Do you guys think mexican citizens owning guns could be of any use in combating the cartel or would that be useless. There’s entire small towns where the cops are corrupt and people band together for a militia. Or is legal guns in the country an easier access for even more ammo that the cartel already have. But then again the cartel have rifles and body armor so I guess it doesn’t matter about keeping guns from them at this point
>Do you guys think mexican citizens owning guns could be of any use in combating the cartel or would that be useless.
They would sell (more likely be forced to give for free) the guns to the Cartel.
>T. Cartel scared shitless at the thought of people fighting back.
>people fighting back.
Most Mexican militias that fought the cartels, eventually became one themselves.
Look up autodefensas
The cartels would feed them their own children within 72 hours
No. They'd rather flee their country than defend it.
Gun laws in mexico literally don't matter, because they can be brought over freely from the US.
Why would you combat the cartel when they leave you alone and hand out free shit every now and then?
>when they leave you alone
Because sometimes they don't leave you alone.
That free shit is paid for in blood. Don't deal with devils
is that madness combat hank?!
No it is the main protagonist of the anime wolf brigade or something like that. it is definitely named wolf something.
Jin Roh wolf brigade
The overriding issue is the will to fight, not the man to man tactical breakdown.
The cartels couldn't control a population armed with bows and arrows if enough of them wanted them dead, conversely you could put a machine gun in everyone's hands and it wouldn't make a difference if they didn't want to fight.
Americans owning guns didn't obliterate crime or government corruption so what makes you think Mexico would be any different? Given my service industry experience with Mexicans most of them would be holding them by the wrong end or loading the wrong ammo.
surely the incompetence of the local governments in mexico means that you can already own guns if you really wanted to?
on a side note, mexicans aren't going to improve their country, because that would require the use of white people and not mexicants
>would that be useless
Mostly this. The only thing that would help is an end to government subsidized drug prices aka the war on drugs.
Plenty did get guns and formed militia, too bad most of them end up turning into yet another cartel
Let's face it, ammo is expensive and drug bussiness is just way too lucrative there
The mean IQ of Hispanics is 86, little better than those of the north american pavement ape at 85. There is no helping them because the problem is inherent to their physiology. They aren't nearly as spontaneously violent as blacks but that just means they can actually plan a civil war which they have been engaging in for a century now off and on.
You'd need a authoritarian state that genuinely gave a shit about them. Actually like some of the Latin American states of the 19th century before they decayed. Or even better the Jim Crow south where blacks were coerced into behaving and due to segregation leading blacks of superior quality could rise to positions of power in their own community by merit as the system forced on them was a rough meritocracy mirroring that of whites. Thus the blacks were lead by others of their on race and were not nearly as resentful as they might have been being ruled directly by outsiders. And the leaders were smart enough to know the score themselves. Blacks didn't always slaughter one another in America, then they were segregated and strictly controlled they experienced relative peace and more equal life outcomes then after they were desegregated. These days the leading blacks are selected by the government not by merit but due to their politics(ie being anti-white) and so they are just a worthless hassel.
I say this to explain what you'd need to tame the Mexican population, it is possible that guns could help if they were instilled with a culture like that of rural America by an outside force but this is a small factor. They might never be worth a tin shit as a country but they might at least have fewer chainsaw based decapitations.
>Thus the blacks were lead by others of their on race and were not nearly as resentful as they might have been being ruled directly by outsiders. And the leaders were smart enough to know the score themselves. Blacks didn't always slaughter one another in America, then they were segregated and strictly controlled they experienced relative peace and more equal life outcomes then after they were desegregated.
I wonder, is Thomas Sowell the product of a black master race eugenics program
>at last, massa will neva suspec
>GIGAbro bin born, him brain huge
There have been towns defending themselves with ye olde milsurp bolt guns, sure. Won't do anything about entrenched legacy Warsaw Pact interest in crime and mayhem flowing north.