Do you have the balls to ambush a tank driving past you from 30feet away?

Do you have the balls to ambush a tank driving past you from 30feet away? Well this Russian dude fighting Russians in Belgorod, Russia sure does. You should implement this into your SHTF training routine.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if that shit actually hit he'd be vaporized just as well.
    i understand that he's russian and therefore moronic but still.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no he wouldn't

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He hit something in the front part of the track.
      Not everything leads to a catastrophic explosion, and there isn't much else you can destroy with an M72(or equivalent).

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >vaporized
      I don't think that was a BMP.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if that shit actually hit
      it hit the front wheels
      >he'd be vaporized just as well
      maybe if he hit the ammo

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If his excuse is being Russian, what is yours?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It did hit. He wasn't vaporized.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think he ment if it hit and detonated as it would outside the minimum arming distance.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is arming distance

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That is well beyond arming distance, if the RPG-18 even has something like that which I somehow doubt.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know what that is. RPG-27 maybe. RPG generally have around 10 meters arming distance.

        The arming distance on a LAW nearly the same length as a T72.
        Surely you could fit at least one, if not more, tank in-between the shooter and target

        >LAW
        So much effort yet still so wrong.

        Never heard the phrase "what is x" before huh? Jej

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know what that is. RPG-27 maybe. RPG generally have around 10 meters arming distance.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The arming distance on a LAW nearly the same length as a T72.
      Surely you could fit at least one, if not more, tank in-between the shooter and target

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >LAW
        So much effort yet still so wrong.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Watch it frame by frame, that's an M72

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      on the M72 it's 10 meters.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you like this? Why must you lie and obfuscate about the simplest of things?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Normally I'd agree but it didn't look like a sure kill to me. Didn't seem to detonate.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Didn't seem to detonate.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Lol i just saw your reply to that anon after i typed this

            https://i.imgur.com/g7YavrQ.jpg

            What are you talking about?
            Clearly the LAW/RPG18/X didnt detonate, so its either the arming distance or a dud. Stop crying.

            Dont bother replying to me you are clearly an idiot.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Dont bother replying to me you are clearly an idiot.
              >t. blind moron desperately trying to salvage nonexistent pride

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                %3D%3D
                Watch that and shut the frick up, unless you want to try and tell me that the NLAW warhead detonated.

                https://m.youtube.com/shorts/FomFkCgcdhw
                Now watch this and compare the two you gigantic fricking moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >unless you want to try and tell me that the NLAW warhead detonated.
                Yes, it penetrated the turret. We went over this when it happened.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Penetrated the roof of a shitty T turret
                Wouldnt surprise me
                >Detonated
                Dont be ridiculous

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Wouldnt surprise me
                Can you show me it happening any other time?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                An NLAW penetrating a turret from above without detonating? No i can not.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Of course, you can't, as it detonated.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao shut the frick up you idiot

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seethe more, serbBlack person.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ah youre just pretending to be moronic

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/b64diQx.png

            >Dont bother replying to me you are clearly an idiot.
            >t. blind moron desperately trying to salvage nonexistent pride

            >fire
            >no bang
            Rocket motor fuel combusting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Kill" is seldom the desired outcome with LAWs.
          Mobility kill, however, is.
          And FYI, traditional AT weapons' projectiles do not make a huge explosion, but create a concentrated burst of superhot plasma that pushes through the armor and essentially sprays into the vehicle's insides. If it hits the crew, it's game over for them. Hit to fuel or ammo can cause secondary explosions, and doom the whole vehicle.

          Unrelated but Isn't NLAW arming distance like 20 meters?But why?Doesn't that make NLAW less efficient in urban and close quarters,who are they protecting at 20 m?(

          Contrary to what Call Of Duty teaches you kids, 20 meters is already an absolutely major frick up, way less than the "danger close" range. Even with oldschool Panzerfausts, you wanted the tanks to be no closer than 50 meters.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Even with oldschool Panzerfausts, you wanted the tanks to be no closer than 50 meters
            >pzf 30
            Here's a picture of you.
            You got me to bite on your dunning kruger bait.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The copper jet projected is not in liquid form but solid. The main jet velocity is around 8000 m/s. Penetration and effect on target (shrapnel and blast pressure) are greatly affected by the angle of the cone and detonation distance.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It very much is not a solid, the effect is hydrodynamic. Think water jet cutting but with hypersonic metal, also much faster than 8 km/s depending on the weapon.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If the cone melted or evaporated it wouldn’t form a jet. While the formed jet is very hot it is not liquid.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I know it's semantics here, but it is in a "fluid state" during formation.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What are you talking about?
        Clearly the LAW/RPG18/X didnt detonate, so its either the arming distance or a dud. Stop crying.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It did detonate and hit in among the road wheels, towards the front.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            See

            Lol i just saw your reply to that anon after i typed this [...]
            Dont bother replying to me you are clearly an idiot.

            >Rocket hits tank
            >Warhead doesnt detonate
            >Motor still burns/Impact flare
            Same happens in the NLAW video, go watch it then come back an appologise.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              LAW and RPG-18 rockets burn out inside the tube

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Lol i just saw your reply to that anon after i typed this [...]
              Dont bother replying to me you are clearly an idiot.

              [...]
              >fire
              >no bang
              Rocket motor fuel combusting.

              See [...]
              And stop talking out of your ass

              >thinks LAW warhead detonations must have FRICKHUEG BIG ASSPLODE like in Hollywood

              https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n3T8FfOvBBI&pp=ygUNTmxhdyBoaXRzIHQ3Mg%3D%3D
              Watch that and shut the frick up, unless you want to try and tell me that the NLAW warhead detonated.

              https://m.youtube.com/shorts/FomFkCgcdhw
              Now watch this and compare the two you gigantic fricking moron

              >NLAW
              has much more fuel than an M72, a dud combustion looks bigger
              >FomFkCgcdhw
              scattered more combusting fragments, flame and smoke from an already burning wreck

              HEAT warheads the dinky size of the M72 can create quite tiny explosions, idiot

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nice cope my guy.
                Warhead didnt detonate, the road wheel where it hit.

                %3D%3D
                Skip to 18:20 and watch this vatnik fricktards example.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Skip to 18:20 and watch this vatnik fricktards example
                it's the same small explosion as in OP's video, except in HD and not obscured by wheels and smoke

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The explosion is noticeably much much larger there though. Honestly, I don't know why you're so invested in this, duds happen.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                LAW warhead detonations must have FRICKHUEG BIG ASSPLODE like in Hollywood
                There are not SILENT ANTI TANK EXPLOSIVES you fricking moron. There was only one bang, from ignition, and the detonation bang is always much louder, but it was completely absent.

                And before you reply with some fricking nonsense about the blast being contained in the target, detonation occurs OUTSIDE the target.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You can literally see it explode you fricking moron.
                >it's the fuel
                There is no fuel left in a law after it out of the tube

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's just the launched projectile hitting the tank anon, it's possible it fused partially or maybe that's just sparks from impact, but that's not what a HEAT charge going off looks like,

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a light 66mm HEAT charge, it's barely more noticable than a 40mm HEDP when it does off, just a little pop and some smoke.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                anon a 66mm HEAT charge is notably larger than a 40mm one in terms of explosives

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Idiot

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just a little pop and some smoke
                No, a little pop and some smoke is what you get when a metal object hits another metal object. A 66mm HEAT charge doesn't make a "pop", and it definitely doesn't make a QUIETER NOISE THAN THE MOTOR FIRING YOU FRICKING moron.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are stupid therefore I'm naming you LAWutist

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              hits tank
              doesnt detonate
              still burns/Impact flare
              >Same happens in the NLAW video, go watch it then come back an appologise.

              You're correct. IIRC ww2 panzerfausts had an arming distance of about 5 meters.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >M72 LAWs are exactly the same as WW2 panzerfausts

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Skip to 18:20 and watch this vatnik fricktards example
                it's the same small explosion as in OP's video, except in HD and not obscured by wheels and smoke

                it's because he's a fricking stupid Russian with brains soft like borscht

                This

                This is what desperation looks like.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/7v6BvTz.gif

            [...]
            [...]
            [...]
            >thinks LAW warhead detonations must have FRICKHUEG BIG ASSPLODE like in Hollywood

            [...]
            >NLAW
            has much more fuel than an M72, a dud combustion looks bigger
            >FomFkCgcdhw
            scattered more combusting fragments, flame and smoke from an already burning wreck

            HEAT warheads the dinky size of the M72 can create quite tiny explosions, idiot

            >Skip to 18:20 and watch this vatnik fricktards example
            it's the same small explosion as in OP's video, except in HD and not obscured by wheels and smoke

            As i stated earlier it was under the arming distance, even confirmed by Ukrainian sources and they made a neat measurement for simpletons like yourself.
            Please do not get so emotional in future.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah reminds me of that video. IIRC in an interview with that tank crew, even without detonating that still somehow managed to pen the tank and shook the crew. They still had to switch tanks after that.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >They still had to switch tanks after that.
            Well, yeah. Tank was filled with gravy at that point.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's because he's a fricking stupid Russian with brains soft like borscht

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      15m according to NAMMO

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Was a great shot all things considered, did everything right. Short window of opportunity, fast-moving target, and only the tracks are worth going for with that little rocket launcher. What else are you going to do to an MBT with a LAW with a couple of seconds to act.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukrainian tank *~~*~~
    Filled with Ukrainian POWs *~~*~~
    Also it's AI
    NAFOtroons celebrating this

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did it penetrate?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doubtful. It looks like it hit on or near the first or second road wheel from the front.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ?si=TzH2n2zOF51t28hU

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you're using an RPG, you want to be as close as possible to the tank, right at the edge of the arming distance. Up from 50 meters away and out to its gun's maximum engagement range, things will only get worse for you as a tank buster. Either attack a tank from 50 meters, or 3000.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I chew tanks daily.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's an explosion in the OP screen cap. Duds and rockets fired within arming distance don't create fireballs like the one clearly seen in the footage. I hope this clears things up for you guys.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      See

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n3T8FfOvBBI&pp=ygUNTmxhdyBoaXRzIHQ3Mg%3D%3D
      Watch that and shut the frick up, unless you want to try and tell me that the NLAW warhead detonated.

      https://m.youtube.com/shorts/FomFkCgcdhw
      Now watch this and compare the two you gigantic fricking moron

      And stop talking out of your ass

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being that poor bloke who poured foundations and started laying bricks for his new house just before the war broke out. He probably had to take a 20 year loan too.

      So anticlimactic,clearly something went wrong no bang whatsoever,arming distance is bullshit,should be like 2 meters max

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That close might be actually safer than further away. That tank can't see shit.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does every video need gay ass music?

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being that poor bloke who poured foundations and started laying bricks for his new house just before the war broke out. He probably had to take a 20 year loan too.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So anticlimactic,clearly something went wrong no bang whatsoever,arming distance is bullshit,should be like 2 meters max

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you have a good shot at blowing up a tank as an infantrycuck and you don't take it you're not worth the air you're breathing

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nobody got hurt, everybody lived. shooter gained some experience, crew weren't even stressed; best outcome all around.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The first rule of war it to make sure everyone has equal fun

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    looks like friction sparks from the warhead disintegrating into the tank, it clearly didnt arm

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So is this ARMA 3 footage or AI generated? Haven't watched, work blocks catbox and Twitter

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Vanya, your esl is showing

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Checked but I'm not Russian. I live in Arkansas and voted for Bill Clinton as governor and president

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nice shot, but the warhead did not detonate. That thing would have been toast.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's the tactical advantage of letting your tanks get within infantry RPG range? Do Russians not have infantry support? Are they stupid?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      infantry slows you down. you want to be fast. a slow moving tank is an easy target.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unrelated but Isn't NLAW arming distance like 20 meters?But why?Doesn't that make NLAW less efficient in urban and close quarters,who are they protecting at 20 m?(

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sub 50m is insanely close combat distances and western armies are super hesitant about short arming distances. This is mostly a safety issue to stop troops killing themselves on accident during live fire training or the odd deployment.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Apparently Putinists got ambushed really fricking hard today

    https://t.me/russvolcorps/923

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      catbox it, i'm not downloading telegram to watch a 2 minute video

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's in Russian so I don't think it will matter to you

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          tldr then? any numbers?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sounds like he is from the third group of which there are 250 soldiers, he can't find the rest of his soldiers, the tank that was supposed to help them never got to their position, and later I think he is panicking and saying he can't move his arms and legs and the other guy tells him to bunker down while he freaks out. Take with a small grain of salt I am not 100% if that is correct but that is what it sounds like

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i don't need to learn black speech to look at dead orcs

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It would. Catbox it, homie, I want to listen to him beg.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      catbox it, i'm not downloading telegram to watch a 2 minute video

      Sounds like he is from the third group of which there are 250 soldiers, he can't find the rest of his soldiers, the tank that was supposed to help them never got to their position, and later I think he is panicking and saying he can't move his arms and legs and the other guy tells him to bunker down while he freaks out. Take with a small grain of salt I am not 100% if that is correct but that is what it sounds like

      tldr then? any numbers?

      here's the google translated transcript

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        handy, just like last time it really doesn't seem like the russian border troops were prepared for it, and this time the volunteers are deciding to dig in.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Chandelier vibes.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the right column reads like a song text tbh

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get it, if some ghetto militia can roll over the border in Humvees, why didn't the Ukrainian counter offensive just take place here? Send the 47th over the line, take a chunky prize like Belgorod, and just like that you've got Russian territory as leverage.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ukraine probably has a policy of not doing that, but if some disgruntled russians do it, different story. think how displeased the US would be if ukraine "escalated" by invading russia.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because the ukies don't really have the force to spare for an adventure in russia, for the same reason that the russians don't have the force to spare to stop it.

      The RVC/SB/FRL/whatever are auxiliary units that don't serve much purpose on ukraine's frontline, so they're able to be spent on political objectives like this. They come with the added benefit of being russians themselves, which makes the political situation trickier to dance around in russia.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >which makes the political situation trickier to dance around in russia.
        It's actually very funny reading Russian news about whole situation because they cal RDK and legion "Ukrainian soldiers", they are deathly afraid to acknowledge that those are Russians

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think in 10-20 years we'll get a really good documentary talking about just how terrified putin is of internal dissent and approval rates. The gaddafi video really did a number on him.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Psyops: because physical wounds heal~

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why didn't the Ukrainian counter offensive just take place here?
      Forbidden by western partners, unironically.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dicksuck Americans told the government not to expand the war to Russia itself if they wanted weapons. The moment the US stopped providing supplies was the moment Russian oil facilities started burning.
      state/defence dept jannies trying to manage this war can suck my dick from behind. This year we bomb their Victory Parade, inshallah.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Despite all the bravado Americans like to show they are giant pussies, Budanov will show them total war

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's not us, it's fifth-columnist Mike Johnson and his legion of trumptard followers who are holding the country hostage

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >fifth-columnist Mike Johnson
            Nah, actually even the current administration are cucks. They had a lend-lease act, they flushed it down the toilet. They didn't want to send missiles, planes or tanks (20 tanks, frick yeah!!!111) even before they got issues in Congress. Degenerate establishment is on one hand scared of russia losing and collapsing, while on the other hand they want to have friendly relations in the future because they're delusional about having russia being an ally against chinks.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              From October 2023
              https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/lend-lease-act-expiration-will-not-affect-current-us-aid-to-ukraine/
              >However, the use of the Lend-Lease was deprioritized due to the existence of newer alternative streams for assistance. Military aid efforts instead focused on three other American budget programs: The Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), the Foreign Military Financing program (FMF), and the Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA), which have all provided aid to Ukraine without any requirements for the return or reimbursement of weapons.
              >Considering the ability of small minorities in Congress to hold up the passage of legislation that has strong bipartisan support, political and bureaucratic barriers and limitations can make voting on aid packages sluggish. In the House, a few members can block progress within the Republican conference, even when a program has majority support. In the Senate, a single senator can deny unanimous consent, forcing the Senate to use cumbersome procedures to end filibusters. Lend-Lease could be an additional tool to clear assistance through simplified procedures. It may also be worth reviving for the purpose of overcoming Congressional gridlock that delays the passage of regular appropriations bills.
              >Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United States, Oksana Markarova, argued in July that “the option of leasing or renting weapons” should ideally remain possible through the Lend-Lease Act in the event of delays or difficulties securing weapons for Ukraine through other packages. She is currently working to extend the Act’s term of validity for another year so that the mechanism stays in place, should stoppages occur in the approval or delivery of other forms of aid.

              America is still a bunch of pantywaists.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >tanks (20 tanks, frick yeah!!!111)
              remember the tanks were only sent to get Germany to unclench on their Leos.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And that's gay. US has thousands of them in storage. Germany has 3.5 tanks. US could and should send hundreds of Abrams tanks.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i think everyone knew the abrams is a logistical issue and leos were a better fit, however germany threw up this ultimatum about "you send tankes first" to play chicken with the US

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >abrams is a logistical issue and leos were a better fit
                This is all fake and gay

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >don't actually hit the enemy where it would be effective
        Didn't we learn anything from North Vietnam?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As the other anons said, thanks to the U.S., Ukrainians aren't allowed.

      Russians however…

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russians however…
        Even RDK's incursion caused ass blasting in Europe the size of Dresden bombings. Even frickin' Belgium whined about "how did our weapons (frickin F2000 rifles) got used in russia?!".

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That is why Belgorod must be captured by partisan groups as soon as possible. Because it would make western red-liners froth at the mouth

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I hope this changes the perception leaders have on the use of western weapons. Restricting them to Ukraine is the same self defeating mentality that lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan. You have to kill your enemies if you wish to defeat them

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah damaging russia is the only way ukraine has a real shot, especially without tons of western arty and ammunition.
            Russia has more men, and a bigger and more functional economy.
            You have to reduce industrial output and that economy to hurt them.
            Will russia nuke?
            Maybe. But Ukraine leadership would all die if they don't escape and russia takes over anyways so nukes are less of a concern to a dying ukraine than to anyone else.

            Sending forces far into russia to sabotage industry might be the best bang for thier buck ukraine can get. Much of the russian economy is oil, and hitting refineries left and right is going to hurt, and refineries are pretty vulnerable targets that don't take a lot of explosives to damage.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      expect for that

      ukraine probably has a policy of not doing that, but if some disgruntled russians do it, different story. think how displeased the US would be if ukraine "escalated" by invading russia.

      because the ukies don't really have the force to spare for an adventure in russia, for the same reason that the russians don't have the force to spare to stop it.

      The RVC/SB/FRL/whatever are auxiliary units that don't serve much purpose on ukraine's frontline, so they're able to be spent on political objectives like this. They come with the added benefit of being russians themselves, which makes the political situation trickier to dance around in russia.

      >why didn't the Ukrainian counter offensive just take place here?
      Forbidden by western partners, unironically.

      Dicksuck Americans told the government not to expand the war to Russia itself if they wanted weapons. The moment the US stopped providing supplies was the moment Russian oil facilities started burning.
      state/defence dept jannies trying to manage this war can suck my dick from behind. This year we bomb their Victory Parade, inshallah.

      As the other anons said, thanks to the U.S., Ukrainians aren't allowed.

      Russians however…

      It doesn't technically make sense? Like okay, they did push, they did spend resources on that region but it doesn't change situation on southern regions, probably doing raids and fricking around in there is the most reasonable thing to do since Russians needs to engage their own resources to deal with them on low UKR cost. Basically destroy few RU units, come back, repeat, create chaos, repeat etc.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they did spend resources
        The point is that actually capturing Belgorod region would take like 5% of the resources used in the summer offensive. Zaporizhia oblast is fortified, Belgorod oblast is not.

        >but it doesn't change situation on southern regions
        It creates a lot of political shit in russia, because they either have to move forces to contain further incursion, or just take it up the ass.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that's pretty much a suicide mission, tho. and clearly they aren't taking the bait because they're just sending random units. I honestly don't get the wider goal here, the elections are over and there isn't a ton that they accomplish continuing to do this instead of just defecting to Ukraine and fighting there.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >that's pretty much a suicide mission, tho
            It's less dangerous than storming Zaporizhia. It's literally what AFU wanted to do in 2022-2023, but got pressured by US & EU not to do.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I can see why they were told not to, it's a waste of manpower and scarce resources.

              Fighting on Russian land puts the Russian side at a huge disadvantage. Russia relies on being able to lay down heavy artillery and FAB bombs on the enemy then sending in the golf carts. When they are in their own towns things become very complicated and they have to resort to urban-warfare NATO tactics which they suck dick at

              and what is the end goal? Russia will eventually envelope the forces there, cut them off from resupply and escape and then just start shelling indiscriminately because like you said those tactics are hard so they'll just not do them. it doesn't take a while lot of resources to do and wont take anything from the current lines. It's pure retribution which is pointless and doesn't win anyone any favors.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia will eventually envelope the forces there
                They aren't going to secure Belgorod from the inside, but by fighting their way to it. To envelope them means putting yourself right on Ukraine's border in range of Ukrainian missiles and artillery.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they're already in range, any collateral they can easily claim as Ukrainian. you're mixing up why you think this is even a good idea in the first place. it's either
                >propaganda to force the Russian public (who apparently have little say on the matter) to demand a withdrawal
                or
                >genuine military ambition to occupy Russian territory
                which is equally insane

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty much they are occupying some small villages around the border which isn’t a bad idea since Russia could just position their air defenses along the line of the border but now they had to reposition their air defenses opening gaps in their lines.
                They lost 6 refineries and 2 factories in 4 days

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's a waste of manpower and scarce resources
                >and what is the end goal?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fighting on Russian land puts the Russian side at a huge disadvantage. Russia relies on being able to lay down heavy artillery and FAB bombs on the enemy then sending in the golf carts. When they are in their own towns things become very complicated and they have to resort to urban-warfare NATO tactics which they suck dick at

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the elections are over
            You are a moron, the elections never happened and don't matter. They aren't a factor and never were. This is performative circus in russia, even their official acknowledge that to foreigners.

            >I honestly don't get the wider goal here
            1. Having russia actually bear more war shit;
            2. Destabilizing politics. Elections aren't a thing, but many support the regime, because for them war is a TV show, which doesn't touch russia. Turning Belgorod into ruins, occupying a chunk of russia proper and doing long-strike attacks breaks the illusion of war not being a thing;
            3. Creating a strategic dilemma for russia: you can either go and protect Belgorod or you can stary in Ukraine protecting the frontline in Zaporizhia.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              if the elections are irrelevant then why go on this protracted campaign of public influence? it's a media blackout for anything in the region now, Russians are used to quietly not saying anything when things get shitty and Swan Lake comes on so it's not having any affect on opinion there.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >this protracted campaign of public influence
                Because it's not a campaign of public influence, you're just mindfricked to think it's is such.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Again, what is the end goal? no one is answering in a sane manner.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Killing Russians

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >no one is answering in a sane manner
                You are just too dumb to comprehend, probably some reading disability or you're just brown

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What does a realistic win scenario look like? It's not permanently establishing an independent republic, it's not taking away manpower from the front as this is a purely internal security issue that can be dealt with via internal security and some assistance from the army, it's not changing public opinion on the war because it's largely irrelevant. There isn't one, this is literally just a frick you to Russia which is cool but unhelpful to the war effort in Ukraine.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >some assistance from the army,

                >unhelpful to the war effort in Ukraine.

                you can argue effectiveness all you want but you make the point yourself

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not permanently establishing an independent republic
                Correct. Something like this is not viable, at least at this point.

                >it's not taking away manpower from the front as this is a purely internal security issue that can be dealt with via internal security
                A-ha-ha-ha, no. Internal security can only beat weak zoomers, the moment they actually encounter armed resistance they fold and run away, just like those border guards did (which are FSB army detachments by the way), or get massacred, like the rosgvardia units sent into Ukraine. They'll have to either divert forces (which would be good enough as a result with this small investment), or continue getting pissed onto their face.
                Right now all RU media, classic and social, basically censors their own citizens from the Belgorod region who are ass blasted and are shocked and whine about what the frick is happening, trying to hide the issue, but it still spread somewhat. The more shit will happen, the less possible it will be to hide.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Communists lost their elections in eastern europe in 1945-1946 also. 'Why hold elections' then?

                They then outlawed and arrested right wing people, then cleansed left wing non communists, then cleansed any dissent inside the party.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The Communists lost their elections in eastern europe in 1945-1946 also. 'Why hold elections' then?
                The joke is they were going to win the elections but rigged them anyways because they were afraid of losing the next one.

                The funny thing to me is how the same stuff is happening but just flipped around, so Western leftists moved to Russia in the 1930s and disappeared in Stalin's gulags and were never to be seen again. Now there are Western rightists who saw a Pride flag and packed their bags, ended up in Russia, but can't get residency to live anywhere reasonable and don't have money to come home so they're stuck building a cabin somewhere in Siberia.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I absolutely can understand non leftists trying to escape Canada.
                What I can't understand is why they beleieve Russia of all places would solve their problems. They seem to imagine Russia as something like 50's US middwest but that's just not the case. At all. And this is not 30's either. In the age of internet you have no excuse to be this misinformed.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you keep the russians busy
        the ukies have shown that they can change operations on the fly an have much higher decision making speed
        So what might take the "ukies" a week to plan and carry out will probably take the russians just as long to deal with and also disrupt what ever they where planning
        I'd also imagine that putin and his power vertical will be knocking some heads together of whom ever failed to predict/stop/counter this this attack
        it is also a good reminder for the russians that they do in fact have to guard their entire border with ukraine and can't just move all the professional units and heavy equipment to the front

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Zelensky wanted to take the opportunity and capture Belgorodafter the collapse of the Russian front in Harkov. Westoid cucks didn't let him do it for fear of nooks.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that would give Germany an excuse to stop supporting them and go hang out with Putin again.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous


    WEBM.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      thanks for the webm
      it's interesting that people are building new houses near a warzone in a time of austerity.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is in russia though, they probably just didn't think it would reach them.


        WEBM.

        thanks anon, i tried but it always came out too large.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah there's no way that little explosion WAY later than launch was the warhead detonating

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hate krautoids and I hate compromised peaceniks in the congress, Total Zigger Death NOW

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I feel pissed off every day and ever hour this war continues.
      Macron, just do it. Do what you should've done two years ago. Make it right

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The eggs, are just a fire that broke out from cigarettes that Nazis were smoking. israelitensky and hato transexuals are making everyone brown no one is gonna be white in the ass on ass. Russian election was just as valid as Americans blm worship contest the golem anglos allow, George Floyd would win 10% of the vote,! If the Bible was gods book, why didn't he just give it to everyone. 90% percent of indian marriages are arranged, ak 47s are cheaper than glasses, so you weigh the eggs, send the waves, in vote, die and history forgets. We have no choice over our free will.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Legally distinct hyperborea theme from TNO
    Yeah, I'm thinking this is unfathomably based

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This shit's still going? How long does it take from Putin to reroute troops from the front anyways?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it probably isn't too high priority tbh. Russia has a lock on internal sources of dissent and information, most of Russia has no idea it's still happening so he can just wait until their supplies run short and send in whatever is left to mop them up.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > Russia has a lock on internal sources of dissent and information, most of Russia has no idea it's still happening
        Russian Telegram and subsequent word of mouth seem to be getting the news out, it looks like. And the reaction is one of acute butthurt that it’s happening at all.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >How long does it take from Putin
      He literally doesn't know about this shit lol

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they were stopped before entering Russ, and their equipotent destroyed
      - why would anyone care about something that is not happening?
      Carrying about something that is not happening is sure way to gulag or worse...

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What Tank is it? T-80BVM?

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Personally Im not on ukr side, they are ok i guess but rather against pucian mongrels, brown pol, 5th columnists and vatnkins cum chuggers in general, who were flooding this board since the war began.
    At first i was kinda neutral, thinking that vatniks had their storm desert, but after literally 1 week and looking how their 3 dollar blitzkrieg failed i realized the paper tiger that putinistan was, and everyone who was a functional brain though this too. but the russian shills kept being insufferable homosexuals (muh feint, muh goodwill, muh reagroup, muh we didnt want to take kiev or odessa neither needed kherson anyways) couldn't take a lose against one of the poorest country of europe. For god sake, they make fun of /k for being an anti russian board calling them redd*tors and they behave exactly like lefty homosexuals, the kind you found in such page.
    TLDR: as long ukr kills puccians im on their boat cuz is funny look at them coping and seething

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *