've sufficed so you could play as any nation from UK to RU or coldwar US, or mix and match anyway you like. There's no options so it's bland. Altis gets stale too. It's like Bohemia said "this is our biggest map so let's stop here"when adding smaller terrains with base assets could've added variety. Like an Altis Mountains terrain or smaller islands. Instead they left it to modders but the average casual player isn't invested enough to figure out how to navigate the workshop and launcher to get mods together. Most of them can't even use the arsenal without getting lost

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >average casual player
            For normies who want to only play KOTH or Wasteland, that's fine.
            The ones who want something more will seek out a group that offers more.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              In that regard the game isn't past its life but still for convenience sake putting in the different BDUs and PASGTs like CUP would've gone a long way

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think so. I don't get the impression they care about the uniforms or really gear for that matter. Apex probably was enough for them. Decent bandit outfits, AKs, and police outfits. Those who did put the time into finding the mods they want and/or invested into the CDLC. Global Mobilization and SOG were huge for the gear queers (GW Got pretty good too, even if the launch wasn't great.) Those that really cared have been running RHS, CUP, and KMNP since the start. Quirks of running RHS and CUP at the same time aside.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anon, you clearly didn't play arma 2
            that game had TONS of content, the problem was that it was "an ocean wide, deep as a puddle"
            The content available was very low fidelity, poor sounds, poor effects, poor graphics, bad modeling jobs. No such thing as data link or any of that stuff.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well then what's the deal with your wife banging your doctor? Is it because he makes more money than you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i thought we weren't going to talk about that

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                why is your wife bouncing get big white butt on BBC in glory holes on Tuesdays, the same day you work late in the department and run even later to pick up groceries on the way home? do you mind explaining that for me buddy?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >inferior high alpha maneuvering to the Super Bug.
      >Price: $80mil-100mil

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The FA/181 in-game is genuinely superior to this in terms of stealth because it can use internal only stores or use external stores if stealth isnt needed

        Are you guys just trolling or seriously thinking that there will be a stealth version of Superhornet?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        : $80mil-100mil
        Is that supposed to be bad?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. The F-35A costs ~$80mil for a more capable top of the line 5th gen fighter. The F-16C block 70/72 costs ~$63mil, and the F/A-18 Super Hornet block III costs ~$70mil. Both better than the KF-21 moron.

          [...]
          Are you guys just trolling or seriously thinking that there will be a stealth version of Superhornet?

          Are you retarded, or did you not see I was responding to the moron shill posting the KF-21?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The F-16C block 70/72 costs ~$63mil
            I doubt. The most recent Jordanian deal was much more than that, even when considering all the addons.
            https://www.timesaerospace.aero/features/defence/jordan-targets-421bn-f-16-deal

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, this is the #1 reason for the PAF now turning to KF-21 rather than vipers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They're going with old F-16 block 50/52s now. The KF-21 isn't even in the running. All the Flips said was they're monitoring the KF-21.
                https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/31523-paf-drops-tejas-keeps-f-16-and-gripen-in-fighter-jet-tender

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That article is outdated tho.
                https://www.turdef.com/Article/philippines-may-acquire-kf-21-boramae/2075

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >All the Flips said was they're monitoring the KF-21.

                >That article is outdated tho
                >may
                I literally said what the PAF said: They MAY look at the KF-21 moronFighter when it enters service in 2030. How can you buy a prototype that isn't even in production, and won't be for years? They can't even give the PAF an actual pre-unit price. This is if daddy US will let the PAF buy the KF-21, as the morons were too stupid to produce the parts themselves, and had to rely on ITAR compliant parts. LMAO. Just stop the marketing on PrepHole, spend your money elsewhere. Like a production line for the KF-21.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They MAY look at the KF-21 moronFighter when it enters service in 2030
                Actually they're discreetly considering its introduction with the deadline of the first plane getting delivered until 2027.
                >PAF spokesman Colonel Maynard Mariano said the KF-21 opportunity was open given the MRF program had not been funded.

                >“Possibly, given that the MRF has not been funded, the KF-21 could be a competitor to the MRF,” he was quoted as saying by the PNA news agency some time ago.

                >If Manila would acquire only the KF-21, Mariano said his party would push to lobby the Korean side to produce the KF-21 Boramae for the PAF in 2027-2029.
                >>This is if daddy US will let the PAF buy the KF-21
                There's zero for the US to veto its delivery to the Philippines as they have been wanting it to bolster its strength in the region. Also, FA-50PH that it has already is equipped with GE F404 ,so your premise of getting banned from the export is by no means realistic at all.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              moron, you're retarded. That is a package price, not the pre-unit price.
              >12 F-16Cs and 4 F-16D Block 70s
              >21 F100-GE-129D or F100-PW229EEP engines (5 spares)
              >21 AN/APG-83 Scalable Agile Agile Beam Radars (SABR) type AESA radars (5 spares)
              >21 MMC 7000AH Modular Mission Computers (5 spares)
              >27 INS/GPS navigation equipment with LN-260 anti-spoofing capability (11 spares)
              >6 AN/AAQ-33 Sniper advanced targeting pods
              >31 terminals, for aircraft and ground stations, link 16 (5 spares)
              >21 M61A1 Vulcan 20mm cannons (5 spares)
              >400+ bombs of different types, with their guidance and fuzing kits and conversion kits to JDAM or Paveway II
              >Hulls with integrated JHMCS II or Scorpion sights
              >AN/ALQ-254 Viper Shield or similar defense systems

              Now, tell me what "prices" you used to consider the per-unit price of the F-16, beside just pulling it out of your ass.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he thinks I didn't consider all of that
                All of what you've listed are default in F-35.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're so ful of shit its fucking laughable

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >haha it's not actually true!
                >you could actually cut corners by omitting flight helmets. See?
                You're a fucking clown.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >All the Flips said was they're monitoring the KF-21.

                >That article is outdated tho
                >may
                I literally said what the PAF said: They MAY look at the KF-21 moronFighter when it enters service in 2030. How can you buy a prototype that isn't even in production, and won't be for years? They can't even give the PAF an actual pre-unit price. This is if daddy US will let the PAF buy the KF-21, as the morons were too stupid to produce the parts themselves, and had to rely on ITAR compliant parts. LMAO. Just stop the marketing on PrepHole, spend your money elsewhere. Like a production line for the KF-21.

                They can't afford the F-35, or aren't allowed to buy it. What does that have to do with your retarded as thinking a package price can be divided by the number of plane to get a per-unit price, and just forget about the other equipment in the package? Only a brainlet with an IQ of 85 would think you could do that. Either that, or a shill. Which one are you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a package price can be divided by the number of plane to get a per-unit price
                No one has said that but your way of thinking that you could cut corners by reducing the amount of spare items and essential stuffs like JHMCS2 is simply mind blowing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, but unlike the blackwasp whose official performance isn't revealed, kf-21 actually does have a prototype and a spec sheet.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >but unlike the blackwasp whose official performance isn't revealed
              It's not real, you brown brained brainlet.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The FA/181 in-game is genuinely superior to this in terms of stealth because it can use internal only stores or use external stores if stealth isnt needed

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the real question is would a jet version of the spitfire work

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be kino, at which point actual performance is irrelevant

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >RAF Yak-9
        God i miss playing Blazing angels 2

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's literally just that moron F35

  16. 3 weeks ago
    afatoldman

    The Silent Eagle proved you cannot transform a Gen4 fighter into one that is Gen5. This will be no different.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just paint it on have glass v and get done with it

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what is this shit

    i get sick of bored gays making dumbass renders and then giving them stupid fucking names and sayin zomg look at plane

    why the fuck would it even be called 181 you fucking chud

    goddamn

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bohemia got pretty gay after A2 with names
      ZSU-2-39, FA/181, "slammer" tank, etc

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it’s a purty plane

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It handles like a lead sled. This is weird, considering the thrust vectoring. The gryphon is much more manuverable.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It has a really, really shitty IR sensor. This makes the macer missiles it carries pratically useless. It's dumb, because IRST should be something the USAF is good at, with its LEGION pod. As a matter of fact, we already know NATO has good IRST in the armaverse, because the Wipeout has the best IR sensor in the game.

    I wish there was a mod that made macer missiles able to lock on to lasers again.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arma sensors are shit tier because of the scale of the game. Radar for instance can only go for a max of 50km's or 26 nautical miles (engine hard limit) which is still well before BVR.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That doesn't excuse the Wasp's IR sensor having a pitiful 2.5km range against aerial targets and just 2km against ground targets. There's barely any time for the macers to lock on before you crash into the target. This could be sort of solved by making the macers lockable to lasers (like the used to be and like how real life hellfires work these days). Really though the wasp should simply have a better IR sensor.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You need to use your targeting pod to get good locks with Macer AGMs now
      alternatively use ACE, it unfucks everything

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ACE kinda spooks me. Seems like it's really complicated.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Don't be afraid of ACE. If you're afraid, disable the medical system and the MOA/MIL zeroing system until you can learn it, it really improves a lot of things otherwise

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can't replace me. Im awake it's time to break free. I'm levitating

Your email address will not be published.