Crimean Bridge Happening II

Previous
What are the strategic and tactical implications of the Kerch bridge being destroyed?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    we have 5 threads already homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kys.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And you will get 5 more and like it you fricking prick.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Kherson Kollapse on /k/
    >Kerch Kollapse on /k/

    Is Moonman running this war?
    AP0AK0

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kupiansk collapsed too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Kill a vatnig tonight

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Okay, now we was close
        Tried to domesticate ya
        But you're an animal
        Vatnik it's in your nature

        Just let me segregate ya
        And eradicate ya
        I really frickin' hate ya
        I always hated you vatniks

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        N-A-T-O
        Sicker than your average russian killer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      MOONMAN CAN'T YOU SEE

      COMMIES AND VATNIKS NEED TO HANG FROM TREES

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Except Kherson is a moronic spelling, it should be Herson.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        My gf and herson

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crimean bridge going down going down going down

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone was expecting a missile attack or something obvious. But instead Ukraine (if they did it) chose a method for complete plausible deniability. Smart move.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All on Putin’s Birthday.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Happy Birthday Putollini

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not really. There's no way the train exploding caused the road bridge to collapse.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        a big old truck bomb full of ANFO would do the trick though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the train exploding
        it doesn't appear that the train exploded, it's merely burning. an actual explosion of any magnitude would have thrown most of those rail cars off the bridge.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It was a figure of speech, but the point that this can't have been an accident stands.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shame it was the vehicle section and not the rail section that collapsed, but progress is progress.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's currently a train actively burning on the rail section. We may yet see it collapse if it's full of ammo and fuel.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Ammo (1.1-4)
        >Fuel (2)

        And this, kids, is why we don't mix HAZMAT classes.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          With how piss-poor Russian logistics are you just know there's a car or two full of artillery shells a little further down the train.

          >Uh...Boris, should we be putting of 152mm shells with this fuel train
          >Why do you b***h Igor train is safe on way to Crimea, do you want waste time prepping second train?
          >Will miss of opportunity to get wiener sucked by new conscripts if you do
          >What am I thinking Boris, this is best plan!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Implying any conversations happen at all
            >Implying the paperwork isn't just waved along, initialed because "Why would it be incorrect? If it was incorrect, it wouldnt be on the paper!"

            Why worry about something that isn't going to happen?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              With how piss-poor Russian logistics are you just know there's a car or two full of artillery shells a little further down the train.

              >Uh...Boris, should we be putting of 152mm shells with this fuel train
              >Why do you b***h Igor train is safe on way to Crimea, do you want waste time prepping second train?
              >Will miss of opportunity to get wiener sucked by new conscripts if you do
              >What am I thinking Boris, this is best plan!

              Earlier today I saw where a load of S300 rockets had literally fallen off a truck onto a roadway during shipment through Russia and that's when I knew the 'Rossiya cannot into pallet' meme was not a meme

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There's currently a train actively burning on the rail section. We may yet see it collapse if it's full of ammo and fuel.
        It actually does not matter if it collapses or not. Concrete in burning fuel means that no train will run over it again until it is replaced or it will really collapse.

        Fire bad you know.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          These are Russians we're talking about. They'll keep sending trains over the rail section, pretending nothing is happening as the bridge visibly breaks down until it finally collapses along with the final train it ever bears.

          It will be beautiful.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think fuel can melt steel beams.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the rail section is massively deformed and the train is still burning. will be out of action for weeks

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The rail section is just cooking. It's fricked.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seems they left a single span of the bridge up for now. Just enough for people to get the frick out, not enough for supplies to get in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      on the another angle theirs a span missing on the other one as well

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nope, there are dropped spans on both sides of the road bridge.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Proofs?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            FUUUUUUUCJKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN
      hohol cope is hilarious

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >hahaha you've only 50% destroyed our only lifeline to the Russian mainland
        Truly this is Russia's greatest success in months.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >KERCH BRIDGE HIT
    >KERCH BRIDGE HIT BADLY
    I'M CUMMING BUCKETS

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Musk should have waited a few weeks before chimping out

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How absolutely fricking demoralized would the soldiers in Kherson be feeling right now?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They don't know yet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What’s stopping commanders from telling the Ukrainians they give up and surrendering en masse?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        FSB commissars?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >picrel
        Can't wait for Kingdom to reach that part of history.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Kherson front collapses
    >Ukraine is knocking on the door of Donbas and took back Lyman
    >Kerch Bridge gets fricked up
    Russia not having much fun this past week.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Current /chug/ cope is that the train bridge is fine and just needs cleaning. And that the explosion was an accident

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Current /chug/ cope is that Ukraine fighting back means WWIII

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >/chug/ went from Kyiv in 3 days to "p-please stop winning so hard ukies"
        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, Potato-man.
          Tempo.

          Check 'em.

          I kneel

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this is vatnik concern trolling. 'muh nooks' is the only cope they have left, but unfortunately for those doomers, its not going to happen.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i'm going to drink to celebrate this momentous occasion

        haha what a piece of shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >And that the explosion was an accident
      Another smooker?
      Wow, smoking must really be dangerous, taking out all those spread around airplane and now bridge...

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bros... are bridges weapons?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a logistic lifeline since rivers are a pain to cross if contested. In this case it's worse than a river.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anything is a weapon if you try hard enough

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      YES
      Russia explicitly constructed it at a height that prevented a number of large cargo ships from passing under it. This limited what kind of ships could enter the Sea of Azov and therefore the efficiency of doing business as coastal industrial cities. Steel isn't exactly a hard to get good; having to use five10,000 ton ships instead of a 50,000 ton ship (or whatever, example numbers) cuts into the margins you can make on manufacture and sales.
      The bridge was literally constructed to play frick frick games with Ukraine and as an implement of economic warfare.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes, you just have to accelerate them and they are practically bullets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Kerch bridge blown the frick out
    Ukrainian morale must be through the roof right now.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone have a good map of the Ukrainian railway? How fricked is the Russian resupply by train in Kherson right now?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the only remaining supply rail to the zaporizhia and kherson regions goes through tokmak, which is only about 30km from the front lines.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        30km is like: practice shooting with vatniks

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So very well within effrctive rage of Ukie artillery.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Well no trains can cross the Dnipro but now their is 1 line coming from Russia to the east bank.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY MEIN FUHRER

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >inb4 Putin bombs the rest of the bridge because he think the Ukrainians will use it to invade Russia

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    memes aside, I think we'll see Russia escalate its terror campaign on Ukrainian infrastructure, 100%. They'll probably try and hit every power plant and bridge in the country

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SUSPECT IDENTIFIED

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I KNEW IT!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the smooker answered the call

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SAMOOKER HYDEROVICH STRIKES AGAIN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can anyone stop him?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how? No way himars or tochka u can do it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I personally think it's car bomb, submersible suicide drone thing, or special forces. I don't know if a car bomb could do enough damage, unless it's Timmy McVeigh nuclear van style. Submersible drone lets you get right up to a support beam and blow it. I don't know how special forces would do it or how they'd get in or out.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        From underneath for sure. Special dolphin operation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        if it was ATACMS, I bet uncle sam said to Ukraine, "fine, here's one, show my what you'll do with it and maybe you'll get another." But could ATACMS even do this?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          One? Maybe not. Two or more though have a better shot. They can carry 500lb warheads.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i think its likely saboteur work

        the point of origin of the explosion is clearly the train, and you wouldnt need a huge amount of explosives to blow up a tanker

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the point of origin of the explosion is clearly the train
          I doubt that.
          I don’t see how an explosion on the train can bring down the road.
          If anything it’s the other way around. The tanker is flammable.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the road sections have just been shaken clean off by the blastwave due to their shitty construction

            there is absolutely no explosive damage on the road sections

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Definitely not... there are sections of road dislodged much further away from the explosion from the train. Also why does the sections close to the train on the other side still remain in place?
              Clearly the whole thing was rigged from under to dislodge the sections of road. They've done this many times on other bridges around ukraine already. Same method.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                no. also, the train and railway is a much more likely target because its literally how the russians are bringing in their supplies for kherson

                the road sections collapsing will have the nice added bonus of creating mass panic though

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What did you mean no? There is no way an explosion from the railway affected the road below. It didn't even dislodge the train from its tracks..
                Clearly both areas were hit spontaneously.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I wanna say it’s absolute bullshit that a bridge of this magnitude can just have parts shaken off, but this is Russia we’re talking about.
              I just assumed shrapnel from the explosion lit the train on fire, but nothing has made sense in this war.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >>the point of origin of the explosion is clearly the train,
          it clearly isn't - an explosion on the rail line that is big enough to throw entire road spans into the water is also big enough to throw those cars hundreds of meters away, and it didn't, the earliest videos showed the road sections dropped and only one or two rail cars burning, more recent ones show a huge rail fire but that's now how it started.. the ukrainians snuck a shitton of explosives underneath the road and the blast ignited a fuel tanker car.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >explosion on the rail line that is big enough to throw entire road spans into the water is also big enough to throw those cars hundreds of meters away

            you really trust russian contstruction?

            there is no explosive damage to any road section. theyre all completely clean breaks and collapses. feel free to show me an image otherwise

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              there are no breaks. bridges aren't made in one unitary piece, they're made in separate spans that sit on pillars. entire spans of this bridge were lifted up and sideways off their supports. unless the ukrainians brought in one hell of a crane while nobody was watching, then there was some other type of upward and sideways pressure that did this. a low-brisance explosion would seem the simplest explanation, but I'm open for any other ideas you might have.

              one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that the explosion didn't occur on the rail line, the rail cars going up was a secondary effect.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                again, there is absolutely no explosive damage to the support pillars or beams. they literally just fell off their support, the sections themselves are also completely unharmed and intact

                feel free to post an image supporting your claim

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >they literally just fell off their support
                so your claim is that they got sleepy and fell over?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yup, thanks to glorious russian engineering lol

                >dropped spans on both sides of the road
                >no blast damage

                where is the explosive damage in pic related?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ukraine isn't strong! we just suck!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ukraine is strong, but that doesnt mean you have to make up a fantasy story about what happened

                we value truth here in the west, not propaganda

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol no. see

                https://i.imgur.com/evqWWkY.jpg

                Bridge still burning

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                HEY YOU BRAINDEAD FRICKING Black person LOOK AT THIS

                MOMENT OF EXPLOSION

                I WAS FRICKING RIGHT

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                again, there is absolutely no explosive damage to the support pillars or beams. they literally just fell off their support, the sections themselves are also completely unharmed and intact

                feel free to post an image supporting your claim

                guys you are overlooking the obvious answer, the bridge sections have to be attached the pillars somehow right? instead of spending money buying the material needed and then paying workers to complete the work, the construction company owner simply kept that money and it became a new Mercedes benz S class or perhaps the down payment on nice new apartment in London.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The spans fell off.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                did they trip over their shoelaces?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Is that typical?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                there are no breaks. bridges aren't made in one unitary piece, they're made in separate spans that sit on pillars. entire spans of this bridge were lifted up and sideways off their supports. unless the ukrainians brought in one hell of a crane while nobody was watching, then there was some other type of upward and sideways pressure that did this. a low-brisance explosion would seem the simplest explanation, but I'm open for any other ideas you might have.

                one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that the explosion didn't occur on the rail line, the rail cars going up was a secondary effect.

                Neither of you is an engineer and it shows.

                Bridges are simply not built to withstand fires. You don't need to melt a structure to completely frick up it's function beyond all repair

                anon, concrete is a mixture of rocks and a cementing binder agent. the "melting" is happening to the binder agent - which turns the "solid concrete" into "scalding hot mud with some gravel in it"

                you can't build a bridge with muddy gravel

                and that bonding agent is... another ceramic. concrete melts apprx at 1500 degree celcius. Approximate the point where liquid steel completely disassembles on a molecular structure level, in fact. You find those temperatures in... industrial furnaces.
                Which are made of guess what? fricking brick*

                * A other refractary ceramics in much smaller volume for the bottom of the furnace where the bituminous coal burns

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Bridges are simply not built to withstand fires.
                you are an idiot and it shows. there doesn't appear to have been a fire on the road section, ergo the rest of your post is irrelevant.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >here doesn't appear to have been a fire on the road section
                moron who doesn't know how fire transmits heat to smoke and the surrounding air.
                Not to mention the cause of the fire most likely being a missile.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Not to mention the cause of the fire most likely being a missile.

                doubt it, probably a small bomb on the train. whatever it was the explosive yield wasnt high

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >whatever it was the explosive yield wasnt high
                The explosive yield was enough to weaken or damage the span hard enough that the heat from a large fire brought it down.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                we have video of people walking right up to the hole where the dropped span is, and (a) they aren't melting and (b) the very earliest video of this shows the spans gone but only one or two rail cars on fire, not the massive fire we see in the more recent photos. so go be a moron someplace else.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                prolonged fire would certainly put the bridge out of comission under normal conditions especially so with a bridge constructed by an oligarch friend of putin whose pipeline company had never before constructed a bridge but consider that they will run trains on it anyways as soon as the tracks are clear so no matter the reduced margins of safety the bridge will be used until it collapses

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the tracks are clear so no matter the reduced margins of safety the bridge will be used until it collapses
                Assuming the Ukrainians don't drop a second missile

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >never constructed a bridge before.
                It's just grift and incompetence all the way down, huh?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                explosion is the most plausible answer but I will concede that one would expect more marks indicating fragmentation like that which likely ignited the rail car
                in addition the way the bridge is damaged is odd, two road sections fall, one remains, then another falls with a small damaged section in the roadway beside it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >would expect more marks indicating fragmentation
                a low-brisance explosion would result in less fragmentation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm surprised no one has posted this here yet:

                This video shows the truck bomb as it detonates, detonation is at the 3 second mark.

                There is something moving under the bridge just before detonation, probably a small boat. However, the boat was under the section one section over from the section that got destroyed by the truck bomb, so it's pretty clear that there wasn't a second bomb in the boat.

                My guess is that the fire spread fortuitously to the railcar tankers that were probably filled with gasoline or oil destined for Crimea.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Flashback to June
    >XAXAXA UKRAINE NAZIS HIMARS IS USELESS IT ONLY PUNCHED LITTLE HOLES IN BRIDGE
    >Today
    >Kerch bridge damaged, some segments annihilated completely
    TRY FILLING THIS UP WITH CONCRETE, DICKHEADS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's with the fricking sea elephant?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ...Tempo?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      TEMPO

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, Potato-man.
      Tempo.

      Check 'em.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anon i...kneel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Congatulations

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        exquisite

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        witnessed

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Now I can't sleep. This will be an exciting weekend.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      TEMPO TEMPO TEMPO POLANDBRO

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there is literally nothing cool about pooland

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GOYDAAAAA!!!!!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I want quesitos

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Goy? Da!

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    love this picture. Reminds me of Independence Day as the alien ship burns through the atmosphere

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit, you're right.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ?t=124

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      thank you anon, glad the edit is good.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nice

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Where is firefighting?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      On the front line retreating

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      probably not safe enough to approach, given the structural damage

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    BAKER NEEDED
    >BAKER NEEDED
    BAKER NEEDED
    >BAKER NEEDED
    BAKER NEEDED
    >BAKER NEEDED
    BAKER NEEDED
    >BAKER NEEDED
    BAKER NEEDED
    >BAKER NEEDED

    This one was an emergency bake and I’m going to bed. Cheers lads, hopefully I’ll wake up to more collapsed sections.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Night mate. May dreams of burning bridge keep you warm and cozy.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Webms anyone?

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zelensky still doesn't have a foreskin

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      post nose

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Speaking of noses:

    Spastic is doing a Live happening.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    is the rail bridge still burning? and more importantly, has anyone made a sam hyde meme yet?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well, I just won my bets on Betmoose, so there's that!

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait to see the what the vatBlack person cope will be for this one. I'm already seeing that "it was an accident!!!"

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fake and gay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fake

      https://i.imgur.com/BZydBJK.jpg

      Can anyone stop him?

      The Russian SMOOKER cannot be stopped

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      go to 6 seconds, and slowly drag it frame by frame, you see it fade back to the normal bridge footage. goofy moron editing here

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wrote this a couple of months ago. Maybe someone better at lyrics can spice it up a bit?

    https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/54722512/#q54729682

    When you're burning,
    Feeling crisp,
    When fears are in your hearts
    I'll fry you all
    I'm on your side
    Leading you to fail.
    Air support can't be found

    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    VDV will sink.
    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    Corpses they will stink.

    When you're down and out
    When you're in the trench
    When shelling falls so hard
    I will come for you
    I'll take your heart
    Oh, when darkness comes
    And pain is all around

    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    Moskva she will sink.
    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    Bloated sailors stink.

    Sail on big blue bird,
    Missiles fired.
    Their time has come to blow.
    All your deaths are on their way.
    See them explode.
    Oh, if you need a hand
    I'm dying right behind,

    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    Fourth Guards tanks will fry.
    Like our bridge under troubled waters,
    Vatniks they will die.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      KERCH STRAIT BRIDGE IS FALLING DOWN
      FALLING DOWN
      FALLING DOWN
      KERCH STRAIT BRIDGE IS FALLING DOWN
      MY FAIR LADY

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Meaning the Kherson and Zaporozinha's supply situation just went FUBAR.

    This is the closest you get to defining the war in a single action.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Expect lots of downed supply helicopters in the coming weeks

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        SEND VDV

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm starting to wonder when the mutinies start. Fragging is already happening and the monke flat out doesn't understand that conscripts will not just sit and starve

        Correcting my reply from last thread now that i know that both road decks are dropped:

        As it stands, exactly zero light logistical movement (I.E. trucks) and civilian traffic can cross from Ukraine to Russia via Crimea. For the next few days or possibly weeks, all logistics into crimea will have to be done via the rail bridge or overland via the "land bridge" of eastern Ukraine. After a certain amount of time the russians may try to span and bridge the gap, but if their performance in Kherson is to be any indicator this will be unsound, haphazard, and slow.

        However, as it stands, the rail bridge is still standing. The rail bridge is also undergoing a major emotional event in the form of thousands of gallons of fuel burning ontop of it. At the very least the rails themselves are ruined. The concrete structure itself? It is being actively compromised by the heat, which is damaging the concrete itself and the steel supports and cables within it. The kerch bridge will not re-enter operation again until the wreck of the train can be removed from the bridge, the tracks can be repaired, and the bridge itself can be assessed. These things will likely take days if not weeks if they happen at all.

        For the next several days there will be no traffic through Kerch into Ukraine at all, in or out.

        The Kupiansk rail and the Crimean bridge were the supply arteries of the war, vital enough that the russians basically refused t consider alternatives to losing them.

        All they have left is the shitty caucasus rail / road routes - which is literally the further you get from the frontlines.

        I have no idea what's gonna happen, but this will be ugly. With the highest echelons active of command away from the front there's no one to negotiate mass surrender in kherson and any other potential total collapse scenarios.

        Ukrainians will be basically spending the next months killing headless, terrified chickens on each village. Even if the soldiers mutiny and kill their officer it changes jack shit because the officer is just 1 dude with no means to communicate intent to surrender.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it's going to be butchery and a smart russian would spend all day with his hands up and his pants down if he were anywhere on the kherson front about now.

          The effect in Crimea can't be understated either. A large number of people in Crimea are legally russian citizens who were moved there to colonize the rock after 2014. These people are now trapped and cut off from their home state, on a peninsula that is being encroached on by the enemy, is in rocket artillery range, and is in no way self-sufficient. The food supply to crimea is now jeopardized and if the ukrainians capture kherson so is the water supply.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Well at least they still have ferries.
            For now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >These people are now trapped and cut off from their home state, on a peninsula that is being encroached on by the enemy, is in rocket artillery range, and is in no way self-sufficient. The food supply to crimea is now jeopardized and if the ukrainians capture kherson so is the water supply.
            If Izyum , the nuclear plant and other exchanges are proof, both ukrs and rus will take steps to avoid an humanitarian crisis.
            They'll probably negotiate a sea convoy to evacuate the region soon

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        do they even have enough left? Ukraine is literally crawling with equipment for dealing with planes, russia hasn't been able to do aerial bombing - aerial resupply seems even more far fetched

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It'll be something like the doomed Azovstal supply helicopter deliveries from months back, can't wait.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can we get a TEMPO check?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      FULL SCHWARZKOPF

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We've gone full Stormin' Norman here, no brakes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We have reached John Boyd levels of many ever warfare.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Correcting my reply from last thread now that i know that both road decks are dropped:

    As it stands, exactly zero light logistical movement (I.E. trucks) and civilian traffic can cross from Ukraine to Russia via Crimea. For the next few days or possibly weeks, all logistics into crimea will have to be done via the rail bridge or overland via the "land bridge" of eastern Ukraine. After a certain amount of time the russians may try to span and bridge the gap, but if their performance in Kherson is to be any indicator this will be unsound, haphazard, and slow.

    However, as it stands, the rail bridge is still standing. The rail bridge is also undergoing a major emotional event in the form of thousands of gallons of fuel burning ontop of it. At the very least the rails themselves are ruined. The concrete structure itself? It is being actively compromised by the heat, which is damaging the concrete itself and the steel supports and cables within it. The kerch bridge will not re-enter operation again until the wreck of the train can be removed from the bridge, the tracks can be repaired, and the bridge itself can be assessed. These things will likely take days if not weeks if they happen at all.

    For the next several days there will be no traffic through Kerch into Ukraine at all, in or out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >major emotional event
      I never thought I'd have so much in common with a bridge.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      engineers will have to core sample the interior of the supports to see how fricked the concrete is. From what we have seen that structures FUBAR, fire like that for hours on end will wreck the concrete and possibly the rebar inside as well.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's a uniquely misleading failure mode, too - the combustion and leakage reduces the weight on that bridge span while it weakens it, meaning if the fire burns out before the bridge collapses, the structure may collapse the moment something actually heavy rolls across the affected spans (and those affected spans will extend surprisingly far because of how thermally conductive steel is)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          was thinking this exact point, even if you can fix the cosmetic damage, its probably going to cave the moment any real stress is put on the structure.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          was thinking this exact point, even if you can fix the cosmetic damage, its probably going to cave the moment any real stress is put on the structure.

          your response made me realize something
          freeze/thaw cycles in Crimea won't have started yet
          they basically have a couple weeks at most before every crack from the thermal expansion of the fire + thermal contraction of the cooldown starts getting wrenched apart by ice

          and this is an over-water bridge

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            oh your right! Any seal coat on that structure is busted, it will let moisture in and then when they start getting colder weather frost heave will do more damage.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The overland rail bridge runs within MLRS range in places. It *can* be used, but it's risky, and trying to push large volumes through it is just asking for fireworks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Clearly it WAS a truck bomb.

        https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1578632518307545089

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So the raging conflagration will weaken steel, but will it do anything to the concrete?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Concrete has a lower melting point than steel, my dude.
      If it's shitty concrete it'll have air bubbles too, which expand when heated.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why didn't they build the bridge under the water?
        The fools.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Concrete has a lower melting point than steel,
        full on schizo.
        If it gets so got you melt ceramics, everything else will basically explode from the extreme heat distributed unevenly causing havok.

        see: nuclear reactor meltdowns.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What?
          Ceramics are not concrete.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          anon, concrete is a mixture of rocks and a cementing binder agent. the "melting" is happening to the binder agent - which turns the "solid concrete" into "scalding hot mud with some gravel in it"

          you can't build a bridge with muddy gravel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He's moronic in that it doesn't melt, but concrete does experience significant weakening when exposed to high temps, temperatures that gasoline fires can reach. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780578

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      prolonged high heat causes concrete to expand as well as causes the concrete to dehydrate and weaken, both of which severely weaken a structure the longer its exposed to high heat. This starts around 200F

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Rebar will deform, tracks will melt, sleepers will burn or melt.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      basically the only thing that allows the concrete to remain suspended over the bridge supports is the steel
      the safety margins don't generally extend to heated steel - that bridge is structurally fricked (you can already see railing/ledges warped by the heat)

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So, I was looking through all the equipment Ukraine got and noticed 10 Switchblade 600s. Uh...Ukraine has already made it clear they have dudes in Crimea. What if a few of them used Switchblades to hit the train and the supports all at once? Between the train going boom and the Switchblades hitting the supports, that might be enough to cause them to crumble and this section of the road to collapse into the sea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the supports didn't crumble. the very first videos of this incident taken just at dawn show the road with spans from both sides in the water, and only one or two rail cars on fire (hard to tell how many with the smoke but it was a small number) but more importnatly the rail cars themselves were relatively undisturbed, they weren't thrown around like they would have been had the rail line been the source of the blast.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the road makes no sense as a target, and there is no blast damage there. the railway line is how the russians are supplying themselves

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >dropped spans on both sides of the road
          >no blast damage

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Switchblade is pretty much a fat, autistix javelin. Exact same warheads. While they could easily do up a tanker train like that, I'm confident in saying you would need a much more substantial bomb to throw the road spans off like that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah this was car bomb sized at least. Judging by the intact road sections the explosion was under the bridge. My money is on charges planted by frogmen

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Special dolphins made in Ukrainian labs.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crimean Bridge is falling down,
    Falling down, falling down.
    Crimean Bridge is falling down,
    My fair lady,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >checks what else is new
    >see this
    Are they trying to completely cut off kherson and crimea?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      seems like a general supply hit - that's one of the caucasus veins.

      Russians are unironically running out of supply routes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      oh shit good catch, makes a lot of sense

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think I got the exact moment of the explosion.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      From here: https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/1578622209219624960

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its a fake video you moron. stop posting this shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just stop

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That video's fake, the time of day doesn't match the initial impact images

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hate to tell you this Anon, but that is a very well composited fake. The attacks happened a bit before dawn, with clear skies, and a train on the bridge. Plus, the base of the ramp up toward the main span is the part that got hit, and they're driving up that ramp in the video.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Well done you got the exact moment of a fake explosion in a months old cgi video

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's a fake video you idiot. the incident occurred just before dawn.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So how will the supreme monke react to this new situation?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Threaten more NOOKS or say the U.S. did it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Have a slice of cake, it's his birthday after all.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      By throwing his shit at the wall.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    As I thought the road bridge looks nothing like actual attack-damage, it's too clean of a collapse. What was the train carrying? Was the train specifically attacked and something flew off and smashed the bridge?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    HATO wouldn't dare to send a stealth bomb-ACK!

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >STILL no firefighters on the bridge
    >fuel tankers still merrily burning

    Russia, what the FRICK are you doing???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The only way they're getting any kind of fire fighting equipment out there is on boats.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Does Russia even have firefighting aircraft? Because that's what they really need to fight this. Fire engines risk toppling the section of the bridge that hasn't collapsed yet.

      there are no breaks. bridges aren't made in one unitary piece, they're made in separate spans that sit on pillars. entire spans of this bridge were lifted up and sideways off their supports. unless the ukrainians brought in one hell of a crane while nobody was watching, then there was some other type of upward and sideways pressure that did this. a low-brisance explosion would seem the simplest explanation, but I'm open for any other ideas you might have.

      one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that the explosion didn't occur on the rail line, the rail cars going up was a secondary effect.

      Ukes might've rigged up some IEDs on the supports beneath the bridge itself and used a drone to monitor the attack to see how effective they were. Suicide drone maybe? Watch the IEDs go off and then hit the train as a target of opportunity? Or perhaps timed so that the IEDs go off when they know there's a train loaded with fuel they can strike to frick the structural integrity by bombing it, setting it on fire and waiting for the vatniks to try and fail to put the flames out.

      I don't think fuel can melt steel beams.

      But it can weaken structural integrity.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zelensky is a israelite without foreskin

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      he has my condolences, but he's doing the best with what he has

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And you are stilling losing to him

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      relevance?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, that's going to stop that bridge from burning. You keep at it, keep puffing until the fire goes out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you thinking about another man's penis?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Brace yourself, boys, we're seeing levels of seethe that is rivalling the Kyiv Rout and Moskva Transitioning

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They're trying, they're really trying right now.

      [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >w-we dont need the bridge
        no greater proof that /misc/troons have no business conversing on military topics

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >We don't need it!
        >Actually think Russia will be able to fix it quickly
        >Every analyst with half a brain says this is a big deal and big Russian names will probably be panicking like mad on Telegram
        /misc/ probably sucks more Russian dick than the average Russian at this point.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The irony is that the ultranationalist Russian bloggers are actually much more honest about the situation than the LARPing Western /chug/sisters.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >when is russia going to unleash all their might?
        >am I missing something?

        Who's going to tell him?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Fricking hell, is there not a single person there that has a background in engineering or construction? The frick is this moronation, yes, we'll pour out some concrete, surely a completely un-reinforced concrete bridge will be able to withstand the loads. Surely this bridge can be poured and cured in a short timespan, then quickly transported and fixed in place. And the fricking moron who thinks that that bridge which just took a massive drop can just be put back into place and used again.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's residual thinking from when the Kherson bridges accidentally had some holes in them and they actually tried filling them with concrete.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I forgot they had that bout of moronation. Fricking boggles my mind. It's even more mind boggling that the morons on /misc/ think this is in any way equivalent to the cratering on the Kherson bridges.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Alot of work to only have it mysteriously catch fire again the next day.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the decadent westerner fails to understand the cost saving strategy of making infrastructure that merely looks usable
          antonovsky bridge is fine, crimean bridge is fine, special military operation is fine

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Cyka, rebar is fine!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          that was from the nova khakovka and antonovsky bridges, and yes, the russians unironically poured some concrete and proceeded to keep using the bridges. they still are using them (there was a photo last week of a truck that some drunk russian drove off the antonovsky), and it's been 2 months now. that won't work for this bridge though, those spans don't just have some 1' holes in them, they're well and truly fricked.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Feels like old /sg/ was 300% smarter than these brainlets

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        When this is all over, I would love to see a compilation of the seething and utter denial shown by these posters for every major event

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is not having a foreskin considered being castrated? It's just a tiny step from being a troony

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not sure 300k bodies is enough to bridge that gap, yeesh.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    all these shots coming out are so fricking beautiful

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >HERE’S HOW RUSSIA CAN STILL WIN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Yes, the Kerch straight bridge has collapsed: but here's why that's a good thing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It didn't blow up, workers have just detoured the outgoing traffic from Crimea and to moskva instead.

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bridge still burning

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy shit man. That might be one of the most iconic photos of this war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the longer that burns the worse things get for fixing that rail bridge.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oof, from this angle you can see the right lanes are looking a bit bendy. That bridge is fricked six ways to Sunday.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse please collapse

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The longer that fire burns the lower the chances that they can fix it, it's already starting to look warped. I cannot even FATHOM why they don't already have a helicopter out there with a bucket to drop water on it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        from the looks of it theyve parked some engines on bridge and have one ladder up as seen in

        https://i.imgur.com/AjZYShg.jpg

        Is it odd the train stopped here? I feel like it's massive momentum would carry it a least a bit further down the tracks.

        incredible firefighting response kek

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I cannot even FATHOM why they don't already have a helicopter out there with a bucket to drop water on it
        They scuttled it for parts to put in their few remaining combat copter.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      THE BRIDGE, THE BRIDGE, THE BRIDGE IS ON FIRE. WE DON’T NEED NO WATER LET THAT MOTHERFRICKER BURN. BURN MOTHERFRICKER, BURN.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Lovely composition on the photo.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I like how there's no attempt to extinguish the flame there.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The only way they're getting anything out there is by boat or aircraft.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I mean what the frick are they going to do? It's a fuel fire, so even if they have fire mains on the bridge that still work it's useless.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Drop CO2 canisters from drones?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Wouldn't the open space just make the C02 dissipate. Foam water maybe instead?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          its literally a bridge get a helicopter to bucket water up from 10 meters underneath and drop it on top repeatedly

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe there's a worry dumping a shitload of water on it might cause it to collapse if it's been damaged enough, I don't know I don't build or bomb bridges.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You'd have to send me out on that bridge at gunpoint. I don't feel like driving a firetruck on the badly damaged car span to try to put a fire out on the badly damaged rail span, all the while wondering if there won't just be a sudden second wave missile attack.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty sure the fire was smaller half an hour ago.
      Oh well they will let the fire burn through and hope everything still works. (they won't)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tell the flames can ignite the other tanks.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      greetings from PrepHole
      the heat from the train cooks the bridge

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it odd the train stopped here? I feel like it's massive momentum would carry it a least a bit further down the tracks.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, where's the locomotive?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        noped the frick out

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      OH HOLY SHIT THAT'S A MIXED LOAD ON THAT TRAIN! PLEASE LET THERE BE AMMO IN THOSE GREEN CARS!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Those are hopper cars, you wouldn't load ammo into them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          (You) wouldn't. I have seen enough russian "logistics" in this war to believe they could.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Boy, would be a real shame if those green cars were coal cars.

        How far will Ukrainian black magic go?!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/BC9EhxY.jpg

      Boy, would be a real shame if those green cars were coal cars.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      OH HOLY SHIT THAT'S A MIXED LOAD ON THAT TRAIN! PLEASE LET THERE BE AMMO IN THOSE GREEN CARS!

      green cars look like grain or possibly other pellet materials like fertilizer, those tankers are the interesting ones, probably a few different spicy materials in there.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fertilizer
        I WANT TO BELIEVE

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fertilizer
        Please let this whole thing go full Beirut.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, where's the locomotive?

      Engineer probably heard the boom, saw fire, disconnected the locomotive and booked it. That would kick in the air brakes on the following cars, at least in theory. Other option is the Ukes stole a whole fricking train, parked it on the bridge, disconnected the locomotive, rigged up their funny business and then used the locomotive to frick off to safety.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/BC9EhxY.jpg

      Please be coal please be coal full of coal dust please be coal

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't the place where the road starts to descent a structural weak point? This feels rather odd.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So this means the Melitopol offensive is coming any day now, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      unironically, all supplies to Kherson run through Tokmak now

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bravo Ukraine (or whoever)!
    I really hoped for that to happen, no better way to say "FRICK OFF" to Russian and show them how fragile their hold on Ukraine is.

    I was hoping for a complete cut, but this will do nicely, getting the train on top of it is the cherry above the cake.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Russians are saying it was a car bomb now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      God fricking damnit, the Irish did this.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        COME OUT YE VAT AND TANS

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The spans collapsed...it's all ogre bros...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tell me this is real and you're not bullshitting me. Please.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that's just the same image of the collapsed road span from an hour ago, we're still waiting for the rail bridge to collapse

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's 4 realsies but no concrete idea on cause yet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats just

      https://i.imgur.com/DWwmZCV.jpg

      The fire rises

      from the other side not the rail

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      now moskova can use bridge to travel and support next vdv landings

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The fire rises

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The other side of the road bridge might not have completely collapsed but it is certainly not in passable shape either without complete repairs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >colums did not collapse
      it split from it's own weight - maybe a chunk of the cargo fell on the span?.
      I assume it's was too wide and thin because it was made by russian oligarch like that anon said.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there was a pick from earlier in the thread from the deck and the right-side bridge deck is holed too, it's impassible. However, the spans and sides of the right deck DID seem to stand for now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ut it is certainly not in passable shape either without complete repairs.
      I wish they still try to use it and we get more picture when it crumble.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There is no panic at the Kerch strait bridge.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    MOMENT OF EXPLOSION

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HOLY SHIT! THATS AN ENTIRE SEMI TRUCK!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      DID RUSSIA JUST LOSE THE CROWN israeliteEL OF ITS INFRASTRUCTURE TO A GODAMNED TRUCK BOMB

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Literal HATO ISIS tactics.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Russia went in expecting nothing more than an insurgency? They got their fricking insurgency.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That actually looks plausible. Holy frick.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      huh, I guess a car bomb really could frick it up that bad

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That looks like the explosion was coming from the truck there.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy shit it was an actual fricking car bomb! INSHA'ALLAH CHECHNYA SHALL RISE AGAIN! I knew those crazy bastards weren't completely cucked.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's not even close to being the same bridge. Frick off with this.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Now THIS is cope

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I was wrong, the other video they posted is clearer proof

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kerch bridge returned to port under its own power.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is it that truck?
      looks... almost like an ammo explosion

      would that truck be headed towards or away from Crimea?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Based on the relative position of the bridges, into Crimea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russia says it was a truck bomb.
      "A truck was blown up on the Crimean bridge - National Anti-Terrorism Committee.
      As a result, seven fuel tanks of the train caught fire. Two car spans of the bridge were partially collapsed."
      https://t.me/breakingmash/38823

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Remote control or did the absolute maddest lad that ever lived give his life for this?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think remote would've raised one too many eyebrows.
        Probably someone about to receive some posthumous honors.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Incorrect, all eyebrows have been raised for months.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Someone add Allahu akbar.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick was that? HE/thermite composite?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what a mad man

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        SOMEONE STOP THIS MAN, HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWSY WITH IT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Timothy McVeigh confirmed for joining Ukraine SOF.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Plot twist that truck was carrying ammo and the driver was smoking

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can't believe they would get someone willing to an hero like that. Could this be an accidental explosion, like mistoraged ammunition ?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Plot twist that truck was carrying ammo and the driver was smoking

        is it that truck?
        looks... almost like an ammo explosion

        would that truck be headed towards or away from Crimea?

        Based on the relative position of the bridges, into Crimea.

        resupply semi having an unfortunate smooking incident?
        and it accidentally takes the rail bridge out of commission too?
        that's bullshit.
        i believe it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        so, from the looks of things the car was heading TO Crimea from Russia. What does this imply?

        Chechens exist, you know. Some of them are more than happy to martyr themselves if it means Russia gets closer to collapse.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ok, frick the Irish, the bridge just got McVeighed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is this the fabled isis-american tactics I've been hearing about?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      so, from the looks of things the car was heading TO Crimea from Russia. What does this imply?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The greatest threat to Russia is other Russians.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hey, remember how the Ukrainians just captured a shitload of artillery shells from the recent Russian retreats? Did they just put em in a truck and blow it on the bridge?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's coming from Russia towards Crimea so unless they went the long way around no

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Windows XP

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's the Irish component of the foreign legion called again? I need to know who to mail this whiskey

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      MY TRUCK IS LOADED

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        wait... is that a ukrainian nazi-leninist trident I see!??!?!?!?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      INSHALLAH BROTHERS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why do you assume it was a truck bomb?
      Might have just been hit when it was passing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Black person did you not see what almost certainly was bits of thermite scattering everywhere?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have seen some sparks but I'm not going to assume it's thermite or even if it was that it thermite that it came from the truck.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WAIT YOU FRICKERS
      At the time of the explosion you can probably see a boat crossing under the bridge. It might just be random waves, but it possibly wasn't the truck

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I swear to god it wasn't a truck bomb, it was an autonomous vessel packed to the fricking brim with explosives, possibly more than one. They found one washed up on Crimea like three weeks ago, probably from a test run. Also, Ukraine was given those a while ago and we didn't hear anything about them for a while, so we know they were capable of pulling this off.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >They found one washed up on Crimea like three weeks ago, probably from a test run.
          exactly

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How big are these things? Was a massive fricking explosion.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Those things aren't going to be big enough to produce an explosion that big. Also considering how inefficient and messy the explosion was, it was almost guaranteed to be just a huge pile of russian ammo.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Don't they transport their munitions by train normally?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Everybody does, rail is the king of cargo efficiency. Only reason anyone uses trucks at all is because the rails don't go everywhere.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So probably wasn't a Russian truck carrying ammo that blew up then

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's a commercial truck with no military markings and not traveling in a convoy. The only way it could possibly be moving weapons on behalf of the Russian government would be if it was moving some sort of black ops warhead to the front for combat testing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A blast from below wouldnt leave such a big scorch mark on the top of the bridge segments though.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It would if the debris from the upwards explosion hit the fuel tanks on the train above and the flames burst outwards from above.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the train full of fuel next to it would

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/heJKLy1.jpg

          >They found one washed up on Crimea like three weeks ago, probably from a test run.
          exactly

          >They found one washed up on Crimea like three weeks ago,
          Any of you lads got the source?

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You would think they would have some sort of firefighting vessel tasked to respond to this sort of incident. Perhaps they could use the Moskva's firefighting equipment?

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like some more rotten luck for the russian side. They can't seem to catch a break

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this thread reads like a twitter thread

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >n-no, stop making fun of my logistics system getting blown up

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >instant butthurt because he felt outed
        it really is a twitter thread

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You are a twit but that's about the extent of it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what a fricking terrible comeback anon

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't particularly care what you think, save it for your blog (or twitter apparently)

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Where are the weapons? I do not see any weapons in this thread.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a truck bomb is a weapon

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It seems to be a simple fuel tank explosion from a train. Perhaps this should be posted in /n/?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      VBIEDs are weapons

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      seethe more, bucko. we're past the bump limit

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    C'MON ANON RIP THE OTHER ONE HE POSTED ITS WAY BETTER

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/status/1578632558153437184?
    New footage just dropped

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1578633221041844225

      oh frick

      second angle

      Better quality
      https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1578632518307545089

      ALLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAHHHHHHH

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yep thats a big fricking truck bomb

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1578633221041844225

      oh frick

      second angle

      That's not a truck bomb.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You may be right. It looks like the explosion was in front of the truck. Either way, that truck driver is ded.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >That's not a truck bomb.
        I agree.
        I am more and more convinced that it was a missile. BIG missile.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      frick i'm really not sure, the explosion looks like it could either be from the truck or from just under and beneath it, in the latter case poor vatnik moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      24 seconds on this video

      under the bridge

      you see water breaking just before the explosion

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The size of that fricking explosion. I have no words.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy shit WHAT did they put in that truck

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1578633221041844225

      oh frick

      second angle

      Better quality
      https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1578632518307545089

      Doesn't look like it came from a truck? More like from the right?

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1578633221041844225

    oh frick

    second angle

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It looks like it’s coming from higher up, above the bridge. The train section is higher. Above.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/status/1578632558153437184?
      New footage just dropped

      Better quality
      https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1578632518307545089

      This doesn't look like a truck bomb to me, that explosion came from under the bridge, not over it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If this explosion came from under the bridge, why is the deflagration brightest on the road surface?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, honestly its kind of hard to tell exactly where the explosion came from

          the bridge doesnt bulge upwards and split either

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Better quality
    https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1578632518307545089

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >that car driving by
      oof

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This clearly really was an accident. Russia was transporting unstable outdated explosives.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Even if the spans on the right haven't fell, they will still need to be removed to repair that pillar.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Look at the detonation footage. That span is absolutely fricked. It's weaker than tissue paper.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      dude, it's over
      let him go

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, big crack on the left.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ut it is certainly not in passable shape either without complete repairs.
          I wish they still try to use it and we get more picture when it crumble.

          Come on, it's fine, just drive over it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > (X) Doubt
            > (X) Doubt
            > (X) Doubt
            > (X) Doubt
            > (X) Doubt
            > (X) Doubt

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Aftermath video shows that it's just a torn railing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/naUXwOu.png

      dude, it's over
      let him go

      I wonder if they'll try to drive over damaged road anyways, wouldn't surprise me.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw Ireland heard Russia threatening The English and bombed their bridge
    The only people who get to kill the English are the Irish!

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    wait that does look like a boat, what the frick?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the explosion was on the next span over though, not that one.

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If that it is a boat, then what? Did they just load a boat with a bunch of bombs and send it on it's merry way? Actually that sounds kinda sick.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >If that it is a boat, then what? Did they just load a boat with a bunch of bombs and send it on it's merry way? Actually that sounds kinda sick.
      Didnt the burgers provide them with "autonomous coast defence vessels" ?
      Maybe they really just loaded it up to the brim with explosives and suicide it?:O

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more footage found

    ?t=20

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    REPOSTING BECAUSE IM A moron

    THIS WAS A BOAT NOT A TRUCK

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that is a wave

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats a wave Zach

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that's not the span that went boom though...

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ISIS approves

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Number one, that's terror. Number two, that's terror.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Now that we think about it, Moskva WAS sunk by Hobols after all. That was a terrorist attack too!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >THERE ARE CIVILIAN CASUALTIES
      >THAT MEANS IT'S A TERRORIST ATTACK
      >all the ukrop civilians killed by russian terror bombings don't count tho

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wtf i love isis now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, they just blew up a bunch of apartment buildings in Zaporizhia like two days ago so is Russia really in any position to be crying about terrorism?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Eh its a strategic target, Im not sure you could call that a terrorist attack considering they hit it early and with little traffic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >bomb and kill thousands of ukie civilians over 7 months
      >AHHHH NOOOO OUR BRIDGE WTF TERRORISTS!
      God I hate Russians

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Where is the evidence proving that it was ukraine?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The russian cries out in pain etc etc

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bros.
    Was this truck from FROM mainland russia?
    This literal who seems to think so
    https://twitter.com/leonidragozin/status/1578636117120647168

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it was, pay attention to the bridge layout and look at a map.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You blew up your own bridge Putin!

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a webm since nobody has thrown one up yet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Let's say it was a truck or a boat or whatever, whatever it is struck on a very precise place and time just when the train was stopping in that section. Dunno why the train was stopping in the first place though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Moreover if it was a truck it was coming FROM RUSSIA and if it was a boat it was coming from the Sea of Azov which Russia controls.

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    im starting to think this may unironically be a russian false flag for casus belli...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      oh please this is just schizo talk just like the pipelines

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >fricking over their own logistics to a vital area in the war
      >for the sake of mobilizing some more
      >after they already mobilized and showed they couldn't even do that well

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Want to start a fight with someone
      >shot yourself in the foot so people get on your side
      Its a bold strategy Cotton...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      False flag? Try standard order incompetence, the boom looks way too big for standard munitions
      I think a truck hauling a load of Russia's war crime-y artillery shells had a "smoke break" and that got way worse since it hit the train too by coincidence

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Another Russian 'falseflag' targeting their own strategic infrastructure?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, if it were a Russian false flag, it wouldn't have targeted something this critical to their already-strained logistics.

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How does Russia spin "a truck forming from mainland russia blew itself up on kerchief bridge" workout tacitly admitting ukraine has operatives within russia, or Russians are willingly collaborating against russia

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I will bake

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Uhhh, quick give me a PANIK status?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No panic, police on scene, traffic being diverted to the Moskva.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Definitely something blew it up from below.

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You are aware what bridge destruction means, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      either way crimea is fricked

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1578638416194912256

    UPDATE

    fire burned itself out

    bridge fricked

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the rail bridge too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yep that rail bridge is right fricked, at least a few spans are going to need to be pulled.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      rail section is beyond fricked, at least 100m section of the bridge has to be replaced before you even think about placing rails on it again

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That rail section is proper cooked, that whole span is gonna need to be replaced. Also, there's two huge holes in that road

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why is there no police, no firefighters? This looks like civilians walking around freely

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming the attack did come by boat, wouldn't it have made more sense to directly target the rail bridge instead?

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more kino

    https://twitter.com/IkerAuros/status/1578638926474276864

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So, 2 bombs on pillars and blew up when the train with gasoline was near. Brilliant diversion

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But seriously, how did they do it? If it was a truck, it would require a frick tonne of explosives, and they had to sneak it in without the driver noticing, assuming it wasn't a suicide mission, which it wasn't, probably.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >assuming it wasn't a suicide mission
      Why?

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukrainians have people willing to allahu ackbar a bridge
    >Russians have 0 morale soldiers that want to flee
    how does Putin think he's winning this one. to be a Ukrainian soldier is, according to the entire Ukrainian and international community, to be a hero
    to be a Rusky soldier is to be a villain (according to the international society) or a chump (according to Russian and Chinese society).

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The amount of particularized burning metal almost makes it look like it used thermite or some sort of anfo metal binary.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *