Tired of you schizos thinking normal design characteristics are some horrible drawback just because they're on something foreign. US carriers have them too, it's for tugs.
They're for line handling and visibility during anchor evolutions.
That Chinese carrier still looks weirdly smooth like it's not real. I chose the related pic because it's new construction and shows the expected texture of thick steel construction including the reinforcements around the forward holes where the Chinese ones just look like holes cut in thin material. Honestly, that Chinese carrier looks like something the Iranians would do for propaganda.
I noticed the difference in the holes too. I think it's not so much reinforcement as a way to make the edge gently curved so that the ropes aren't bending at hard angles and rubbing against a sharp edge.
>You do realize the Americans have 11
ASBM can take car of that quickly.
Carriers are only good at bullying weaker countries, this is the age of anti ship missiles, there is a reason why the Chinese use their Carriers for air control and intel rather than snti ship.
>Retard
lmao it's always you in every thread defending China every single time. Ballistic missiles are fundamentally unsuited for attacking maneuvering targets. We've been over this before.
>Ballistic missiles are fundamentally unsuited for attacking maneuvering targets
Sources my ass
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They cannot guide themselves
3 weeks ago
RC-135 Rivet Joint
Not only that they have to find the target during a search phase. So they are very vulnerable to jamming and the plasma interference degrades normal guidance. Oh and I forgot to mention that they require Sat and OTH radar help(so you hit those day one lmao ayyy)
You're trolling obviously. But for those who aren't aware only limited numbers of the newer DF-21B and DF-26s have terminal guidance. Even with this both need to slow down in order to employ terminal radar or optical guidance, in addition any maneuvering will to evade air defense will also bleed speed since the MARV is unpowered. This is before EWAR and the longer response time is factored. They're a threat but not some magic silver bullet.
>Even with this both need to slow down in order to employ terminal radar or optical guidance,
Nope lol. The terminal guidance are done by sat, they don't slow down
Boy oh boy. I guess they are magically communicating with drones and satellites without slowing down to reduce the plasma sheath formed when flying mach 5. Next you will tell me it doesn't have a 700m CEP and they just equipped the DF-21D with radar terminal for lols because satellites do everything.
Low energy troll but I'm still gonna effort post because lots of people think DFs are making carriers obsolete
The Chinese official propaganda is that the missile will hit the carrier and kill the Americans and then we will give up and go home because we lost the will to fight.
When in reality each DF-what ever the fuck is tracked by ISR we would launch strikes on Chinese missile sites with B-21s and B-2s. The original mission profile of the B-2 was hunting down road mobile ICBMs, so sending them and their little brother to go find these CARRIER KILLERs is something the USAF will do (then later brag to the navy about saving their ass)
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>The Chinese official propaganda is that the missile will hit the carrier and kill the Americans and then we will give up and go home because we lost the will to fight.
Is that what you mutts belive?
> communicating with drones and satellites without slowing down to reduce the plasma sheath formed when flying mach 5
Yep, that's how it works. If you think plasma sheath block all comm then you are retarded
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Low effort trolling pls try harder anon kun
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Ok brainlet
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
do you have a source to back your claims? I'm inclined to believe the other anon instead of a gay just screeching insults with no counterpoints other than >y-you're wrong because... well you just are!
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You are asking sources for freshman level physics?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yep, prove your claims, also should be a freshman level concept
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Radio signals through a plasma sheath is not a freshman level concept
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Oh sorry brainlet. I got told about it in my fluid mechanics II, during my 3rd year.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Post degree
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
[...]
post degree, wall outlet and hand
any fule nous about comms blackout in reentry from space and what causes it.
He can't hes a trolling gay and/or thirdy, funny thing is that hes not even good at it.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Post degree
post degree, wall outlet and hand
any fule nous about comms blackout in reentry from space and what causes it.
ASBM is a cope for nations with no sub force. Everyone knows you actually have to send subs out to hunt down the enemy HVTs or a dedicated surface taskforce because stand off attacks against Aegis protected fleets have a low kill prob.(nobody ever talks about EW/ECM and off board sensor support for the person being attacked)
Getting into a missile shooting war favors the US, thats the War we want, we built our whole navy around getting shot at with missiles.
[...]
Glider like df17 can litteraly hit moving car. Stop coping
Ah yes the car known for its search radar and E/W suite. My Corvette can detect an ICBM and shoot a THAAD at it while shooting chaff rockets and IR decoys.
Yeah, It's so poorly made designed that the USN is literally copying the Type 055 with Its new DDG(X). Or are you telling me that the chinese managed to copy and built a USN destroyer design decades before It was ever designed? Maybe the chinese have a time machine?
Yeah, It's so poorly made designed that the USN is literally copying the Type 055 with Its new DDG(X). Or are you telling me that the chinese managed to copy and built a USN destroyer design decades before It was ever designed? Maybe the chinese have a time machine?
Why does the bridge look really uncanny? Like it's made out of plywood?
EMALS is proper name of a product made by General Atomics. Chinese trolls will take the names of existing systems and slap them on their version it to allude to quality. If you have experience with Chinese people in business/trade they do this a lot.
Unless General Atomics makes it or gives you a license its not EMALS.
also: kinda weird that OP doesn't post on sinodefense forum they literally have a 890 page thread on this ship
No he goes on PrepHole and asks a single line question...HMMMM
What is the tactical advantage of putting three (3) large holes into your ship on the top portion of the bow?
Above draft torpedo tubes, forwards facing so they can aim them with the bow.
Look closer, there's a rpoe coming out.
It's for marines to rappel on a beach, giving the carrier landing craft capabilities.
Air intakes for when you wanna go real fast.
They're called Speed Holes.
Its lightening cuts, saves wight while not compromising structure.
Tired of you schizos thinking normal design characteristics are some horrible drawback just because they're on something foreign. US carriers have them too, it's for tugs.
so many red flags
didnt they get the memo?
hypersonic missiles can turn that into a reef
nice CGI, mutt.
no, that's a PS. EMAL installation will probably take another 3-6 months.
it really looks chinese
They're for line handling and visibility during anchor evolutions.
That Chinese carrier still looks weirdly smooth like it's not real. I chose the related pic because it's new construction and shows the expected texture of thick steel construction including the reinforcements around the forward holes where the Chinese ones just look like holes cut in thin material. Honestly, that Chinese carrier looks like something the Iranians would do for propaganda.
Hmmm, lets try that again
I noticed the difference in the holes too. I think it's not so much reinforcement as a way to make the edge gently curved so that the ropes aren't bending at hard angles and rubbing against a sharp edge.
tower still empty
No pictures from up?
Then it's probably from before they even put the barns.
if you weren't a dumb shit you would realize the ship had the barns installed way before launch.
but this is a shop.
Why the insult?
>china introduces one (1) modern carrier
>AMERICAN EMPIRE IS OVER
You do realize the Americans have 11? As well as 9 other F-35 capable flat-tops
>yeah, thats a total of 20
>You do realize the Americans have 11
ASBM can take car of that quickly.
Carriers are only good at bullying weaker countries, this is the age of anti ship missiles, there is a reason why the Chinese use their Carriers for air control and intel rather than snti ship.
Cope.
>Carriers are only good at bullying weaker countries
Well American one's are. Everyone is weaker than us.
>this is the age of anti ship missiles
You from the 1960s?
>there is a reason why the Chinese use their Carriers for air control and intel rather than snti ship.
Fighters sortied of US carriers have literally done every mission profile except nuclear strike. COPE!
low energy troll.
Destroyers with ASBM outrange the combat radius of CSG.
Cope
Retard
>Retard
lmao it's always you in every thread defending China every single time. Ballistic missiles are fundamentally unsuited for attacking maneuvering targets. We've been over this before.
>Ballistic missiles are fundamentally unsuited for attacking maneuvering targets
Sources my ass
They cannot guide themselves
Not only that they have to find the target during a search phase. So they are very vulnerable to jamming and the plasma interference degrades normal guidance. Oh and I forgot to mention that they require Sat and OTH radar help(so you hit those day one lmao ayyy)
ASBMs cant hit a non-cooperative target. Nobody tests them on non-cooperative targets they shoot them at static targets with no EW/ECM.
Sorry little buddy
Glider like df17 can litteraly hit moving car. Stop coping
On set track, like those carrier mockups, I assume
>ASBM
>BM
lmao what is this? 1960?
You're trolling obviously. But for those who aren't aware only limited numbers of the newer DF-21B and DF-26s have terminal guidance. Even with this both need to slow down in order to employ terminal radar or optical guidance, in addition any maneuvering will to evade air defense will also bleed speed since the MARV is unpowered. This is before EWAR and the longer response time is factored. They're a threat but not some magic silver bullet.
>Even with this both need to slow down in order to employ terminal radar or optical guidance,
Nope lol. The terminal guidance are done by sat, they don't slow down
Boy oh boy. I guess they are magically communicating with drones and satellites without slowing down to reduce the plasma sheath formed when flying mach 5. Next you will tell me it doesn't have a 700m CEP and they just equipped the DF-21D with radar terminal for lols because satellites do everything.
Low energy troll but I'm still gonna effort post because lots of people think DFs are making carriers obsolete
The Chinese official propaganda is that the missile will hit the carrier and kill the Americans and then we will give up and go home because we lost the will to fight.
When in reality each DF-what ever the fuck is tracked by ISR we would launch strikes on Chinese missile sites with B-21s and B-2s. The original mission profile of the B-2 was hunting down road mobile ICBMs, so sending them and their little brother to go find these CARRIER KILLERs is something the USAF will do (then later brag to the navy about saving their ass)
>The Chinese official propaganda is that the missile will hit the carrier and kill the Americans and then we will give up and go home because we lost the will to fight.
Is that what you mutts belive?
> communicating with drones and satellites without slowing down to reduce the plasma sheath formed when flying mach 5
Yep, that's how it works. If you think plasma sheath block all comm then you are retarded
Low effort trolling pls try harder anon kun
Ok brainlet
do you have a source to back your claims? I'm inclined to believe the other anon instead of a gay just screeching insults with no counterpoints other than
>y-you're wrong because... well you just are!
You are asking sources for freshman level physics?
Yep, prove your claims, also should be a freshman level concept
Radio signals through a plasma sheath is not a freshman level concept
Oh sorry brainlet. I got told about it in my fluid mechanics II, during my 3rd year.
Post degree
He can't hes a trolling gay and/or thirdy, funny thing is that hes not even good at it.
post degree, wall outlet and hand
any fule nous about comms blackout in reentry from space and what causes it.
ASBM is a cope for nations with no sub force. Everyone knows you actually have to send subs out to hunt down the enemy HVTs or a dedicated surface taskforce because stand off attacks against Aegis protected fleets have a low kill prob.(nobody ever talks about EW/ECM and off board sensor support for the person being attacked)
Getting into a missile shooting war favors the US, thats the War we want, we built our whole navy around getting shot at with missiles.
>rook at srong chinese carrier! Fear me Wright Man!!!!!
>NUUUUUUUU Carriers are useress and wirr be kirred by hypersonic missir!!!!!!
pick one chang
Longer than Napolean, Hitler, or Alexander the Great, combined
Why does the bridge look really uncanny? Like it's made out of plywood?
It looks REALLY cheap. I've seen mud boats with better houses.
It's a "stealthy" design, their Type 055's bridge is also that clean looking for lower RCS
Looks cheap and poorly made, expect revisions.
Ah yes the car known for its search radar and E/W suite. My Corvette can detect an ICBM and shoot a THAAD at it while shooting chaff rockets and IR decoys.
Yeah, It's so poorly made designed that the USN is literally copying the Type 055 with Its new DDG(X). Or are you telling me that the chinese managed to copy and built a USN destroyer design decades before It was ever designed? Maybe the chinese have a time machine?
>The chinks copied our design from the future!
You’re a fucking retard.
Did i say copy,copied or copying?
No I said it (the carrier) looks Cheap (it do)
Jesus little man too much time next to a DOOL-BAND RAYDAR i bet.
If you rustle his jimmies enough, he'll start spamming copypastas about the Korean War and haplogroups
Cheaply built and cheap looking just like the future DDG (X)
oh I nearly forgot lads
EMALS is proper name of a product made by General Atomics. Chinese trolls will take the names of existing systems and slap them on their version it to allude to quality. If you have experience with Chinese people in business/trade they do this a lot.
Unless General Atomics makes it or gives you a license its not EMALS.
also: kinda weird that OP doesn't post on sinodefense forum they literally have a 890 page thread on this ship
No he goes on PrepHole and asks a single line question...HMMMM
At the current rate, EMALS will just become a generic all encompassing term for electromagnetic catapults.
is sleeping on a ship comfy, bros?
*i mean navy ships, dont want to hear your story about your time on a cruise ship or some cargo ship
no