>drones will dominate the sk-ACK

>drones will dominate the sk-ACK

What went wrong?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >40mm
    Why is it so large to shoot such a tiny round?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you have a gun turret larger than an entire city.
      Even the 'small' ones are ridiculous in size.
      What is this eve nemant to be portraying?

      What is this? AA for giants?
      It needs to be at least three times smaller

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's a typo, they meant 4000mm for the small ones and 40,000mm for the one in the water.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      in korea 40 mean 400000

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Korean non-existent AD
    >can't even shoot down Nork Drones hovering over their cities, while crashing one of their own planes trying to intercept them

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's just a repurposed navy gun.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        so they did it like the French

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's literally a Bofors copy (probably not a downside)

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          More specifically twin barrel Dardo.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where are the radars?

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It'll be hilarious when the first one of these is knocked out by a $200 fpv done

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I feel the same about Chinese aircraft carriers

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Hanwha continues to innovate with a new cannon-based automated air defence system and lasers.

      >Hanwha used the opportunity occasioned by Seoul ADEX 2023 to unveil a new automated air defence concept designed to counter UAV and aircraft threats approaching populated areas or military installations.

      >Simply termed the ‘40mm Automated Air Defence System’, the idea is to create a 24-hour system that ensures rapid response to airborne threats.

      >The system comprises just two personnel in an engagement control station, a radar vehicle and a network of uncrewed 40mm twin-barrel cannons. It is designed to be fixed rather than mobile.

      >The radar detects approaching threats possessing cross-sections as small as 0.03m2, sufficient to recognise commercial-size UAS.

      https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/landwarfareintl/hanwha-shows-off-new-40mm-automated-air-defence-system/

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Are those fricking Antonovs An-2 attacking?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          it sounds funny, but then you gotta remember who they are shooting at

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          A month ago, I would have laughed at that.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          NK has hundreds of them. that they plan on using to dropping thousands of paratroopers behind enemy lines, these fly slow and low to the ground and have had every metal part that can be replace by wood, replaced so as to make the radar signiture lower

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The DPRK has a large fleet of them.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Its a big step up above the paraglider assault idea, probably could cut the engine and glide in too when you're close enough.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You don't remember azeri An-2 suicide drones in nagorno karabakh?

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    useless without shells

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you have a gun turret larger than an entire city.
    Even the 'small' ones are ridiculous in size.
    What is this eve nemant to be portraying?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I assume it's not to scale

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        But why are they different sizes? What does the giant one in the middle of the lake(?) signify?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          its the main gun
          the smaller ones around are the PD

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The bigger one is (I imagine) for getting a closer look at what it actually looks like
          The smaller ones are (again, assumed to be) presented as an example of how they could be used, scattered around a city to protect it from airborne threats
          If they made the small ones to scale with the rest of the city then you wouldn't even be able to see them, and if the city were scaled up to match the guns instead then there'd be too few buildings to adequately represent a city or the kind of distance the guns can cover

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The small ones are for drones. The big one is for orbital drones.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To shell Paris?

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why does this thread seem so inorganic?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because almost all shill threads of every flavor flare up when something blows up in Russia. Just pay attention. Shilling will be at a steady, low level when things are normal but as soon as a factory or bridge gets hit half the catalogue is shill threads. There is basically no genuine discussion on this board

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    MM means Maximum Meter in korean

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >40 Meter Diameter Dual AA guns
      now I truly see

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        A point defense weapon in the 2nd Finno-Korean hyperwar

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    looks like that krautshit shit but since it's chinese it actually might not be shit and actually affordable because chinks don't add the prerequisite of +100 yachts, +10 private islands and +1B$ in private offshore bank account built into the price of each unit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >chinks
      Can't tell if shitpost or moronic.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The kumchiker

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, looks like they made a 40ww instead.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >ww2
    >40mm becomes the go-to weapon against kamikaze attacks
    >after 1945
    >jet era approaches
    >40mm becomes obsolete
    >fast forward to the current year
    >kamikaze drones become the biggest threat on the battlefield
    >bring out 40mm
    Time is a flat circle indeed...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In warhammer they had titans who could use laser as powerful as sun yet they fought with swords. They even stripped chainsaw sword to titan to battle behemoths. What if there will be armors which resist to all ballistic weapons and only way to take it down is with massive sword

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        "The slow Blade penetrates the Shield"

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Thank you

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Time is a flat circle

      Time is a flak circle.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Skynet and Terrahawk Paladin already exist.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Those are planetary defence batteries at that size.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    As drones are so small and difficult to detect while being easily deployed near the front lines, it seems to me that the best defense would be a rocket assisted fragmentation round for the 40mm grenade gun locking onto the drone's radio signal.

    Big heavy AA weapons are too difficult to deploy and easily targeted themselves and the defenders would never be able to put enough in the field to protect the troops, whereas a grenade gun with anti-drone rounds could be issued to every squad.

    Shirley something like this could be developed with today's tech?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      For a rocket assisted programmable airburst, the round is going to cost like 15k, you will need a LIDAR scope that shows lead to be able to get it anywhere near the target, probably have to fire 3-5 shots for a kill and have an effective range under a km. Could be effective, but also expensive as frick for not much coverage

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think it would be very expensive at all (discounting the inevitable Wall Street Military-Industrial Complex gouging) and the round would lock on to the drone's radio signal and detonate once the signal got weaker, akin to WWII proximity fuzes. As for range, all that's needed is short range as the drone wouldn't be spotted until it was in sight anyways.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Wouldn't it be more practical to have digital tracking and targeting on the gun itself, similar to ciws? Then all you might need for the ammo are some programmable detonation modes.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Wouldn't it be more practical to have digital tracking and targeting on the gun itself, similar to ciws?

            Well, I ain't no electronics engineer but I'd think the targeting would be pretty simple, as the drone is receiving and transmitting radio signals and as they're pretty maneuverable, it'd probably be pretty hard to keep the grenade gun and it's targeting system on-target?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I figure you could cut down on cost, complexity, and space requirements by going programable ammo. And I'm pretty sure the technology needed to track fast and tiny drones exists but don't quote me on that.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Well to properly understand the problem you have to understand a bit about electronic waves;
              The higher the frequency, the more they go in a straight line, the lower it is, the more it becomes diffuse - like sound, or light that passes through a thick layer of clouds. You regular radio waves are for most intends and purposes, pretty low.
              Imagine you have a very cloudy day, and while you can tell it's "day" and not "night", you may be unable to tell where the sun might be.
              And while you can determine, that "looking down", is darker than "looking up", you may be unable to successfully point at the sun. With good sensors you can do a bit more, but it has limitations.
              Radar "vision" is a lot less accurate and predictable than seeing.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Korea has finally reached the levels of 90s swedish technology.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they copy the germans

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Rheinmetall is just too based

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        germans are the gaygest nation in Europe

        Koreans literally pushed out 50 tanks for Poland in two years while kraut gays whine that they can't make deliveries of new leopards until 2030

        Instead of opening new repair lines to service european Leo fleet they push their eurotank concept. They really didn't learn anything since 1945

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Rheinmetall is just too based

      >same gay

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you are a moron shill

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >40mm
    Looks more like 40 000mm to me.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You know how 'pages' is sometimes abbreviated as 'pp'? The Koreans do the same thing with meters.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >asiatic shill thread
    AA guns existed before this shit and they already work against drones as showed by Guepards in Ukraine.
    asiatics truly are like one step above poojeets in terms of being militant nationalists online. They lie and/or exaggerate all the time for the sake of self-perceived national glory; remember that room temp superconductor hoax? Well that's a good example of their hubris. So everytime I see asiatic shit on /k/, I take it with a shovel of salt.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >you will never have city defence guns that are ACTUALLY that big
    why even wake up

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's a big gun.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's the conversion rate for macrometers to inches?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      40 * 25.4 = 1.57480315

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *