Challenger bros. It's our showtime

Challenger bros
It's our showtime

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bong Bus was a good name kek

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bong Bros
      Spank Bong
      Bong dot Com

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how long until they're actually deployed tho? i mean i get it it's more of a move to push the fucking kraut but still

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Finally the vast amounts of military spending that should have been spent on our public healthcare will be worth-ACK

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your concern has been noted. we will stop sending MBTs and anything else to ukraine.

      -rishi sunak

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >noooo you must disband your military and spend all the money on healthcare!
      >/k

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What's the difference between disbanding and handing it over to some drunken Slavic pimps for free?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The amount of dead Russians

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Military spending gets us shiny new gear and cool videos from slavlands.
      Public healthcare gets us what exactly? I don't use it. Haven't been to a doctor in almost a decade.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >chally covered with slav ERA

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >chally with balkenkreuz

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not going to lie going to look KINO ukies are innovative in that shit I whould not be surprised if they find a way to attach stugna to a bradley

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the question is if they will be allowed to do that, bc I guess anglos will handle the upkeep and maintenance

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Attaching a station fired ATGM to a turret is hard
        The better question is would it even be worth it when you have access to OP as shit tandem warhead TOW II's

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >send a meaningless number of tanks after getting shown up by IFV deliveries from every major country
    >brag about it
    moron send a battalion wtf are you doing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      UK prioritys are navy > air force > army

      they simply dont have the stock to send any army gear

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ....Didn't they recently announce to something like half their tank fleet?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yup, after BoJo stood up in parliament and went on the record saying "We will never again see pitched tank battles in Europe!".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, he got all the big calls right

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Standard UK political fare. Every Prime Minister is always the 'WORST PM EVER!!!! . . . except for the one that came before him of course'.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I really don't think that is the case nor do I remember people claiming at the time that Thatcher was the worst PM ever, or that Major was, or even that Blair was. Cameron was doing well until he boxed himself in with an unexpected election result, May failed but for the right reasons which is complicated and Johnson solved the problems by simply lying. Should Sunak go I think its unlikely people will think he was worse than Johnson.

                So I don't think there is any truth in this at all.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bongbros, do ya think he will be back in downing st before the election like many are predicting?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If you asked me that under normal political circumstances I'd laugh in your face and need a minute to be calm enough to talk intelligibly. We are definitely not in normal, or even vaguely sane, political circumstances at the moment though. Sunak seems to be working hard to get some kind of 'domestic disturbance' going with his new anti-strike legislation (which is the sort of thing that should lead to politicians being hanged from the lamp posts) so who knows? I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he was back in number 10 before too long.

              Of course that would lead to the Tories getting absolutely fucking slaughtered in the next election - even worse than they're going to be already. At the moment they're looking at at least a generation in 'the wilderness' before they have a credible chance of forming a government again; if BoJo came back then it could realistically lead to the actual death of the party.

              I just want to go back to when things made sense.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In reality it's the reverse, Johnson's removal was not popular among the people who actually vote, especially up north

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Johnson wasn't removed, his position became untenable because there was nobody left to tell lies on his behalf. This wasn't the press, it wasn't the civil service or the deep state, it was Tory MPs refusing to serve in his cabinet because he was routinely humiliating everyone that worked for him.

                His popularity in the red wall is much overstated, nobody wants him back.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >His popularity in the red wall is much overstated, nobody wants him back.

                I'm not so sure. Johnson beat Starmer in a by-election, this is unheard for a party that's been in power for nine years. Regardless, Johnson would lose less seats than Truss or Sunak, bottom line is that the Tory MPs lost their nerve (especially in October last year) and will regret it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Johnson beat Starmer in a by-election,
                Hartlepool? That was a year before he well and truly fucked everything up with multiple rolling scandals. That said, people have short memories. I think people are pissed off at the state of the country, and his casual approach to everything will just piss people off more. Sometimes the joke stops being funny.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Chally sisters….it’s OUR time

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    finally we get to see how a chally stacks up against the modern anti-tank system
    maybe, anyway

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would it not be better to send tanks they have experience of using, know how to fix and have a system in place already for recovery and repair of ones that are broken down? As awesome as it would be to see Challengers slaying vatnik T-80s they would only work with British crews.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >get new recruit who's never been on tanks before
      >teach him about tanks on the tank he will be using

      >get experienced tanker who's used to soviet junk
      >convert him to a late 90's tank with NV, thermal, FCS, comfort, lethality and protection like he's never had access to before.
      >goes back to fight more effectively than ever before.

      There is no situation where having a massively more capable tank isn't a benefit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      when you find the british t-64 stocks let me know, thanks

      i imagine that these are the challengers we lent to poland last year to replace the t-72s they sent to ukraine until they got more abrams or whatever
      did those t-72s ever actually make it though? i keep hearing how these challenger iis are the first mbts to be sent to ukraine.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >i keep hearing how these challenger iis are the first mbts to be sent to ukraine.
        First WESTERN mbt anon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There have been actual Uke special forces, army etc training with British troops on UK soil for months. Do we not have actual challengers in the country that we could have been training them on?

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This accurate?
    Suggests there isn't a whole lot that can get through the turret, maybe large diameter HEAT through the mantlet (Kornets push 1000mm plus after ERA for eg).
    I also wonder If this is actual Armor protection or if it is including the steel bulk of the gun mounting/breech.
    AFAIK the steel beasts protection includes anything that will prevent penetration into the fighting compartment, not just armour.

    Honestly I hope there is proper research done on the Armored warfare in Ukraine.
    Since we saw Russian tanks loaded with 1980s darts, and others with many gun launched ATGM I have been particularly curious about how the actual Armored warfare plays out with the Ukrainian tanks and also with ATGMs.
    How well the respective Armor performs, ERA ect.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I never get the whole fanfic of tank armor thickness, even if you have a good idea that X area is 1000mm thick you haven't a clue what kind of material(s) is used and what kind of concept so knowing the thickness is kind of moot?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They do have a clue what materials are used and there are models that estimate it.
        Composite Armor is not magic, they all work in roughly the same way.
        Dorchester is NERA, there isn't much more to it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So you haven't a clue as to what materials are used right?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nta but isn't chobham armor still classified? does anyone have a real clue on how well protected challenger 2s are because the general consensus seems to be that its got the best armor out of all western mbts but has a shitty rifled gun instead of smoothbore

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nah bro its made out of fucking paper

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Steel Beasts armors aren't accurate at all

      I never get the whole fanfic of tank armor thickness, even if you have a good idea that X area is 1000mm thick you haven't a clue what kind of material(s) is used and what kind of concept so knowing the thickness is kind of moot?

      They are basically guesstimations the efficiency of the array and slap and RHAe value.
      The Steel beasts ones are massively wrong (way too high) like pic related should be 350-430mm vs KE, 700-750mm to declassified RARDE documents for Chieftain Replacement

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah here are the Swedish reports.
        The leopard here is obviously A5 or later with the additional 'arrowhead' array on the turret.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          explain what this is showing? Retarded non-swedish speaker here.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Red is insufficient protection, green is sufficient.
            Left side is Vs a 700mm pen KE penetrator, right is Vs a 1200mm pen HEAT warhead.
            The chart shows the percentage of turret protected (y axis) vs the RHA equivalent penetration of the anti-tank weapon (x axis)

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why doesn't UK send the Warrior?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At least the name sounds cool

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lads, I'm sorry to admit but, I think I have a little respect for the Brits now. I know it's shameful but these are unusual times.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      comfy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is no shame from accepting a headpat from an Englishman.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Come home eire

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Give pats.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm absolutely amazed Challengers are being sent to fuck up some russkies. Still feels like a dream

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have to hand it to the Brits. They really have taken the initiative to send Ukraine the hardware it's been asking for. I understand it's a complicated situation for the Germans and the French, but there's no denying that they've fallen short of their obligations by comparison. The Germans are still dragging their feet to get Ukraine some fucking tanks; denying even Poland from sending Leopard 2's. It's like they expect the Americans to be the first to send tanks all the way from North America so they don't have to deal with the potential political fallout. All the while more soldiers and civilians die.
      And then there's the British: training troops, suppling a shit tone of manpads, now we're seeing reports of helicopters and tanks. They're not even in the EU anymore. If we want to end this with a victory then lets just send what is needed.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Now you know why Puccia and their dickriders on the internet seethe so much over them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah Brits can be very based. I've been an Anglophile for a while now and I was clearly not mistaken in my liking of them. Germans on the other hand are cucked and pathetic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >denying even Poland from sending Leopard 2's
        why do you just keep on lying? Just for the (you)s?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >why do you just keep on lying? Just for the (you)s?
          I read it in The Economist. It was published on the 11th so I assumed nothing has changed in 3 days. If I'm wrong then let me know, I'd love to be wrong on this.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don't mind Dennis, he's the local German autismo

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don't mind Dennis, he's the local German autismo

            the article says Germany's permission must be obtained, which is true. You said Germany denied the permission, which is a lie.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The article says "refused the allow". Just read one sentence ahead. You're being pedantic. And do you know that no one has requested their use? Any insider knowledge you want to share with us?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don't mind Dennis, he's the local German autismo

            [...]
            the article says Germany's permission must be obtained, which is true. You said Germany denied the permission, which is a lie.

            >Germany (...) has thus far refused to allow anyone to send them to Ukraine
            actual fake news. No country has made an official request to send them yet.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >christmas tree stuck to the front
        The pioneers of camouflage, lads.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And then there's the British

        Yeah Brits can be very based. I've been an Anglophile for a while now and I was clearly not mistaken in my liking of them. Germans on the other hand are cucked and pathetic.

        >very based.
        You mean subservient to Americans. Though I guess that is based from your perspective right?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Send MBTs before anyone to pressure German-cucks
          >It's just subservience

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ivan here got cucked by JOHN BVLL

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Don't worry, once the swine Russians are done with were kicking the yanks out of Europe aswell

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's easier for Britain; not only are we further away from Russia then Germany is but we've got got a Natural 'moat' that the Russians can't just walk across. To get to Germany, Russia has to push through Poland; to get to Britain, Russia has to either push through Poland>Germany>BeNeLux or Finland>Sweden>Norway, and even after those there's still the Chanel to cross. So Britain is understandably freer to make material donations.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          2022 isn't 1940s, the threats are about nuclear missiles/Surgical strikes (if possible with Russian arsenal kek) not land invasions. UK stands strong in the face of those threats, the others except the US and a few others don't, needing a leader or an icebreaker so to say.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's thermonuclear war if Russia moves on any NATO (or soon to be) member. Do you bongs and krauts not understand that?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We're in denial because we never got the chance for a proper world war against the russians and that sounds like a lot of fun, but nukes falling would spoil it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >To get to Germany, Russia has to push through Poland
          Russia has just demonstrated it has total logistical failure less than 100km from its own border and you think they're going to "push through" Poland?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The weird thing is the German population mostly disagrees with Scholz on this, so he's just fucking himself for no benefit.

        It's easier for Britain; not only are we further away from Russia then Germany is but we've got got a Natural 'moat' that the Russians can't just walk across. To get to Germany, Russia has to push through Poland; to get to Britain, Russia has to either push through Poland>Germany>BeNeLux or Finland>Sweden>Norway, and even after those there's still the Chanel to cross. So Britain is understandably freer to make material donations.

        Russia can't push more than 100 miles from their border, how are they getting to Berlin?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > no benefit
          You are aware that Putin has 100+ mil USD in swiss banks through middlemen, I guess Scholzie will get some from that
          Also he will only be politically fucked this way. It would be way worse for him if his FSB keeper would leak out his CP

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >born just in time to watch HD drone footage of tank divisions pushing Soviet shit in
    I hate to fall into the "wow cool robot" half of the meme, but fuck me, what a time to be alive.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >You WILL get to see some kino footage of a chally 2 turret popping a T-62 in glorious 4k 60 fps
    GodDAMN is it a good time to be alive

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    *In 6 months time

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly so happy

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Challenger 2 was the tank some retarded bong leaked technical data on Warthunder forums, right?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. Literally on the Wikipedia page.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not only the Chally 2, but several other tanks, including a Chinese tank, IIRC.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I thought that was China?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Both. Wasn't there a third incident also? Don't remember what it was.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not only the Chally 2, but several other tanks, including a Chinese tank, IIRC.

      War Thunder leaks order
      >Eurocopter leak
      >Chally leak (turret protection)
      >Leclerc leak
      >Chinese ammo leak mk1
      >Chinese ammo leak mk2
      Feel free to add more or detail, these are off the top of my head.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Eurocopter? Tiger or some other?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yh, Eurocopter Tiger. Its a leak that happened a long time ago now, so mostly forgotten about.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What did they leak about it? Isn't it partially stealth?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Leclerc came before Challenger, I am sure of it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/classified-challenger-tank-specs-leaked-online-for-videogame/
          Earliest Challenger 2 leak, dated 16/07/21
          >https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/classified-tank-specs-leaked-on-war-thunder-game-forums-again/
          Earliest Leclerc leak, dated 6/10/21
          Close but Challenger was definetly before Leclerc

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How long before it happens again?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >2021
            what, no way, surely it happened in 2019...

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yeah way. TBF, I thought it was 2020 so theres that

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah.
      To prove to the Warthunder developers on the games forum that the Challenger2 gun mantle in reality was x3 better protected than the game portrayed.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And now they CAN'T make it 3x better protected otherwise they will be legally liable, so that guy played himself.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody is laughing at L31 HESH now cunts!

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's the tactical advantage of Apache Ah-64 helicopters?

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uk-sends-apache-helicopters-armed-28955516.amp

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They have drip and thus will cause a lot of seething among the enemy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >up to 4
      >senior defence source told the sunday people
      >article is in the mirror and other crap tabloids
      i'll believe it when i see it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Apache better come with Harry

      25 vatnik kills

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Something something penis cream

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Challenger 2 mantlet is only ~300mm steel and a bit of air.

    Uhh Challenger bros... Not like this.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's inert armour

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Remove yourself, Sturgeon chud.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So what is the huge chunk of metal behind the mantle?

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think 14 tanks will make much difference tbqh looking at the numbers of everything else.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The idea is probably to nudge momentum incrementally. 14 being many isn't enough to start an international incident, but it might get another 3 or 4 countries to send 8-12 of their own.
      It's ramping things up gradually, whereas 'UK sends 80 challengers' might make Lavrov actually deviate from his usual "that stick of ginger has gone too far up my bum, and now I can't reach it and I regret ever trying"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Even 80 Challengers isn't a lot, I don't think it changes anything Russia does beside making denouncements. It just means Britain's army is stripped bare, but it's our own fault for cutting it to a skeleton force.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't think you understand the whole picture.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I probably don't, care to provide a qrd?

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Bongs are in dire financial straights, getting Seppo bucks for training the Ukies and getting the old MID up and running make financial and strategic sense

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We really aren't, the FTSE is at a record high. The great thing about a services and finance based economy is that we charge people more in line with inflation but our costs haven't risen as much as in manufacturing based economies because we don't use as much energy.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the FTSE is at a record high.
        kek

        KEK

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All while paying some of the most chunky dividends in the world.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This doesn't mean the economy is doing well you fucking brainlet.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >companies making more money than ever
              >no job cuts with high employment
              >high consumer confidence
              >incel on 4 chan thinks this means the economy isn't doing well

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Can't last, consumer spending is surviving on debt and savings, which were historically high after COVID.
                Eventually people won't be able to pay massively elevated prices and then you will see the typical recession.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can't last, consumer spending is surviving on debt and savings,

                Not even close.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >750,000 households at risk of mortgage default
                >2022 Q3 economy 0.8% smaller than 2019 Q4 economy
                >11% inflation
                >majority of economist predicting UK is heading for a worse recession than most other advanced economies
                FTSE will be on it's arse in a year, it means nothing. Most of it is linked to high dollar denominated commodity prices, it is not a good indicator of the health of the UK economy. Stupid fucking noob.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Doomposting UK economy
                Still 6th in world 2nd in Europe screech harder no one heard you before.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >21st by GDP per capita
                ooof. but at least you've imported a lot of pakis to make up for it

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That hasn't changed either, cope harder.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                504,000 immigrants last year

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And only a few ten thousand new permanent arrivals. The 500k number includes students and foreigners on work visas.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah they're definitely going back home after

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Students do, if you can afford the overseas fees you aren't going want to hang around this shithole afterwards. We should be glad to get people who can rock up here, spend 60k of foreign cash and leave again. The reality is that there are small numbers of outright fraudulent applications, this isn't to do with universities, its do with the government's liberalisation and insufficient regulation. The "universities" those people apply to are just PO box numbers or a flat over a kebab shop.

                It would be a very Tory thing though to crack down on this, end up defunding Cambridge and the scammers just move on to something else.

                The reason the Tories like, sometimes, the idea of cutting student visas is that its easier to remove legal immigrants than the illegal immigrants they let in on a nod and a wink. Its also storing up problems because a lot of ethnic minorities thought Brexit meant their village from India or Pakistan would be able to move here once racist EU immigration laws ended. Sunak in particular is expected to deliver.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The bigger issue is that in measurements of averages, our numbers are skewed by the massive wealth inequality where our extravagantly rich are so much richer than most it actually pulls the average up noticeably. We are definitely poorer than such measurements imply, and we're far from the richest nations even then.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You should see how high the Caracas exchange is.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It's our showtime
    Yup, Time to show the world how challenger 2 looks after getting hit by a Fagot or rpg-28. Finally myth that western tanks are better than russian one will be demolished.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Finally myth that western tanks are better than russian one will be demolished.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Finally myth that western tanks are better than russian one will be demolished.

      Does it ever get tiring being wrong?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Soon, I will be proven right!! Keep coping.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >British Challenger 2 tank was hit directly by 14 RPGs and an anti-tank missile in Iraq. The crew was uninjured and the tank was back in operation 6 hours later. Another survived 70 RPG hits. Only 1 Challenger 2 has been destroyed in combat; by another Challenger 2 in a friendly fire incident.
          >Be T90, die from a grenade attached to a toy
          Yeah

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That rpg is used by goat herder for fuck sake. This time the rpg's will be used by russian. The same country that create them. Also do you think there won't be any CAS lol.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Aahh yes the RPG will hit so much sweeter because the trigger will be pulled by some drunken rapist who happens to have the same nationality of the designer of the RPG

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You don't understand. When a Russian uses an rpg they gain the power of the ussr. It's like a fusion dance, they can double the amount of drunken rapist power.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The rpg is literally designed to be used by russian armed forces. They will know the way to utilize it at maximum efficiency to ensure better accuracy to hit challenger weak spot. I am also forgot to mention that even lowly t-72 will be able to pen challenger armor so... 10 of them won't have any impact other than to humiliate the bong and nato at the same time.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your an idiot, consider life changes.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Excellent shitposting sir.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They have different RPG systems who can easily penetrate you moronanger shit; is not the same RPG-7; dumb mutt.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >This time the rpg's will be used by russian.
              Anon...that's not an improvement.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >70 RPG hits
            This sounds a little bit implausible for a few reasons
            >Armour that resists one semi-penetration nevertheless becomes damaged and weakened, that tank would look like swiss cheese and likely be as squidgy after 20 hits, let alone 70
            >To be hit 70 times implies there's something operationally wrong with the tank, either it was stuck (not unlikely with its 75 ton weight), the crew couldn't see shit or the tank is big and slow and couldn't get out of the kill zone quickly or at all
            >The Taliban aren't the most well equipped force in the world, did this tank drive up to their armoury or something? It seems doubtful an ambush would have been carrying 70+ rockets and however many launchers needed to fire that many

            Ultimately I'm going consider this propaganda, didn't happen and is targeted at people who wouldn't know much about this stuff.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Empires back on the menu boys.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't the Chally2 manual leaked a few years ago?
    Milfag or tankfag ukies could already memorize it, shortening the training 😀

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Wasn't the Chally2 manual leaked a few years ago?
      Yup, by an incredibly autistic British officer who was upset by his tank-fus representation in either WoT or Warthunder (I forget which). IIRC a Chinese officer did the same thing with whatever Knockofferov MBT China's using.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *