Including this list, and the other incident where the F-35 took a swim, there are seven crashes, so 7:840 crashes, SU-57 has like 1:7. This means F-35s have a 0.83% chance of crashing. SU-57s have a 14.3% crash rate meaning they are 17 times more likely to crash than F-35s. Really makes you think
We fly them. And we fly them ALOT. They also tend to do exactly whats asked of them. Unlike a certain over hyped unproven aircraft thats shilled as the end all be all of modern fighter Aviation.
The Gripen is the king in the North.
Take note amerikanska; first you need to get off the ground, then you need to do as you claim, then you need to get back down on the ground and within 10 minutes repeat above process.
This is what the Gripen does, irregardless of where it finds it's self in the world.
The same unfortunately cannot be said of American aircraft.
Sad.
It's an equivalent fighter to a Block 50 F-16, except costs more because of low production numbers and a much smaller industry for parts, so it's also more expensive to operate than an F-16. Thus it will almost always be passed over for F-35s, which are far superior at lower cost, or F-16s if they aren't allowed to buy Panthers. You couldn't even sell Gripens to your next-door neighbors, Norway, Denmark, and Finland are all buying Panthers.
Burgersisters, it's over. We must abolish the HATO, and give Europe to mighty Russia, which is actually not weak, and winning.
t. John Smith from Washington (not oblast)
They said they were letting the computer take some of the load off the pilot. Maybe they've got something like automatic braking. Instead of stopping when it sees a solid wall in front of it the plane would refuse to pull maneuvers that would cause a crash and level out automatically if it was headed into the ground.
Most of it is automating the tiny tweaks and adjustments in flight to maintain intended orientation. When an F-35 is flying you'll see a lot of micro flutter in the control surfaces. That's the computer adjusting things on the fly so the pilot can focus on intended maneuvers instead of keeping it flying straight.
It has a much faster and smarter computer that can predict pilot intent and execute it faster and smoother. It also works with the shaping to basically make it impossible to put the plane in an uncontrolled stall.
Reformists are moronic. Even using WW2 aircraft as a standard, every one of the “popular” aircraft at the time would be called widow makers today. B-29 being a very prominent example
GET BACK IN YOUR GRAVE YOU SON OF A b***h
No luck, anon. Some moron used quints to trap his ghost here.
Your trip is over. Now get back there!
How many times has this piece of shit scam crashed now?
7 with something like 400000 flight hours
>more F-35s have crashed than SU-57s puccia will ever produce
many such cases!
Including this list, and the other incident where the F-35 took a swim, there are seven crashes, so 7:840 crashes, SU-57 has like 1:7. This means F-35s have a 0.83% chance of crashing. SU-57s have a 14.3% crash rate meaning they are 17 times more likely to crash than F-35s. Really makes you think
Keep in mind the F-35 has a lot more flight hours than the Su-57 on top of all that. 17:1 is just the baseline.
And the F-16 peaked at 18 in a year in the 80s, it's still an absolutely tiny number compared to prior projects.
No! No! NO! SHUT UP! STOP TALKING!
>Before posting a thread, please check our catalog to ensure that a thread about the same topic does not already exist.
F
35
what a piece of shit
Yet another reason why Gripens are better
can't crash 'em if nobody flys 'em
bump
We fly them. And we fly them ALOT. They also tend to do exactly whats asked of them. Unlike a certain over hyped unproven aircraft thats shilled as the end all be all of modern fighter Aviation.
The Gripen is the king in the North.
Take note amerikanska; first you need to get off the ground, then you need to do as you claim, then you need to get back down on the ground and within 10 minutes repeat above process.
This is what the Gripen does, irregardless of where it finds it's self in the world.
The same unfortunately cannot be said of American aircraft.
Sad.
Still mad nobody’s buying your shit swede. . . we get it, it can take off from a road wow . . .
There are sections of highway in the US designed to do that too.
It's an equivalent fighter to a Block 50 F-16, except costs more because of low production numbers and a much smaller industry for parts, so it's also more expensive to operate than an F-16. Thus it will almost always be passed over for F-35s, which are far superior at lower cost, or F-16s if they aren't allowed to buy Panthers. You couldn't even sell Gripens to your next-door neighbors, Norway, Denmark, and Finland are all buying Panthers.
>They also tend to do exactly whats asked of them.
Until they don't.
Sweden crashed 3 gripens and 2 more in testing. And they have far fewer gripens than the US has F-35s.
Sounds like the engine let go on takeoff. That's gotta be embarrassing for P&W, and gives GE more ammunition for the next competition.
I feel like the morons are really out right now.
Burgersisters, it's over. We must abolish the HATO, and give Europe to mighty Russia, which is actually not weak, and winning.
t. John Smith from Washington (not oblast)
>Washington (not oblast)
City of Federal Importance
Vatniks can't comprehend the fact he crashed the airplane without hitting a building.
well at least the parachute actually works on the fricking thing
*whispers into Putin's ear*
"Sir, another Su-34 hit the yeysk apartments"
Someone should make a deep fake and dub it with this.
arrestor system where?
>7 crashes
>840+ airframes
>over 500k flight hours collectively
Honestly... that's pretty fricking impressive
They said they were letting the computer take some of the load off the pilot. Maybe they've got something like automatic braking. Instead of stopping when it sees a solid wall in front of it the plane would refuse to pull maneuvers that would cause a crash and level out automatically if it was headed into the ground.
Most of it is automating the tiny tweaks and adjustments in flight to maintain intended orientation. When an F-35 is flying you'll see a lot of micro flutter in the control surfaces. That's the computer adjusting things on the fly so the pilot can focus on intended maneuvers instead of keeping it flying straight.
Yeah but hasn't that fly by wire corrections been the norm since the 70s? What does the F-35 do differently?
I'm honestly surprised pilots would put up with that in the 70s.
It has a much faster and smarter computer that can predict pilot intent and execute it faster and smoother. It also works with the shaping to basically make it impossible to put the plane in an uncontrolled stall.
Even the F-16 has automatic pull up
He was warned about that HILL!
bump
>Aircraft/Helicopter of any kind crashes
>HOLY FRICKING SHIT ITS GARBAGE MILLIONS OF THEM CRASH EVERY SECOND
This meme sucks
It's not a meme since these morons (reformists) will scream and yell at anything that isn't from the cold war or ww2
Reformists are moronic. Even using WW2 aircraft as a standard, every one of the “popular” aircraft at the time would be called widow makers today. B-29 being a very prominent example
They are the definition of stupidity and are (imo) a danger to the U.S military in general.