No, apaches don't carry the necessary munitions. The 80s Iowa had piss poor air defense, instead relying on cruisers and destroyers for air defense, so time period doesn't matter that much.
>In this situation the ammo would be stowed safely in the citadel
Why?
1 month ago
Anonymous
because its not a russian ship 🙂
you keep the ammo in the magazine till order to prepare the guns is given
1 month ago
Anonymous
There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at, so there would be no need to bring up rounds from the magazine. The Iowa’s magazines are held deep within the citadel, specifically to keep them safe.
1 month ago
Anonymous
What about ammo for the AA guns people are talking about?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Those may be loaded, but those are outside of the citadel. Cooking them off won’t result in sinking an Iowa.
1 month ago
Anonymous
The magazines are also in the citadel. All they'd be able to hit is the ready service ammunition, the detonation of which would do little more than destroy the 20 or 40mm gun mount it was servicing and start a small fire.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at
the guns themselves and the elevation mechanism
1 month ago
Anonymous
If a launch ship is close enough to dispatch helos, its close enough to assume that the target battle ship would be armed and ready to fight. but yeah, fi you want to be a complete gay an assume the Iowa crew was in position, anticipating intercept, then you may have a point. that would be retarded, though.
1 month ago
Anonymous
We are talking about Apaches, not Apaches and some carrier vessel. Which, if it existed, would be expected to stay far outside the Iowa’s gun range, even if the Iowa could detect such a distant vessel to begin with. In either case, the guns would stay empty. Even if they did load them for some reason and a Hellfire rolls a natural 20 on penetrating a turret AND causes a cook-off, that STILL wouldn’t be enough to sink the ship.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>even if the Iowa could detect such a distant vessel to begin with
Iowa carries 3 float planes for aerial recon
1 month ago
Anonymous
>3 float planes for aerial recon
shoot down the apaches with them
1 month ago
Anonymous
>There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at
Shame there was no Sanshiki-like stuff
1 month ago
Anonymous
The real ammo 5 inch and above are never outside of the citadel until it is fired it goes from the magazines into the barbets to the hoists and then into the breach to be shot. So the ammo is always under armored protection and flash protection between each transfer point.
It is almost like they designed the ships to withstand being shot by giant fucking guns that went boom. They Nuked ww2 Battleships during Able and Baker testing and most were still deemed able to fight after the nukes and they had to scuttle them to get them to sink.
Modern ships and weapons are all tailored to never be hit and take damage. Battle ships were designed to be able to be hit take a shitwhack of damage and still fight.
>Not going through the Iowa’s armor belt.
going right through it like it's not even there, anon. an abrams frontal glacis is more armor than any battleship ever made.
>abrams frontal glacis is more armor than any battleship ever made.
AhahahahahahBahhdjrh2jdvb
10 Apaches with AM39 Exocets. Or even just 1 Apache with Exocets… not sure why helicopter launched AShMs aren’t getting mentioned as the ship obliterates they are
Apache can't carry Exocet you dummy, those things weigh 1400lbs each and need a launch platform
>Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill
My dawg, look at the attached diagram and let me know where the HEAT warhead of a hellfire would detonate to achieve penetration of the main belt or deck armor. Remember that a NATO triple heavy target has a total cumulative air gap of only 14 inches. Getting into the citadel of the Iowa would be impossible because the exterior plating and decks would detonate the warhead so massively early (10+ feet in the main deck's case) that the heat jet would disperse. For a main belt hit to access engineering or magazine spaces you are looking at > 37mm decapping plate > 800mm airgap > 25mm tank wall > 800mm fluid gap > 290mm main belt armor (at 19 degrees from vertical, outwards > 2-4000mm tank space > then another steel bulkhead, probably 25mm or so.
It's not designed for penetration like that. And it's even worse trying to hit the main deck because the slant range is so much higher and you'll be coming through the super structure.
Congratulations you poked a 1/4" hole Into a turret. Thankfully everyone was standing 10 feet away from the frontal plate and now the crew just needs to clean up some welding spatter
are you saying theres no chance to put a gun out of action by aiming above/below the barrel or directly at it?
1 month ago
Anonymous
There are 9 main battery guns, that are of irrelevant value in this fight. While you're doing that 10-8 5inch guns will have filled the area with so much shrapnel id be surprised if there was an intact piece of apache bigger then a burger
1 month ago
Anonymous
>that are of irrelevant value in this fight
mission kill is type of kill
1 month ago
Anonymous
It says sink
1 month ago
Anonymous
OP said 'sink' not mission kill. Moreover, a HEAT warhead works by penetrating armor with a hypersonic jet of copper and cooking off the ammo and fuel in the confines of a tank. Battleships are spacious, incredibly spacious, compared to a tank. All a Hellfire is going to do it put a small hole in the metal. Even if the turrets were engaged (they wouldn't be if they were fighting only aerial units) there's just too much space between the armor plate and the innards for a dinky little Hellfire to cause a cook off.
See
https://i.imgur.com/xt57A0m.jpg
There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at, so there would be no need to bring up rounds from the magazine. The Iowa’s magazines are held deep within the citadel, specifically to keep them safe.
This goes doubly for every other system of note on the Iowa. You're not going to cause any meaningful damage to a battleship with an anti-tank weapon, because an anti-tank weapon is meant to destroy tanks AKA small metal boxes on treads filled to the brim with fuel and ammunition. There's just to much armor and space on a battleship for something as small as a Hellfire to 'light the match'
Also, you're a colossal gay.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>You're not going to cause any meaningful damage to a battleship with an anti-tank weapon
well.. technically.. if you were to shoot one down the smoke stack..
1 month ago
Anonymous
L-luke? >t. womp rat
1 month ago
Anonymous
>well.. technically.. if you were to shoot one down the smoke stack..
It would do nothing as they are grated and baffled to prevent divebombers from doing exactly what you are talking about
1 month ago
Anonymous
>heres no chance to put a gun out of action by aiming above/below the barrel
that is the case. main gun turrets became the most heavily armored topside parts of battleships to the point where there is no weakness that doesn't involve a super-freak accident or user error. Iowa main guns were designed to take an 16" AP shell weighing 2700lbs
stack Hellfires next to that and let me know when you stop counting
Hellfires aren't even piercing a good portion of the superstructure, and even where they do pierce shit isn't an APC or a tank and crew are spread the fuck out
I did, about trefiddy vs faivninty, and so? The hellfire has a tandem warhead plus each apache can (theoretically) carry 16, plus all the HEDP 30mm shots and you got a ship full of holes.
Yes, people under estimate the Hellfire as an anti-shipping weapon. Its not a one hit KO but each AH-64 can carry a dozen of them. Anyone that tells you that over a hundred rocket strikes still isn't enough to cause a mission kill is just blind. I legit think that even a single Apache stands a reasonable chance of causing considerable damage and can do so with literally zero chance of retaliation.
I read it as a the colloquial "sink" as in render ineffective. Many purpose built modern anti-shipping weapons aren't even likely to literally sink a modern (read: lightly armored) warship.
Hahaha imagine making such mental gymnastic just to avoid admitting being wrong on an anonymous image board filled with fucking retard neckbeards.
Hahahaha
Get a hold of yourself anon. Everyone is wrong some times what the f
Iowas were designed to eat 8” shells and survive multiple torpedo hits. Hellfires just don’t have the punch to moderately damage one, much less sink it. Moreover, the operational range of the Hellfire would put the Apaches well inside the Iowa’s AA envelope (5” guns having a range of 16km vs the Hellfire’s 11) and even WWII Iowa’s had radar fire control and proximity fuses.
How does that make any difference? A HEAT round that small is going to punch a tiny hole in one deck plate and not even scratch the 3-4 other armored bulkheads behind it. A HEAT round is designed to cook off volatiles located literally on the other side of an armored surface, like in a tank. It’s not going to do dick against an armored structure like a battleship because the spacing between deck plates is measured in meters for things like rooms and hallways. The jet might penetrate one deck plate, but it’s not going to penetrate the other deck plate 2 meters away, it will have dispersed too much. Fucking learn how these weapons work before you shit up this board with your stubborn retardation.
Or better yet, have a nice day
because 10 apaches could do that like over 100 times
also re-reading the OP he says apaches not hellfires specifically so they could probably use one of the helicopter-launched AShMs like the penguin
How are they doing this without getting swatted out of the air by heavy AA?
1 month ago
Anonymous
fire all missiles before getting greased idfk
You're punching through a inch top deck and then a 5inch main deck plus roughly 20 feet of space?
yup
It'll have to go through decks (1.5" steel) and then the main deck (6") at an angle. I'm not sure modern ASMs are up for it. Boats just aren't built like they used to be. You'd probably be better off just wrecking the superstructure and getting a mission kill.
I think that amount of steel isn't so much for modern penetrators. The space would be the biggest issue as the deck would act like a cope cage for the warhead
1 month ago
Anonymous
Yeah but they're laser guided, they'll loose the laser if the bird gets turned into shrapnel
1 month ago
Anonymous
LASER BIRDS GETTING BURNED
1 month ago
Anonymous
Penguin outranges any AA the Iowas ever had.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Penguin outranges any AA
what if the combat isn't taking place in antarctic waters?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>how are they going to fire AShMs with a range of 50 kilometers at a ship??!?!?
lol. lmao even.
This^
Snipe all the good stuff like turrets, bridge, missile launchers, radar.
I bet a hellfire could even damage the prop and prop shaft with a good hit on the rear a water line.
Then you could just pepper it with 30mm.
technically the AH-1 is built on the same chassis as a UH-1 Iroquois, the same way M7 Priests and M10 Wolverines use the same frame as an M4 Sherman so calling it a Huey isn't entirely inaccurate
>Could 10 apaches sink a lone WW2 Iowa class?
appearently Apaches have very recently gotten access to Spike-NLOS with 25km range, thats probably enough to keep them more or less safe from Iowas AA screen except by flying into misses by blind luck
No they don't have enough firepower to do any serious damage to any area on an Iowa they can break some stuff on deck but that deck is 5 inches thick armor plate and the side armor is sloped 16 armor plate.
hellfire can penetrate up to 800mm steel, so if you have 3 air crews working 3 shifts 24/7 - in a few months they'll poke enough holes for it to sink over the next year or two
unless you find an island to hide behind thats not going to work with hellfires range limitations
1 month ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/IG12fxQ.png
A helicopter is moving slower than a WWII era plane, and 5" dual purpose guns with VT fuses can reach out quite a long ways. This [...] anon's idea won't work because a hellfire's range is less than half the radar horizon of an Iowa. I'm sure the accuracy of the 5" guns at >11km wouldn't be great but do you really want to be on the receiving end of a dozen radar controlled 5" guns for a solid minute while you get into firing range?
Also pic related is the USS Iowa's armor scheme, there's no way for a hellfire to penetrate the outer hull and then continue on to penetrate the belt armor 2 meters away. What the hellfires totally can do though is poke holes in the superstructure and turrets praying they hit something important, and with 120 missiles on 10 helos chances are fire control and radar would be pretty much fucked by the time you finished, leaving her open to further attacks and forcing her to retreat. I do wonder how well the CIWS on the 80s refit would do against hellfires, I'm sure they could swat at least a few of them.
I thought the hellfire had a longer range (the radar horizon is just shy of the hellfire's range based on calculators online) so I was wrong indeed HOWEVER, I still think that the radar would not be able to track Apaches accurately if they were flying close to sea level. Finding info on the Iowas ww2 radars is kinda hard, so I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
Another point is, can the AA guns even angle down far enough ?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I still think that the radar would not be able to track Apaches accurately if they were flying close to sea level
Iowa can use radar to target surface targets as well >can the AA guns even angle down far enough
yes, they too can be used on ships
1 month ago
Anonymous
yeah but fairly small targets like the Apache?
1 month ago
Anonymous
11km is knife fighting range for WWII capital ship
1 month ago
Anonymous
For getting bearing/range? Sure. But accurately tracking and essentially locking onto an apache? I doubt that radar was advanced enough for that. Even if they could see it (and I have my doubts for that) the apache would need to fly in a very predictable manner to get hit.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>For getting bearing/range? Sure. But accurately tracking and essentially locking onto an apache?
the shells have no guidance after firing, we only need which way they're going and how fast >need to fly in a very predictable manner to get hit.
have all the guns offset their targeting solution to form a cloud of death
A helicopter is moving slower than a WWII era plane, and 5" dual purpose guns with VT fuses can reach out quite a long ways. This
fairly certain the apache can peekaboo shoot and scoot hellfires beyond the radar horizon
anon's idea won't work because a hellfire's range is less than half the radar horizon of an Iowa. I'm sure the accuracy of the 5" guns at >11km wouldn't be great but do you really want to be on the receiving end of a dozen radar controlled 5" guns for a solid minute while you get into firing range?
Also pic related is the USS Iowa's armor scheme, there's no way for a hellfire to penetrate the outer hull and then continue on to penetrate the belt armor 2 meters away. What the hellfires totally can do though is poke holes in the superstructure and turrets praying they hit something important, and with 120 missiles on 10 helos chances are fire control and radar would be pretty much fucked by the time you finished, leaving her open to further attacks and forcing her to retreat. I do wonder how well the CIWS on the 80s refit would do against hellfires, I'm sure they could swat at least a few of them.
The could penetrate the turrets and hope to cause an ammo detonation, although there would be no reason to have ammo there ready outside of surface combat.
Could also kill everyone on the Armored bridge.
Citadel in the Hull would be largely impervious however, there is simply too much air space for small shaped charges to be effective. The compartments and multiple Armor plates basically act like a gigantic composite array.
The barbettes and turret sides I think are thin enough for a Hellfire to penetrate. Keep hitting those and you'll probably find something Hispanicy enough to set off a chain reaction and detonate the magazines. If not, just do that with the 5" turrets, then blanket the superstructure with rockets and chain gun fire. At that point see if you can chew up the less armored ends enough and hope the raft concept fails to work
You're going to have to go through tens of feet of space and steel before you even get to the armor deck, and everything worthwhile to damage is down there
>You're going to have to go through tens of feet of space and steel before you even get to the armor deck
No >and everything worthwhile to damage is down there
No
Do not even reply if you can't provide anything to back your claims, I really am not interested.
>why not just punch through the 5inches on top?
there is no water above the battleship, it is only around and below it
Secondary explosions and fires
flying closer makes you easier target for AA, or can hellfire do top attack?
>flying closer makes you easier target for AA
Quit thinking two dimensionally. You can be above and still far away. We are talking about an operational ceiling of 20k feet.(nearly 4 miles up).
No, the Soviets believed that no conventional munitions available to them would be able to sink the Iowa classes when they were re-activated in the 1980s.
Almost every surface action group since WW2 has deployed with at least one submarine with it. Plus the major point of the destroyer screen is ASW as well.
I think so but it won't be easy. Basically the Apaches would have to mobility-kill the Iowa and then slowly kill off all the crew or at least enough of the crew to allow a boarding party get on. Once on board, then the boarding party can scuttle the Iowa.
Do people not realize that the Iowas got 4 CWIS when they were reactivated and can shoot down missiles far fucking better than a hellfire. Hellfire are shit as far as missiles go no popup maneuver slow with weak ass payload the Iowa 80s reactivation installed things to defeat Excocets and actual real naval missiles that can do things like Carey a real payload and do terminal popup maneuvers. Not to mention that a helicopter is slow and quite easy to shoot down unless you are a grunt in a foxhole.
Navy SEALs will stand down and cower at the command of superior ranking officers.
They will receive non-judicial punishment (NJP) and be forced to swab the deck. Afterwards, they will have to drop and give 'em 50!!!
After they have been busted back down to E-1, they will be forced to work on Kitchen Duty while their shipmates will go out on port calls mingling with the local women!!!!
Jocko Willink and his SEALs teams (also with DJ Shipley and SlayderRaider) will be forced to clean the cum from the deck of the crews quarters, while the commanding officers watch and laugh!!!
WWI dreadnoughts took hit after hit 380mm ultra big bore guns that would flatten your most heavily armored MBTs many times over and didn't sink.
Sinking the ship with an Apache is entirely conditional on positing that you're hitting explosives that are already on the ship and causing them to cook off somehow.
And hitting explosives is entirely conditional on the idea that for some reason the crew brought ammunition up even though they aren't fighting any ships.
Apache is slower and can't go as high as fighters the Iowa was facing and the range on the Hellfire is shit and within range of the guns. The only saving grace is that the Iowa doesn't have much by way of guns for AA. If it has its complement of destroyers for that then this becomes even more difficult.
ITT people think a ship designed to take hits from 3,000lb shells going up to 2,000 FPS is going to be sunk by a missile with a payload just under 20lbs going at most 1300 FPS.
If we want to talk realistic, it is 1980s Iowa with its regular complement of escorts versus 1980s Apaches and any such engagement you might as well throw a bunch of gasoline on your helios and burn them to spare your men because you're not going to do some sort of insane air calvary assault on a fleet swarming with AA missiles that drastically outrage you.
You need to see how thick those turrets are armored for they are designed to be shot directly from other battleship guns and still work. When turret 2 of Iowa blew the fuck up from an out of battery detonation inside the turret the armor held and the guns on either side were not affected. A hellfire would not make a dent.
Sinking a large battleship is all about flooding. Hellfires wouldn't cause enough flooding below the waterline. Yamato and Musashi took like 10 plus torpedo hits and a shit load of bombs through the deck before sinking. Hellfires wont make holes big enough.
You're aware those are underwater, right? Besides, with such a small munition, assuming it could even hit a target underwater, it would have to be extremely precise.
yeah, they're under several meters of water, and water are just about the best thing there is for countering a HEAT jet.
No chance in hell 10 Apaches are sinking an Iowa, but 10 apaches decked out with Spike-NLOS would be able to disable things like radar, lightly armored AA emplacements, and maybe scrag the bridge? Bear in mind, Iowa towers were massive, armored, with lots of redundancies. HEAT just plain isn't good at dealing with heavily armored fortifications, and a battleship conning tower is more or less a multi-story bunker made of metal. They might be able to bore a hole through the armor, but in the space of, say, a hallway, the killing/damaging power of the jet is going to drop off quickly. The reason they work so well on tanks is because crew, fuel, and ammo is all cramped into a space of just a few cubic meters, greatly increasing the chance of killing someone/setting shit on fire. Shoot one of those at a conning tower, where all the important shit is located in the center, with less important rooms/halls surrounding them, you're just going to spray the interior of the outer rooms with small bits of metal. And since the borehole of the HEAT round is 1/4-1/2 an inch in diameter, multiple hits on the same armor block isn't going to breach the plate to gain access to the next layer, it's just going to punch another tiny hole.
The thermobaric building penetrators the US gave the Saudis probably get much less effective with water due to the pressure waves dynamics I'd imagine. I also imagine the charge dynamics are all fucked underwater. There is no reason to not use a torpedo for this sort of thing.
>The BLU-118/B is a penetrating warhead filled with an advanced thermobaric explosive that, when detonated, generates higher sustained blast pressures in confined spaces such as tunnels and underground facilities. The BLU-118/B uses the same penetrator body as the standard BLU-109 weapon. The significant difference is the replacement of the high explosive fill with a new thermobaric explosive that provides increased lethality in confined spaces.
The penetration is going to be fucked up by passing through several feet of water and probably the charge timing. That's obvious.
I was commenting on how it also produces particular problems for one of the US's penetrators as well, because the minimal amount of air is going to reduce effectiveness.
The incendiary version of the same weapon would be rendered even more ineffective by being used below water obviously.
The 2080s one had an extra layer of DU armor and reactive armor everywhere along with active protection systems every few feet to fire an EFP spay at any munition. It also has a spiderweb of laser interceptors coverage and plenty of drones that can take out an Apache, plus its missiles.
Now the new helio carriers have some of the same, but the 18 inch mag lev coil guns on the Iowa can send shells out at Mach 10 up to 310 miles away, more with rocket assist.
Also, even if you somehow hit the reactor, it's just going to cause a nuclear enviornmental disaster, not an explosion really.
It's variable. Obviously it has to go up when it enters submersible mode but it can also jettison parts of the belt when it needs to take flight with the turbo fans.
I don’t know why people in this thread think Apaches only carry Hellfire’s, or that all Hellfire’s are the same. Not all Hellfire’s are an HE warhead. A well placed HEAT shaped charge on a turret of the Iowa could cripple the ship in many ways, you could do this with a Hellfire, TOW or JAGM. Range would not be a problem. A TOW can hit target at nearly 3 Miles.
???
Literally all anyone in this thread is talking about is HEAT warheads interaction with the particulars of a ships construction. >TOW can hit target at nearly 3 Miles.
As can a 5"/38
Yea no shit but it is not an invincible death ray that can penetrate any thickness at will. Hellfire dinky shit missile payload against a turret face that is 18 inches thick and would not give a single fuck if you punched a 4 inch hole in it even if you could. One gun bay of the 3 in a turret is huge and has like 60 people working in it and that is not even in the barbet or shell handling rooms. There is fuck all a helicopter can do agaist a Iowa there is fuck all a modern surface ship of any nation can do to hurt an Iowa either.
18 inches of steel is butter for a shaped charge, bud.
unfortunately you only loaded anti armor weapons before discovering the float planes
The bigger issue with shaped charges of that size is the simple size of a ship. These things are designed to disable tanks, where once you penetrate the armor there are vital components within inches of the molten copper, spall, or whatever else you're relying on for damage. The space in a BB turret is far more expansive. The likelihood you're going to cause reliable damage with a helfire is virtually nil. Much less when you consider the ship is moving and the apaches are likely going to be forced to operate at the very edge of the missiles effective range.
Yes I have first fucking hand knowledge of them as a retired submarine weapons department chief and there has never been one against a battle ship they are all old destroyers and frigates and most are only sunk when the submarine takes the kill shot battle ships were literally nuked in Able and Baker tests and only sunk after being scuttled.
T. FTC/SS 1991-2011
What kind of Battleship(2012) autism is this thread. In 1989 an accidental turret explosion killed 47 due to carbon monoxide. The Iowa is not unsinkable. In fact it’s probably a death trap compared to modern surface ships. 10 Apaches with maximum ammunition would lay waste with modern FCS.
>10 Apaches with maximum ammunition would lay waste with modern FCS
ridiculous. Hellfires would basically bounce off any of the armor and Hyrda would make smoke fires on the deck plates, the minigun is worthless AND even the original Iowa FCS+AA would eat the slow fat Apaches in two bites, they'd be one and done and that's if they caught everyone napping, with earmuff ons, after 2 beers and Ambiens all around
>a explosion of thousands of pounds of powder inside a turret blew out part of just that turret and killed 2% of the crew >this proves the 50,000 ton battleship is easily sinkable by helicopter munitions
Wow you're right that ship is a pussy. As a reasonably fit male I bet you could beat the USS Iowa in a fistfight.
this is like a man with a rifle pointing it at a tank that had a round cook off in it and kill the gunner once, and saying he can do that many times over, look at the thousand rounds of rifle ammunition he has
Most of the hellfires would punch through the outer hull plating and then ruin some workspace or bunk room, or maybe kill some poor dudes in one of the 5" guns. The ship itself would suffer hardly any real damage
In an actual realistic military setting it's virtually impossible. Apaches don't carry heavy enough ordnance to seriously threaten a 60k ton displacement ship. Not to mention an Iowa could rapidly clear the area in which the Apaches are able to operate. If the engagement was absolutely favorable to the Apaches, say the ship was in harbor and there was terrain for the Apaches to hide behind then they could inflict some serious damage to the ships sensors and secondary battery.
Now finally talking sense mk 46 are mainly for anti sub and quite small but if you could hit it enough maybe. I dont know if a 46 could get through the torpedo blister since it does not have a WAS. Battleships were thought to be able to take 3-4mk 48ADCAPs before being sunk when I was in.
Assuming each Apache is carrying 2 AGM-65 Mavericks they could do some serious damage to the Iowa while staying out of range of the AA batteries. However they probably would struggle to sink the ship, but they could leave it a smoldering hulk.
The Maverick still would have very serious trouble penetrating the belt and turret, but it at least has a better chance too start some cookoffs and it has enough penetration to actually do *some* appreciable damage to the superstructure.
Did you guys ever take note on the pecularity of AShM development between the east and west esp. early on?
The earliest successful Soviet AShM, the SS-N-2 Styx (P-15 Termit) had a 1,000lb HEAT charge (The maverick is ~ 126lbs).
In comparison the west got by with dual use SAM's like Terrier and Standard and placed a greater importance on anti-submarine missiles before developing general purpose subsonic sea skimmer AShM like Harpoon and Exocet with warheads under 500lbs.
The Soviets coalesced into a high-low AShM strat as technology developed - smaller subsonic general purpose AShM sea skimmers that broadly rivaled Harpoon and larger supersonic AShM battleship and supercarrier killers with warhead weights well over 500lbs.
You aren't doing shit with a hellfire against an Iowa except pissing it off
they could probably behead it easily, fuck the entire command control infrastructure, idk about sinking it unless they score a catastrophic series of hits to the magazine
Neither, they can do damage to critical systems like radars, comms antennae, kill off the bridge crew by precision striking the bridge itself and the tower around and bellow it, and possibly set portions of the deck and superstructure on fire by concentrating missile strikes onto secondary guns to cause ammo cookoffs.
Sinking a ship of that size though requires either cooking off a main gun magazine which would be buried under literal meters of steel armor and concrete, with large air spaces inbetween, or punching massive holes bellow the waterline that would overwhelm the ship's bilge pumps and damage control team.
You're never going to accomplish either of those goals with hellfire missiles, even modern antiship missiles would probably struggle to totally mission kill an Iowa or any other battleship of the era, because they were specifically designed to give and take hits from enormously large artillery shells many times the mass of a modern missile packed with HE filler.
The best bet would be to drop modern torpedoes on her, because all ships are extremely vulnerable to HE detonations bellow the keel, the force of displaced water expanding upwards and then collapsing back down beneath a ship can break it's back no matter how heavy the armor belts are.
Well it's been theorized more then a few times that the heavy deck armor of the Iowas and other such BBs would have been able to act as a second keel and let her limp back to port for repairs instead of being a near instant kill
they could probably behead it easily, fuck the entire command control infrastructure, idk about sinking it unless they score a catastrophic series of hits to the magazine
They'd have about the same chance as they would collapsing Tora Bora. You simply don't understand the scale of these fucking boats
Tandem hellfires on LOAL top attack aren't even piercing the armored deck, much less the belt lol.
Literally a pop gun against a behemoth
>pop gun against a behemoth
basically. think "biplanes vs King Kong"
They can't sink it, but probably can do mission kill.
Assuming Iowa can't really fight back well, Apaches can keep distance, take out important subsystems on deck and maybe take out a few guns. Iowa would be a lot less capable afterwards. Or if they take out significant portion of the air defense systems then someone else can finish the job but at that point a lone Iowa would probably just retreat.
Two things:
i) People are discussing if hellfire can penetrate. Hellfire can penetrate Iowa's armor easily. It's just that the whole it generates wouldn't sink Iowa during the service life of the ship. When you're attacking tanks you set off some chain reaction, it's not just a hole in the armor that kills the tank. For a ship like Iowa, you need a huge hole to cause damage.
ii) Iowa type ships never go alone. They're too valuable assets to send out alone, even during WW2. If I remember correctly, some people even say that big ships during WW2 were just glorified escorts without any decisive action. You can't lose them, situations they may make difference are limited. But they're good for prestige and "fleet in being" type of thing.
can keep distance, >nah
Hellfire has 11km range. Iowa WW2 has no AA capability to engage targets at that range.
subsystems on deck >if theyre important theyre not on the deck
Radio and main guns are above deck. You can disable some if not all guns. Hellfire is precise enough.
can penetrate Iowa's armor easily >bullshit
Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill.
>For a ship like Iowa, you need a huge hole to cause damage
you very likely need more than one. Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship? >Overall the four British ships fired more than 2,800 shells at Bismarck, and scored more than 400 hits, but were unable to sink Bismarck by gunfire.
and that's firing everything from 5" to 16", much of it at point blank range.
and this was just in the last engagement, when Bismarck had already been crippled over the past few days' fighting.
The USS Nevada tanked a nuke and was still afloat.
>Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship?
Retard, that's literally what I was trying to point out. You can't sink Iowa with holes from Hellfire. Learn how to understand what you read.
>assuming Iowa can’t fight back
Why would we assume this? It’s a battleship, it battles, why the fuck would it not be able to fight back against a bunch of helicopters that are slower, larger targets than the planes it encountered in WW2? The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
>The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
Apaches have Hellfires that can engage beyond any AA Iowa WW2 has. If you can get full Hellfire range Iowa can't do anything. But Apaches can't do much to Iowa either besides making it mission kill. Sinking is out of question.
>Can Iowa see the Apaches at that range? yes, easily >Has that range ever been achieved in combat or was it only on trials? >t.butthurt he got dunked on
Was the Hellfire ever used "in anger" at 11km? lol
can keep distance, >nah
Hellfire has 11km range. Iowa WW2 has no AA capability to engage targets at that range.
subsystems on deck >if theyre important theyre not on the deck
Radio and main guns are above deck. You can disable some if not all guns. Hellfire is precise enough.
can penetrate Iowa's armor easily >bullshit
Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill.
[...] >Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship?
Retard, that's literally what I was trying to point out. You can't sink Iowa with holes from Hellfire. Learn how to understand what you read.
[...] >The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
Apaches have Hellfires that can engage beyond any AA Iowa WW2 has. If you can get full Hellfire range Iowa can't do anything. But Apaches can't do much to Iowa either besides making it mission kill. Sinking is out of question.
>Iowa has some composites,
oh boy we got a live one boys. go read a few books on how naval armor works to prevent penetration. hint: it involves a lot more than a big slab-o-STS
Iowa's armor was designed to stop a 2700lb shell traveling at 1600mph. that's 230,000,000 (230x1,000,000) ftlbs of energy at impact and then you add in the detonation of the warhead.
now go do the math on a Hellfire and get back to us
>Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill
My dawg, look at the attached diagram and let me know where the HEAT warhead of a hellfire would detonate to achieve penetration of the main belt or deck armor. Remember that a NATO triple heavy target has a total cumulative air gap of only 14 inches. Getting into the citadel of the Iowa would be impossible because the exterior plating and decks would detonate the warhead so massively early (10+ feet in the main deck's case) that the heat jet would disperse. For a main belt hit to access engineering or magazine spaces you are looking at > 37mm decapping plate > 800mm airgap > 25mm tank wall > 800mm fluid gap > 290mm main belt armor (at 19 degrees from vertical, outwards > 2-4000mm tank space > then another steel bulkhead, probably 25mm or so.
It's not designed for penetration like that. And it's even worse trying to hit the main deck because the slant range is so much higher and you'll be coming through the super structure.
>Can Iowa see the Apaches at that range? yes, easily >Has that range ever been achieved in combat or was it only on trials? >t.butthurt he got dunked on
Was the Hellfire ever used "in anger" at 11km? lol
[...] >Iowa has some composites,
oh boy we got a live one boys. go read a few books on how naval armor works to prevent penetration. hint: it involves a lot more than a big slab-o-STS
Iowa's armor was designed to stop a 2700lb shell traveling at 1600mph. that's 230,000,000 (230x1,000,000) ftlbs of energy at impact and then you add in the detonation of the warhead.
now go do the math on a Hellfire and get back to us
You shoot the turrets anon. One hellfire per turret would replicate the 89 explosion three times over, and probably larger since they were lucky in 89 that not all the powder in the turret went up. If you got lucky you might catch powder in a safe passage and ultimately set off a magazine promptly. Even if you didn't the fire from the 89 explosion took 90 minutes to bring under control despite deliberate flooding; three simultaneous fires of that size would be harder and take longer. It is possible the ship could be lost to them, especially since One and Two simultaneously burning would jeopordise their shared powder magazine on the first platform. Note also that all of this is happening inside the citidel and best case scenario in combat would kill about 10% of the crew immediately.
That leaves a single Apache thirteen more Hellfires. I think you probably roll the dice on secondary turrets hoping you get lucky on some magazine misadventures, but idk.
How did the hellfires even hit the turret? The apache has to be within 5 inch range to fire and since it's laser guided it's required for it to stick around. If it loses the laser the hellfires are going to miss
1 month ago
Anonymous
>How did the hellfires even hit the turret? The apache has to be within 5 inch range to fire and since it's laser guided it's required for it to stick around. If it loses the laser the hellfires are going to miss
moron, please. Hellfires have been mmw radar fire and forget since 1995, the AA envelope for Iowa 5 inch guns is shorter range than a laser Hellfire anyway and the Apache's critical systems are armored against 23mm while Iowa 5 inch VT took over 1000 rounds per AA kill and killed by frag (1 shot per 6 seconds per gun, 20 guns on WWII fit, 12 in Reagan fit). The AN/APG-78 Longbow fcr can simultabeously launch all 16 hellfires against separate targets and can target share. The Iowa has absolutely no chance of preventing the launches of all 16 hellfires per Apache using 5 inch and no way of preventing them from hitting. Unironically its only hope would be a lucky hit with 16 inch while the apache was closing to range, otherwise a single Apache could make every turret an inferno and proooobably get a magazine, just on balance of probabilities.
1 month ago
Anonymous
If you're not laser guiding them you no longer have the level of target discrimination required to do what you're talking about. And once again retards fail to understand that the magazine spaces are all inside the citadel and under the waterline. There is NO feasible way for any helicopter based weapon to penetrate the citadel and then reach the magazine spaces inside
1 month ago
Anonymous
>If you're not laser guiding them you no longer have the level of target discrimination required to do what you're talking about.
Wrong. Stop being a dumb fuck and posting about systems you don't understand. Hellfire Longbow will target the turrets just fine and this capability was demonstrated with Apache Guardian. As for the citadel, where the fuck do you think the primary and secondary turrets reside? Do you genuinely not realise that the primary turrets protrude five decks into the citadel and sit on top of their powder magazine because you've never even looked at the layout of the class before? Iowa nearly blew its magazine in the 89 explosion. The safety measures to prevent flashback from turret to magazine are not infalliable, and if you hit 3 primary turrets and 20 secondaries you've got a good chance of promptly breaching magazine do to shit luck (eg catch powder in scuttle or safe passage and it goes at a moment where safeties dom't catch it), killing the ship with 23 massive turret fires or getting a magazine later when for eg the One and Two turrets are both 3000 degree infernos and their bulkheads are cherry red, and they share a common room that links them on the first platform that happens to be the powder magazine so now your magazine is being cooked by a six story and five story drum fire on either side that's burning HE and powded.
Anyway, I'm done replying to you. Go learn something, you dumb gay.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Mad brainlets itt get more and more pathetic with every post.
Hellfires don't have the ability to outrange the 5"/38s. 5"/38s have radar driven firecontrol and radar fuzes. They also have the ability to work against something faster than a 3 legged hippo, which is the best the apache can manage, especially with a full warload.
Apachefags got fucking torched because their piddlyshit flying dumpster has nothing on the Iowa. Not enough range, not enough firepower, not enough maneuverability.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>just like muh Death Star!
1 month ago
Anonymous
>primary turrets protrude five decks into the citadel
My poor dumb moron, do you think there is a contiguous space from the 5" turrets to the main 5" magazine? Holy shit, you don't know anything about battleships, do you? What are those weird boxes on the righthand portion of the image? Surely they aren't long armored tubes that run ammo from the 5" magazine to the room below the turret, right?
1 month ago
Anonymous
How the fuck are you reaching the powder magazine? Draw me a 1 meter line, the best a hellfire can do, from the powder stores here and show me where it hits exterior hull.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>the AA envelope for Iowa 5 inch guns is shorter range than a laser Hellfire
Source? >5 inch VT took over 1000 rounds per AA kill and killed by frag (1 shot per 6 seconds per gun, 20 guns on WWII fit, 12 in Reagan fit)
Shows what you know about the purpose of AA. It's primary function isn't to destroy enemy aircraft, it's to put enough steel and explosives in the air to make bombing and torpedo runs difficult/dangerous, of course they're going to burn through ammo. This forces planes to maneuver and veer off. Ironically, AA was much more effective against kamikaze fighters for this very reason, the pilots weren't trying to drop bombs and veer off, they were trying to hit the ship and as such got wrecked.
Compared to Japanese fighters, Apaches are big and slow, and need to maintain laser contact with their target for their Hellfires to hit, which is difficult when jinking and flying evasively. Even at 11km, they'd get bracketed by 5" proximity fused shells and get obliterated.
You just have no idea how any of this works, do you?
>If you're not laser guiding them you no longer have the level of target discrimination required to do what you're talking about.
Wrong. Stop being a dumb fuck and posting about systems you don't understand. Hellfire Longbow will target the turrets just fine and this capability was demonstrated with Apache Guardian. As for the citadel, where the fuck do you think the primary and secondary turrets reside? Do you genuinely not realise that the primary turrets protrude five decks into the citadel and sit on top of their powder magazine because you've never even looked at the layout of the class before? Iowa nearly blew its magazine in the 89 explosion. The safety measures to prevent flashback from turret to magazine are not infalliable, and if you hit 3 primary turrets and 20 secondaries you've got a good chance of promptly breaching magazine do to shit luck (eg catch powder in scuttle or safe passage and it goes at a moment where safeties dom't catch it), killing the ship with 23 massive turret fires or getting a magazine later when for eg the One and Two turrets are both 3000 degree infernos and their bulkheads are cherry red, and they share a common room that links them on the first platform that happens to be the powder magazine so now your magazine is being cooked by a six story and five story drum fire on either side that's burning HE and powded.
Anyway, I'm done replying to you. Go learn something, you dumb gay.
Ah yes. In their hubris, the USN designed an enormous expensive ship absolutely bristling with the naval gunnery equivalent of Loony Tunes style bomb fuzes. Never did they ever consider that their secondary and AA batteries would come under direct fire from, say, one ton shells filled with HE moving at mach 2. The fact that any Iowas survived WWII is a mystery
Fucking shut the fuck up and stop embarrassing yourself
>verification not required
1 month ago
Anonymous
And like many have said, disrupting targeting of any missile is good enough for the Iowa since any weapons fired have such narrow targets
1 month ago
Anonymous
>A battleship >narrow target
lol lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
we've been over that simply hitting a battleship sized target with a hellfire isn't a sufficient level of precision to do anything noteworthy against a battleship.
If we're going to go full retard, then why don't we have some madlads with laser designators tread water in the ocean and paint the Iowa's radar for the apaches. Honestly I know that this wouldn't work, but we're already stupid so we might as well commit to the stupidity. Maybe sell the idea to Hollywood for their next action movie.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's a combat situation anon, why wouldn't they be?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Because you don't use 16/50's against Helos?
1 month ago
Anonymous
So if the main guns are loaded for some bizarre reason when conducting anti air warfare that means the breach is closed. The 98 explosion wasn't from a rounf cooking off it was a propellant bag detonating outside the breach. So how is there going to be this big explosion in a turret when you have to get through 17 inches of armor on the face and then a big ass air gap and another 12 inches of gun barrel to hit the propellant charge that has an easy way to expand (out the barrel)?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Because you don't use 16" guns against aerial threats.
>For a ship like Iowa, you need a huge hole to cause damage
you very likely need more than one. Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship? >Overall the four British ships fired more than 2,800 shells at Bismarck, and scored more than 400 hits, but were unable to sink Bismarck by gunfire.
and that's firing everything from 5" to 16", much of it at point blank range.
and this was just in the last engagement, when Bismarck had already been crippled over the past few days' fighting.
The USS Nevada tanked a nuke and was still afloat.
>assuming Iowa can’t fight back
Why would we assume this? It’s a battleship, it battles, why the fuck would it not be able to fight back against a bunch of helicopters that are slower, larger targets than the planes it encountered in WW2? The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
>Snipe all light guns with hellfires >Rearm with R9X hellfires, decapitate all crew that goes on deck
With enough time, the crew goes insane and sinks the ship on their own
>battleship made to fight and withstand other battleship rounds and torpedoes >being sinked by 10 helicopters, none of which loaded with torpedoes
LOL
O
L
Best you can do is frag the bridge but ain't no way in hell you're sinking it with just 10 Apaches
As we have established, 10 apaches can't do any meaningfull damage to Iowa, so let's modify paramaters a little.
>(You) have a modern LPH with a total of 10 modern helicopters of your choice as well as all the crew, munitions and fuel they may require, but you have no other crafts or offensive armaments. >Due to an organizational fuckup of collosal proportions a hostile Iowa-class BB (1940 refit, full combat load) is detected on it's own in the area and is somewhat vulnerable to attack. >However it is on course to enter enemy combat-air-patrol range in just a couple of hours. If it does, there's nothing you can possibly do anymore. >(You) are the only thing that can stop it before the terrorists win. >What helos do you pick? >What do you arm them with? >How do you organize your attacks?
For those who want bigger challange, consider Iowa 1980 refit.
Fun scenario.
Assuming I can get targeting data from somewhere, I'm going with 10 Mi-26, each carrying 2 Rapid Dragon 6 tube modules (Unfortunately it looks like the Chinook interior bay is 1ft too narrow for a Rapid Dragon module). Each Red Dragon module loaded with AGM-158C LRASM.
I love battleships, but I think 120 of those launched from would do the job.
If I can't get targeting data from somewhere, then let me know and I will rethink.
10 Apaches with AM39 Exocets. Or even just 1 Apache with Exocets… not sure why helicopter launched AShMs aren’t getting mentioned as the ship obliterates they are
US? Honestly not too well. The limited and not really all that good harpoons can probably be intercept and at least drive off a WW2 Iowa. 1980s would probably be able to decoy and CIWS the 8 missiles and take only marginal damage. She'd be fast enough to chase down anything besides a CVN and maybe some of the nuclear cruisers and obviously in a gun duel she's going to win 98/100 times. The Russians with far more and much more effective AShM missiles would have a far better chance. That's really just USN's doctrine of having the airpower be the strike assets bite them in the ass.
I would guess an Italian FREMM would have it easier since with the guided rounds she could shell from far over Iowa's max range, plus OTOMAT can pack a punch at least over the water line.
Do you recon you could disable radars/antennas + secondary battery and get in range for torpedoes if it was a night attack?
The issue with that is that those guided rounds to my knowledge are all either GPS guided which simply aren't suitable for naval use due to both ships moving 30 knots or they are line of sight guide via radar which puts the FREMM well within 16 inch range and 3 inch guns loose that fight. It's not like the Iowa can't fight over the horizon either. As for impact yeah you could do some damage with a rapid fire 3 inch guns. The biggest issue is you have no AP ammo and one you clean out 40mm mounts and the like you aren't going to be able to kill even the secondary turrets
Well no, to my knowledge (Italian Wikipedia page) the Vulcano rounds for the 127mm are of 3 different types and only one is GPS guided. The BER is a 70km unguided round while the GLR is IR guided and in the 70-90 km range but I doubt it would do much since it's made to explode after pen so not sure it would work against stuff like radars.
My idyllic plan was then on the line of someone like the F 590 night engaging the Iowa from well over the 16 in's range (of what? 40km) with his 5 in hoping to blind it, shoot her missiles to set it on fire and then hopefully get in the 30-20 km range (so inside the Iowa's secondary battery's range) and torpedo her before she shoots back.
If it doesn't work just shoot everything from afar hoping it burns down before it can close the distance.
But yeah best way to take out a battleship would be with planes, definitely not a frigate.
Well, it depends on which cruiser and what battleship.
If you were to take Moskva and New Jersey in their 1980s configuration, New Jersey does everything Moskva does, but more and with additional displacement and armor. Its possible for Moskva to win, but in all likelyhood NJ is winning that fight.
If you compare a Iowa during ww2 to a current year Ticonderoga class, it loses. Shitty radar and short range weapons mean its effectively helpless.
because this is a stupid thread, yes they'ed fire all their armor piercing rounds and and missiles at the exact same spot hit a magazine until asplode.
if Iowa ships were so impervious to Apache then Saddam Hussein would have used them in a hull down defensive line in the sand during desert storm
It's genuinely hard to tell. Most modern ASMs have delay detonation warheads, which begs the question, if they fail to penetrate the belt armor, which is 11.3" of hardened steel, would the fuzing system survive? If not, you'd have a hole in the shell plating and a fire inside the void spaces from unburned fuel from the missile.
I don't see a TASM/HARPOON/ETC having much chance at achieving penetration on battleship belt armor.
It'll have to go through decks (1.5" steel) and then the main deck (6") at an angle. I'm not sure modern ASMs are up for it. Boats just aren't built like they used to be. You'd probably be better off just wrecking the superstructure and getting a mission kill.
1 month ago
Anonymous
fire all missiles before getting greased idfk
[...]
yup
[...]
I think that amount of steel isn't so much for modern penetrators. The space would be the biggest issue as the deck would act like a cope cage for the warhead
you guys are underestimating the inertia on a ton warhead with a superdense cap, and some designs have multiple EFPs point in every direction around the missile.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Anon, the only ones that bothered to do that are the Russians since everyone else went to thin skinned ships with the iowas being the sole remaining class with any real armor on it. Plus those aren't launched by apaches.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Maybe I'm overestimating a 2700 pound projectile at Mach 1.5 made of nearly solid steel.
Maybe, but I'll let your brain chug about if a mass of high explosive is stronger than solid forged steel.
1 month ago
Anonymous
FWIW we knew all about explosive warheads when these naval guns were being built, plenty of bombs, torpedoes, exploding shells etc.
these worked the best at penning naval armor
1 month ago
Anonymous
>these worked the best at penning naval armor
they also do a real number on entrenched enemy in fortified positions on ground
1 month ago
Anonymous
Even then, the controls towers are pretty well armored
Do Apaches have any weapons that let them sit outside the Iowa’s AA screens?
They tried with the TASM (Tomahawk AnitShip Missle) it really only had a chance when set on popup attack mode but the problem with that is the super structure takes the damage and Battleships and the like do not need any of the superstructure to survive and fight.
Tldr: was tried and found lacking so was discontinued.
Ok PrepHole listen up. China has somehow got their hands on a fully functional Iowa and they are planning an attack on US soil.
The Russian managed to activate the Kube found while "secretly" digging in the red forest and used it to disable every military asset. Due to classic russian stupidity 10 [insert helicopters of your choice] were not affected.
The president appointed you as chief of this operation, you have access to all the top NATO scientists and all the military budget.
How do you bubba rig the choppers to stop the threat and save the country?
Like, a modernize Iowa? With Phalax and RAMs? Fuck all, basically. Maybe a suicide mission where I load them all up with as many Spike-NLOS as physically possible and take out all their sensors and PD, but after that all the birds are sitting ducks. The only result is that the ship now can’t defend itself as well against shore-mounted defenses and missiles, but that’s about it
Well, kit out most of the choppers with NLOS and try to neutralize its radar and point defence and then moron-rig something Hispanicier for the remaining choppers to get in close and do damage. A torpedo or a bunker buster or somethingr
Not anywhere that wouldn't get shithammered by the 5"/38s that smother the Iowa.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Unless you knock out 5"s with other helicopters first.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're not going to be able to do that without discriminating precision weapons and the only types you're fitting on an Apache are the laser guided hellfires.
In order to shine a laser you need LOS and that is well within 5inch range
1 month ago
Anonymous
Could the Spike-NLOS pull it off? I can't seem to find much on the exact nature of its targeting systems, but it can engage out to 25km
1 month ago
Anonymous
No, all these weapons are simply 'attack the blob' style targeting.
This seems like a good thread to ask something I've been wondering for a while, how much does it take to sink your average modern trawler or container ship?
>how much does it take to sink your average modern trawler or container ship?
2 torpedoes to be sure, or if you're confident they're unarmed you can surface and use the deck gun.. alternatively board it and flood it by opening valves
Probably not much. Commercial ships aren't designed to endure missile attacks. I don't know if they have similar number of compartments that can limit the damage or if they have enough crew to respond fast.
If you attack with an anti ship missile, I think just one would be enough. It would probably punch a big hole through the ship anyway so if it hits the right spot it'll sink it.
Put holes in it under the waterline or start fires. Torpedos, mines, bombs, missiles, even gunfire will work in sufficient amounts. These ships aren't designed to withstand attack, so sinking them is trivial.
So to immediately put things in perspective, a cargo ship is going have maybe 5-6 watertight bulkheads and a crew of 20~. A navy frigate is going to have upwards of 30 and have a crew in the 100-200 range. It's just two massively different standards
Huh, that does make a lot of sense. So for civilian ships you'd only really need to poke a few holes to cause threatening levels of flooding? I guess that explains how Somalian pirates with RPGs are still able to threaten shipping.
If we're having intensely stupid gayricious fantasies adding hardpoints, hovering say six feet high then landing on simple dunnage to facilitate torpedo loading is quite reasonable and practical as are any weapons system mods.
Huey bomber proof of concept used actively by Lebanon:
http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Arts/Art29055.htm
Primary Apache mission gross weight is ~15Klb, MOW is 23K per Boeing.
Mounting a central weapons rack then hanging a Mark 84 with a JDAM kit would be doable with payload to spare. Apache can operate at night.
The trouble with gaylord gay kiddiedreams is they omit context without which a system could not exist. Presumption of flyable Apache presumes its support and skill and supply tail. Basic bomb dropping mods for gravity muns can be done at base level since avionics, weapons, electricians, structural etc troops exist.
>apaches approach Iowa >two get blasted by AA fire before they can even blow their load >8 dump their load into the iowa >scruffs the paint, makes the crew moderately annoyed >AA finishes off the remaining apaches >Iowa spends the next three days firing nonstop shells at the helo base for the minor transgression
best hope you'd have would be to penn the turrets and set off the ammunition/powder bags or start a fire that would do so. a hellfire could easily cut through the armor of any battleship (iirc 1.8m rha rated), however vital spaces were well separated from the hull because battleships were fuckhuge and that's what would be the problem. so not so much the armor, but too much distance for the jet to cover after the armor had been penetrated in order to hit something combustible enough to do damage. it would be like driving nails into a tree. easily done but not going to acheive much.
This thread has too much by the books thinking. Hellfire this maverick that bla bla
The answer would clearly be a night attack, have half your choppers kill the radar, and have the other half land some b61s dialed up to maximum yield with timed fuses. It's that easy
And I mean land in the loosest sense. Weld two armed and ticking b61s to the sides of 5 apaches and once the radar is down, crash land those suckers onto the deck
That's basically the scenarios people have been thinking about but the major issue is what this guy's says here
You're not going to be able to do that without discriminating precision weapons and the only types you're fitting on an Apache are the laser guided hellfires.
In order to shine a laser you need LOS and that is well within 5inch range
is that in order to actually target those systems you're too close and you're going to get swatted by 5"/38 fire. Helicopters loose one of their biggest advantages at sea since they can't hug terrain like they can on land to do pop ups and stuff
If the radar can be killed from a distance at night, the effectiveness of those 38s is gonna drop significantly. Coupled with the "unique" delivery method I'm proposing for the b61s, I think it's the best plan so far.
How are you hitting the radar though? The only weapons the apaches have that are capable of that kind of precision are TOWs and Hellfire both require LOS on the target and that's within range for radar guided 5 inch spam. I know of no helicopter launched HARM systems
>How are you hitting the radar though? The only weapons the apaches have that are capable of that kind of precision are TOWs and Hellfire both require LOS on the target and that's within range for radar guided 5 inch spam.
Be the Iowa's greatest ally so that they won't shoot at you until after you knock out the radar.
It's something nobody really knows. Nobody has done tests on what happens when one of those detonates under something with so much deck armor. At the very least, a Mk48 hit is forcing her back to port though
The hellfire HEAT missiles can only make small insignificant 800mm deep holes into the battleship. The hellfire high explosive missile if it can defeat the Iowas 300mm armor belt would be the only threat
No, apaches don't carry the necessary munitions. The 80s Iowa had piss poor air defense, instead relying on cruisers and destroyers for air defense, so time period doesn't matter that much.
hellfires to the waterline could poke enough holes for it to tilt
Not going through the Iowa’s armor belt.
How many wizards are needed to cast the spells to make the Iowa's armor belt impervious to a hundred rockets?
not him but you would probably need 2 missiles to go through the same hole in the outer 2 inches and the inner 16 inches to get through the belt
Seems to me like a hundred would be enough
bout tree-fiddy
They dont have to focus fire belts, they just need to focus on the turrets/ammo storage. completely realistic with modern laser guided munitions
In this situation the ammo would be stowed safely in the citadel. Breaching the Iowa’s citadel with Hellfires is a pipe dream.
>In this situation the ammo would be stowed safely in the citadel
Why?
because its not a russian ship 🙂
you keep the ammo in the magazine till order to prepare the guns is given
There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at, so there would be no need to bring up rounds from the magazine. The Iowa’s magazines are held deep within the citadel, specifically to keep them safe.
What about ammo for the AA guns people are talking about?
Those may be loaded, but those are outside of the citadel. Cooking them off won’t result in sinking an Iowa.
The magazines are also in the citadel. All they'd be able to hit is the ready service ammunition, the detonation of which would do little more than destroy the 20 or 40mm gun mount it was servicing and start a small fire.
>There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at
the guns themselves and the elevation mechanism
If a launch ship is close enough to dispatch helos, its close enough to assume that the target battle ship would be armed and ready to fight. but yeah, fi you want to be a complete gay an assume the Iowa crew was in position, anticipating intercept, then you may have a point. that would be retarded, though.
We are talking about Apaches, not Apaches and some carrier vessel. Which, if it existed, would be expected to stay far outside the Iowa’s gun range, even if the Iowa could detect such a distant vessel to begin with. In either case, the guns would stay empty. Even if they did load them for some reason and a Hellfire rolls a natural 20 on penetrating a turret AND causes a cook-off, that STILL wouldn’t be enough to sink the ship.
>even if the Iowa could detect such a distant vessel to begin with
Iowa carries 3 float planes for aerial recon
>3 float planes for aerial recon
shoot down the apaches with them
>There’s nothing for the main batteries to shoot at
Shame there was no Sanshiki-like stuff
The real ammo 5 inch and above are never outside of the citadel until it is fired it goes from the magazines into the barbets to the hoists and then into the breach to be shot. So the ammo is always under armored protection and flash protection between each transfer point.
It is almost like they designed the ships to withstand being shot by giant fucking guns that went boom. They Nuked ww2 Battleships during Able and Baker testing and most were still deemed able to fight after the nukes and they had to scuttle them to get them to sink.
Modern ships and weapons are all tailored to never be hit and take damage. Battle ships were designed to be able to be hit take a shitwhack of damage and still fight.
>Laughs in radar guided 5"/38 spam
>turrets/ammo storage
Also armored, fuckwit.
>Not going through the Iowa’s armor belt.
going right through it like it's not even there, anon. an abrams frontal glacis is more armor than any battleship ever made.
>abrams frontal glacis is more armor than any battleship ever made.
AhahahahahahBahhdjrh2jdvb
Apache can't carry Exocet you dummy, those things weigh 1400lbs each and need a launch platform
>Iowa
>300mm armor steel belt
>hellfires with around 800mm of penetration wont go through this
alright then
You're not hitting just a belt though
Yeah, but that guy was just talking about the belt.
Doubt it would do any real harm to something that is designed to tank torpedoes
Best bet would probably be to target important places with the hellfires and start fires with the gun and rockets
Hellfires couldn't do shit to a battleship lmao. Do you retarded zoomer kids even read wiki articles before you post?
the turrets themselves do present nice flat single plate target which is preferable for HEAT warhead
Congratulations you poked a 1/4" hole Into a turret. Thankfully everyone was standing 10 feet away from the frontal plate and now the crew just needs to clean up some welding spatter
are you saying theres no chance to put a gun out of action by aiming above/below the barrel or directly at it?
There are 9 main battery guns, that are of irrelevant value in this fight. While you're doing that 10-8 5inch guns will have filled the area with so much shrapnel id be surprised if there was an intact piece of apache bigger then a burger
>that are of irrelevant value in this fight
mission kill is type of kill
It says sink
OP said 'sink' not mission kill. Moreover, a HEAT warhead works by penetrating armor with a hypersonic jet of copper and cooking off the ammo and fuel in the confines of a tank. Battleships are spacious, incredibly spacious, compared to a tank. All a Hellfire is going to do it put a small hole in the metal. Even if the turrets were engaged (they wouldn't be if they were fighting only aerial units) there's just too much space between the armor plate and the innards for a dinky little Hellfire to cause a cook off.
See
This goes doubly for every other system of note on the Iowa. You're not going to cause any meaningful damage to a battleship with an anti-tank weapon, because an anti-tank weapon is meant to destroy tanks AKA small metal boxes on treads filled to the brim with fuel and ammunition. There's just to much armor and space on a battleship for something as small as a Hellfire to 'light the match'
Also, you're a colossal gay.
>You're not going to cause any meaningful damage to a battleship with an anti-tank weapon
well.. technically.. if you were to shoot one down the smoke stack..
L-luke?
>t. womp rat
>well.. technically.. if you were to shoot one down the smoke stack..
It would do nothing as they are grated and baffled to prevent divebombers from doing exactly what you are talking about
>heres no chance to put a gun out of action by aiming above/below the barrel
that is the case. main gun turrets became the most heavily armored topside parts of battleships to the point where there is no weakness that doesn't involve a super-freak accident or user error. Iowa main guns were designed to take an 16" AP shell weighing 2700lbs
stack Hellfires next to that and let me know when you stop counting
Hellfires aren't piercing the belt. Even if they somehow did, damage control would stop the flooding before it got bad.
Hellfires aren't even piercing a good portion of the superstructure, and even where they do pierce shit isn't an APC or a tank and crew are spread the fuck out
Tandem hellfires on LOAL top attack aren't even piercing the armored deck, much less the belt lol.
Literally a pop gun against a behemoth
anon look at how large a hellfire is and then look at how large a battleship cannon round is
I did, about trefiddy vs faivninty, and so? The hellfire has a tandem warhead plus each apache can (theoretically) carry 16, plus all the HEDP 30mm shots and you got a ship full of holes.
There were proposals to fit it with harpoon missiles for anti-ship duty.
Yes, people under estimate the Hellfire as an anti-shipping weapon. Its not a one hit KO but each AH-64 can carry a dozen of them. Anyone that tells you that over a hundred rocket strikes still isn't enough to cause a mission kill is just blind. I legit think that even a single Apache stands a reasonable chance of causing considerable damage and can do so with literally zero chance of retaliation.
>to cause a mission kill
So was it a mission kill OP asked about?
>Could 10 apaches sink
>sink
I read it as a the colloquial "sink" as in render ineffective. Many purpose built modern anti-shipping weapons aren't even likely to literally sink a modern (read: lightly armored) warship.
Hahaha imagine making such mental gymnastic just to avoid admitting being wrong on an anonymous image board filled with fucking retard neckbeards.
Hahahaha
Get a hold of yourself anon. Everyone is wrong some times what the f
Iowas were designed to eat 8” shells and survive multiple torpedo hits. Hellfires just don’t have the punch to moderately damage one, much less sink it. Moreover, the operational range of the Hellfire would put the Apaches well inside the Iowa’s AA envelope (5” guns having a range of 16km vs the Hellfire’s 11) and even WWII Iowa’s had radar fire control and proximity fuses.
they weren't designed to withstand barrages of anti-tank PGMs that can be shot downwards
It wasn’t designed to withstand getting shot at by air soft pellets either, doesn’t mean they could sink it, retard
false equivalence, moron.
your ass isn't designed to take dicks but that obviously never stopped you
How does that make any difference? A HEAT round that small is going to punch a tiny hole in one deck plate and not even scratch the 3-4 other armored bulkheads behind it. A HEAT round is designed to cook off volatiles located literally on the other side of an armored surface, like in a tank. It’s not going to do dick against an armored structure like a battleship because the spacing between deck plates is measured in meters for things like rooms and hallways. The jet might penetrate one deck plate, but it’s not going to penetrate the other deck plate 2 meters away, it will have dispersed too much. Fucking learn how these weapons work before you shit up this board with your stubborn retardation.
Or better yet, have a nice day
because 10 apaches could do that like over 100 times
also re-reading the OP he says apaches not hellfires specifically so they could probably use one of the helicopter-launched AShMs like the penguin
How are they doing this without getting swatted out of the air by heavy AA?
fire all missiles before getting greased idfk
yup
I think that amount of steel isn't so much for modern penetrators. The space would be the biggest issue as the deck would act like a cope cage for the warhead
Yeah but they're laser guided, they'll loose the laser if the bird gets turned into shrapnel
LASER BIRDS GETTING BURNED
Penguin outranges any AA the Iowas ever had.
>Penguin outranges any AA
what if the combat isn't taking place in antarctic waters?
>how are they going to fire AShMs with a range of 50 kilometers at a ship??!?!?
lol. lmao even.
This^
Snipe all the good stuff like turrets, bridge, missile launchers, radar.
I bet a hellfire could even damage the prop and prop shaft with a good hit on the rear a water line.
Then you could just pepper it with 30mm.
Doesn't have the range.
How are you hitting the screws that are under 10 feet of water and underneath the stern?
OP you absolute fag you posted a Huey.
LOL my bad
t. OP
That's a Russian Hind, tourist.
Thats a chinkhook you dummy
That's a huey, you newfag
Apache you fucking Redditards. OP said so
That's a Alouette, fucking spaz
technically the AH-1 is built on the same chassis as a UH-1 Iroquois, the same way M7 Priests and M10 Wolverines use the same frame as an M4 Sherman so calling it a Huey isn't entirely inaccurate
They were also called HueyCobra and variations thereof in the early days. It's a very old design.
https://www.nhahistoricalsociety.org/ah-1g-bell-209-huey-cobra-snake-helicopter/
>Could 10 apaches sink a lone WW2 Iowa class?
appearently Apaches have very recently gotten access to Spike-NLOS with 25km range, thats probably enough to keep them more or less safe from Iowas AA screen except by flying into misses by blind luck
No they don't have enough firepower to do any serious damage to any area on an Iowa they can break some stuff on deck but that deck is 5 inches thick armor plate and the side armor is sloped 16 armor plate.
a hellfire would easily cut through 20 inches of steel, are you insane?
only place where you find bare plate is turret, elsewhere you find "spaced armor" in large volumes
hellfire can penetrate up to 800mm steel, so if you have 3 air crews working 3 shifts 24/7 - in a few months they'll poke enough holes for it to sink over the next year or two
I feel like going in range to fire hellfire is too dangerous
From a WW2 Iowa?!
doesn't it have radar guided AA guns and proximity fuze shells?
fairly certain the apache can peekaboo shoot and scoot hellfires beyond the radar horizon
unless you find an island to hide behind thats not going to work with hellfires range limitations
I thought the hellfire had a longer range (the radar horizon is just shy of the hellfire's range based on calculators online) so I was wrong indeed HOWEVER, I still think that the radar would not be able to track Apaches accurately if they were flying close to sea level. Finding info on the Iowas ww2 radars is kinda hard, so I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
Another point is, can the AA guns even angle down far enough ?
>I still think that the radar would not be able to track Apaches accurately if they were flying close to sea level
Iowa can use radar to target surface targets as well
>can the AA guns even angle down far enough
yes, they too can be used on ships
yeah but fairly small targets like the Apache?
11km is knife fighting range for WWII capital ship
For getting bearing/range? Sure. But accurately tracking and essentially locking onto an apache? I doubt that radar was advanced enough for that. Even if they could see it (and I have my doubts for that) the apache would need to fly in a very predictable manner to get hit.
>For getting bearing/range? Sure. But accurately tracking and essentially locking onto an apache?
the shells have no guidance after firing, we only need which way they're going and how fast
>need to fly in a very predictable manner to get hit.
have all the guns offset their targeting solution to form a cloud of death
A helicopter is moving slower than a WWII era plane, and 5" dual purpose guns with VT fuses can reach out quite a long ways. This
anon's idea won't work because a hellfire's range is less than half the radar horizon of an Iowa. I'm sure the accuracy of the 5" guns at >11km wouldn't be great but do you really want to be on the receiving end of a dozen radar controlled 5" guns for a solid minute while you get into firing range?
Also pic related is the USS Iowa's armor scheme, there's no way for a hellfire to penetrate the outer hull and then continue on to penetrate the belt armor 2 meters away. What the hellfires totally can do though is poke holes in the superstructure and turrets praying they hit something important, and with 120 missiles on 10 helos chances are fire control and radar would be pretty much fucked by the time you finished, leaving her open to further attacks and forcing her to retreat. I do wonder how well the CIWS on the 80s refit would do against hellfires, I'm sure they could swat at least a few of them.
The could penetrate the turrets and hope to cause an ammo detonation, although there would be no reason to have ammo there ready outside of surface combat.
Could also kill everyone on the Armored bridge.
Citadel in the Hull would be largely impervious however, there is simply too much air space for small shaped charges to be effective. The compartments and multiple Armor plates basically act like a gigantic composite array.
The barbettes and turret sides I think are thin enough for a Hellfire to penetrate. Keep hitting those and you'll probably find something Hispanicy enough to set off a chain reaction and detonate the magazines. If not, just do that with the 5" turrets, then blanket the superstructure with rockets and chain gun fire. At that point see if you can chew up the less armored ends enough and hope the raft concept fails to work
somebody email this premise with a donation to battleship NJ
t. OP
Everyone is focusing on the 12 inches of side armor but why not just punch through the 5inches on top? That seems much more practical.
flying closer makes you easier target for AA, or can hellfire do top attack?
>why not just punch through the 5inches on top?
there is no water above the battleship, it is only around and below it
You're going to have to go through tens of feet of space and steel before you even get to the armor deck, and everything worthwhile to damage is down there
>You're going to have to go through tens of feet of space and steel before you even get to the armor deck
No
>and everything worthwhile to damage is down there
No
Do not even reply if you can't provide anything to back your claims, I really am not interested.
Secondary explosions and fires
>flying closer makes you easier target for AA
Quit thinking two dimensionally. You can be above and still far away. We are talking about an operational ceiling of 20k feet.(nearly 4 miles up).
>implies 12inch krupp steel will protect against modern HEAT
No, the Soviets believed that no conventional munitions available to them would be able to sink the Iowa classes when they were re-activated in the 1980s.
Did the soviets not have torpedos? The Iowas have been sinkable by those since ww2 and are basically defenseless against modern guided torpedos.
Almost every surface action group since WW2 has deployed with at least one submarine with it. Plus the major point of the destroyer screen is ASW as well.
Then the soviets did have conventional munitions that could sink an Iowa class
True, but even they dreaded having to fight one and its escorts. It's why they leaned into spamming gigantic volleys of huge AS missiles
No, Hellfires are way too dinky.
I think so but it won't be easy. Basically the Apaches would have to mobility-kill the Iowa and then slowly kill off all the crew or at least enough of the crew to allow a boarding party get on. Once on board, then the boarding party can scuttle the Iowa.
Do people not realize that the Iowas got 4 CWIS when they were reactivated and can shoot down missiles far fucking better than a hellfire. Hellfire are shit as far as missiles go no popup maneuver slow with weak ass payload the Iowa 80s reactivation installed things to defeat Excocets and actual real naval missiles that can do things like Carey a real payload and do terminal popup maneuvers. Not to mention that a helicopter is slow and quite easy to shoot down unless you are a grunt in a foxhole.
10 apaches carrying 20 navy seals, who infiltrate at night to blow the ship from inside out.
>20 navy seals
vs
>Complement 151 officers, 2,637 enlisted
Navy SEALs will stand down and cower at the command of superior ranking officers.
They will receive non-judicial punishment (NJP) and be forced to swab the deck. Afterwards, they will have to drop and give 'em 50!!!
After they have been busted back down to E-1, they will be forced to work on Kitchen Duty while their shipmates will go out on port calls mingling with the local women!!!!
Jocko Willink and his SEALs teams (also with DJ Shipley and SlayderRaider) will be forced to clean the cum from the deck of the crews quarters, while the commanding officers watch and laugh!!!
I read this in the tune of Ram Ranch for some reason
WWI dreadnoughts took hit after hit 380mm ultra big bore guns that would flatten your most heavily armored MBTs many times over and didn't sink.
Sinking the ship with an Apache is entirely conditional on positing that you're hitting explosives that are already on the ship and causing them to cook off somehow.
And hitting explosives is entirely conditional on the idea that for some reason the crew brought ammunition up even though they aren't fighting any ships.
Apache is slower and can't go as high as fighters the Iowa was facing and the range on the Hellfire is shit and within range of the guns. The only saving grace is that the Iowa doesn't have much by way of guns for AA. If it has its complement of destroyers for that then this becomes even more difficult.
ITT people think a ship designed to take hits from 3,000lb shells going up to 2,000 FPS is going to be sunk by a missile with a payload just under 20lbs going at most 1300 FPS.
knocking out all turrets is realistic
Yeah, but that isn't sinking it.
If we want to talk realistic, it is 1980s Iowa with its regular complement of escorts versus 1980s Apaches and any such engagement you might as well throw a bunch of gasoline on your helios and burn them to spare your men because you're not going to do some sort of insane air calvary assault on a fleet swarming with AA missiles that drastically outrage you.
You need to see how thick those turrets are armored for they are designed to be shot directly from other battleship guns and still work. When turret 2 of Iowa blew the fuck up from an out of battery detonation inside the turret the armor held and the guns on either side were not affected. A hellfire would not make a dent.
Sinking a large battleship is all about flooding. Hellfires wouldn't cause enough flooding below the waterline. Yamato and Musashi took like 10 plus torpedo hits and a shit load of bombs through the deck before sinking. Hellfires wont make holes big enough.
We talking US Army rotary wing? I need to factor that into my spreadsheet because at least some of them are crashing before getting involved...
fuck off
Yeah, even 20 couldn't do it. Now Marine Ospreys? Just need 7. 5 crashing into the Iowa should be enough to set something important on fire.
I would like some more variables to play with... is this a stand alone fight ie no backup incoming and perhaps most important is time a factor?
Aforementioned bearing in mind, I feel that one could merely focus all firepower on the rudder/proppeller assemblies. Make it dead in the water.
>proppeller
>:-(
it's called a screw
You're aware those are underwater, right? Besides, with such a small munition, assuming it could even hit a target underwater, it would have to be extremely precise.
yeah, they're under several meters of water, and water are just about the best thing there is for countering a HEAT jet.
No chance in hell 10 Apaches are sinking an Iowa, but 10 apaches decked out with Spike-NLOS would be able to disable things like radar, lightly armored AA emplacements, and maybe scrag the bridge? Bear in mind, Iowa towers were massive, armored, with lots of redundancies. HEAT just plain isn't good at dealing with heavily armored fortifications, and a battleship conning tower is more or less a multi-story bunker made of metal. They might be able to bore a hole through the armor, but in the space of, say, a hallway, the killing/damaging power of the jet is going to drop off quickly. The reason they work so well on tanks is because crew, fuel, and ammo is all cramped into a space of just a few cubic meters, greatly increasing the chance of killing someone/setting shit on fire. Shoot one of those at a conning tower, where all the important shit is located in the center, with less important rooms/halls surrounding them, you're just going to spray the interior of the outer rooms with small bits of metal. And since the borehole of the HEAT round is 1/4-1/2 an inch in diameter, multiple hits on the same armor block isn't going to breach the plate to gain access to the next layer, it's just going to punch another tiny hole.
> feel that one could merely focus all firepower on the rudder/proppeller assemblies. Make it dead in the water.
Um those particular pieces of equipment are 30 feet under water and about 30 feet forward of the stern as well.
What if Apaches kamikaze into the rudder? Would that mission kill the boat?
semi related to the thread:
if bunker busters can go through X amount of concrete, how much water could they penetrate?
The thermobaric building penetrators the US gave the Saudis probably get much less effective with water due to the pressure waves dynamics I'd imagine. I also imagine the charge dynamics are all fucked underwater. There is no reason to not use a torpedo for this sort of thing.
Thermobarics aren't anything-penetrators you stupid sack of shit.
>Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Dunning-Kreuger himself. Please sir, explain to us why pressure wave weapons are useless for confined spaces.
Go tell military procurement their stupid sacks of shit, I didn't build it.
>The BLU-118/B is a penetrating warhead filled with an advanced thermobaric explosive that, when detonated, generates higher sustained blast pressures in confined spaces such as tunnels and underground facilities. The BLU-118/B uses the same penetrator body as the standard BLU-109 weapon. The significant difference is the replacement of the high explosive fill with a new thermobaric explosive that provides increased lethality in confined spaces.
>for confined spaces.
Nobody's talking about what it does after it has penetrated, retard. Thermobarics don't penetrate shit.
The penetration is going to be fucked up by passing through several feet of water and probably the charge timing. That's obvious.
I was commenting on how it also produces particular problems for one of the US's penetrators as well, because the minimal amount of air is going to reduce effectiveness.
The incendiary version of the same weapon would be rendered even more ineffective by being used below water obviously.
>When people tell me they can resist an all out siege from the military with their current load out in an above ground building.
Chances anyone in that house would be ok?
maybe if they had a walk in freezer in the basement and they were in it and it wasn't directly aimed at the house
WW2 Iowas had 20 5in guns with radar fire control
They'd shred helicopters from quite a ways away.
The 1980s Iowa or the 2080s one?
The 2080s one had an extra layer of DU armor and reactive armor everywhere along with active protection systems every few feet to fire an EFP spay at any munition. It also has a spiderweb of laser interceptors coverage and plenty of drones that can take out an Apache, plus its missiles.
Now the new helio carriers have some of the same, but the 18 inch mag lev coil guns on the Iowa can send shells out at Mach 10 up to 310 miles away, more with rocket assist.
Also, even if you somehow hit the reactor, it's just going to cause a nuclear enviornmental disaster, not an explosion really.
>an extra layer of DU armor and reactive armor everywhere
total displacement?
It's variable. Obviously it has to go up when it enters submersible mode but it can also jettison parts of the belt when it needs to take flight with the turbo fans.
>total displacement?
Yes.
>fucking time travelers
At least put spoiler alert in front!
I don’t know why people in this thread think Apaches only carry Hellfire’s, or that all Hellfire’s are the same. Not all Hellfire’s are an HE warhead. A well placed HEAT shaped charge on a turret of the Iowa could cripple the ship in many ways, you could do this with a Hellfire, TOW or JAGM. Range would not be a problem. A TOW can hit target at nearly 3 Miles.
>at nearly 3 Miles
I don't think you're going to get to 3 miles distance
???
Literally all anyone in this thread is talking about is HEAT warheads interaction with the particulars of a ships construction.
>TOW can hit target at nearly 3 Miles.
As can a 5"/38
This thread might as well be can 20 HK mp7s take out a tiger 2?
Muh heat into the 18" turret face= my MP7 is loaded with ap ammo.
This it total zoomer clown shoes shit thinking.
HEAT just happens to work well against plate armor
Yea no shit but it is not an invincible death ray that can penetrate any thickness at will. Hellfire dinky shit missile payload against a turret face that is 18 inches thick and would not give a single fuck if you punched a 4 inch hole in it even if you could. One gun bay of the 3 in a turret is huge and has like 60 people working in it and that is not even in the barbet or shell handling rooms. There is fuck all a helicopter can do agaist a Iowa there is fuck all a modern surface ship of any nation can do to hurt an Iowa either.
>The latest kind of Hellfire is estimated to penetrate 1000mm of RHA
thats what the internet says don't blame the messenger
The bigger issue with shaped charges of that size is the simple size of a ship. These things are designed to disable tanks, where once you penetrate the armor there are vital components within inches of the molten copper, spall, or whatever else you're relying on for damage. The space in a BB turret is far more expansive. The likelihood you're going to cause reliable damage with a helfire is virtually nil. Much less when you consider the ship is moving and the apaches are likely going to be forced to operate at the very edge of the missiles effective range.
18 inches of steel is butter for a shaped charge, bud.
>there is fuck all a modern surface ship of any nation can do to hurt an Iowa either.
This is absolutely brain rot. Have you watched a Sink-X?
Yes I have first fucking hand knowledge of them as a retired submarine weapons department chief and there has never been one against a battle ship they are all old destroyers and frigates and most are only sunk when the submarine takes the kill shot battle ships were literally nuked in Able and Baker tests and only sunk after being scuttled.
T. FTC/SS 1991-2011
Rank, Name, Photo proof, DD-214, VOICE RECORDING, PERSONAL BIOGRAPHY, PEER REVIEWED 4 YEAR STUDY, SATELLITE IMAGE
Prove it you bombastic gay!!!
not him, but, Prinz Eugen, a German cruiser, was nuked by US, and survived
What kind of Battleship(2012) autism is this thread. In 1989 an accidental turret explosion killed 47 due to carbon monoxide. The Iowa is not unsinkable. In fact it’s probably a death trap compared to modern surface ships. 10 Apaches with maximum ammunition would lay waste with modern FCS.
>Iowas 3 float planes shoot down the apaches before they get into hellfire firing range
checkmate atheists
Apache has stinger. Checkmate boomer.
unfortunately you only loaded anti armor weapons before discovering the float planes
th-thee Apache can use its b-bushmaster as air defense b-bro like please
does it have radar guided ballistic computer aiming for moving air targets?
HUD controlled line of sight slaved chaingun
Yes actually
>10 Apaches with maximum ammunition would lay waste with modern FCS
ridiculous. Hellfires would basically bounce off any of the armor and Hyrda would make smoke fires on the deck plates, the minigun is worthless AND even the original Iowa FCS+AA would eat the slow fat Apaches in two bites, they'd be one and done and that's if they caught everyone napping, with earmuff ons, after 2 beers and Ambiens all around
>a explosion of thousands of pounds of powder inside a turret blew out part of just that turret and killed 2% of the crew
>this proves the 50,000 ton battleship is easily sinkable by helicopter munitions
Wow you're right that ship is a pussy. As a reasonably fit male I bet you could beat the USS Iowa in a fistfight.
One explosion among hundreds induced by the Apache gunships.
this is like a man with a rifle pointing it at a tank that had a round cook off in it and kill the gunner once, and saying he can do that many times over, look at the thousand rounds of rifle ammunition he has
Most of the hellfires would punch through the outer hull plating and then ruin some workspace or bunk room, or maybe kill some poor dudes in one of the 5" guns. The ship itself would suffer hardly any real damage
In an actual realistic military setting it's virtually impossible. Apaches don't carry heavy enough ordnance to seriously threaten a 60k ton displacement ship. Not to mention an Iowa could rapidly clear the area in which the Apaches are able to operate. If the engagement was absolutely favorable to the Apaches, say the ship was in harbor and there was terrain for the Apaches to hide behind then they could inflict some serious damage to the ships sensors and secondary battery.
you'd probably have better luck using ASW helicopters and launching torpedoes at it
Now finally talking sense mk 46 are mainly for anti sub and quite small but if you could hit it enough maybe. I dont know if a 46 could get through the torpedo blister since it does not have a WAS. Battleships were thought to be able to take 3-4mk 48ADCAPs before being sunk when I was in.
Assuming each Apache is carrying 2 AGM-65 Mavericks they could do some serious damage to the Iowa while staying out of range of the AA batteries. However they probably would struggle to sink the ship, but they could leave it a smoldering hulk.
The Maverick still would have very serious trouble penetrating the belt and turret, but it at least has a better chance too start some cookoffs and it has enough penetration to actually do *some* appreciable damage to the superstructure.
Did you guys ever take note on the pecularity of AShM development between the east and west esp. early on?
The earliest successful Soviet AShM, the SS-N-2 Styx (P-15 Termit) had a 1,000lb HEAT charge (The maverick is ~ 126lbs).
In comparison the west got by with dual use SAM's like Terrier and Standard and placed a greater importance on anti-submarine missiles before developing general purpose subsonic sea skimmer AShM like Harpoon and Exocet with warheads under 500lbs.
The Soviets coalesced into a high-low AShM strat as technology developed - smaller subsonic general purpose AShM sea skimmers that broadly rivaled Harpoon and larger supersonic AShM battleship and supercarrier killers with warhead weights well over 500lbs.
You aren't doing shit with a hellfire against an Iowa except pissing it off
To go even further, it probably would have taken well over 10 Styx to sink an Iowa.
Esp. Considering Destroyers and frigates have survived a Styx hit.
that's not even an apache you fucking retard
they could probably behead it easily, fuck the entire command control infrastructure, idk about sinking it unless they score a catastrophic series of hits to the magazine
Neither, they can do damage to critical systems like radars, comms antennae, kill off the bridge crew by precision striking the bridge itself and the tower around and bellow it, and possibly set portions of the deck and superstructure on fire by concentrating missile strikes onto secondary guns to cause ammo cookoffs.
Sinking a ship of that size though requires either cooking off a main gun magazine which would be buried under literal meters of steel armor and concrete, with large air spaces inbetween, or punching massive holes bellow the waterline that would overwhelm the ship's bilge pumps and damage control team.
You're never going to accomplish either of those goals with hellfire missiles, even modern antiship missiles would probably struggle to totally mission kill an Iowa or any other battleship of the era, because they were specifically designed to give and take hits from enormously large artillery shells many times the mass of a modern missile packed with HE filler.
The best bet would be to drop modern torpedoes on her, because all ships are extremely vulnerable to HE detonations bellow the keel, the force of displaced water expanding upwards and then collapsing back down beneath a ship can break it's back no matter how heavy the armor belts are.
Well it's been theorized more then a few times that the heavy deck armor of the Iowas and other such BBs would have been able to act as a second keel and let her limp back to port for repairs instead of being a near instant kill
They'd have about the same chance as they would collapsing Tora Bora. You simply don't understand the scale of these fucking boats
>pop gun against a behemoth
basically. think "biplanes vs King Kong"
The biplanes killed Kong though. A better analogy would be tanks against Godzilla.
fair. I forget they were Helldivers, it was a bad call. yeah tanks vs Godzilla is better
If the Apache can fire a hellfire down the barrel of one of the main guns, and set off a chain reaction then sure.
Why would the main guns be loaded?
look, a lot of bothans died to get him that information
They can't sink it, but probably can do mission kill.
Assuming Iowa can't really fight back well, Apaches can keep distance, take out important subsystems on deck and maybe take out a few guns. Iowa would be a lot less capable afterwards. Or if they take out significant portion of the air defense systems then someone else can finish the job but at that point a lone Iowa would probably just retreat.
Two things:
i) People are discussing if hellfire can penetrate. Hellfire can penetrate Iowa's armor easily. It's just that the whole it generates wouldn't sink Iowa during the service life of the ship. When you're attacking tanks you set off some chain reaction, it's not just a hole in the armor that kills the tank. For a ship like Iowa, you need a huge hole to cause damage.
ii) Iowa type ships never go alone. They're too valuable assets to send out alone, even during WW2. If I remember correctly, some people even say that big ships during WW2 were just glorified escorts without any decisive action. You can't lose them, situations they may make difference are limited. But they're good for prestige and "fleet in being" type of thing.
>Apaches can keep distance,
nah
>important subsystems on deck
if theyre important theyre not on the deck
>Hellfire can penetrate Iowa's armor easily
bullshit
can keep distance,
>nah
Hellfire has 11km range. Iowa WW2 has no AA capability to engage targets at that range.
subsystems on deck
>if theyre important theyre not on the deck
Radio and main guns are above deck. You can disable some if not all guns. Hellfire is precise enough.
can penetrate Iowa's armor easily
>bullshit
Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill.
>Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship?
Retard, that's literally what I was trying to point out. You can't sink Iowa with holes from Hellfire. Learn how to understand what you read.
>The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
Apaches have Hellfires that can engage beyond any AA Iowa WW2 has. If you can get full Hellfire range Iowa can't do anything. But Apaches can't do much to Iowa either besides making it mission kill. Sinking is out of question.
>hellfires outrange the 5"/3-ACK!
Can Iowa see the Apaches at that range? Has that range ever been achieved in combat or was it only on trials?
Answers are no and only on trials.
>Can Iowa see the Apaches at that range? yes, easily
>Has that range ever been achieved in combat or was it only on trials?
>t.butthurt he got dunked on
Was the Hellfire ever used "in anger" at 11km? lol
>Iowa has some composites,
oh boy we got a live one boys. go read a few books on how naval armor works to prevent penetration. hint: it involves a lot more than a big slab-o-STS
Iowa's armor was designed to stop a 2700lb shell traveling at 1600mph. that's 230,000,000 (230x1,000,000) ftlbs of energy at impact and then you add in the detonation of the warhead.
now go do the math on a Hellfire and get back to us
>iowa couldn't detect an aircraft at 11 kilomet-ack!
>220 kW
does it run hot?
Anyone got the frozen turkey greentext?
I only remember the popcorn one
didn't the iowas get a much better search radar?
Sure, eventually, but it had surface and air search radars of sufficient capability to target aircraft at the ranges discusses here.
>Retard. I don't know Hellfire's RHAe but even tow has like 900mm (that's almost a meter thick metal). Unless Iowa has some composites, tip: it doesn't, Hellfires can penetrate anywhere. It's just that the holes would not be enough to sink it. So you'd have to target for mission kill
My dawg, look at the attached diagram and let me know where the HEAT warhead of a hellfire would detonate to achieve penetration of the main belt or deck armor. Remember that a NATO triple heavy target has a total cumulative air gap of only 14 inches. Getting into the citadel of the Iowa would be impossible because the exterior plating and decks would detonate the warhead so massively early (10+ feet in the main deck's case) that the heat jet would disperse. For a main belt hit to access engineering or magazine spaces you are looking at
> 37mm decapping plate
> 800mm airgap
> 25mm tank wall
> 800mm fluid gap
> 290mm main belt armor (at 19 degrees from vertical, outwards
> 2-4000mm tank space
> then another steel bulkhead, probably 25mm or so.
It's not designed for penetration like that. And it's even worse trying to hit the main deck because the slant range is so much higher and you'll be coming through the super structure.
>look at the attached diagram
>how naval armor works
hivemind rise up
Explain how a small shaped charge is getting through multiple decks with meters of space between them
You shoot the turrets anon. One hellfire per turret would replicate the 89 explosion three times over, and probably larger since they were lucky in 89 that not all the powder in the turret went up. If you got lucky you might catch powder in a safe passage and ultimately set off a magazine promptly. Even if you didn't the fire from the 89 explosion took 90 minutes to bring under control despite deliberate flooding; three simultaneous fires of that size would be harder and take longer. It is possible the ship could be lost to them, especially since One and Two simultaneously burning would jeopordise their shared powder magazine on the first platform. Note also that all of this is happening inside the citidel and best case scenario in combat would kill about 10% of the crew immediately.
That leaves a single Apache thirteen more Hellfires. I think you probably roll the dice on secondary turrets hoping you get lucky on some magazine misadventures, but idk.
Why are the main guns loaded?
How did the hellfires even hit the turret? The apache has to be within 5 inch range to fire and since it's laser guided it's required for it to stick around. If it loses the laser the hellfires are going to miss
>How did the hellfires even hit the turret? The apache has to be within 5 inch range to fire and since it's laser guided it's required for it to stick around. If it loses the laser the hellfires are going to miss
moron, please. Hellfires have been mmw radar fire and forget since 1995, the AA envelope for Iowa 5 inch guns is shorter range than a laser Hellfire anyway and the Apache's critical systems are armored against 23mm while Iowa 5 inch VT took over 1000 rounds per AA kill and killed by frag (1 shot per 6 seconds per gun, 20 guns on WWII fit, 12 in Reagan fit). The AN/APG-78 Longbow fcr can simultabeously launch all 16 hellfires against separate targets and can target share. The Iowa has absolutely no chance of preventing the launches of all 16 hellfires per Apache using 5 inch and no way of preventing them from hitting. Unironically its only hope would be a lucky hit with 16 inch while the apache was closing to range, otherwise a single Apache could make every turret an inferno and proooobably get a magazine, just on balance of probabilities.
If you're not laser guiding them you no longer have the level of target discrimination required to do what you're talking about. And once again retards fail to understand that the magazine spaces are all inside the citadel and under the waterline. There is NO feasible way for any helicopter based weapon to penetrate the citadel and then reach the magazine spaces inside
>If you're not laser guiding them you no longer have the level of target discrimination required to do what you're talking about.
Wrong. Stop being a dumb fuck and posting about systems you don't understand. Hellfire Longbow will target the turrets just fine and this capability was demonstrated with Apache Guardian. As for the citadel, where the fuck do you think the primary and secondary turrets reside? Do you genuinely not realise that the primary turrets protrude five decks into the citadel and sit on top of their powder magazine because you've never even looked at the layout of the class before? Iowa nearly blew its magazine in the 89 explosion. The safety measures to prevent flashback from turret to magazine are not infalliable, and if you hit 3 primary turrets and 20 secondaries you've got a good chance of promptly breaching magazine do to shit luck (eg catch powder in scuttle or safe passage and it goes at a moment where safeties dom't catch it), killing the ship with 23 massive turret fires or getting a magazine later when for eg the One and Two turrets are both 3000 degree infernos and their bulkheads are cherry red, and they share a common room that links them on the first platform that happens to be the powder magazine so now your magazine is being cooked by a six story and five story drum fire on either side that's burning HE and powded.
Anyway, I'm done replying to you. Go learn something, you dumb gay.
Mad brainlets itt get more and more pathetic with every post.
Hellfires don't have the ability to outrange the 5"/38s. 5"/38s have radar driven firecontrol and radar fuzes. They also have the ability to work against something faster than a 3 legged hippo, which is the best the apache can manage, especially with a full warload.
Apachefags got fucking torched because their piddlyshit flying dumpster has nothing on the Iowa. Not enough range, not enough firepower, not enough maneuverability.
>just like muh Death Star!
>primary turrets protrude five decks into the citadel
My poor dumb moron, do you think there is a contiguous space from the 5" turrets to the main 5" magazine? Holy shit, you don't know anything about battleships, do you? What are those weird boxes on the righthand portion of the image? Surely they aren't long armored tubes that run ammo from the 5" magazine to the room below the turret, right?
How the fuck are you reaching the powder magazine? Draw me a 1 meter line, the best a hellfire can do, from the powder stores here and show me where it hits exterior hull.
>the AA envelope for Iowa 5 inch guns is shorter range than a laser Hellfire
Source?
>5 inch VT took over 1000 rounds per AA kill and killed by frag (1 shot per 6 seconds per gun, 20 guns on WWII fit, 12 in Reagan fit)
Shows what you know about the purpose of AA. It's primary function isn't to destroy enemy aircraft, it's to put enough steel and explosives in the air to make bombing and torpedo runs difficult/dangerous, of course they're going to burn through ammo. This forces planes to maneuver and veer off. Ironically, AA was much more effective against kamikaze fighters for this very reason, the pilots weren't trying to drop bombs and veer off, they were trying to hit the ship and as such got wrecked.
Compared to Japanese fighters, Apaches are big and slow, and need to maintain laser contact with their target for their Hellfires to hit, which is difficult when jinking and flying evasively. Even at 11km, they'd get bracketed by 5" proximity fused shells and get obliterated.
You just have no idea how any of this works, do you?
Ah yes. In their hubris, the USN designed an enormous expensive ship absolutely bristling with the naval gunnery equivalent of Loony Tunes style bomb fuzes. Never did they ever consider that their secondary and AA batteries would come under direct fire from, say, one ton shells filled with HE moving at mach 2. The fact that any Iowas survived WWII is a mystery
Fucking shut the fuck up and stop embarrassing yourself
>verification not required
And like many have said, disrupting targeting of any missile is good enough for the Iowa since any weapons fired have such narrow targets
>A battleship
>narrow target
lol lmao
we've been over that simply hitting a battleship sized target with a hellfire isn't a sufficient level of precision to do anything noteworthy against a battleship.
If we're going to go full retard, then why don't we have some madlads with laser designators tread water in the ocean and paint the Iowa's radar for the apaches. Honestly I know that this wouldn't work, but we're already stupid so we might as well commit to the stupidity. Maybe sell the idea to Hollywood for their next action movie.
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you
It's a combat situation anon, why wouldn't they be?
Because you don't use 16/50's against Helos?
So if the main guns are loaded for some bizarre reason when conducting anti air warfare that means the breach is closed. The 98 explosion wasn't from a rounf cooking off it was a propellant bag detonating outside the breach. So how is there going to be this big explosion in a turret when you have to get through 17 inches of armor on the face and then a big ass air gap and another 12 inches of gun barrel to hit the propellant charge that has an easy way to expand (out the barrel)?
Because you don't use 16" guns against aerial threats.
>For a ship like Iowa, you need a huge hole to cause damage
you very likely need more than one. Do you have any idea how fucking difficult it really is to sink a ww2 era battleship?
>Overall the four British ships fired more than 2,800 shells at Bismarck, and scored more than 400 hits, but were unable to sink Bismarck by gunfire.
and that's firing everything from 5" to 16", much of it at point blank range.
and this was just in the last engagement, when Bismarck had already been crippled over the past few days' fighting.
The USS Nevada tanked a nuke and was still afloat.
>assuming Iowa can’t fight back
Why would we assume this? It’s a battleship, it battles, why the fuck would it not be able to fight back against a bunch of helicopters that are slower, larger targets than the planes it encountered in WW2? The Apache doesn’t have any weapon systems that can engage from beyond the Iowa’s AA envelope, and no weapons that can actually meaningfully damage the thing.
>Snipe all light guns with hellfires
>Rearm with R9X hellfires, decapitate all crew that goes on deck
With enough time, the crew goes insane and sinks the ship on their own
>battleship made to fight and withstand other battleship rounds and torpedoes
>being sinked by 10 helicopters, none of which loaded with torpedoes
LOL
O
L
Best you can do is frag the bridge but ain't no way in hell you're sinking it with just 10 Apaches
As we have established, 10 apaches can't do any meaningfull damage to Iowa, so let's modify paramaters a little.
>(You) have a modern LPH with a total of 10 modern helicopters of your choice as well as all the crew, munitions and fuel they may require, but you have no other crafts or offensive armaments.
>Due to an organizational fuckup of collosal proportions a hostile Iowa-class BB (1940 refit, full combat load) is detected on it's own in the area and is somewhat vulnerable to attack.
>However it is on course to enter enemy combat-air-patrol range in just a couple of hours. If it does, there's nothing you can possibly do anymore.
>(You) are the only thing that can stop it before the terrorists win.
>What helos do you pick?
>What do you arm them with?
>How do you organize your attacks?
For those who want bigger challange, consider Iowa 1980 refit.
the only way it can be sunk would be all 10 of them loaded with torpedos and do a suicide run and even then its not garanteed
10 mi-26s with barrel bombs
Fun scenario.
Assuming I can get targeting data from somewhere, I'm going with 10 Mi-26, each carrying 2 Rapid Dragon 6 tube modules (Unfortunately it looks like the Chinook interior bay is 1ft too narrow for a Rapid Dragon module). Each Red Dragon module loaded with AGM-158C LRASM.
I love battleships, but I think 120 of those launched from would do the job.
If I can't get targeting data from somewhere, then let me know and I will rethink.
10 Apaches with AM39 Exocets. Or even just 1 Apache with Exocets… not sure why helicopter launched AShMs aren’t getting mentioned as the ship obliterates they are
How would a modern guided missile cruiser fare against that lone battleship? Can modern anti-ship missiles even pen the armor belt?
US? Honestly not too well. The limited and not really all that good harpoons can probably be intercept and at least drive off a WW2 Iowa. 1980s would probably be able to decoy and CIWS the 8 missiles and take only marginal damage. She'd be fast enough to chase down anything besides a CVN and maybe some of the nuclear cruisers and obviously in a gun duel she's going to win 98/100 times. The Russians with far more and much more effective AShM missiles would have a far better chance. That's really just USN's doctrine of having the airpower be the strike assets bite them in the ass.
I would guess an Italian FREMM would have it easier since with the guided rounds she could shell from far over Iowa's max range, plus OTOMAT can pack a punch at least over the water line.
Do you recon you could disable radars/antennas + secondary battery and get in range for torpedoes if it was a night attack?
The issue with that is that those guided rounds to my knowledge are all either GPS guided which simply aren't suitable for naval use due to both ships moving 30 knots or they are line of sight guide via radar which puts the FREMM well within 16 inch range and 3 inch guns loose that fight. It's not like the Iowa can't fight over the horizon either. As for impact yeah you could do some damage with a rapid fire 3 inch guns. The biggest issue is you have no AP ammo and one you clean out 40mm mounts and the like you aren't going to be able to kill even the secondary turrets
Well no, to my knowledge (Italian Wikipedia page) the Vulcano rounds for the 127mm are of 3 different types and only one is GPS guided. The BER is a 70km unguided round while the GLR is IR guided and in the 70-90 km range but I doubt it would do much since it's made to explode after pen so not sure it would work against stuff like radars.
My idyllic plan was then on the line of someone like the F 590 night engaging the Iowa from well over the 16 in's range (of what? 40km) with his 5 in hoping to blind it, shoot her missiles to set it on fire and then hopefully get in the 30-20 km range (so inside the Iowa's secondary battery's range) and torpedo her before she shoots back.
If it doesn't work just shoot everything from afar hoping it burns down before it can close the distance.
But yeah best way to take out a battleship would be with planes, definitely not a frigate.
Well, it depends on which cruiser and what battleship.
If you were to take Moskva and New Jersey in their 1980s configuration, New Jersey does everything Moskva does, but more and with additional displacement and armor. Its possible for Moskva to win, but in all likelyhood NJ is winning that fight.
If you compare a Iowa during ww2 to a current year Ticonderoga class, it loses. Shitty radar and short range weapons mean its effectively helpless.
because this is a stupid thread, yes they'ed fire all their armor piercing rounds and and missiles at the exact same spot hit a magazine until asplode.
if Iowa ships were so impervious to Apache then Saddam Hussein would have used them in a hull down defensive line in the sand during desert storm
The 5"/38s would be more than a match for them with VT fuses.
How well would pic-related do against a battleship?
It's genuinely hard to tell. Most modern ASMs have delay detonation warheads, which begs the question, if they fail to penetrate the belt armor, which is 11.3" of hardened steel, would the fuzing system survive? If not, you'd have a hole in the shell plating and a fire inside the void spaces from unburned fuel from the missile.
I don't see a TASM/HARPOON/ETC having much chance at achieving penetration on battleship belt armor.
why belt? you could just as easily have it smash downwards into something squishier than the belt armor designed to take naval gun fire
You mean the deck armor ment to resist large caliber naval rifles?
not nearly so thick as the belt
You're punching through a inch top deck and then a 5inch main deck plus roughly 20 feet of space?
It'll have to go through decks (1.5" steel) and then the main deck (6") at an angle. I'm not sure modern ASMs are up for it. Boats just aren't built like they used to be. You'd probably be better off just wrecking the superstructure and getting a mission kill.
you guys are underestimating the inertia on a ton warhead with a superdense cap, and some designs have multiple EFPs point in every direction around the missile.
Anon, the only ones that bothered to do that are the Russians since everyone else went to thin skinned ships with the iowas being the sole remaining class with any real armor on it. Plus those aren't launched by apaches.
Maybe I'm overestimating a 2700 pound projectile at Mach 1.5 made of nearly solid steel.
Maybe, but I'll let your brain chug about if a mass of high explosive is stronger than solid forged steel.
FWIW we knew all about explosive warheads when these naval guns were being built, plenty of bombs, torpedoes, exploding shells etc.
these worked the best at penning naval armor
>these worked the best at penning naval armor
they also do a real number on entrenched enemy in fortified positions on ground
Even then, the controls towers are pretty well armored
Do Apaches have any weapons that let them sit outside the Iowa’s AA screens?
Spike-NLOS has 25km range
They tried with the TASM (Tomahawk AnitShip Missle) it really only had a chance when set on popup attack mode but the problem with that is the super structure takes the damage and Battleships and the like do not need any of the superstructure to survive and fight.
Tldr: was tried and found lacking so was discontinued.
Sinking might be difficult, but they could easily make it entirely combat ineffective.
since its already dumb scenario lets pretend napkin prototypes are real
Ok PrepHole listen up. China has somehow got their hands on a fully functional Iowa and they are planning an attack on US soil.
The Russian managed to activate the Kube found while "secretly" digging in the red forest and used it to disable every military asset. Due to classic russian stupidity 10 [insert helicopters of your choice] were not affected.
The president appointed you as chief of this operation, you have access to all the top NATO scientists and all the military budget.
How do you bubba rig the choppers to stop the threat and save the country?
It's just not really possible with helis. They simply can't carry the required ordnance.
You can't jerry rig a W54 onto a torpedo?
Like, a modernize Iowa? With Phalax and RAMs? Fuck all, basically. Maybe a suicide mission where I load them all up with as many Spike-NLOS as physically possible and take out all their sensors and PD, but after that all the birds are sitting ducks. The only result is that the ship now can’t defend itself as well against shore-mounted defenses and missiles, but that’s about it
No like the thing from the 40s but with admiral Chang at the rudder.
Well, kit out most of the choppers with NLOS and try to neutralize its radar and point defence and then moron-rig something Hispanicier for the remaining choppers to get in close and do damage. A torpedo or a bunker buster or somethingr
Can chinook carry a tallboy?
Not anywhere that wouldn't get shithammered by the 5"/38s that smother the Iowa.
Unless you knock out 5"s with other helicopters first.
You're not going to be able to do that without discriminating precision weapons and the only types you're fitting on an Apache are the laser guided hellfires.
In order to shine a laser you need LOS and that is well within 5inch range
Could the Spike-NLOS pull it off? I can't seem to find much on the exact nature of its targeting systems, but it can engage out to 25km
No, all these weapons are simply 'attack the blob' style targeting.
This seems like a good thread to ask something I've been wondering for a while, how much does it take to sink your average modern trawler or container ship?
Not a simple answer but to try and make is simple >50% reserve buoyancy
>how much does it take to sink your average modern trawler or container ship?
2 torpedoes to be sure, or if you're confident they're unarmed you can surface and use the deck gun.. alternatively board it and flood it by opening valves
That's the part I'm curious about, would a 30mm be able to feasibly destroy a big civilian ship? Handheld RPGs?
Probably not much. Commercial ships aren't designed to endure missile attacks. I don't know if they have similar number of compartments that can limit the damage or if they have enough crew to respond fast.
If you attack with an anti ship missile, I think just one would be enough. It would probably punch a big hole through the ship anyway so if it hits the right spot it'll sink it.
Put holes in it under the waterline or start fires. Torpedos, mines, bombs, missiles, even gunfire will work in sufficient amounts. These ships aren't designed to withstand attack, so sinking them is trivial.
So to immediately put things in perspective, a cargo ship is going have maybe 5-6 watertight bulkheads and a crew of 20~. A navy frigate is going to have upwards of 30 and have a crew in the 100-200 range. It's just two massively different standards
Huh, that does make a lot of sense. So for civilian ships you'd only really need to poke a few holes to cause threatening levels of flooding? I guess that explains how Somalian pirates with RPGs are still able to threaten shipping.
boop its rudder so it can't go back to port and then boop the repair crews. rinse and repeat until everyone on board has starved to death.
it's like you nibbas never heard of the bismark
You know apaches can't carry torpedos, right?
maybe you can use two of them to carry one? so 10 apaches could carry combined 5 torpedoes
They could be retrofitted.
If we're having intensely stupid gayricious fantasies adding hardpoints, hovering say six feet high then landing on simple dunnage to facilitate torpedo loading is quite reasonable and practical as are any weapons system mods.
Huey bomber proof of concept used actively by Lebanon:
http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Arts/Art29055.htm
Primary Apache mission gross weight is ~15Klb, MOW is 23K per Boeing.
Mounting a central weapons rack then hanging a Mark 84 with a JDAM kit would be doable with payload to spare. Apache can operate at night.
The trouble with gaylord gay kiddiedreams is they omit context without which a system could not exist. Presumption of flyable Apache presumes its support and skill and supply tail. Basic bomb dropping mods for gravity muns can be done at base level since avionics, weapons, electricians, structural etc troops exist.
That's why everything childish is stupid.
>apaches approach Iowa
>two get blasted by AA fire before they can even blow their load
>8 dump their load into the iowa
>scruffs the paint, makes the crew moderately annoyed
>AA finishes off the remaining apaches
>Iowa spends the next three days firing nonstop shells at the helo base for the minor transgression
Temper, temper!
I'm amazed we went this long without any references to that...
just how big do you think the captain's erection was when he gave the order for that broadside?
hopefully flaccid, swatting down idiot morons who just don't know any better shouldn't do anything, it should be just another Tuesday.
Iowa is OP as fuck
How can other botes even compete.
best hope you'd have would be to penn the turrets and set off the ammunition/powder bags or start a fire that would do so. a hellfire could easily cut through the armor of any battleship (iirc 1.8m rha rated), however vital spaces were well separated from the hull because battleships were fuckhuge and that's what would be the problem. so not so much the armor, but too much distance for the jet to cover after the armor had been penetrated in order to hit something combustible enough to do damage. it would be like driving nails into a tree. easily done but not going to acheive much.
This thread has too much by the books thinking. Hellfire this maverick that bla bla
The answer would clearly be a night attack, have half your choppers kill the radar, and have the other half land some b61s dialed up to maximum yield with timed fuses. It's that easy
Dunno mate, Mr "let's insert seal team 6 on deck and have him sink the ship" sounded pretty off the book to me.
My idea would work though. That plan is suicide and would fail. Suicide with success is much better
And I mean land in the loosest sense. Weld two armed and ticking b61s to the sides of 5 apaches and once the radar is down, crash land those suckers onto the deck
That's basically the scenarios people have been thinking about but the major issue is what this guy's says here
is that in order to actually target those systems you're too close and you're going to get swatted by 5"/38 fire. Helicopters loose one of their biggest advantages at sea since they can't hug terrain like they can on land to do pop ups and stuff
If the radar can be killed from a distance at night, the effectiveness of those 38s is gonna drop significantly. Coupled with the "unique" delivery method I'm proposing for the b61s, I think it's the best plan so far.
How are you hitting the radar though? The only weapons the apaches have that are capable of that kind of precision are TOWs and Hellfire both require LOS on the target and that's within range for radar guided 5 inch spam. I know of no helicopter launched HARM systems
It can work
Maverick range is 22km
38s at maximum is 16km, and I highly suspect their accuracy at that range.
Hover at 18km, lase the radar, spam the mavs, then suicide your nukes into the ship
JAGM-MR would work too if we're disallowing mavericks
>How are you hitting the radar though? The only weapons the apaches have that are capable of that kind of precision are TOWs and Hellfire both require LOS on the target and that's within range for radar guided 5 inch spam.
Be the Iowa's greatest ally so that they won't shoot at you until after you knock out the radar.
Okay, so I decide to moron-rig my apaches with Walleye II Mk6 nuclear glide bombs. Your move mr. law man
Could one of the modern torpedoes that "snap the boat in half" snap an iowa in half?
It's something nobody really knows. Nobody has done tests on what happens when one of those detonates under something with so much deck armor. At the very least, a Mk48 hit is forcing her back to port though
Sell the 10 Apaches for 520m, buy 3 f35's, launch 6 agm-158c at it from 200miles away
The hellfire HEAT missiles can only make small insignificant 800mm deep holes into the battleship. The hellfire high explosive missile if it can defeat the Iowas 300mm armor belt would be the only threat
>Pictured: Cobra
Gr8 b8 got me good.
That's an AH-1 Cobra, not an AH-64.
Great thread.
>mission kill
>mission kill
>mission kill
What if the mission is to fuck up 10 Apache helicopters?
Autism speaks and this thread is it’s mouth
>someone asserts something factually wrong
>is corrected
>AUTISM