>challenger 2s. >over 100 bradleys. >nearly 100 Strykers. >250 m1117. >hundreds of various MRAPs

>challenger 2s
>over 100 bradleys
>nearly 100 Strykers
>250 m1117
>hundreds of various MRAPs
>British APCs
>hundreds of hmwmvs
>12 avenger systems
>supported by various SPGs
>further supported by HIMARS and m270
>-2 avenger systems
This is shaping up to be the sexiest armored assault of all time. Should this offensive happen the PrepHoleino would outmatch that of the gulf war. as military enthusiasts take a moment to be thankful for the war in Ukraine

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I understadn they need to announce these donations so as to inspire further donations, but in a way, it's a pity that's so necessary as it gives Russia time to prepare themselves. Imagine if all these donations, and more, were still possible without announcing them, then suddenly one day, BAM, they're let loose in Ukraine during a gigantic offensive in May; the first the orcs have heard about any of it. Completely off-guard.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I pray that this is the deal with Abrams, Leopards, and F16s but probably not.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >as it gives Russia time to prepare themselves.
      anon, this isn't project zomboid, you can't just kill armor by having hundreds of conscripts lay in their way to break them

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you remember how the HIMARS deliveries started?

      >mr monkey we will send just 4 of them. Don't tell me the 4 trucks gonna make you lose.
      >sending 8 HIMARS are not escalation, your media told me you already use MLRS analogs which are so better
      >the next supply package will contain only 10 HIMARS and a couple of MLRS. Not a big deal when there are already 20 of them operating, huh?
      >we will supply 500 ATACMS rockets for our MLRS to be able to shoot. What do you mean they may be used in HIMARS too?
      >why leave kherson btw?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        all HIMARS have been destroyed already

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No need to seethe about the next package of gibs, right?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No HIMARS have been destroyed but they've been kinda cucked by Russia moving everything valuable outside of it's range.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You mean Russia has been cucked by having to move its supply lines out of range of 18 American rocket artillery systems, the best in the world.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well yeah, I guess the mere threat of HIMARS kinda makes them useful, but no big booms unless vatniks do something dumb again.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>we will supply 500 ATACMS rockets for our MLRS to be able to shoot. What do you mean they may be used in HIMARS too?

        I just coomed

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I for one am excited about the whole thing. We’re going to see probing attacks, decentralized across the whole line. Murmurs on vatnik media of seeing a few brads here, a chally there. Slowly, then all at once, an armored hammer of a thousand armored vehicles will punch through the lines and advance 20km, deep into a backfield softer than a mobiks recently tenderized buttocks. The next day - a logarithmic gain as the fuelers catch up and the hammer spreads outward from its point of breakthrough.

      Personally I think we’ll see an entire front collapse, probably in the north (least expected) as this will be easier, more demoralizing, and keep the russians fixed in Crimea for finishing by artillery. I would imagine we’ll see a heavy feint, or illusions of a faint, that will attempt to get the russians to position forces down south. Just a shame we have to wait a few months for it!

      And on this episode of "Lying about Russia", "Russia has no intel on what they're fighting except what NATO posts on Twitter"

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Very naive to assume that just because Ukraine are the good guys that no spies exist within their ranks.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >good guys
          i hate redditors so much it's unreal

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How interesting, tell me more.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            redditors are the ones who think everything is like relative man, there's no bad or good

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Very naive to assume ... that no spies exist within their ranks.
          That's what I'm saying. I'm just not being a gay about it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i mean russia's going to notice 200+ armored vehicles of types ukraine didn't have previously, but i wish they would have delivered GMLRS unannounced

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're forgetting the 50 CV90s, the 40 Marders, and the...whatever number of AMX 10 RCs.

    Still waiting on GLSDB and Leopard 2s though. Especially GLSDB, those should have an outsized strategic impact just as HIMARS did when they first arrived.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably easier to shoot down though.
      I honestly think one of the subtle reasons that the US does not provide ATACM is because they are basically what the S-400 was designed to defend against, and they are much more expensive than GMLRS.

      Like if it takes 10 ATACM to penetrate Russian AD and destroy a strategic target (IE rail bridge) then that's 20 million dollars right there.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And still losing to prisoners. lol

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1 Wagner Corps(30k+ troops), 1 Airborne Division(12-24k troops), 1 motorized brigade(2-8k troops), 1 motorized regiment(900-2000 troops) vs 12 brigades(24k-96k troops)
      So, to reiterate, 55k+ Russians vs about the same Ukrainians.
      Also, cope and seethe while using NATO symbols to illustrate your operational failures.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At this rate all male Russians are going to be dead before they conquer Ukraine.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >you were born just in time to witness leopards, abrams and leclercs riding together against the mongol hordes

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    and they still can't win

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >11 months into a 3 day operation

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    UK initially said 100 Brimstones a couple days ago when they announced the Challengers. This morning it's clarified that it will be 600 instead.

    Sure hope a hi def video system comes with those to capture use incidents.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly it seems like too little too late. Russia is moving forward everywhere right now, multiple villages falling every day. And once they get the territories they want, they'll be digging in and there's no way of getting rid of them anymore, especially with no air power.
    We should have given them tanks back in the autumn, it will take multiple months of training before they can even use them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're right. To make up for lost time we will send more.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They need tanks, that's what can reverse the tide. But when Germany is even willing to give them a few Leopards as a token gesture , let alone the hundreds that they need, you know they don't have the willingness to do what's necessary for Ukraine to win.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Bradley is a tank :^)

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Avengers on the ukraine.
    >Avengers on the roofs.
    >Avengers on my mind.
    >Do Avengers really
    >Avengers
    >Avengers
    >Avengers

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    upboated fellow resister. the evil monke man is truly awful

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You won't see them except in propaganda photos. They will be stored in bunkers safe from kalibration and inevitable embarrassment on the battlefield.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine is beating Russia

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >that speechbubble color
    get the fuck out 4chanfag

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    huge cope. What day are we on of the 3 day special military operation?

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I for one am excited about the whole thing. We’re going to see probing attacks, decentralized across the whole line. Murmurs on vatnik media of seeing a few brads here, a chally there. Slowly, then all at once, an armored hammer of a thousand armored vehicles will punch through the lines and advance 20km, deep into a backfield softer than a mobiks recently tenderized buttocks. The next day - a logarithmic gain as the fuelers catch up and the hammer spreads outward from its point of breakthrough.

    Personally I think we’ll see an entire front collapse, probably in the north (least expected) as this will be easier, more demoralizing, and keep the russians fixed in Crimea for finishing by artillery. I would imagine we’ll see a heavy feint, or illusions of a faint, that will attempt to get the russians to position forces down south. Just a shame we have to wait a few months for it!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. your brain on onions

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I quit zogging as an O3 and I hate to say it my vatnik friend, but we are much much better at this whole thing than you

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Like in Izium.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Western equipment seems to be performing much better than the Russians equipment. NATO is wrecking Russia without putting any nato troops in danger. Russia still can’t figure out how to hit foreign military aid shipments

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      feels good to finally battle test old stock for shits and giggles while our boys are comfy back at base and out of harms way.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what is lancet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hasn’t really seen much success. The Russians don’t even have a javelin equivalent after 30 years kek

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is that why they need to edit in explosions?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
          DO NOT REDEEM SIR NOOOOOOOOO
          PLEASE

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it isn't the equipment, but the monkey that uses it.

      Russian equipment in this war is also performing much better when not used by Russians.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    which stryker version will amerifats send?

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How good is the avenger? Isn't it just like 8 stingers on a hummvee? Or is there something on the platform that makes the stingers perform better?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It has a .50 cal machine gun for drones too. Not sure what electronics or search/track capabilities the platform has though.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not a single military in the world would be able to handle that kind of a zoo full of small quantities of different equipment from dozens of countries and different time periods. Just because there's a long list of weapons doesn't mean they can be used and maintained affectively together at the same time by a very constrained military that has to learn all that stuff on the go. It's madness. 10 fucking Challengers?? And what the fuck are Ukrainians supposed to do with them? Send 5 to Soledar and 5 to Bakhmut?
    To me it all looks more like a political PR campaign rather than a well-thought military aid effort.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The thing is that the conflict is stalemated and even small numbers of modern equipment make a massive difference.

      Obviously it would be better to have like a hundred Abrams and just desert storm that shit, but a slow trickle is better than nothing.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and even small numbers of modern equipment make a massive difference.

        It doesn't. Those 10 Challengers ain't shit in such a high-intensity war. Each side can easily lose twice as that on a bad day. The only two things that would make difference are longer-range missiles (ATACMS or something else) and fighter jets. Everything else should be supplied in adequate quantities, otherwise it's fucking nothing and it just prolongs the war.

        14 Challengers, 12 is a platoon, with 2 probably left in reserve. Just add them to a pre-existing battalion of slavshit tanks until more Western tanks are donated. It's better than nothing and if they perform welll it's likely more will be sent.

        >It's better than nothing
        Exactly. Nothing more than that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      14 Challengers, 12 is a platoon, with 2 probably left in reserve. Just add them to a pre-existing battalion of slavshit tanks until more Western tanks are donated. It's better than nothing and if they perform welll it's likely more will be sent.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >platoon
        company sorry

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You people have some patience, posting same shit over and over again, it's been like a fucking year now. Is life in eastern Europe really that boring?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You have to realise that 90% of the posters here are either NEET or close to it. There's not a lot to do beyond eagerly await more kino.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i am from great britain and i can say we are tired of ukraine and corruption of ukraine.
    the last pack of armaments we send will be the last before public losses patience, and i know these will happen also in other euro country aswell

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i am from great britain
      proof? Post tea.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They’re gonna get all that shit and still lose Bakhmut, and we’ll never hear the end of it from shitskins and tankies. Watch.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Meh, let em have it, it'll be back in AFU hands come May.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    me on the right

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Greta sure went off the deep end.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *