In the UK the force used in self defense must be "equal" so probably not. They need to have a weapon and you would need to be injured.
Reminder a man in the UK got a prison sentence because he used "excessive force" when he used a sword to defend himself against 3 pistol armed home invaders.
[x] doubt. Most of these cases I hear about involving people being convicted of a crime for defending themselves in other countries either didn't actually happen or involve behavior on the part of the defender that would get you charged with a crime in most US states (chasing people leaving the scene and shooting them in the back, executing people who are no longer a threat, etc.).
Can't find the exact case but here's three links referencing it so feel free to provide better proof
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defence_in_English_law#cite_ref-9
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Self-defense#Reasonable_Force
https://www.studocu.com/en-gb/document/royal-holloway-university-of-london/criminal-law/self-defence-revision/11894087
>In R v Lindsay (2005) AER (D) 349, the defendant picked up a sword in self-defense when attacked in his home by three masked intruders armed with loaded handguns, and killed one of them by slashing him repeatedly with that sword. The prosecution case was that, although he had initially acted in self-defense, he had then lost his self-control and demonstrated a clear intent to kill the armed intruder. In fact, the defendant was himself a low-level cannabis dealer who kept the sword available to defend himself against other drug dealers. The Court of Appeal confirmed an eight-year term of imprisonment. In a non-criminal context, it would not be expected that ordinary householders who "go too far" when defending themselves against armed intruders would receive such a long sentence.
So he got pinched because he was a criminal already and may or may not have gone too far.
To be fair, he could deflect the bullets, then when they're out of bullets he would still have a working weapon while they wouldn't. It's a completely unfair match up. Maybe if it was 5v1 and they had full autos
Ayy yo so like how do you get to the point where you decide to stretch your ass out to that size. Like aren't you basically going to be chained to bad dragon having to buy the new larger release each year because your ass is already formed to the old one?
Captcha: DRDASS
looks more like a suicide machine
it would be extremely painful
You're a big guy
for OP.
>verification not required
You'd definitely be able to defend yourself from your self with that thing.
I recommend using something that won't move in an unpredictable way.
In the UK the force used in self defense must be "equal" so probably not. They need to have a weapon and you would need to be injured.
Reminder a man in the UK got a prison sentence because he used "excessive force" when he used a sword to defend himself against 3 pistol armed home invaders.
[x] doubt. Most of these cases I hear about involving people being convicted of a crime for defending themselves in other countries either didn't actually happen or involve behavior on the part of the defender that would get you charged with a crime in most US states (chasing people leaving the scene and shooting them in the back, executing people who are no longer a threat, etc.).
Can't find the exact case but here's three links referencing it so feel free to provide better proof
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defence_in_English_law#cite_ref-9
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Self-defense#Reasonable_Force
https://www.studocu.com/en-gb/document/royal-holloway-university-of-london/criminal-law/self-defence-revision/11894087
>In R v Lindsay (2005) AER (D) 349, the defendant picked up a sword in self-defense when attacked in his home by three masked intruders armed with loaded handguns, and killed one of them by slashing him repeatedly with that sword. The prosecution case was that, although he had initially acted in self-defense, he had then lost his self-control and demonstrated a clear intent to kill the armed intruder. In fact, the defendant was himself a low-level cannabis dealer who kept the sword available to defend himself against other drug dealers. The Court of Appeal confirmed an eight-year term of imprisonment. In a non-criminal context, it would not be expected that ordinary householders who "go too far" when defending themselves against armed intruders would receive such a long sentence.
So he got pinched because he was a criminal already and may or may not have gone too far.
He wasn't charged for the drugs
Why do you keep making these threads lol?
All complete bullshit kek
What's the narrative here?
To be fair, he could deflect the bullets, then when they're out of bullets he would still have a working weapon while they wouldn't. It's a completely unfair match up. Maybe if it was 5v1 and they had full autos
>laughs in American as all the commonwealth b***hes need special permission not to die in their own homes
You should give it a try.
are bongs allowed to wear a whole bunch of rings on both hands or this that outlawed?
Just get a bike wheel like everyone else
Try one of these, you can self defend and frick yourself in the ass same time.
Ayy yo so like how do you get to the point where you decide to stretch your ass out to that size. Like aren't you basically going to be chained to bad dragon having to buy the new larger release each year because your ass is already formed to the old one?
Captcha: DRDASS
Self defence needs to be equal to the threat in the UK.
Stab someone who assaults you? - illegal - unless something about the nature of the attack made it reasonable.
Stab/bludgeon someone who attacks you with weapon ? - legal
Someone attacks you on a bridge and during the defending yourself you accidentally push them off? - legal
Chase after someone who has just attacked you? -ilegal
And so on.
Carrying a weapon for the purpose of self defence is illegal though.
just get the cold steel shovel, and sharpen it properly
You can't use anything for self defense in the UK
Even if that did work (it won't). That baby weld ain't holding shit.