Could NATO beat CSAT?

Could NATO beat CSAT?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick is a CSAT?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Customer Satisfaction Score.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Canton Protocol Strategic Alliance Treaty, basically a Chinese-run analog to NATO.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How is ARMA 3 getting everything right

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All but Stealth A-10 and F-18.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        F-18 Block III has stealth improvements, among other things. No stealth A-10 though.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    They only show a small special ops group, those have better equipment and training.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's still the fact that in this universe the t-14 is a mass produced tank, the SU-57 is widely used around the world, and Russia made a compound rotor hind.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia made a compound rotor hind.
        it's more of a coaxial rotor mi-28 with passenger space. The Russians were actually working on something like that in the mi-42, but it used NOTAR instead of coaxial rotors, and was canceled after feature creep and budget cuts. If Kamov and Mil worked together they could probably make something like the mi-48 depicted in the game by 2035.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The mi-42 looked rediculius

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I kinda wonder if that was part of the reason the program was canceled, because it looked dorky and wouldn't be cool on parades. The sketches make the thing look weird and fat in the tail section. I do think a coaxial rotor design like Kamov specializes in would probably be better for the purpose anyway, given that they already make a decently armed and armored transport helicopter in the Ka-29TB.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't really see your point. Russia has always been a major exporter of weapons and vehicles, and I don't see the outcome of the current war changing that. Iran agreed to buy a bunch of SU35s just last month, and while they aren't T14 variants, Algeria has like 300 BMP-T Terminators. None of that says anything about the state of the Russian military in 2023, nor should mass-produced T14s and SU57s being used by one of their main strategic allies say anything about the condition of Russia in 2035. Its not even that surprising that Papua rebels in 2035 have AK12s, India already bought 70k AK203s back in 2021 so its not like Russia is the exclusive user of them right now; to say nothing of 12 years from now

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia has always been a major exporter of weapons and vehicles, and I don't see the outcome of the current war changing that
          Russia is currently having trouble delivering on any of their arms contracts. They're using tanks that were supposed to be exported to India. Serbia is eyeing french fighter jets because Russia can't get them spare parts for their migs. Iran has little choice but to buy from Russia. It remains to be seen how long it takes for Russia to fill that order.

          Russia has both lost a lot of material in Ukraine and demonstrated that it is an unreliable supplier. The very public failing of their weapons, combined with the supply issue, will have a cooling affect on their export market. Russia would not even want to be exporting much stuff after the war, since they'd see rebuilding their own stocks as a priority.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they did

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He did nothing wrong

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Literally yes, Kerry was only upset because they concealed the nature of their mission from him for so long

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Get Oreokastro'd

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In Arma or IRL? In Arma, Nato is too broke to even maintain overseas bases, hence the Altis drawdown. IRL, yeah we could probably handle them. Aside from the earthquake bomb, they aren't really shown as having any gamechanging gear. Sure, the air-conditioned fragsuits and caseless rifles would be neat to be issued; but its not going to be the thing that makes or breaks an engagement.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is it ever explained why NATO is in economic recession while CSAT is thriving?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        look around you

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Around me? I see a wall to my right, my PC to my left, there's a monitor in front of me, wooden floors under me, a ceiling and lights above, and a window behind me. What's your point?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >window behind me
            Never have your back on a window or a door

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >monitor in front of me
            >window behind me
            Ergonomics fail. Enjoy your cluster headache, moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >be first gen immigrant from third world country living in the US
          >glance at apartment and nice clothes
          >have 10x the wealth my ancestors had previously

          Yeah, p good homie.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Do you live in Appalachia or Romania or something? It's decent to good in most of NATO.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Generally, no. In specific cases like Greece and Turkey its because the Chinese have earthquake'd them and used the turmoil to put them into debt slavery. They've also started civil wars all over the world to install puppet governments like in Tanoa and that one dlc African country. So it makes sense that Nato as a whole is in trouble, but I don't think its ever explained why the key players like the US and UK are poorgays now.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because the plot demands them to be for it to work.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's like that because the story was written in 2011, fresh off the global financial crisis, in which China avoided recession and continued to grow its GDP. Now that Russia has seppuku'd itself in Ukraine and China has spurned many previously apathetic countries, the geopolitical future portrayed in Arma 3 doesn't look so realistic. But it seemed plausible enough at the time of the game's release.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nah, Arma 3 story was written in a rush in 2013. The 2011 script was about a war between Iran and Israel (this is why the campaign has a shitload of israeli weapons and vehicles), with Miller (at that point a regular civilian) as the protag. it was weirdly meant to be an open world rpg with a dialog wheel. But then those two devs got imprisoned for spying, so the plot was canned.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh right, I remember those guys getting in trouble back then lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A difference of two years doesn't change the overall point of what was said about predicted geopolitics. I kind of doubt the devs wrote the whole story in the same year the game released, though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The 2011 script was about a war between Iran and Israel
                > But then those two devs got imprisoned for spying, so the plot was canned.
                That's the most moronic fanfiction I've ever read. They were literally arrested on the Greek island of Lemnos. Go take a look at what that island looks like and then look at Arma 3's map dumbass. Yeah, that's right, it's straight up just Altis and Agios Efstratios is right there, they didn't need to do much to change the name of that one. They didn't literally rewrite the entire plot and location of the game to be the same fricking place they were jailed at. That's moronic.

                Dipshit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, they are Greek islands, which were originally the setting for a war between Iran and Israel. Nothing I said was false nor conjecture. If you weren't aware and have learned something new then that's fine, no need to shit your pants about it tho.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why would Iran be fighting Israel in the Aegean Sea?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >hich were originally the setting for a war between Iran and Israel.
                A war between Iran and Israel. Taking place on Lemnos. Right.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol he mad about game development.
                Are you greek? You things get butthurt over tons of shit nobody else cares about.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not him or Greek but i would side with European Grease over turkshits or the "chosen" people of israel.
                Now frick off ESL

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Canonically, a massive oil crisis in 2014 (lmao) crushed western economies and gave Iran massive revenues which they then invested in a competent, high-tech military (lmao). Apparently in story leaks from the alpha build of the game they conquered Israel (lmao) and I think they also got Turkey but I'd have to double-check.
        Keep in mind that much of Arma 3's development happened from 2011-2012.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >In Arma,
      NATO straight up beats a CSAT regimen during the Stepping Stone campaign.

      Furthermore, in the main campaign Kerry kicks their asses a bunch of times with only ragtag rebels.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Aktchually,
        Stepping stone is fought against arficoons while their Chinese "allies" stood down

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing said was incorrect. NATO still fought a full CSAT regimen, called Scimitar. Also we see the Chinese CSAT in the Apex and Old Man DLCs. NATO spec ops kicked their asses.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      CSAT was supposed to have a significantly larger industrial base in 2035, and had finally started making equivalent quality equipment to NATO. they also have a technological edge over NATO; jet VTOLs, thermals optics and CRBN exoskeletons deployed as standard, not to mention earthquake bombs and genetically engineered malaria

      They are also involved in numerous conflicts, so they don't have the conflict-virgin problem that irl china does

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ArmA 3's aesthetic sucked.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      NATO and AAF were cool enough. CSAT looked really stupid, especially the camo and helmets.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It was all bad

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russians are not in the game, go back to your containment threads

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/A05esuL.jpg

        >Russians are not in the game,

        A side story DLC where Poland is the bad guy and the US sides with Russia at the end. Frick off

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >”Russians are not in the game, frick off!”
          >is shown that yes, Russians are in the game
          >”it’s just a DLC, frick off”
          How many times were you dropped as a kid?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Russians are not in the game,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      contact DLC
      spetsnaz ally with small NATO group at the end of it to fight off livonia (poland for all intents and purposes lol) from blowing up a giant alien fungus thing

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't forget the part where the entire civilian population of Livonia just start slaughtering each other for no apparent reason while the aliens just sit in their spaceship, wondering what the frick is going on.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          poles are deepwired to immediately go doomer prepper mode at the slightest sign of invasion

          all it took was for ayys to just vibe in their ship and less than an hour doing frickall and everyone in this tiny ass region of ((poland)) are at eachothers throats lmao

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      In the Contact DLC, you play as an American and basically help Russia annex what I assume is a stand in country for Latvia.

      contact DLC
      spetsnaz ally with small NATO group at the end of it to fight off livonia (poland for all intents and purposes lol) from blowing up a giant alien fungus thing

      It can't be Poland because there's mentions of the country sharing a border with Russia. So it's Estonia or Latvia. Russia annexes the territory it invades, which wouldn't be possible without it being on the border.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >It can't be Poland because there's mentions of the country sharing a border with Russia.
        How do i know you are American

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Livonia is a historical region of Latvia, but in the game it's supposed to be a Polish-speaking country sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania, located at the location of Suwałki Gap, renamed to "Andrzejów Gap".

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russians weren't trying to annex Livonia. In the lore, Russia has previously dealt with the Aliens, and knew that Livonia's plan of attacking their node would cause an interplanetary war and was trying to prevent that from happening

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't CSAT a neo ottoman empire and Chinese alliance?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the main players in CSAT are a revitalized Iran/Persia and Red China, with some secondary nations like Russia, and then a bunch of satellite states like Altis,Tanoa, Takistan, etc

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A single deranged maniac sails the ocean in his private submarine with the sole objective of fricking CSAT over. He has comprehensively dismantled CSAT operations by co-opting local forces on at least three occasions, including once where said forces consisted of just some old guy. If there is anyone competent in NATO outside of CTRG (doubtful) then CSAT don't stand a chance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Captain Miller of the Royal Navy? He doesn't exist now get back in formation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      millerchads we win again!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      my husbando Miler

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/jj9I9DT.jpg

      my husbando Miler

      What's that little scouter device on the glasses supposed to be?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        google glass. people b***h about arma not predicting IVAS, but every nato soldier always had a HUD, though its not clear what exactly it displays.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is this official description or some vatnik edit the whole thing? Sounds straight from Lavrov
    https://armedassault.fandom.com/wiki/Russian_Armed_Forces
    >Sharing a common geopolitical goal of pushing back against an increasingly desperate and aggressively expansionist NATO alliance, Russian soldiers often participate in joint military exercises with their counterparts in the Far East. The capital, Moscow, is regularly selected as a host city for CSAT members and their partners for annual summits, the latest of which was held in 2035.
    >Furthermore, in a pitiful attempt to cling onto its collapsing hegemony, the U.S. has arrogantly denied requests from the Kremlin for all NATO military exercises along its borders with Livonia to be halted. The upstart Livonians and their Western allies have long been a hindrance, obstructing the airspace into the Kaliningrad Oblast, and restricting the military's ability to resupply its Baltic Fleet bases.
    >In spite of this, leaders from NATO states have continued to throw unfair accusations against Russia. They have repeatedly accused Russian forces of conducting supposed "incursions" and "airspace violations" across the border into Livonia along the so-called "Andrzejów Gap" region.
    >Provoked by the constant disrespect and contempt that NATO leaders have exhibited towards Russian interests, the time for its entry into CSAT may finally be here after nearly two decades of geopolitical vacillation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ArmA III Contact's script was written by the Russian minister for foreign affairs

      Suddenly it all makes sense.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Cute body

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >depicts Russians as being allied with Americans against poles
    Because NATO should ally with Russians to utterly and completely destroy poolacks

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >OLD MEN RULING THE WORLD
    I like the old man dlc where you grow a insurgency and gather weapons for it by robbing CSAT.
    Also OFP resistance was nice.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a shame the scenario crashes if you play it for too long because the game can't handle all the variables. I usually try to speedrun it by arming up as fast as possible with some C4 and a disguise, then taking a boat to the military island and blowing up the dome.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    wonder what arma 4s story will be

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BI will go breasts up before it comes out. Mark my words

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      British people and all commonwealth consitautens are massive homosexuals and cannot get into guns. Frick brit commonwealth chinese jannies too.
      You will never be free and 2nd amendment pilled

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You guys need to understand, Take On Helicopters is the lynchpin of the entire store. Vrana's work in Seattle with Larkin Helicopter's is a big reason why CSAT became what it was.
    Vrana is why the Chicoms have the Eastwind Device, it was stolen from the US by Vrana.
    IT'S ALL COMING TOGETHER

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm forever disappointed at the absolute lack of creativity or care put into the opportunity for a original near-future setting. The original trailers and screenshots had stuff like the XM25, railgun tanks and optical camo. Even if it didn't go that far, it's a shame I had better gear in the irl 2015 army than the supposed 2030 one of the game.

    I think it's where Bohemia really got lazy and realized the community can and will basically make them game multiple times over for them. Little stuff that just says "we don't give a frick" like failing to remodel the base NATO vests after they swapped the main rifle from the Tavor to the MX.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ive been saying that shit for years. I quite like the 2035 setting, but I hate how halfassed it is. CSAT had a negev in every fireteam since the game was still in beta, yet to this day not a single guy in their whole alliance has pouches to carry belt boxes, this is true of every faction, but at least Nato have the excuse of not having an belt-fed when the game was released and the AAF being poorgay morons. Its explicitly stated that stratis gets biting cold winds at night when Kerry meets up with the CTRG guys, yet not a single character in the whole AAF (you know, the guys who have lived on stratis their whole lives) wear anything more substantial than a cotton BDU shirt. This compared to the British DLC for Arma 2, which had a whole separate list of night characters in the editor to reflect how differently night patrols were equipped. Like you say, the little stuff.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Operation Flashpoint:RES was the peak of Codemasters. Also the irl "negev" development team were triggered spies who got fired, that should tell you everything.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know caring about vanilla A3 is lame because everyone just plays with their own specific mod loads, but I think that's part of the problem. Bohemia can just shit out an occasional map and engine update and people will gobble it up.

        Little stuff just sticks out so much, like the 2 different kinds of NATO vests in game. The original plate carrier style from the pre release that have 5.56 STANAG mags and the "updated" IOTV style vests that they added well post release that at least have the 6.8 caseless mags on them but look like they were made for a different game.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this is because screeching tacticalgay boomers throwing a shit storm because it didn't look like GWOT with humvees and PAGSTs like they expected

      Bohemia should have gone much further in depth for 2035. what they had was way too conservative. we've already technologically passed it even now in 2023

      >no widespread use of drones
      >no standard thermals and AR
      >NATO without hearing protection
      >CSAT only using two Chinese developed vehicles (Xi'an and their ATV) despite being a Chinese dominated alliance. most vehicles being Russian when they aren't even in the alliance
      >CSAT still using QBZ-95s in 2035+
      >Swimming and diving added to the game, but only naval assets are RHIBs and a single American destroyer and carrier, and an unenterable British sub

      Wasn't necessarily a bad setting for 2013 but damn it could greatly improved. CSAT could especially use some further development

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think that despite being the ArmA folks, Bohemia don't actually really know a lot about military equipment so them trying to do speculative stuff was a tall order, further complicated by engine limitations. It's why so many pieces of equipment are just "current thing but slightly" different (plus the original Iran vs Isreal setting limited choices), it's the same shit the BF2042 devs did.

        If I had any competent computer skills, I'd have loved to see a vanilla rework of all the base factions to actually fill out unique ToEs for each. Makes me intensely curious as to what ArmA 4 will use as a setting.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it'll probably be like Arma as a platform and just have basic 1980-2000-2020 factions for US and Russia and just a remaster chernarus-sahrani-altis with everything else being a paid DLC

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >that pic
          I miss 2000s future stuff

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They also had to balance what the community wanted, you had people in 2013 literally REEEEEing that the game was even slightly futuristic, they wanted a Arma 2 with basically mid 2000s weapons. I was an alpha player and probably have 800+ hours on Arma 3 and people just kept b***hing and moaning.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The main problem with the setting is how it doesn't work well with modded factions.
      In Arma 2 you already had several NATO militaries, Russia, a Ukraine knockoff, European insurgents an Iraq knockoff and Eastern insurgents.
      The maps were also excellent.
      To play Arma 2 cooperatively with a community you just needed ACE, ACRE and you were set. 6 GB of mods.

      In Arma 3 you need at least 20 GB of mods. All the RHS shit which is overly detailed instead of just adding content that existed in the last game (tfw still no Tunguska) and CUP maps are massive too.

      When it comes to content Arma 3 with no mods has quite a lot but the scenario is not as compatible with mods as Arma 2. Still I like the 2035 setting on its own.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The REAL main problem with the setting is that we absolutely will have generalised AI by 2035 and that shit would be world changing.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick is the NATO MBT a Merkava

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why does Bohemia have to go out of its way to create fictional countries just for their scenarios?
    >Altis
    >Takistan
    >Malden
    >Chernarus
    >Horizon Islands
    >Livonia
    Who cares? Just write stories about real countries already ffs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I want them to take things even further in the opposite direction and go full Strangereal. Give me a full fictional world with fictional wars that I can get unreasonably fake-nationalistic over. Long live the People's Republic of Bumfrickistan.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lmao does CSAT even have logi choppers.

    DeD in the dirt for a long campaign

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >DeD in the dirt for a long campaign
      Ok vatnik

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they have that skycrane thing.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nuclear escalation could quickly lead to the destruction of the human race.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      DEFCON 1 would be a scenario and DEFCON 2 was Cuba.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Join us, we're killing commies.

    https://globalconflicts.net

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't remember where I heard this apparently the og story was about nato vs Iran in eastern Greece (not Isreal vs Iran) but Iran would have invaded and conquered Isreal and be using Isreal's Stuff, which means that a lot of Nato's Israeli stuff was actually meant for CSAT before the story changed

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Does ARMA 1 and 2 have a decent campaign? Played some Cold War Crisis and it was great, but heard that the rest of the series doesn't live up to it in singleplayer. A shame if that's true, because an fps campaign that's autistically /k/ instead of a power fantasy would be fun.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Arma 2 Chernarus campaign is fun in my opinion. It is definetly dated and has its issues but worth a shot.
      The game can screw you over due to its script system and if you want to break the game you can easily do it.

      You start out as a Force Recon Team doing small missions and end up getting involved in a regional civil war with outside involvement like Russia and the USA.
      The story is pretty good, there are a lot of details and side missions and you can achieve multiple endings. The last missions have some RTS elements to them where you can act as the high command of a faction while simultaneously commanding a small squad that can control a variety of vehicles so you have a lot of freedom in how you play.
      Be sure to pick a difficulty that lets you save multiple times because it can get buggy very fast.

      Arrowhead campaign is more straight forward and feels more like a showcase of the equipment.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I played a mission of that which was recreated in ARMA 3. I think it was called Manhattan. Seemed like fun, but it was really hard to find the rebel base.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why does the CSAT armor seem to be more effective than the NATO one? Also their guns seem more powerful than the MX rifle. But it seems like the NATO faction has better armor and air assets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're gonna have to specify what armor you mean. You're clearing talking about tanks and body armor but didn't say which is which.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I mean the general infantry armor for CSAT, it seems better than NATO's infantry body armor. Takes like 3-4 hits to kill a CSAT and 2 hits to kill a NATO.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That depends on where you aim and what weapon you use. CSAT armor is full body. Legs and arms are covered. NATO armor is torso only, but the vests they use are stronger.

          CSAT armor is level 2 all over, while NATO armor can go up to level 5, but only for the chest. A single 7.62mm round to the chest or pelvis will kill a CSAT, while a NATO can take 1 round to the chest and survive.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I think that's why then, when you do leg or arm shots the CSAT just walks it off

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              If you want to be bullet proof, you can combine CSAT uniforms with NATO vests.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Especially in the campaign, where the first time you face CSAT, you likely only have the 5.56mm weapons, which are underpowered as frick against any armor. 6.5mm or nothing.

                Arma 3 was such a good idea and design, just poorly implemented, love the 2035 time period and NATO vs. CSAT.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Especially in the campaign, where the first time you face CSAT, you likely only have the 5.56mm weapons, which are underpowered as frick against any armor. 6.5mm or nothing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I remember when I first played the Arma 3 campaign and the endurance update just came out.
                Was fun running away from the scripted artillery on Stratis with limited stamina in a mission designed around you having unlimited stamina.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How can that be true when in the first mission your commander tells you to pace yourself or else you won't be able to hit anything?

                >Jesus fricking Christ Kerry. You won't hit shit when you're wheezing like that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This was actually changed.
                I played the campaign in 2014 the first time and replayed it a few years ago and noticed teh difference you described.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This was actually changed.
                I played the campaign in 2014 the first time and replayed it a few years ago and noticed teh difference you described.

                They changed the stamina thing after alpha or beta, I can't remember which, or it might have been after release, but it used to be less whacky and you could run farther before your stamina went down, they kinda made it worse tbh.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I think it was after release. I was fortunate enough to play the campaign right when it hit and that arty section made me seethe hard because of it.
                I remember how easy it was in my second playthrough years later because they either adjusted the section or changed the stamina system again.

                Still I got to enjoy patrols in both playthroughs which added a lot to the campaign for me.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yea they changed the stamina system a few times, it always would piss me off because I'd hop back on after a few months and get pissed then get off. They updated the scopes too after alpha or beta they used to be strictly "zoomed in" then they changed the ACOG type scopes to have a field of view around them. They made so many changes to the game it got annoying after a while, I always remembered you could be driving an MRAP and run into a tree and just fricking explode lol.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't experience the vanilla changes a lot because I mostly play with ACE and CSE when ACE wasn't released yet. Vehicle physics are notorious for being buggy and the collision model needs an overhaul.
                I remember when someone accidentally blew up half our unit when placing an explosive charge on an ammo crate which caused the charge to glitch and detonate.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You can't finish the campaign with ACE unless it's a special version of it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I play COOP multiplayer.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The CSAT uniforms are supposed to be some sort of climate controlled frag suit, combined with their Land Warrior style helmets. An interesting idea, but ultimately a moronic implementation because no way will a flexible uniform be able to protect from actual infantry small arms and something like a mortar or bigger would just disintegrate them anyways.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *