Challenger

a new challenger appears

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/challenger-3/

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is it getting a 120mm smoothbore? Also it looks like it has beefed top frontal armor. I can't tell if it has more top turret armor though.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, L55A1

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      huh, thought they would upgrade to a 125mm+ smoothbore.

      maybe i confused it with another future tank

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        125mm is russhit guns

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >"upgrade"
        that would be a downgrade
        The german gun they will use has more energy than the russhit one

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          nope.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That sign on his desk should have a smaller one with "the absolute" written on it laid on top.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          kf51 uses 130mm why does ur pic say 120mm

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            try reading the rest of the file name for that pic, anon

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      huh, thought they would upgrade to a 125mm+ smoothbore.

      maybe i confused it with another future tank

      at this point they could bring a 155mm rifled gun that shoots 155mm HESH & HE-Frag, and call it an assault gun or a tank destroyer
      cuz vatniks have also been toying around with the 152mm tank gun for 3 decades

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I mean considering that you could put an unmanned turret there it should be possible but thats really the point?
        Your HE munition would probably be cheaper and easier to produce but the anti tank ammo would be hard as frick as you now either have two part ammo or a cluster frick of heavy ammo

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          british tank industry is owned by family of lords who will rather frick children than invent actually new tank..

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Your HE munition would probably be cheaper and easier to produce but the anti tank ammo would be hard as frick as you now either have two part ammo or a cluster frick of heavy ammo

          The Challenger 2 uses three part ammo so two part would be a step forward.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bongs giving up their superior aircraft production skills to make mediocre tanks is so sad, I hope Tempest works out so they can just buy Abrams and build they shit they dont suck at making

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Airplanes are expensive. Tanks are expensive but not quite as much.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    <<61440163
    >Stroke, the post

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Fully British
    >Joint venture with Rheinmetall

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The British invented the tank so technically every tank developmemt project is a British venture

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Guns were invented in China, so the tank is technically chinese.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Rheinmetall is a British owned company.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what does "additional natures" mean?
      t. esl

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Different types of shells like cluster bombs, etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It can fire angry European badgers (Meles meles) at the enemy, plucked straight from a Welsh field and put in the ready rack for deployment. While not as ferocious as it's cousin the honey badger (Mellivora capensis) it will still shred personnel and light vehicles, before leaving and establishing a system of burrows, or setts, from which they will proceed to fight brutal guerilla actions as an invasive species.
        Or whatever

        Different types of shells like cluster bombs, etc.

        said. I like my explanation better honestly.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They really used the specs of a barebones Chally 2 from when it was first produced as comparison to cope and say its totally a different tank and not just an upgrade

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >no integrated recon/attack/ indirect fire spotter drones
      >no anti-drone defense or APS
      yeah

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >claims it doesn’t have APS
        >the tank literally has APS
        Have the fart fumes given you brain damage? Were you dropped on your head as a baby? At least try not to be a dribbling imbecile when you mald about the bongs.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    >BZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!
    >Boom!
    >Track damaged
    >Tank abandoned and useless
    Tanks are an outdated concept

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I know this is bait but if that's true then why is every single relevant military in the world not only continuing to build tanks but also develop new models

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Because you can still use them against civilians / extreme third worlders (like gaza situation).

        Only works against incompetent Russians

        Sadly no, right now drones work against any vehicle without massive EW protection in one very specific area. T-series, merkavas, leopards and Abrams have been disabled and even destroyed by shitty drones.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >extreme third worlders
          That's a new term.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          most moronic take I'll see on this board today, I promise.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >moronic Slavs with western equipment are still moronic
          >The tank is dead

          Drones are not a concern for tanks in the hands of competent militaries

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Drones are not a concern for tanks in the hands of competent militaries
            lmao

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            its a question of deterrence rather copetence
            >mine clearing
            >stealth
            >armour
            >gas masks
            >era blocks
            cope cages are a stop gap for a changing threat
            solutions are being developed

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The other relevant militaries are already heavily invested in things like tanks, so there's a lot of institutional momentum keeping those programs going and maintaining confidence in them. On top of that, none of the other relevant militaries have experience with getting their own tanks wrecked by cheap drones at the scale of what's happening in israelitekraine, so there's no personal "oh frick this is the future" pucker moment yet

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        cuz they dumb as a rock

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Only works against incompetent Russians

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >bzzzz
      >Boom
      >Shot out of sky

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >run out of ammo
        >die
        ?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Trophy shot down 12 drones then the Challenger left our shitty FPV drones range before we could hit it with 13
          Very sad

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >imply this is the trophy
            Get's your fact right moron.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You can mount both on the same tank moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >imply this is the trophy
            Get's your fact right moron.

            trophy has 2 shots on each side(with additional storage for one more warhead for each side)
            and it can't shoot down drones(for now at least)

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your drone operator was killed by allied aircraft a week ago.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    finally becomes merely decent

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >fully British
    Just like Rolls Royce I guess.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The last couple of British armored vehicles have been total shit. Defend why the challenger 3 would be any different, especially when they still store ammo with the crew. I will concede that the gun upgrade is a big step in the right direction

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is this one water proof?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no, only russians have figured that one out

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      "whoops"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's not even deep in comparison.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Iranian drive a unit of Chieftain into the maysan swamps and get stuck, abandoned then destroyed by Iraq
      >armatard uses this to shit on the Chieftain.

      >a challenger gets stuck in some mud during a random demo and that was probably pulled out the mud a few hours later with 0 damage
      >This means the Chally 2 is cooked and James from Guernsey Autonomous Oblast is demoralised

      At least the Iranian Chieftains were actually destroyed or even damaged by the incident.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      russias only modern tank has issues making it to the other side of the red square without being mission killed.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      shouldve happened 10 years ago.
      instantly obsolete.
      >kf51 panther and EMBT
      the challenger 3 is the heaviest MBT ever made. will break every bridge.

      west need to build tanks <53 tons

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > heaviest MBT ever made
        Because they have to make due without DU armor like fricking morons

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          what the frick are you talking about

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I’m talking about the British not having depleted uranium armored inserts in their tanks. Are you slow?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              chobham

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Chobham isn’t DU you moron

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ukrainian mud is an absolute motherfricker, there ain't an MBT on the planet that's immune to it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is cope

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    BUT HOW MUCH HORSEPOWER?????

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this big girl has been jumped up to a respectable 1500hp

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >respectable 1500hp
        Maybe that was respectable in 1980 when the ATG1500 released

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Development had started by 1964 with a contract given to Chrysler in 1976, originally as an engine for the later cancelled MBT-70.[5]

          >In the early 1970s, the AGT1500 was developed into the PLT27, a flight-weight turboshaft for use in helicopters. This engine lost to the General Electric GE12 (T700) in three separate competitions to power the UH-60, AH-64, and SH-60.[6] Serial production of the AGT1500 began in 1980;
          sort of

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah it lost all the competitions because by the early 1970s it was not close to a complete engine, it was never even mounted in the MBT-70 that it was intended for after 6 years of development, they had to outsource a new 12 cylinder diesel from Continental Motors (picrel) to keep the program moving

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Bog standard tank. This will finally bring the challenger 2 up to abrams and Leo standards but there isn’t a revolutionary piece of gear in this tank.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > there isn’t a revolutionary piece of gear in this tank.
        that you know of

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >drivers camera is fixed

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Holly shit the bongs finally are going to have a decent tank. I hope they build thousands

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      anon…. These are being built using refurbished challenger 2 hulls, there aren’t thousands that exist.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        oh.. ok

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wtf why

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Of the 386 CR2s the MoD had that went down to 227, of the 159 spares 72 were awaiting 'disposal' and 87 aren't officially accounted for. There's upwards of 87 CR2s somewhere out there waiting to be found, the MoD is the same tier as the Imps in Soulstorm with 100 lost Baneblades.
        Of that 227, 148 are planned to become CR3s with 65 as spares because 14 have been given to Ukraine, though there's still the missing 87 CR2s which are just gone somewhere the MoD hasn't admitted to. Maybe they should create a tipsline for people to ring if they spot one of those tanks lost in the wild.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Source?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            MoD FoI request for the reported on the whole fleet, they don't say anything about the missing 87 here though
            https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a80cf26e5274a2e87dbbf14/20160915-FOI08139-77597_CR2.pdf
            The Times say there were 43 that were disposed of between 2010 and 2014
            https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mod-destroyed-challenger-tanks-that-could-have-gone-to-ukraine-hklr9wpv6
            40 were disposed of between 2001 and 2009 during the same period one was destroyed in Iraq, whether that one was included in that 40 is unclear. Regardless, Britain has between 43-87 missing tanks presumably down the back of a sofa in Whitehall.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              when they say "disposed", do they mean send the whole thing to the scrapper or do they mean "stripped for parts and placed outside just in case" ?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They don't say so it could be either, but given Britain rarely if ever keeps old military vehicles, aircrafts or ships more likely than not melted down into forks and spoons.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds like my country.
                We had a bunch of just-upgraded Leo 1's in the early 2000's, and right after getting them delivered we spent a shit-ton on money cutting them into nice little metal bits. Turns out storing them cost "some" money

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Turns out storing them cost "some" money

                Its the magic of modern accounting and free access to the government for special interests that want the government to buy new tanks.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                stripped of parts and scrapped
                it costs not-insignificant money to keep shit in actually "potentially reusable in future" condition

                I know this is bait but if that's true then why is every single relevant military in the world not only continuing to build tanks but also develop new models

                >every single relevant military in the world not only continuing to build tanks but also develop new models
                they're not
                the three major groups are the Continental Europeans, the Americans, and the Brits, and they're all staring at each other wondering what the next generation tank of the future will look like

                in the meantime, the "new models" are simply eking out Leopard, Abrams, Challenger, Leclerc and Ariete to buy more time to figure out what to do
                everyone can sense that the tank is on the cusp of an F-35 moment, except nobody yet knows what an F-35 tank looks like

                Probably safer than the Ajax which has the hull made in Spain and shakes the spines of the crew loose

                don't be an idiot, that problem has been solved

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >the three major groups are the Continental Europeans, the Americans, and the Brits, and they're all staring at each other wondering what the next generation tank of the future will look like
                >continental europeans
                >brits
                AHHAHAAH
                AHHAHAHAHA
                HAHAHHAHA

                no truly, eu-militaries are amongst the most shit-pathetic on earth, and virtually everyone is inferior to (insert any 3rd world nation) you can possibly think up

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >least deluded turdie

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      anon…. These are being built using refurbished challenger 2 hulls, there aren’t thousands that exist.

      oh.. ok

      Why samegay

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      lolno. We are just slapping a new turret on old hulls. It's not even worth the money being invested.
      Not going forward with the MBT-80 was a colossal fricking mistake.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Niiiice enjoy the new tank, brits! Now the Abrams needs the L/55 too.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The amount of samegays and posts by you know who in this thread...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He's also south korea shilling obnoxiously pretending to be his made up character asiaticshill in other threads, kek.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Sooon my precious, sooon......

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Get a life.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He can't, he never learnt how.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    And there is the inevitably reply.

    Be honest how many of those deleted posts are you faking being your opponents?
    Rheotrical question.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why was your post with the screenshot deleted, warriortard? Humor us.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    Man he’s having a rough day. I was wondering why he was sperging out in multiple threads even more than usual today

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What baffles me the most about warriortard is that it isn't some underage autist who does this, apparently this is all by a full grown man who thinks he is Mr. Tough Guy because he can banevade on a board with a moderation that doesn't seem to give much of a frick.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You seem to think you are so kind of lone hero in your own little story.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It is always so cute when he has to reply to everything.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    that looks like a cartoonish abrams

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >how dare you won't reply to me
    >now face my wrath: i'm gonna say so many mean things to you
    lol
    lmao even

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There will be a reply to this post.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hi

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why reply to someone when he's is gonna reply to you anyway? Rent free.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    really wondering why there's no integrated APS. Wasn't there a contract for the Trophy system?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This whole thing has been hilarious. The bongs made an abrams equivalent in 2024

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, they already received the contract. It completed trials last year and began integration this year. Chally 3 will come with trophy APS as standard.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not saying it is a bad choice, but it might be changed before it even enters service. The whole drone vs tanks thing is still in full swing and evolving as the conflict in Ukraine continues.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cool hopefully it looks better than the Abrams add on kek

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what kind of RWS gun they're gonna put on top of the tank?
    A regular ol' HMG? a 30mm airburst autocannon?

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >warriortard wastes his life away being a complete loser and always has to hide who he is
    >calls it winning
    >will react angrily to this post in some sort of way

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >it won't happen because.... It just won't okay?!
    Yes I'm sure they're putting all that money and effort into acquiring and integrating Trophy for no reason at all. It's public information you tard.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >it is very hard for our local tard to not to reply

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why would any posters react to such a post unless they are warriortard who is mad over what was said about him?

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This is what i was talking about, even trolls wouldn't do this shit unless they get laughably desperate. I guess you lack the social skills and brain to truly process this.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >shot trap
    lurk on a real armor board for five years, do not post again until said time has past

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What was wrong with the rifled barrel? Like was it functionally bad or just bad because the government moronicly stopped producing ammo for it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No commonality with NATO standard.
      Worse barrel life.
      Lack of ammunition production due to moronic politicians and policies.
      Basically all there is. Maybe some marginal performance differences but in practice doesnt matter.
      Should have spent the money resolving the clusterfrick that is Scout SV.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Should have spent the money resolving the clusterfrick that is Scout SV
        what is the issue with ajax?
        is all british army shit crap fricked?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >what is the issue with ajax?
          Its slightly behind schedule but less behind schedule than Puma. This is apparently the end of the world or something.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Oh really, those are the only problems? Would be a shame if someone were to Google the answer

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Get a life dude.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It looks moronic

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Challenger 3
    Russians: Lancet 3

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Fully British built
    I am worried for the safety of the crew.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Probably safer than the Ajax which has the hull made in Spain and shakes the spines of the crew loose

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Should have had a low profile turret like the Challenger Falcon.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >120mm l55
    >British built
    Did they open a plant in bonglandia?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Headquarters: Telford, Shropshire, England, UK
      yeah

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they got the licence for making it

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Fully british built

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i dont want to sound like an butthole but why would anybody even care?
    the UK has like 2 tanks right now, how many of these Challenger 3's are they gonna build? like... 1 more and thats it?
    unless they are built for export to other countries, then i guess they will build more than 1 more.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the UK has like 2 tanks right now, how many of these Challenger 3's are they gonna build? like... 1 more and thats it?
      and it will take a decade to get it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the british carrier situation is even worse.
        officialy 0 carriers right now, either broken down, cannibalised to fix the other ones, or have a thousand crippling failures.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >literally zero carriers
          It just returned from operations. You need to very seriously consider getting professional help.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It just returned from operations.
            did it break down again?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The exercise ended. Like, whats the fricking deal here? I'm not British so you're not going to land a single "zinger", all you're doing is making yourself look like a complete fricking moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It just returned from operations. You need to very seriously consider getting professional help.
            ha, yah it returned on fire

            >It just returned from operations.
            did it break down again?

            >did it break down again?
            yes, and caught on fire, lmfao

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              jesus christ thats just sad.

              >literally zero carriers
              It just returned from operations. You need to very seriously consider getting professional help.

              [...]
              [...]
              Yeah i made new threads but everyone kept making fun of my penis so i came here instead

              >trying this hard

              The exercise ended. Like, whats the fricking deal here? I'm not British so you're not going to land a single "zinger", all you're doing is making yourself look like a complete fricking moron.

              it takes 1 second to verify that you guys are full of shit, why are you like that?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Samegayging
                >confusing QE with PW
                For what purpose?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >it takes 1 second to verify that you guys are full of shit, why are you like that?

                "They" are shill bots running on a server farm somewhere.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >"They" are airmen shill bots running on an airbase somewhere
                ftfy

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                it takes 1 second to verify that HMS Prince Of Wales and its air wing performed perfectly fine, why are you like that?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >it takes 1 second to verify that HMS Prince Of Wales and its air wing performed perfectly fine, why are you like that?
                show it and prove it
                literally link the article

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                literally google it, idiot
                got some pretty pictures too
                https://theaviationist.com/2024/03/06/incredible-photos-of-the-hms-prince-of-wales-and-its-f-35bs-under-the-aurora-borealis/
                https://navyrecognition.com/index.php/naval-news/naval-news-archive/2024/march/14185-royal-navy-s-aircraft-carrier-hms-prince-of-wales-back-to-uk.html

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >https://navyrecognition.com/index.php/naval-news/naval-news-archive/2024/march/14185-royal-navy-s-aircraft-carrier-hms-prince-of-wales-back-to-uk.html

                Show dick and prove its above SK average.
                Literally link any twitter source you have

                great link!!
                allow me to read some excerpts:
                >"In May 2020, the ship encountered what was described by the Royal Navy as "minor" flooding, a prelude to a more severe incident in October 2020, where significant flooding damaged her electrical cabling."
                ^"implessive" design feature!
                >"a malfunction in the starboard propeller shaft external coupling on 27 August 2022, leading to significant mechanical problems."

                in that entire article, nothing is mentioned about its performance, and rather focuses on the myriad problems experienced by the boat

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >in that entire article, nothing is mentioned about its performance, and rather focuses on the myriad problems experienced by the boat
                because bad news sells clicks
                the original claim was that 0 carriers were operational
                POW was provably operational in February 2024
                we're not talking about May 2020, we're not talking about August 2022, we're not talking about January 2022, we're not talking about September 2023

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Show dick and prove its above SK average.
                Literally link any twitter source you have

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >replies to a post from two hours ago

                >it takes 1 second to verify that HMS Prince Of Wales and its air wing performed perfectly fine, why are you like that?
                show it and prove it
                literally link the article

                >writes all this in a minute in a reply to that new post
                Either this is a fake conversation or the second poster is a shill or schizo.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you know very well which fartsniffing schizo that is
                >t. first poster

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This is the same guy who had conversations with himself about dick size, farts, onlyfans. His mind is all over the place

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                its one airmen that sockpuppets his posts pretending to be like 5 different people
                its shit-pathetic, and used to get called out all the time when the "Unique poster count" was still around

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you know very well which fartsniffing schizo that is
                >t. first poster

                >you know very well which fartsniffing schizo that is
                >t. first poster

                lol, lmfao even
                haha who is it??

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >if they're in port they're automatically broken
                now you're really grasping

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >if they're in port they're automatically broken
                >now you're really grasping
                HAAHHAHAH

                https://www.forces.net/qe-class-aircraft-carriers/hms-queen-elizabeth-arrives-forth-ahead-vital-repair-work
                >"HMS Queen Elizabeth has arrived on the Forth ahead of repair work in Fife."
                >"The £3bn aircraft carrier is to undergo work to her starboard propeller shaft coupling at Rosyth Dockyard – where construction on the ship was completed in 2017."
                >"The ship left Portsmouth earlier in March before stopping off in Glen Mallan in Loch Long where a fire broke out on board."

                lmfao, i dont know why you just didnt back away from the whole carrier argument in the first place, knowing this information is plastered all overt the internet

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                the previous news headline you screencapped mentioned BOTH QE and POW, from which you implied that BOTH carriers were damaged, which isn't true

                yes, QE had an unexpected malfunction (not related to the fire which was very minor)
                however although POW was also in port, she was shipshape and indeed substituted for QE on exercise from January to February 2024

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >>It just returned from operations
              >ha, yah it returned on fire
              Prince of Wales returned from operations. See what I am saying? You're making yourself look like an idiot.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >See what I am saying?
                yeah, it looks like damage control and its not going too well.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Damage control
                Not British so no, what's happening here is you're being an idiot and I'm having fun correcting you. You're so fricking stupid you confused their ships, there are only two of them and your dumbass still fricked it up.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >not British
                Easiest way to spot a British poster.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Easiest way to spot a British poster.
                I'll post guns when you do.

                https://i.imgur.com/RPbg4XM.jpeg

                >Prince of Wales returned from operations
                haha lol^

                [...]
                but enough about you

                >Gets btfo
                >onto the next headline!
                What a sad life you must lead.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >What a sad life you must lead.
                may I see the deployed prince of wales?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                give them a moment they have to put the fires out.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >may I see the deployed prince of wales?
                https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/14/hms-prince-of-wales-nato-steadfast-defender/#:~:text=HMS%20Prince%20of%20Wales%20has,the%20Nordic%20Response%2024%20drill.

                you didnt correct anybody, and nobody confused anything.
                people are laughing their collective asses off at the state of the british military and there is nothing wrong with laughing at it.
                >barely have 2 carriers
                >they both break down or catch fire every 30 seconds and have to cannibalise each other to stay afloat
                >have like 2 tanks, announce a new tank, people laugh they are going to build 1 for show and call it a day
                how the mighty have fallen.

                >people
                No, one person.
                >they both break down
                One broke down
                >and catch fire
                Same one caught fire.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >british tabloid dot com "our carrier is a super hero marvel defender of the galaxy"
                >yeah its on fire/broken down but its ok

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're saying that it was not at Steadfast Defender '24? This is what you're resorting to?

                Dude, I say this sincerely, speak to someone about your problems.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >My dick is small
                >My brain is obsessed
                >Yeh all my threads got deleted but its ok i will carry on

                >please stop laughing your peepee smol if you laugh: (
                im laughing so hard my pee pee turned into a vegana.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Also forgot to add i grew my pubes so now it looks like a midgets thumb poking through a bush! God the british make me so mad!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >My dick is small
                >My brain is obsessed
                >Yeh all my threads got deleted but its ok i will carry on

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                its like RT posting about Armata.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you didnt correct anybody, and nobody confused anything.
                people are laughing their collective asses off at the state of the british military and there is nothing wrong with laughing at it.
                >barely have 2 carriers
                >they both break down or catch fire every 30 seconds and have to cannibalise each other to stay afloat
                >have like 2 tanks, announce a new tank, people laugh they are going to build 1 for show and call it a day
                how the mighty have fallen.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Prince of Wales returned from operations
                haha lol^

                Lmfao+++ my dick is smol but i save lots of newspaper articles for these situations!

                but enough about you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                See guis i just want to post my articles to take my mind off the 1" pecker im packing. UK bad!1

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Lmfao+++ my dick is smol but i save lots of newspaper articles for these situations!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >trying this hard

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/qMkwpmE.jpeg

      >the UK has like 2 tanks right now, how many of these Challenger 3's are they gonna build? like... 1 more and thats it?
      and it will take a decade to get it

      the british carrier situation is even worse.
      officialy 0 carriers right now, either broken down, cannibalised to fix the other ones, or have a thousand crippling failures.

      Yeah i made new threads but everyone kept making fun of my penis so i came here instead

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Guis y do u make fun of me all i want to do is obsess over the UK and penis size

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    absolutely hysterical debooooooonking going on here. lmfao is the hms prince of wales your mother or something?

    >british tabloid dot com "our carrier is a super hero marvel defender of the galaxy"
    >yeah its on fire/broken down but its ok

    ^lmfao, and its hilarious watching the cope-spin too

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >May I see its at OpSD '24?
      >posts article about it leaving for OpSD '24 while talking to himself

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Im smol wiener btw (:

        yes, I want to see evidence of the Prince of wales performance in said opp's

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Evidence has been provided.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Evidence has been provided.
            no it hasnt, literally post a link to how the prince of wales performed in 2024 during excercises

            >say dumb shit
            >people call you dumb
            >surely the British are behind this

            >tell a homosexual lie
            >be told to provide evidence
            >you dont provide evidence, and instead start /k/oping about dick size and brown skin or something
            insufferable really^

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >they have zero operational carriers
              >yes they do, one just came back from exercises
              >it wasnt there
              >[proof provided]
              >no it doesnt count how did it perform during the exercise!?!?!
              This is cope.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >our destroyers are the best
                >okay they don’t have full strike length VLS cells so they can hit targets on land
                >okay they were outperformed by the ABs in combat at the role they are supposed to specialize in
                >the beds are nice though
                This is cope

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >he's now rambling about destroyers
                giga-cope

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >bo you can’t point out how British destroyers can’t engage targets on land making them the bottom of the barrel destroyers of the world. It’s simply not fair

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >gets btfo
                >immediately onto the next unrelated thing

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >our dinghies are the best
                >photo of deflated, sinking boatlet
                >profit
                >????

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >forgot to mention im dogtrans btw

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Ok im back im smol wiener btw

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Wait, type 45s don’t have SSM capabilities? What the frick

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                diamond had 1 shootdown, because it was armed with precisely 1 missile lmfao
                >"no more, no less"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hey man u wish u had a missile, that thing looks like a 22lr

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Im smol wiener btw (:

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who knew that the British were so insecure about their military and apparently penis size. What caused this

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >say dumb shit
      >people call you dumb
      >surely the British are behind this

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I’m not the guy posting articles. I’m trying to follow along with the thread and the one guy talking about dicks in every post is hard not to notice

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Who knew that the British were so insecure about their military and apparently penis size. What caused this

          [...]
          yes, I want to see evidence of the Prince of wales performance in said opp's

          Lmfao 9/10 you are a troony + manlet, 10/10 you have a micro clitdick lmfao

          LMFAO

          LMFAO!!!!!
          LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          LMFAO
          LMFA!!!!!!!!!!!!!0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          lmfao

          LMFAO!!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >clitdick
            i'd suck it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Look at this guy trying to rationalize facts about British destroyers by projecting shit like this onto an anonymous person. 12 year old tier insults and letting everyone know how mad he is about the ABs 14x better engagement envelope

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Totally! Ive had 3 threads deleted already because of my smol cawk! Im super serious now its the british fault!
              1st my dog gets fat
              2nd my wife gets fatter
              3rd my dick concaves into my fat
              Now im stuck in a world of fat with no dick!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Most sane British poster

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How can someone be this upset

                Im trans btw damn i wish publix sold xxs wiener rings im tired of using cereal

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How can someone be this upset

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Who knew that the British were so insecure about their military
      Everyone who’s been on /k/ longer than 5 minutes
      >and apparently penis size
      This is new to me. Might just be a new tactic they are trying out

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yah I guess the
        >"youre brown"
        and calling everyone rajesh ran its course

        the "implessive" crowd is still going un-impeded however

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Did they finally give up on calling everyone warriortard or is the penis thing in addition to that

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can understand the usual fartsniffer hyper-autism but I refuse to believe Koreans are this insecure about their dicks.
    It must be mutts/yuropoors larping as them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No it’s all warriortard. He exists 100%

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Totally! Ive had 3 threads deleted already because of my smol cawk! Im super serious now its the british fault!
        1st my dog gets fat
        2nd my wife gets fatter
        3rd my dick concaves into my fat
        Now im stuck in a world of fat with no dick!

        Most sane British poster

        How can someone be this upset

        [...]
        Im trans btw damn i wish publix sold xxs wiener rings im tired of using cereal

        https://i.imgur.com/0TXdkiH.jpeg

        Seek professional medical help my dude.
        This parasocial relationship ain't healthy.

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s rare that this place breeds a good meme anymore but well done

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Guis yall have elevated dog bowls and a wife that sells herself on the hot dog stand right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yup...let me guess, tiny wiener?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeh i woke up one day in my gaming chair and it got sucked into my stomach while i was thinking about the british! If i stand up (unlikely) it comes in just bellow the average korean so they make me mad too

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Damn that sucks, wana know something worse? Yup...i....i have a craftsman toolbag my wifes pay pig sent it as a joke, i told him i threw it away but i use it at work for my xl lunch

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this will be the tank that will finally push the Russians back to Crimea, we promise. it will do what the challenger 2 failed to accomplish. this time, the challenge will be won!

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >warriortard is back for another round of getting buck broken
    This will surely improve his mental health.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >mental health
      >surely my 30th post itt bringing up a fictional character is good for my mental health

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You tell him turd! Sticking up for the micro peens everywhere my dood! Can you do me a solid and send over your wifes OF? (Only Fats)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You mean the same fictional character (you) which got so many of his posts deleted in this thread? The same fictional character that always makes salty and passive aggressive replies when he is brought up?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes that one that doesn’t exist. You make the threads and delete them so you can bring them up later. You’re also the guy that has posted about penises for 3 hours now itt

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, you make these threads and they usually get deleted long after someone can delete their own thread, but you know this. You are such a freak, warriortard. Come squeel for us, piggy. Oink, oink, squeeeeeeeeee.

            Oh and since they are "my" threads, i can only encourage everyone to report warriortard threads. Can you do the same? Should everyone report warriortard threads? We are waiting.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yes absolutely report warriortard threads. That doesn’t make him real

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hah get real champ, my twitter is famous here as is my degenerate fart fettish and fanboi swagger for jake paul.
                I am the ultimate simp.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, it is official: warriortard wants to report him and his threads. Let us all do him this favor.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                *us

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                >warriortard isn't real
                >please believe me
                >*proceeds to shit up the board on a daily basis*
                You can always tell when he's run out of devices he can post with.

                Enough guys im a sad act with no friends

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Stop telling me to squeel and calling me piggy! My confidence is TRASHED after today ive been bullied about my penis constantly and now i am being body shamed! Ill show you im talking my dog for a lie down to get some exercise.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >his
          >he
          WATCH YOUR TONE BUDDY IM TRANS AND PROUD AND FYI MY WIFE IS AS STABLE AS THE WARRIORS GUN WHEN WALKING UPSTAIRS

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes that one that doesn’t exist. You make the threads and delete them so you can bring them up later. You’re also the guy that has posted about penises for 3 hours now itt

        >warriortard isn't real
        >please believe me
        >*proceeds to shit up the board on a daily basis*
        You can always tell when he's run out of devices he can post with.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    another tank for the ukrainians to abandon and leave for the Russians, nice

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It still has that massive cutout for the drivers hatch. What a waste

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >samegayging continues

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ok looks coll, but does it have an electric kettle?

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They should have gone down to a 2 man turret with bustle loader IMO, would help reduce weight since Chally is a fat bastard.

    British tanks are just permanently a bit behind now, they have finally got the smoothbore, commander sight and APS which is good, but it will quickly be out of date again when drone RCWS, 130s, and even unmanned turrets start popping up

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >permanently
      nah
      >it will quickly be out of date again when drone RCWS, 130s, and even unmanned turrets start popping up
      well, that's the entire reason why they didn't lean harder into Challenger 3; so that they have money left over for the next generation tank, when it appears

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >so that they have money left over for the next generation tank,
        lmfao, who are they going to buy it from?

        gunna be kinda hard to make a modern tank out of recycled steel

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >who are they going to buy it from?
          let's see
          right now there's even a big question what the next gen tank should look like, that's way more important than steel sources
          >drone RCWS
          will drones really be that big a deal? they're essentially slower, piloted missiles. tanks have been dealing with faster and deadlier weapons for a long time now, and counter-drone systems are just as hot now as drones themselves
          >130s
          why not 135mm, or 140mm, or even go back down to 105mm but have more ATGM missile reloads for the anti-tank role?
          >and even unmanned turrets
          the weakness of unmanned turrets is reliance on sensors, which can be blinded or knocked out

          these questions (and more) are all up in the air, and the answers are way more difficult than a bunch of anons on a Mongolian throat-singing hobbyist imageboard can come up with

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >what the next gen tank should look like, that's way more important than steel sources
            LMFAO, ha yah, the steel is no big deal!

            >will drones really be that big a deal?
            yes, literally look at ukraine
            how are you even asking this moronic question?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >the steel is no big deal!
              lmfao yes it really isn't
              >look at ukraine
              lmfao you're looking at all the cool webms and not reading what the AFU itself is saying, which is that FPV drones are a cope for not having ATGMs
              >how are you even asking this moronic question?
              lmfao learn to read

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Claims steels is some sort of unobtanium
              >Calls other people moronic
              Opinion discarded.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >British tanks are just permanently a bit behind now, they have finally got the smoothbore, commander sight and APS which is good, but it will quickly be out of date again when drone RCWS, 130s, and even unmanned turrets start popping up
      Not really. A lot of these could charitably be called emerging technologies, and not much beyond testbed prototypes or very limited and questionable production runs exist for them as of yet.
      >Drone RCWS
      Why would this need to be a thing? The whole point of an MBT is direct engagement. If you're looking for substantial NLOS capability you're better off giving them to a light brigade.
      >Unmanned turrets
      Too many downsides to be really practical. The same tank that spurred a renewed interest in MBTs is also a bit of a case study of why its kind of a dumb idea. Having to haul your tank back to a depot and have the turret dismounted every time something fricks up on it isn't good.
      >130mm gun
      130mm gun falls into the same pit that the 140mm does in a lot of ways. People have been playing with that concept since the 80s and it hasn't seen fruition yet. RM are pushing it hard as the next great thing, but there's not much interest or need for it from the procurement side. I'm expecting 120mm to remain the mainstay for some time yet.

      TL;DR I ain't holding my breath.

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2024
    >manned tanks

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *