Does the FOAB actually exist or was the test fake?

Does the FOAB actually exist or was the test fake?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the homosexual of all bombs

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's somehow more concerning given I know pidors have fewer fathers and more homosexuals to put in it

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A fake test would have cost about the same as a real test, so there's no reason to think that they didn't build at least one.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but unlike a nuke which we can monitor with satellites and seismographers to do indirect measurements, we have no fricking idea what happened there.
      A fake test could have been massively cheaper. Either have a fuel release on the ground and the FOAB was 100% explosive, or put explosives on a tower and fill the FOAB with mostly fuel and just a small bursting charge. That's cheaper than developing the biggest FAE bomb as the complexity is massively reduced.
      By the way, in the video released by Russia they clearly showed a Tu-160 bomb bay opening, and then a cut to what's clearly the FOAB being pushed off a cargo aircraft ramp. Even if they had a camera rigged under the fuselage you see the bomb jump back with a drogue chute rather than drop down. So they already faked something. And then you see a cut and the fuel is already spread in a smoky cloud. We didn't see the bursting charge. I remembered the inconsistency in delivery method and checked the video after years of not thinking about it, and I just noticed we actually don't see the weapon function. The fuel is already spread over the test area. Frick's sake.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its Russia, its safe to assume anything they do is fake or at best, not the whole story. Fuel air bombs are not the most complicated weapons to get working but really big ones like this are usually huge and expensive to deliver, needing large cargo planes or very large bombers. even if they didnt fake the test (they probably did) the weapon has such niche uses that it might have well not existed at all. In reality they could have just set off a stationary explosive and a bunch of aerosolized fuel in the air to get the same effect without going through the trouble of developing an actual weapon. iirc this was released shortly after the US demonstrated the MOAB so its probably just dick waving "Look! we can do it too and bigger!"

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >moab made for a specific reason
    >has a very specific type of target in mind
    >it's weight and size is directly related to help it destroy deeply buried structures

    >foab made entirely because russia has little man syndrome
    >no actual target would need this
    >undeniably worse in every way than simply dropping multiple standard fae bombs in the same area

    i still think it's meant to be a joke

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The joke is russia is incompetent and has a tiny penis, please understand. Same reason for the Tsar bomb, same reason for gay-1000, same reason for their fictional nuclear torpedo, same reason for every other stupid bullshit thing they trumpet about being bigger. They literally cannot comprehend that big does not equal best, and they are so utterly incapable of precision they have to make everything frick huge to accomplish its mission.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but its bigger than moab and that is what is important

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The joke is russia is incompetent and has a tiny penis, please understand. Same reason for the Tsar bomb, same reason for gay-1000, same reason for their fictional nuclear torpedo, same reason for every other stupid bullshit thing they trumpet about being bigger. They literally cannot comprehend that big does not equal best, and they are so utterly incapable of precision they have to make everything frick huge to accomplish its mission.

      >big bomb bad because... le puccia???
      jesus your brains must be leaking out of your ears with all that brain rot going on
      big bomb is always good
      bomb is like dick, everyone loves watching bomb go boom
      just like unity through dick, unity also comes through bomb

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        big bombs are bad when they're too big to be practical

        Russia builds impractically big bombs because they have turbo insecurity and have to have The Biggest Bomb

        TL:DR, Big Russian Bomb Bad Because Russia

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >big bomb bad because... le puccia???
        absolute moron. how do you even manage to survive when you have this little reading comprehension?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russians (and US MIC salesmen) lied about russian capabilities for all of modern history, why should this be any different.

        I hate that this Black personfight in Uke land has made it fashionable to hate russians for no reason because I hated them for a decade previous for very legitimate reasons.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought I read about them using one in the early stages of the invasion of Ukraine. I don't remember anything other than that, so it might not have actually happened. It does raise the question of why they haven't been using them if they have them though.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because it has to be dropped off the ramp on a cargo aircraft.
      Only useful when you have no AA threat.

      [...]
      >big bomb bad because... le puccia???
      jesus your brains must be leaking out of your ears with all that brain rot going on
      big bomb is always good
      bomb is like dick, everyone loves watching bomb go boom
      just like unity through dick, unity also comes through bomb

      It's not a bad bomb because it's Russian.
      It's just that Russians whipped the most random bullshit together as a flex.
      Big bombs? Yeah they're good. The problem is that this one clearly needs to be offloaded from a cargo plane. Can't be dropped by stealth bomber or a really fast one. It can't glide so it has to be dropped by overflying the target area.

      you think that nukes are real. But you don't believe the foam is?

      That's a different concept.
      If you doubt nuclear physics you disagree with the entire concept of the atomic bomb.
      If you doubt the FOAB, you don't disagree with the chemical reaction behind explosions, you're just questioning if that particular bomb is real.
      It would be extremely hard to fake a nuke. Yeah it was done in tests, and it only simulates the blast, not the signature double flash or the radioactive footprint.
      A FOAB would be extremely easy to fake. There's no footage of it without cuts. It's never been seen working uninterrupted. And since there's no unique markers left by a FAE that could be measured indirectly and from a distance, a fake is indistinguishable from a real weapon function.
      It's basically the gasoline jug duct taped to a pyrotechnic charge trick used in movies. I can say I have a hand grenade that makes a really huge fireball. I toss it, and it just so happened that there's no unedited footage of the grenade landing and going off. All you see is a bunch of aerosolized gasoline in the air catching fire. Maybe it was my grenade. Maybe I tossed a prop grenade into a pyrotechnic device laid there and cut the footage to make it seem real. You can't do that with a nuke.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I dont doubt nuclear physics I know that compressing a subcritical mass down to nearly half its size its fiction and the atomic bomb is a made up concept from h.g. wells book "the world set free"

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't doubt nuclear physics, I simply don't believe they exist

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nuclear physics is more than just the fake ass bomb you moron and I'm not gonna try to explain them to a laymen

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Space travel is a made up concept from jules verne book "from the earth to the moon"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They could fake it, but why would they? If they can strap some plastic explosives to a big fuel tank, it's not a big step to then weld some fins to it and throw it out of a plane.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It does, it's a huge thermobaric bomb and vacuum bomb's are somewhat of a Russian signature weapon. But its so big it needs an Il-76 to deliver it so hahahah gl hf

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you think that nukes are real. But you don't believe the foam is?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      foab*

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I dont doubt nuclear physics I know that compressing a subcritical mass down to nearly half its size its fiction and the atomic bomb is a made up concept from h.g. wells book "the world set free"

      nuclear physics is more than just the fake ass bomb you moron and I'm not gonna try to explain them to a laymen

      >a mere laymen couldn't POSSIBLY comprehend the vast connection of neurons (regularly assfricking eachother) that allow me to comprehend the fakeness of nukes

      shut the frick up. your mind is that of a homosexual down to the biomolecular level

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You sound like a fricking moron who doesn't understand shit about nuclear physics or how those "bombs" are made or how they work

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

          >homosexual's collective assfricking neurons gets assmad
          >an entire neurological system made of assfrickery becomes assmad
          >tries to link to his homosexual website of homosexualry
          moron.
          Only timecube is real
          https://web.archive.org/web/19980629180418/http://www.timecube.com/

          I knew you sad fricks were pathetic, but this is full on timecube levels of dumbfrickery

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I like that the fundamental basis of this morons homosexualry is that he is too stupid to look into highschool level physics, thermodynamics, or math.
            Instead he just goes
            >NOOOOO EVIL MAGICS NOT REAL MASS DOES NOT BECOME LIGHTER
            and tries to justify everything from there.
            As if we don't have fricking naturally radioactive elements that literally fricking decay into energy before our eyes naturally.

            Holy kek, the cope!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I like that the fundamental basis of this morons homosexualry is that he is too stupid to look into highschool level physics, thermodynamics, or math.
          Instead he just goes
          >NOOOOO EVIL MAGICS NOT REAL MASS DOES NOT BECOME LIGHTER
          and tries to justify everything from there.
          As if we don't have fricking naturally radioactive elements that literally fricking decay into energy before our eyes naturally.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    0Man000dick0
  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think they're real (It's just a big fuel air bomb), but Russia doesn't have any bombers big enough to carry it that they're willing to sacrifice to Ukie AA

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *