Burgers?

You have 10 seconds to explain this

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The US hasn't had them in inventory since the 90's, the Philippines and some other nations still use and modernize them from ancient donor stockpiles.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They look pretty sweet too

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        thats kinda hot

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it would be hot if they didn't put a walmart red dot on it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Kyle only needed a sightmark

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because frick you this is America and we can keep or force our allies to keep whatever guns we want in service as long as we want

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >in keeping with the rest of our israeli dominated administrations, we are so cheap that we keep around ancient pieces of shit so we can sell them in bulk to moronic third worlders, enslaving them too under our globohomosexual world hegemony enforced under a rainbow banner of McFreedom and Diversity

      Amurika

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I heard that they’re still occasionally used by armored vehicle crews, especially since they’re more compact than an M4. Although they look crude and outdated, the M3 is actually a really well thought out design (other than the charging handle on the early models). I’m pretty sure it’s a case of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”, and “idk it just came the tank”

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They were all supposed to be removed from service after the Gulf War, but I believe some NG and Reserve tank units had them locked away deep in their armories until around 9/11

      In terms of ancient small arms that are confirmed to still be in use, the Air Force still issues an original Colt 603 as a DMR to missile security at one of the nuke bases, I think it was Malmstrom. Note the armory bar code on the magwell

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Damn I want that

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Love nothing more than scopes mounted ontop of carry handles

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    its cool it works and you are a homosexual

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this would literally be perfect riot defense why cant we have them?

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For real. One of my high school friends dad owned a grease gun and damn that guy loved his grease gun. He invited everyone and their brother to go shoot it with him.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    "In service" on Wikipedia means it's used by at least one military power. The Mosin is still listed as "In service" for example.
    Though the M3 did have an unusually long service life in the American army, mostly as a crew gun for tankers. Though Delta Force actually used it for a time, apparently it was stupid quiet when suppressed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The Mosin is still listed as "In service" for example.
      It kinda is tho

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >It kinda is
        what's ambiguous about the Russians issuing them out in Ukraine? that seems pretty "in service" to me
        >captcha: No KKK

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Considering we’re seeing mosins pop up in ukraine yes, theyre definitely still in service.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Swedish K is better

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Having fired both, I disagree. The M3 has better ergos, more accurate, and more controlable. The M3 would be my 2nd top WW2 pick for best SMG behind the KP31.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What about the Sterling?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not really fair to compare weapons of war period manufacture with postwar ones.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I was like 9 when I shot a Sterling so I don't think I could judge it fairly.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What about the Sten?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          sten was an absolute piece of shit. it took like 5 man-hours to produce and was worth about 100 quid in today's money. imagine the quality that came with it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >it took like 5 man-hours to produce and was worth about 100 quid in today's money.
            Isn't that a quality of its own?
            The Jerries were so impressed they made their own clone.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah but it was a weapon of desperate necessity, hence why the germans made it at the end.
              While I haven't shot one I'm sure the PPS-43 is a much better economy-SMG than the STEN was. I feel like there's a decent list of SMGs that come out ahead of the STEN in anything but "ideal to make in desperate situations"

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >BEF doesn't have the STEN in 1940 and loses
                >BEF has the STEN in 1944 and wins
                'nuff said

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I shot a Canadian STEN with the tube stock and I wasn't that happy with it. The grip wasn't comfortable at all and the mags didn't run well on that particular gun. I think a Mk V with good mags wouldn't be too bad.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It was a weapon designed around a fairly desperate war time economy. There were far better designs already in use like the Lanchester, but they were short on key materials and skilled mechanics and were hoping to make something that worked and could be manufactured everywhere by anyone. They succeeded in that. It is possibly the crudest weapon of WW2 but it meant at least one guy in the squad had something that went dakka dakka.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          sten was an absolute piece of shit. it took like 5 man-hours to produce and was worth about 100 quid in today's money. imagine the quality that came with it.

          I would literally trust my cheap cast-zinc Ring of Fire pistol with my life over a Sten. They kind of work, and often put bullets where you point them. The mags suck, and if you hold the gun wrong or catch it on your clothes/fat ass while moving they fire exactly one round and then need slapping around until they work again. Plus they hurt to shoot. You know a gun is bad when third-world hellholes are cutting them up and dumping them in favor of home-made shit.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ian get out

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How about the Owen?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It works.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone make semi auto clones?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not so much Burgers, more like Pinoys. Their navy still uses them for shipboard security.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. Pinoys still use the Grease Gun, to very good effect. .45 is still as potent in 2022 as it was in 1943. Grease gun is honestly a good weapon, especially for the cost of production. I wish someone would make a modern M3 repro.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it's funny because .45 was invented to kill flips

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          .45 ACP was invented to duplicate the performance of the .45 caliber revolver cartridge the Army was using (was it .45 Schofield at that point lol)

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    If the US used them 'till the Gulf War you bet your ass some shithole will be using it for the next 50 years

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >thinks the service life section only refers to the service in its country of origin
    European education

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Someone's about to use one in a mass shooting so they can ban c&r guns, huh?

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's not the only m3 still in service 😉

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >You have 10 seconds to explain this

    In the 90s they used to give them to tank crews and the like as a gun they could use if they had to abandon the tank. I don't know what they're using them for now.

    They work though, they're reliable, they don't weight too much and they have a slow controllable rate of full auto fire which makes them decent for suppressive fire.

    Wish I owned one, I think they're really neat.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the smile
      Same when i got to shoot one. They're just fun

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what was the obsession with making gun sights occlude so much of your peripheral vision?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It just figgin works, agr on a gun is just a number the M2 has been in use since 1918, if you can't fix it.. it isn't broke

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit!!!!

    we are still using the greese gun??? hella frickin based

    can we bring back the Iowa Class battlship again?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Somewhere designed to the sten mags
    Some were Chinese copies that didn't do it correctly before they moved to Taiwan.
    And some people just wanted it to fit just right.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's not the most accurate, nor the most comfortable, nor has the best rate of fire, but it's sturdy enough to beat a man to death with and still spit bullets after.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >1933
    m3sisters... how the FRICK do we reply to these m2chads?!?!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      bro there's no comparison when it comes to the big man himself. A design that can endure long enough to even be compared to something of Brownings is more of a compliment than anything else

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    obligatory ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.’

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *