Decoys become too realistic, how do you even differentiate them from the original?

Decoys become too realistic, how do you even differentiate them from the original?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't. Thats the point.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Develop better tech to differentiate between the decoy and the real target

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That is clearly a himars are you blind?
        >Verification not required

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Theres no point in trying.
    Scale up production and drown them all in munitions.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's easy. If decoys become that good, the enemy will try to disguise their real equipment by making it look like a decoy. So you should try to destroy the seemingly fake targets. It's basic game theory stuff.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what's a fake target and how do you tell it apart from random stuff sitting around?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        When, you blow it up, there is no secondaries and a lot of wood chips flying off

        https://i.imgur.com/YrRHUea.jpg

        Decoys become too realistic, how do you even differentiate them from the original?

        That's an excellent decoy, can barely tell without the shrapnel damage exposing the wood. Wonder if you could even re-use it, if its not too damaged on other angles (and the vehicle its mounted on isn't fricked)

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >and the vehicle its mounted on isn't fricked
          Based on the wheels and the axle, you can fix it with a hammer and a wrench in the barn it came from. Those aren't even identical tires to begin with.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody expects the inflatable tank to actually shoot... It's genius

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, that is a very good decoy. Decoy of cesar? Best hitherto I've seen was a sheet-metal fabrication of some arty piece that baited a lancet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Decoy of cesar?
      AN/MPQ-64

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The best part is that there probably are some autistic wood working Germans who would happily crank out these decoys in the hundreds for free, having the time of their lives.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just make the real thing look like a decoy

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Like that house that was driving around

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, I'd make the tank look slightly off so someone may suspect it is a decoy and not bomb it.

        Russians like to bomb houses so that is moronic.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >implying Russians can hit a house they aim at

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            As long as there are civilians in the house, they'll get a bullseye.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Wouldn't work against Russians either way.
          Look at their documentation of Ukrainian losses, a portion of them are obvious fricking decoys.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Wouldn't work against Russians either way.
            >Look at their documentation of Ukrainian losses, a portion of them are obvious fricking decoys.

            [...]

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >why zoomers can't afford houses

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I bet you feel fricking stupid rn

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I feel stupid cause someone posted the webm I was referring to?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes

            you both are dumb

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it becomes so realistic it starts rivaling original's cost

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It does kinda look like an AI-generated object, with bits sticking out that look military vehicle-like but the more you look at it the less sense it makes. Is it based on a real vehicle?

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    looks very realistic
    also kudos to the carpenters to make it looks so realistically with plywood and other scraps

    so when can we have weaponized carpenters in the battlefield?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >so when can we have weaponized carpenters in the battlefield?
      The NAVY already does that

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Forgive me If I'm wrong but Seabees are some of the most underrated people that contributed to ww2, motherfrickers were building shit on boiling hot, mosquito infested shitholes in the Pacific and got little recognition.
        P.S Badge look sick as hell

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are correct. Seabees are highly underrated in terms of use on the battlefield and what they contribute in a non combat role. WW2 was a shit show for those boys.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/iPQW1lW.png

        looks very realistic
        also kudos to the carpenters to make it looks so realistically with plywood and other scraps

        so when can we have weaponized carpenters in the battlefield?

        Wasn't the Dallas shooter a fricking Army carpenter?

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >back when recon was a biplane pilot with binoculars shit decoys worked fine
    >when TGPs came long recoys had to get better
    >now drones can recon from very close decoys need to be near perfect
    As drone FLIR becomes more common we'll see more decoys made of metal so they heat up in the sun like the real thing.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    A radar from something like F-35 or a satellite should definitely be able to differentiate wood from metal and compare returns with the threat library. Much subtler differences can be caught too, especially with neural network (AI) these days. The future (already in fact) is talking all that sensor data (radar+IR+signals+placement+...) and feeding it to a neural network to predict what color of g-string the Russian commander wears for ass in ass.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Decoys become too realistic, how do you even differentiate them from the original?
    lmfao, the decoys probably cost as much as or more than the drone that takes them out

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      much cheaper than if the real thing got hit moron

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >much cheaper than if the real thing got hit moron
        not debating that point

        simply stating that droning decoys has virtually no operational cost now thanks to cheap drones

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    quite a step from inflatable dummies.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's a very simple way, but I'm not saying.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *