Ex wagner solder comments the Kharkiv offensive

Part 1
I had an irresistible desire to comment on one demonstration post dedicated to our progress in the Kharkiv direction and surprisingly illustrated by a short video, from which people in the topic have already grabbed their heads.

I quote the brightest fragment:

...The enemy notes the good interaction of Russian army units on the battlefield. This allows offensive operations to be carried out to a sufficiently large depth without stopping for respite and clarifying the situation. And it's really a completely new form of our army's offensive. She hasn't seen anything like this before.

It would seem, why be distracted by an obviously not very suitable object? Meanwhile, the question is not in this particular post, but in the problems that have not yet been raised, which it highlights.

I have to note that behind the Russian army in principle, especially Soviet Russia - if we consider the usual modern means of armed struggle, there was quite good interaction not only between units on the battlefield, but also between different types of troops.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Part2
    This sacred knowledge and skills of the titans of war were critically lost due to the degradation of the culture of staff work at levels from battalions to armies; insufficient professionalism of command personnel; technological lag in modern means of observation and communication; complicated nature of decision-making mechanisms requiring rapid response; low level of training of personnel, especially in conditions of relatively mass growth of the active army.

    Good interaction is normal. It's not normal - it's bad. But it is the bad one that we are in the third year that is very different. Therefore, in fact, this splash of euphoria on the fact of the phenomenon of normal is clear to me. It's just that my emotions are more contradictory.

    It is also quite unjoying that a fairly large depth of the offensive in this war has to be considered several kilometres. The possibility of implementing deep offensive operations, which grow out of the development of the breakthrough of the enemy's echeloned Defence, largely rests on our inability to conquer, if not domination, then at least an advantage in the lower sky in combination with the high-precision defeat of various enemy fire, in general, actively and effectively hindering not only the development of success, but the breakthrough of the Defence itself.

    Meanwhile, in the current conditions, even local breakthroughs with jerks of several kilometres can create operational and tactical crises for the enemy. But they are also impossible without normal planning, organisation, integrated support (reconnaissance, fire, engineering, logistics) and coordination of interaction.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's no references to asses and sticking things in them. Boring fake.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Part3
    Therefore, instead of breakthroughs and jerks with collapses of the enemy's Defence, we see a slow and very bloody gnawing of this very Defence. Even in those isolated cases when such breakthroughs are successful (we are not considering advances in the poorly protected Kharkiv pre-field now, as this is a newly opened direction in special circumstances), they are preceded by a long and heavy fuss with excessive losses.

    And, finally, it is especially possible that the text with a passage about a completely new form of offensive (without comments) is illustrated by a video in which the column of our detachment moves on a postcard under the visual control of the enemy without maintaining the corresponding intervals between fighters in groups. Only one cassette... How did these people cook? What the frick did they cook like that? Are all our strategic reserves so prepared? What great depths will we reach with such reserves? Is there a little loss?
    https://t.me/philologist_zov/965

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Be as verbose as possible without saying anything of note
    I fricking hate the Russian language so much it's unreal.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How to pretend to be smart, the country.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't even know if he's bragging or dooming

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the tldr is Wagner can't into combined arms and takes tons of casualties everytime it's deployed

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tl;dr
        >Our Ukie adversary is commenting that the new Russian advance is performing surprisingly well. But the fact the improved Russian performance is deemed "surprising" shows how far the Russian military has fallen from it's USSR days. When effective coordination not just between units, but branches were the norm. And furthermore the "new effective tactics" the Ukies have observed were nothing more than slight variation of Russian infantry advancing in tight groups through observed incoming fire to slowly grinding down the outnumbered defending Ukie forces, shows that the "improvements' is actually pretty minimal.

        Yeah, pretty doomer take.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And
          >these 'big advances' are still measured in a few Kilometres'

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        pt 1: the enemy was surprised by us being competent for once
        pt2: being competent ought to be normal
        pt3: but it isn't, so we'll retvrn to ineffectiveness

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          also, competent means still grinding thousand of troops to take a village
          >Therefore, instead of breakthroughs and jerks with collapses of the enemy's Defence, we see a slow and very bloody gnawing of this very Defence. Even in those isolated cases when such breakthroughs are successful (we are not considering advances in the poorly protected Kharkiv pre-field now, as this is a newly opened direction in special circumstances), they are preceded by a long and heavy fuss with excessive losses.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dostoevsky's literature and its consequences were a disaster for the Russian race.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russians do not read Dostoevsky besides introductions to his books necessary to write essays at school

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they don't have to have read him for his writing to have had an effect on the Russian language, much like English speakers mostly don't read Shakespeare but use his idioms every day

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Funny how they end up sounding like cavemen when they try to speak English since their native language lacks articles.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not a fan either but I'm going to be fair and say that shitty translation has a lot to answer for. There are a lack of English natives with high-level Russian skill but lots of Russians and Ukies who think they're native-level, so translations are often trash made by non-natives who translate literally with no regard for register, idiomatic language, and localization. If I could read Russian, I bet I could fix that up, since I pretty much rewrite shit for a living.
      Honestly, there are only a few languages that usually get translated to English well, and they're the most normie-tier foreign languages like French, Spanish, German, Japanese etc.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sorry for you,
    or glad it happened

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I have to note that behind the Russian army in principle, especially Soviet Russia - if we consider the usual modern means of armed struggle, there was quite good interaction not only between units on the battlefield, but also between different types of troops.
    That is the most insane shit I've ever read. Jesus Christ,

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So is he impressed that mounted infantry units can coordinate with friendly armor units in the same area of operations? Is the bar really that low?

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Black person what? Why are frogposters so moronic? They are not even remotely close to Kharkiv and dont even have 1/10th the troops to capture Kharkiv in the first place.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    troops committed to the new northern front: 50k
    population kharkiv, pre-war: 1,421,125

    Russian casualties for capturing Avdiivka: 47,000
    Population of Avdiivka: 31,392

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russian casualties for capturing Avdiivka: 47,000
      It's gotta be way more, they had 30k dead alone which is why Murz "committed suicide".

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I heard they had well over 300k casualties, makes a lot of sense

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >avdeeka hyperfortress of a wastepile 3 miles from dontesk that took 2 years for the second army in the world to take, burning half a million men
    Not really a win lol

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Vatnik frick does not understand that Russia's troop amount doesn't matter as long as they get mulched 15:1, the sequel.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I have to note that behind the Russian army in principle, especially Soviet Russia - if we consider the usual modern means of armed struggle, there was quite good interaction not only between units on the battlefield, but also between different types of troops.
    The literal, exact opposite of reality. This guy either lies blatantly or is delusional.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Trading a small village for tens of thousands of dead pidors plus irreplacable (for putler at least) hardware ?
    You know I think Kharkov is a small price to pay for 50 million less pidors around

    You know what excuse me while I go donate some more money for shells and drones

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >delusion and projection
    You're rather pathetic. The press-ganging claim has been attempted ever since the war began and you still have no proof. Meanwhile Russians get called to fight and die in suicide rushes. 1.4k died just yesterday.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >an actual vatnik showed up
    christ, it must be a bloodbath

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    must be going badly if they send out bots like you

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ziggerstan ain't sending the best

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine wants greenlight to attack into Russia.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-wants-green-light-strike-russian-soil-us-weapons-2024-5?op=1

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >pepe poster shows up
    You know they are mad if that moron shows up.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >muh telegram talking points
    in other words, not even ukrainians are paying attention to you, so you come here where shit like this is pointless

    or maybe...
    >he's doing it for free

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    5 Rubels has been added to your account.
    Lord monke thanks you for your service, comrade.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Can we crowdfund for a drone strike on this 3/10 that believes he is an 8/10?
    I can't even begin watching his videos just cause I can't stand him going "friends" with that barytone.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That would be murder anon, and only GUR can murder a Russian and get away with it.

      [...]

      Russia has mobiks and storm-z for mass infantry suicide squads.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You Vatnigs really never want to improve from the rapist and murderers tag? Putin Trying to LARP as Stalin is just sad for the world and shills that suck is balls are just slaves.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    so you are doing it for free. shit happens, try getting a job in the trades.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can read Russian just fine.

    My English is great, too, if I may say so, as I have been shitposting for over 20 years now.

    But this half ML, half verbatim translation
    >Meanwhile, the question is not in this particular post, but in the problems that have not yet been raised, which it highlights.

    This russian-english SHIT just hurts my brain.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *