CV90 bros, new lore just dropped

CV90 bros, new lore just dropped

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >1000 CV90s
    Meanwhile Russians are showing up in golf karts

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm glad Sweden still remembers how to hate russia.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >indirect 40mm fire 7km away
    sick
    lets see a bradley doing that

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Be fair. The Bradley is a good platform. And is doing good work in Ukraine.
      But, yes, I would rather be in the CV90.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Don't know about that one.
      Maybe with drone corrected fire, but it still sounds like a waste of ammo.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like you are a moron and a waste of your fathers sperm and mothers egg.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      how effective can that be? probably not fun for the guys getting hit but i doubt it does much more than annoy them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If it was effective they would release the drone video

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          depends. they withhold tons of videos for a long time.

          All else being equal, CV90 pens the Bradley.

          25mm would get through a cv90s armour eventually as well. they arent that well armoured.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They don’t withhold videos at all

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              they do actually. they have said so many times. its not specific for the cv90.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They haven’t said it once

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So they always release all videos the day after it takes place?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                What videos

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Are you autistic?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Load it with flak
        >Have it detonate above trenches
        It did start out as an AA gun after all.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cool, can we see actual combat footage tho?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No it’s banned

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >it’s banned
        May I see some proof that this is the case

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what's the dog cone for

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    have a nice day warriortard.
    We've been waiting.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Did the copelord finally give up on his hair?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        He made a treaty with it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Whoa.
      He got fat and accepted his bald fate.
      He actually looks like some steppe mystery meat on this picture.
      ...
      Any interesting antics after he returned from his exile?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fan vad glad jag blir när jag ser inslag som dessa

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cv90 is a light tank.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cv90 is a comfy mortar system.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That is really useful.
      Having indirect fire in a mobile platform is a good option to have.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It’s not really useful as it’s not really effective at indirect fire. It’s like have a baby 60mm mortar. It would be much more useful if it could run up on the enemy and just kill them

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I think military engineers and weapons designers know a little more than you about this, friendo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Okay. Every vehicle ever made is good!

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              No. Just better than anything you could design.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >baby 60mm mortar
          except they are twin 120mm mortars

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            (nta) Don't waste your time. This guy knows nothing about weapons or IFV's especially.
            I'd bet he's never even kissed a girl.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            (nta) Don't waste your time. This guy knows nothing about weapons or IFV's especially.
            I'd bet he's never even kissed a girl.

            Same person. Post guns

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Same person
              Wrong. Virgin.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >can’t post guns
                lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I notice there is no denial of being a kissless virgin.
                You're going to die a wizard!!
                LMAO

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Lol noguns

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Post guns
              >On a thread about cv90s

              U a fed? I'm onto you ATFberg

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        When will the swedes make their 40mils beltfed?

        Eeeh. I dno man. Seems limited in scope, might as well have man portable mortars.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >portable mortars.
          Two portable 120mm mortars? I'm curious, even without ammunition, how much do you think that would weigh Anon?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They are towed. Putting them on a dedicated hull is moronic

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >man portable mortars.
              >Towed
              You need to make up your mind. I can't keep up with all these goalposts being moved.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not that guy I was just letting you know about the portability of 120mm mortars

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I'm simply not convinced about a mortar-esque system on the CV90 chassi being a great vehicle yes you now have a vehicle with mortars, but also the logistics needed for it and the manufacturing.

              >2024
              >people still not understanding the CV90 system
              i know people like to throw this word around a lot these days but the CV90 is MODULAR
              its designed from the beginning to be easily converted from one model to another
              you essentially just lift the whole turret out and put in another with a 120mm gun for example

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nope they are purpose built. You don’t just lift off a weapons module and replace it with a new one. That’s the boxer and it’s much better

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It isn't if you're fighting in a tight low visibility environment.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah you can see how that scenario lends to the CV90 being suboptimal in other environments

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's almost like it was made for Sweden, which is a tight low visibility environment for over a thousand kilometers of terrain.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah it’s not the best design for a flat place like Ukraine. They hardly ever use it

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, because they don't have it. The mortar version.
                Regular CV90 has extremely low ground pressure among other factors, which makes it very good for Ukraine in actuality. It just needs a tweaked custom build to really fit, hence the ones ordered for them by Denmark are CV9035NL MLU.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                nta
                You're arguing with the 'tard.
                He doesn't want to discuss weapons or even IFV's. He just wants to ragebait you.
                Do yourself a favor, just ignore him, and leave him to fume. It's what he deserves.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm simply not convinced about a mortar-esque system on the CV90 chassi being a great vehicle yes you now have a vehicle with mortars, but also the logistics needed for it and the manufacturing.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Are 120mms even man portable? I thought that's why they were towed,
            88mm seems the normal upper end of man portable.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Seems limited in scope

          How? In WW2 most casualties were from artillery and inside that, from mortars.

          Add modern stuff and you get 16 rounds of guided 120 mm Strix per minute, ready to fire in <2 minutes and ready to scoot in <1 minute, on a platform that has the mobility and maintenance requirements of CV90.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >most casualties result from artillery has nothing to do with the cv90

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Granatkastarpansarbandvagnarna

      https://i.imgur.com/LkyfnhF.jpg

      CV90 bros, new lore just dropped

      I'm wondering about this 40mm Gun. On the one side, its super cool the design is ancient, but only used by sweden? Like, what armor can the 40mm with AP go through that the 25mm can't do? The side of a T-72?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Like, what armor can the 40mm with AP go through that the 25mm can't do? The side of a T-72?
        Most modern IFVs, of course not Russian ones, can frontally deal with 25/30mm rounds while a 40mm would rape that IFV to death. Modern 40mm Bofor rounds can do 170mm worth of penetration while a 25mm is nowhere close.

        I swear half the reason for the 40mm butthurt is because the USA still mostly uses the 25mm and Americans are kings at hating what they don't have.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          25 seems to do better with general IFV work. We can compare the Bradley and cv90 in Ukraine. You misunderstand IFVs as tools to hunt other armored vehicles while that isn’t the case. The Bradley has TOW to deal with larger armored vehicles. I understand some CV90s have atgms but all Bradley’s have them

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            NTA
            Your post is contradictory. You say:
            >You misunderstand IFVs as tools to hunt other armored vehicles while that isn’t the case.
            Then go onto talk about how the Bradley has a TOW to deal with armored vehicles.
            Which is it? Are you going to encounter armored vehicles or not?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You misunderstood the post. I said the Bradley has TOWs to deal with armored threats, but chose a better gun for general IFV work as shown in Ukraine.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >but chose a better gun
                So the CV90 40mm then.
                see

                https://i.imgur.com/6npt94O.png

                >Like, what armor can the 40mm with AP go through that the 25mm can't do? The side of a T-72?
                Most modern IFVs, of course not Russian ones, can frontally deal with 25/30mm rounds while a 40mm would rape that IFV to death. Modern 40mm Bofor rounds can do 170mm worth of penetration while a 25mm is nowhere close.

                I swear half the reason for the 40mm butthurt is because the USA still mostly uses the 25mm and Americans are kings at hating what they don't have.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Better gun for general IFV purposes. There is a reason no one else bought the 40mm CVs. And the 25mm on the Bradley has shown to be very useful in Ukraine. The same can not be said about the 40mm. I know you won’t like these facts but I have videos to back up my position and you do not. Sorry

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                25 better than 40
                kek. You're giving off such 'small dick energy' right now.
                Do you anything to back up your claims? Other than:
                >IFV purposes
                An info graphic? Something other than 'shown to be useful'?
                Because it seems clear to me that the CV90 is better in every measurable department.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, besides the combat videos I have a study that 25mm is better than 35mm for killing infantry. More stowed kills are carried. This evens out when programmable ammunition is used but the CV90s in Ukraine don’t have that capability as they lack the 3P ammunition programmer.

                > Figures from the US Army Research Laboratoy on investigating the adoption of a 35 mm gun on the Bradley come to the results pictured above: While a standard 35 mm point-detonating high explosive (HE) round has a higher lethality per round than a 25 mm HE round, the actually amount of stowed kills is considered to be worse at short to medium combat ranges, where the smaller fragmenting effect of the 25 mm HE round doesn't matter as much, because the accuracy is still very respectable. Only at longer ranges - i.e. above 1500 metres/one mile - the 35 mm point-detonating HE ammunition is favourable. Depending on terrain and combat scenario this can be satisifactory or not - during the Cold War the average combat distance in Central Europe was considered to be less than 1500 m, which means that a 35 mm Oerlikon or Bushmaster gun does not offer more lethality against infantry in this situation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > but the CV90s in Ukraine don’t have that capability as they lack the 3P ammunition programmer.

                no? they are capable of that. its hard to say how much of that ammunition they have though.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >On the one side, its super cool the design is ancient, but only used by sweden?
        Worst korea uses the same 40mm shell in the k21 IFV, but fired from a different cannon

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i love mobile mortar systems and thing they fill a valuable role in modern combat

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Easily the best IFV in Ukraine.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Other than the Bradley it is.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bradley is second to CV90.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Incorrect. The cv90 isn’t out fighting with the troops. They prefer to keep the cv in the back and just use it for indirect fire to make up for the lack of mortars. Bradley is hands down the best
          https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/01/15/the-american-made-m-2-bradley-is-the-best-fighting-vehicle-of-the-ukraine-war/?sh=104df0960e7b

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >CV90's are highly valued while Bradley's are expendable
            got it

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >highly valuable
              Relegated to lobbing rounds at targets of opportunity
              Lmao the cuck of all IFVs

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >stugna-p is out fighting tanks. They prefer to keep the javelin back...
            >stugna-p is hands down the best...
            Your tard is showing.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >infantry fighting vehicle actuslly fights with the infantry
              >this is the same as atgms!
              kek there’s a reason that there is not a single piece of cv90 /k/ino yet. Not one.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >There's a reason there's more stugna-p footage than there is javelin..

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah it’s a fixed ATGM with a built in camera. Is the CV90 also fixed in position? Also there’s a lot more javelin footage than there is stugna p

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            All else being equal, CV90 pens the Bradley.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              All else is not equal. The Bradley isn’t made to fight the cv90. It’s an infantry fighting vehicle that happens to be really good against armored vehicles. The cv90 is largely untested. Prove me wrong with cv90 combat footage

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no one with their own life on the line would choose to sit in a bradley over a cv90
        and i say this as a big chadley simp

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That’s only your opinion and it’s meaningless.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Someone posted 'the pasta' in his Challenger thread.
    Let him burn himself out, and then we can talk about awesome machine that is the CV90.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cool would loved to have seen footage instead of having to take the word of the crew.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I wont believe it until I see the video. If it was drone corrected fire there has to be drone footage.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I see you're back from visiting your girlfriend 😀
    Both here and in the Challenger thread.
    You got all the tears out virgin?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    warriortard seething harder than he has ever seethed before.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s the battle of the cropped opinion piece write ups

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lets compare technical stats about the two vehicles.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Let’s compare combat successes caught on video between the two vehicles

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >caught on video
            Only caught on video?
            What an odd thing to say...

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah evidence is important

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Evidence is important in discussing technical stats?
                I would have thought the technical stats were the important part.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                When comparing armored vehicles combat data is much more important than Wikipedia stats. LMAO

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Wikipedia stats
                Really they have such excellent contributors.
                Like: Loafiewa. Oh, wait, no. That guy gets put down every time he talks.
                LMAO

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't want to tell you how to do your trolling (you're the expert), but having been mocked in this thread quite severely, maybe a new thread would be the better approach?
            I mean, you're just drawing attention to how sad you are.
            Just a suggestion though. Take it or leave it champ.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Sure, Bradley has the better gun. All Bradley’s have atgms vs only a small amount of CV90s. Bradley has seen more combat in peer wars.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Given up on the Challenger thread, back for more mockery on the CV90 thread.
    You really are a twonk.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Tune in next month when ukraine stuff DIY rockets in bradley tow launcher as fire support.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why would they do that?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Because Bradley is a killing machine

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ukraine would
          >stuff DIY rockets in bradley tow launcher as fire support.
          because the Bradley is a killing machine?
          I feel I've missed the joke.
          Explain pls.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm guessing he's just saying "it just kills."
            You can put a soda bottle rocket in the tube and Brad would still kill the enemy.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That cannon packs a punch.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *