>build your entire foreign policy around hypersonic missiles. >the US just slapped one down with a fucking Patriot

>build your entire foreign policy around hypersonic missiles
>the US just slapped one down with a fricking Patriot
don’t forget to laugh at china

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >US

    More like some Ukrainian dudes who spent a few weeks training on it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the missile knows where it is, missiles don't need training

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The missile knows where it is by knowing where it isn't.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The missle subtracts where is is from where it should be and this is called error.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The missle subtracts where is is from where it should be and this is called error.

          the missile knows where the west side is

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous
  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >laugh at china
    why?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cause chinks are the true enemy, their words, not mine.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      China has continually puffed up the tech as well and keeps pretending it will sink a carrier. Despite that they are fast, maneuverable, hard to find at sea, usually not alone, etc. Or that all of the speed advantage of hypersonics is lost during manuevering.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Despite that they are fast, maneuverable, hard to find at sea,
        Lol no. Chinese sat track your carriers 24/7

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Implying the Chinese are a competant military power
          Not even once, at any point in history, ever. No exceptions. Why would you lie about shit like this on the internet you scoundrel?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >American education

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >He has no response

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Chinese sat track your carriers 24/7
          Do you know how satellites work? They are either geosynchronous orbit or an orbit that flies around the plant in a predictable path. They dont shadow ships or any moving craft. The amount of geo synchronous satellites you would need to cover all of the world's oceans with precision to track a carrier would be astronomical. The U.S. actually can track ships by using an array of hydrophones and attack subs. The former couldn't be used to target a ship and the later would just attack the ship itself. Nevermind that a U S. Naval group would be fully aware of a Chinese sub shadowing it.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Chinese sat track your carriers 24/7
            Proof? What sats, exactly?

            It really isn't as hard as you think. They can already track individual aircraft right now and future AI advancements will effortlessly root out the signal from the noise. From china's jilin 1 satellite:
            https://twitter.com/HenriKenhmann/status/1325377922228629507
            It's not hard either to find and then track ships via wakes via cheap, large constellations of SAR micro sats just in case you didn't know. And this capability is rapidly increasing over time.
            https://www.arabobserver.com/us-intelligence-chinas-army-owns-about-half-of-the-worlds-isr-systems/

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >jilin-1 constellation can actually track aircraft
              Frick me, I didn't know it was that good. I was just shitposting.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's fake. A sat in sun-synchronous orbit should move while tracking, and it's not stationary in a geosynchronous orbit. Congrats, you fell for CCP external propaganda from the SCIO and CAC.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It's not hard either to find and then track ships via wakes via cheap, large constellations of SAR micro sats
              Synthetic-aperture radar? The mapping technology? The one that specifically relies on relative motion while its target stays still to generate the synthetic-aperture effect and enhance resolution? That's what they're tracking wakes with? I doubt it. Maybe that's why your article doesn't mention it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you somehow think SAR imaging sats are incapable of tracking wakes, and that other components in the killchain cannot action on this data to narrow down the search space, I don't know what to tell you. Believe whatever you want.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >If you somehow think SAR imaging sats are incapable of tracking wakes
                Can you show me China able to do it?
                >and that other components in the killchain cannot action
                Exactly what other parts? Be specific, my han-mutt fren.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I absolutely believe commercial satellites in general are capable of doing such a thing, but I would love to see the specific slide deck you're pulling that graphic from to better understand specifically how China is using SAR microsats to do so.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >ut I would love to see the specific slide deck you're pulling that graphic from to better understand specifically how China is using SAR microsats to do so.
                Not the chinsect, but here it is: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/2869

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you. Based off of the description provided, I would still like positive confirmation this is actively being done, but it sounds plausible enough.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                For high speed, low wind conditions, maybe. Seems to rely on perfect sea states to accomplish the track.

                Where did this moronic notion that advanced modern anti missile systems with mach 4-5 interceptors can't deal with hypersonic missiles even came from?

                Hypersonic missiles are easier to detect than cruise missiles because they can't fly in thick atmosphere. You will know they are coming and can just plot interception even if your interceptor is not as fast as them.

                Sure it's harder than hitting subsonic missiles but just fire 2-3 missiles at them and it's going to work.

                The US literally can track them with the space based early warning sat.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                looks like neocon propaganda to try to start war with iran

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Chinese sat track your carriers 24/7
          Proof? What sats, exactly?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What sats, exactly?
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-02E
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-02C
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-01
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-02
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-03
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-04
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-05
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03B-06
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03C-01
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03C-02
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03C-03
            Jilin-1 Kuanfu-01B
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D01
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D02
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D03
            Jilin-1 Mofang-01A
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-02D
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-02F
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-10
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-11
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-12
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-13
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-14
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-15
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-16
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-17
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-18
            Jilin-1 Mofang-02A-01
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-04
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-05
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-06
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-07
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-04A
            Jilin-1 Kuanfu-01C
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-27
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-28
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-29
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-30
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-31
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-32
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-33
            Jilin-1 Mofang-01A
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-09
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-35
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-36
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-37
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-38
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-39
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-40
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-41
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-42
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-43
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A01
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A02
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A03
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A04
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A05
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A06
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-08
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-51
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-52
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-53
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-54
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-44
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-45
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-46
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-47
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-48
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-49
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-50
            Jilin-1 Pingtai-01A01
            Jilin-1 Gaofen-03D-34
            Jilin-1 Mofang-02A03
            Jilin-1 Mofang-02A04
            Jilin-1 Mofang-02A07
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A07
            Jilin-1 Hongwai-A08

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 1
              Yaogan 2
              Yaogan 3
              Yaogan 4
              Yaogan 5
              Yaogan 6
              Yaogan 7
              Yaogan 8
              Yaogan 9A
              Yaogan 9B
              Yaogan 9C
              Yaogan 10
              Yaogan 11
              Yaogan 12
              Yaogan 13
              Yaogan 14
              Yaogan 15
              Yaogan 16A
              Yaogan 16B
              Yaogan 16C
              Yaogan 17A
              Yaogan 17B
              Yaogan 17C
              Yaogan 18
              Yaogan 19
              Yaogan 20A
              Yaogan 20B
              Yaogan 20C
              Yaogan 21
              Yaogan 22
              Yaogan 23
              Yaogan 24
              Yaogan 25A
              Yaogan 25B
              Yaogan 25C
              Yaogan 26
              Yaogan 27
              Yaogan 28
              Yaogan 29
              Yaogan 30
              Yaogan 30-1A
              Yaogan 30-1B
              Yaogan 30-1C
              Yaogan 30-2A
              Yaogan 30-2B
              Yaogan 30-2C
              Yaogan 30-3A
              Yaogan 30-3B
              Yaogan 30-3C
              Yaogan 30-4A
              Yaogan 30-4B
              Yaogan 30-4C
              Yaogan 31A
              Yaogan 31B
              Yaogan 31C
              Yaogan 32A
              Yaogan 32B
              Yaogan 33
              PrepHole Error: Too many lines

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 30-5A
              Yaogan 30-5B
              Yaogan 30-5C
              Yaogan 30-6A
              Yaogan 30-6B
              Yaogan 30-6C
              Yaogan 30-7A
              Yaogan 30-7B
              Yaogan 30-7C
              Yaogan 33R
              Yaogan 31D
              Yaogan 31E
              Yaogan 31F
              Yaogan 31G
              Yaogan 31H
              Yaogan 31J
              Yaogan 31K
              Yaogan 31L
              Yaogan 31M
              Yaogan 34
              Yaogan 30-8A
              Yaogan 30-8B
              Yaogan 30-8C
              Yaogan 30-9A
              Yaogan 30-9B
              Yaogan 30-9C
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 32-2A
              Yaogan 32-2B
              Yaogan 35A
              Yaogan 35B
              Yaogan 35C
              Yaogan 34-2
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 33-2
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 36A
              Yaogan 36B
              Yaogan 36C
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 34-3
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 37
              Yaogan 34-4

              >What sats, exactly?
              Gaofen 1
              Gaofen 2
              Gaofen 8
              Gaofen 9-01
              Gaofen 4
              Gaofen 3
              Gaofen 1-02
              Gaofen 1-03
              Gaofen 1-04
              Gaofen 5
              Gaofen 6
              Gaofen 11-01
              Gaofen 10R
              Gaofen 7
              Gaofen 12
              Gaofen 9-02
              Gaofen 9-03
              Gaofen DUOMO
              Gaofen 9-04
              Gaofen 9-05
              Gaofen 11-02
              Gaofen 13
              Gaofen 14
              Gaofen 12-02
              Gaofen 5-02
              Gaofen 11-03
              Gaofen 3-02
              Gaofen 3-03
              Gaofen 12-03
              Gaofen 5-01A
              Gaofen 11-04
              Gaofen 13-02
              Ziyuan I-01
              Ziyuan I-02
              Ziyuan I-02B
              Ziyuan I-02C
              Ziyuan I-03
              Ziyuan I-04
              Ziyuan I-04B
              Ziyuan I-02D
              Ziyuan I-04A
              Ziyuan I-02E
              Ziyuan II-01
              Ziyuan II-02
              Ziyuan II-03
              Ziyuan III-01
              Ziyuan III-02
              Ziyuan III-03
              CBERS-1
              CBERS-2
              CBERS-2B
              CBERS-3
              CBERS-4
              Double Star TC-1
              Double Star TC-2
              Bilibili VS
              Haiyang
              Shiyan
              TanSat

              AND SO ON
              I can't be arsed to list every single one chink earth observation sat, 4 posts should be enough

              Now that you have copied Wiki, may I see their abilities to track a Carrier at sea?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No Black person, you may not look at classified information. But you can look at civilian satellites with the same technology such as ICEYE and inform yourself instead of coping through muh citations redditism.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >same technology such as ICEYE
                Proof?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The point was waking your dumb ass up to a simple fact: chinks have a frickton of Earth observation sats.
                And you should already know that CVBGs are impossible to hide.
                Don't remain ignorant of their progress until it is too late.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The point was waking your dumb ass up to a simple fact: chinks have a frickton of Earth observation sats.
                How many actually work?
                >And you should already know that CVBGs are impossible to hide.
                Not really. May I see Chiner finding them, and tracking them in the open ocean?
                >Don't remain ignorant of their progress until it is too late.
                What progress, exactly? Explain in detail, and provide proof to substantiate your claims.

                [...]
                It really isn't as hard as you think. They can already track individual aircraft right now and future AI advancements will effortlessly root out the signal from the noise. From china's jilin 1 satellite:
                https://twitter.com/HenriKenhmann/status/1325377922228629507
                It's not hard either to find and then track ships via wakes via cheap, large constellations of SAR micro sats just in case you didn't know. And this capability is rapidly increasing over time.
                https://www.arabobserver.com/us-intelligence-chinas-army-owns-about-half-of-the-worlds-isr-systems/

                >They can already track individual aircraft right now
                Why is a sun-synchronous orbit sat not moving while tracking? Seems fake.
                >It's not hard either to find and then track ships via wakes via cheap, large constellations of SAR micro sats just in case you didn't know.
                Proof? Show me it done.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's fake. A sat in sun-synchronous orbit should move while tracking, and it's not stationary in a geosynchronous orbit. Congrats, you fell for CCP external propaganda from the SCIO and CAC.

                It's not a single satellite, but an entire satellite system. Its demonstrated abilities including being able to track a F-22 are not in dispute, I suggest some light reading here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jilin-1

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not a single satellite
                Proof?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 1
              Yaogan 2
              Yaogan 3
              Yaogan 4
              Yaogan 5
              Yaogan 6
              Yaogan 7
              Yaogan 8
              Yaogan 9A
              Yaogan 9B
              Yaogan 9C
              Yaogan 10
              Yaogan 11
              Yaogan 12
              Yaogan 13
              Yaogan 14
              Yaogan 15
              Yaogan 16A
              Yaogan 16B
              Yaogan 16C
              Yaogan 17A
              Yaogan 17B
              Yaogan 17C
              Yaogan 18
              Yaogan 19
              Yaogan 20A
              Yaogan 20B
              Yaogan 20C
              Yaogan 21
              Yaogan 22
              Yaogan 23
              Yaogan 24
              Yaogan 25A
              Yaogan 25B
              Yaogan 25C
              Yaogan 26
              Yaogan 27
              Yaogan 28
              Yaogan 29
              Yaogan 30
              Yaogan 30-1A
              Yaogan 30-1B
              Yaogan 30-1C
              Yaogan 30-2A
              Yaogan 30-2B
              Yaogan 30-2C
              Yaogan 30-3A
              Yaogan 30-3B
              Yaogan 30-3C
              Yaogan 30-4A
              Yaogan 30-4B
              Yaogan 30-4C
              Yaogan 31A
              Yaogan 31B
              Yaogan 31C
              Yaogan 32A
              Yaogan 32B
              Yaogan 33
              PrepHole Error: Too many lines

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 30-5A
              Yaogan 30-5B
              Yaogan 30-5C
              Yaogan 30-6A
              Yaogan 30-6B
              Yaogan 30-6C
              Yaogan 30-7A
              Yaogan 30-7B
              Yaogan 30-7C
              Yaogan 33R
              Yaogan 31D
              Yaogan 31E
              Yaogan 31F
              Yaogan 31G
              Yaogan 31H
              Yaogan 31J
              Yaogan 31K
              Yaogan 31L
              Yaogan 31M
              Yaogan 34
              Yaogan 30-8A
              Yaogan 30-8B
              Yaogan 30-8C
              Yaogan 30-9A
              Yaogan 30-9B
              Yaogan 30-9C
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 32-2A
              Yaogan 32-2B
              Yaogan 35A
              Yaogan 35B
              Yaogan 35C
              Yaogan 34-2
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 33-2
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 36A
              Yaogan 36B
              Yaogan 36C
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 34-3
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 37
              Yaogan 34-4

              >What sats, exactly?
              Gaofen 1
              Gaofen 2
              Gaofen 8
              Gaofen 9-01
              Gaofen 4
              Gaofen 3
              Gaofen 1-02
              Gaofen 1-03
              Gaofen 1-04
              Gaofen 5
              Gaofen 6
              Gaofen 11-01
              Gaofen 10R
              Gaofen 7
              Gaofen 12
              Gaofen 9-02
              Gaofen 9-03
              Gaofen DUOMO
              Gaofen 9-04
              Gaofen 9-05
              Gaofen 11-02
              Gaofen 13
              Gaofen 14
              Gaofen 12-02
              Gaofen 5-02
              Gaofen 11-03
              Gaofen 3-02
              Gaofen 3-03
              Gaofen 12-03
              Gaofen 5-01A
              Gaofen 11-04
              Gaofen 13-02
              Ziyuan I-01
              Ziyuan I-02
              Ziyuan I-02B
              Ziyuan I-02C
              Ziyuan I-03
              Ziyuan I-04
              Ziyuan I-04B
              Ziyuan I-02D
              Ziyuan I-04A
              Ziyuan I-02E
              Ziyuan II-01
              Ziyuan II-02
              Ziyuan II-03
              Ziyuan III-01
              Ziyuan III-02
              Ziyuan III-03
              CBERS-1
              CBERS-2
              CBERS-2B
              CBERS-3
              CBERS-4
              Double Star TC-1
              Double Star TC-2
              Bilibili VS
              Haiyang
              Shiyan
              TanSat

              AND SO ON
              I can't be arsed to list every single one chink earth observation sat, 4 posts should be enough

              All that space junk for a hypothetical missile to destroy a hypothetical carrier if it can hypothetically track the carrier and hypothetically escape already-demonstrated interceptors

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's a great way to invite China destroying all of the US's own satellites in response.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                We can fling up the smaller ones faster than they can shoot them down at this point. Just have to make a call to SpaceX.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 1
              Yaogan 2
              Yaogan 3
              Yaogan 4
              Yaogan 5
              Yaogan 6
              Yaogan 7
              Yaogan 8
              Yaogan 9A
              Yaogan 9B
              Yaogan 9C
              Yaogan 10
              Yaogan 11
              Yaogan 12
              Yaogan 13
              Yaogan 14
              Yaogan 15
              Yaogan 16A
              Yaogan 16B
              Yaogan 16C
              Yaogan 17A
              Yaogan 17B
              Yaogan 17C
              Yaogan 18
              Yaogan 19
              Yaogan 20A
              Yaogan 20B
              Yaogan 20C
              Yaogan 21
              Yaogan 22
              Yaogan 23
              Yaogan 24
              Yaogan 25A
              Yaogan 25B
              Yaogan 25C
              Yaogan 26
              Yaogan 27
              Yaogan 28
              Yaogan 29
              Yaogan 30
              Yaogan 30-1A
              Yaogan 30-1B
              Yaogan 30-1C
              Yaogan 30-2A
              Yaogan 30-2B
              Yaogan 30-2C
              Yaogan 30-3A
              Yaogan 30-3B
              Yaogan 30-3C
              Yaogan 30-4A
              Yaogan 30-4B
              Yaogan 30-4C
              Yaogan 31A
              Yaogan 31B
              Yaogan 31C
              Yaogan 32A
              Yaogan 32B
              Yaogan 33
              PrepHole Error: Too many lines

              >What sats, exactly?
              Yaogan 30-5A
              Yaogan 30-5B
              Yaogan 30-5C
              Yaogan 30-6A
              Yaogan 30-6B
              Yaogan 30-6C
              Yaogan 30-7A
              Yaogan 30-7B
              Yaogan 30-7C
              Yaogan 33R
              Yaogan 31D
              Yaogan 31E
              Yaogan 31F
              Yaogan 31G
              Yaogan 31H
              Yaogan 31J
              Yaogan 31K
              Yaogan 31L
              Yaogan 31M
              Yaogan 34
              Yaogan 30-8A
              Yaogan 30-8B
              Yaogan 30-8C
              Yaogan 30-9A
              Yaogan 30-9B
              Yaogan 30-9C
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 30-10
              Yaogan 32-2A
              Yaogan 32-2B
              Yaogan 35A
              Yaogan 35B
              Yaogan 35C
              Yaogan 34-2
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 02
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 03
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 35 04
              Yaogan 33-2
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 35 05
              Yaogan 36A
              Yaogan 36B
              Yaogan 36C
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 36 02
              Yaogan 34-3
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 03
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 36 04
              Yaogan 37
              Yaogan 34-4

              >What sats, exactly?
              Gaofen 1
              Gaofen 2
              Gaofen 8
              Gaofen 9-01
              Gaofen 4
              Gaofen 3
              Gaofen 1-02
              Gaofen 1-03
              Gaofen 1-04
              Gaofen 5
              Gaofen 6
              Gaofen 11-01
              Gaofen 10R
              Gaofen 7
              Gaofen 12
              Gaofen 9-02
              Gaofen 9-03
              Gaofen DUOMO
              Gaofen 9-04
              Gaofen 9-05
              Gaofen 11-02
              Gaofen 13
              Gaofen 14
              Gaofen 12-02
              Gaofen 5-02
              Gaofen 11-03
              Gaofen 3-02
              Gaofen 3-03
              Gaofen 12-03
              Gaofen 5-01A
              Gaofen 11-04
              Gaofen 13-02
              Ziyuan I-01
              Ziyuan I-02
              Ziyuan I-02B
              Ziyuan I-02C
              Ziyuan I-03
              Ziyuan I-04
              Ziyuan I-04B
              Ziyuan I-02D
              Ziyuan I-04A
              Ziyuan I-02E
              Ziyuan II-01
              Ziyuan II-02
              Ziyuan II-03
              Ziyuan III-01
              Ziyuan III-02
              Ziyuan III-03
              CBERS-1
              CBERS-2
              CBERS-2B
              CBERS-3
              CBERS-4
              Double Star TC-1
              Double Star TC-2
              Bilibili VS
              Haiyang
              Shiyan
              TanSat

              AND SO ON
              I can't be arsed to list every single one chink earth observation sat, 4 posts should be enough

              Why are the Chinese like this? I remember during the Winter Olympics they had before the Russian chimpout, they had some kind of ski-jump assembled in an industrial park or something, with steam stacks and chimneys pumping in the background. It looked fricking ugly and disgusting, and hardly the type of scenery you'd expect for the *Olympics*.

              Turns out the decision was intentional, the Chinese wanted to show the world that "They have infrastructure." So the did the real world equivalent of posting an industrial plant utterly unprompted to show off to the board (the world) just how much "factory and industry they are of being having."

              This chink didn't copypasta wikipedia because he thinks these satellites are tracking USN carriers (lmao). He posted them because his bug brain got offended at the notion that China doesn't have *ANY* satellites, so he posted *ALL* the satellites.

              >"See, China has S A T E L L I T E S!"

              They really are the socially awkward narcissist with delusions of grandeur to Russia's outright anti-social bully, also with delusions of grandeur.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What sats, exactly?
            Yaogan 1
            Yaogan 2
            Yaogan 3
            Yaogan 4
            Yaogan 5
            Yaogan 6
            Yaogan 7
            Yaogan 8
            Yaogan 9A
            Yaogan 9B
            Yaogan 9C
            Yaogan 10
            Yaogan 11
            Yaogan 12
            Yaogan 13
            Yaogan 14
            Yaogan 15
            Yaogan 16A
            Yaogan 16B
            Yaogan 16C
            Yaogan 17A
            Yaogan 17B
            Yaogan 17C
            Yaogan 18
            Yaogan 19
            Yaogan 20A
            Yaogan 20B
            Yaogan 20C
            Yaogan 21
            Yaogan 22
            Yaogan 23
            Yaogan 24
            Yaogan 25A
            Yaogan 25B
            Yaogan 25C
            Yaogan 26
            Yaogan 27
            Yaogan 28
            Yaogan 29
            Yaogan 30
            Yaogan 30-1A
            Yaogan 30-1B
            Yaogan 30-1C
            Yaogan 30-2A
            Yaogan 30-2B
            Yaogan 30-2C
            Yaogan 30-3A
            Yaogan 30-3B
            Yaogan 30-3C
            Yaogan 30-4A
            Yaogan 30-4B
            Yaogan 30-4C
            Yaogan 31A
            Yaogan 31B
            Yaogan 31C
            Yaogan 32A
            Yaogan 32B
            Yaogan 33
            PrepHole Error: Too many lines

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What sats, exactly?
            Yaogan 30-5A
            Yaogan 30-5B
            Yaogan 30-5C
            Yaogan 30-6A
            Yaogan 30-6B
            Yaogan 30-6C
            Yaogan 30-7A
            Yaogan 30-7B
            Yaogan 30-7C
            Yaogan 33R
            Yaogan 31D
            Yaogan 31E
            Yaogan 31F
            Yaogan 31G
            Yaogan 31H
            Yaogan 31J
            Yaogan 31K
            Yaogan 31L
            Yaogan 31M
            Yaogan 34
            Yaogan 30-8A
            Yaogan 30-8B
            Yaogan 30-8C
            Yaogan 30-9A
            Yaogan 30-9B
            Yaogan 30-9C
            Yaogan 30-10
            Yaogan 30-10
            Yaogan 30-10
            Yaogan 32-2A
            Yaogan 32-2B
            Yaogan 35A
            Yaogan 35B
            Yaogan 35C
            Yaogan 34-2
            Yaogan 35 02
            Yaogan 35 02
            Yaogan 35 02
            Yaogan 35 03
            Yaogan 35 03
            Yaogan 35 03
            Yaogan 35 04
            Yaogan 35 04
            Yaogan 35 04
            Yaogan 33-2
            Yaogan 35 05
            Yaogan 35 05
            Yaogan 35 05
            Yaogan 36A
            Yaogan 36B
            Yaogan 36C
            Yaogan 36 02
            Yaogan 36 02
            Yaogan 36 02
            Yaogan 34-3
            Yaogan 36 03
            Yaogan 36 03
            Yaogan 36 03
            Yaogan 36 04
            Yaogan 36 04
            Yaogan 36 04
            Yaogan 37
            Yaogan 34-4

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What sats, exactly?
            Gaofen 1
            Gaofen 2
            Gaofen 8
            Gaofen 9-01
            Gaofen 4
            Gaofen 3
            Gaofen 1-02
            Gaofen 1-03
            Gaofen 1-04
            Gaofen 5
            Gaofen 6
            Gaofen 11-01
            Gaofen 10R
            Gaofen 7
            Gaofen 12
            Gaofen 9-02
            Gaofen 9-03
            Gaofen DUOMO
            Gaofen 9-04
            Gaofen 9-05
            Gaofen 11-02
            Gaofen 13
            Gaofen 14
            Gaofen 12-02
            Gaofen 5-02
            Gaofen 11-03
            Gaofen 3-02
            Gaofen 3-03
            Gaofen 12-03
            Gaofen 5-01A
            Gaofen 11-04
            Gaofen 13-02
            Ziyuan I-01
            Ziyuan I-02
            Ziyuan I-02B
            Ziyuan I-02C
            Ziyuan I-03
            Ziyuan I-04
            Ziyuan I-04B
            Ziyuan I-02D
            Ziyuan I-04A
            Ziyuan I-02E
            Ziyuan II-01
            Ziyuan II-02
            Ziyuan II-03
            Ziyuan III-01
            Ziyuan III-02
            Ziyuan III-03
            CBERS-1
            CBERS-2
            CBERS-2B
            CBERS-3
            CBERS-4
            Double Star TC-1
            Double Star TC-2
            Bilibili VS
            Haiyang
            Shiyan
            TanSat

            AND SO ON
            I can't be arsed to list every single one chink earth observation sat, 4 posts should be enough

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >russia is china
    >ukraine is america

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The patriot shot down a hypersonic

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        yeah but not THE hypersonic. china an op's pic has nothing to do with it. not even marginally

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        So, now Khinzal is a real hypersonic? Good to know.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >A russian hypersonic air-launched missile is the same as a chinese ballistic missile with a glide-reentry vehicle with hypersonic maneuvering capability
          Are you fricking moronic or just not paying any attention? It wasn't a chink missile and most definitely the wrong kind of "hypersonic"

          >and then, all of a sudden, the kinzhal wasn't a real hypersonic.

          Vatnik vranyo defined the KINZHAL as a hypersonic weapon and lied about its speed (easy to verify). Deal with it.

          >inb4 no, PAC-1, 2, 3 aren't suddenly a wunderwaffen hypersonic, they're still the same "useless american trash inferior to the S400 that couldn't defeat some scuds" as russians likes to say

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >easy to verify
            how?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Diabolical trips of moronation

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                molokh demands an naswer

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                *an answer ofc

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              1. the Kinzhal is modified Iskander, they can't be too different.

              2. Estimating its Isp with the Tsiolkovsky equation (4200 kg total weight, 2000 kg weight without fuel). For a 4km/s ("Mach 10") Iskander it would need a solid fuel with a Isp of 500 s. There's no military rocket fuel even close to that, let alone solid fuels that in general have an Isp of 220-260 s.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the Kinzhal is modified Iskander
                no shit sherlock, any other brilliant insights?
                >they can't be too different
                w h a t? aside from platform, RIGHT? jesus
                >For a 4km/s ("Mach 10") Iskander it would need a solid fuel with a Isp of 500 s
                Kinzhal (or, rather 9-C-7760/9-C-7660) has only mach 7 and boasts isp of 350-400
                >4200 kg total weight
                3800
                >2000 kg weight without fuel
                ? only know about payload 500kg

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Russian math

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                elaborate

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Kinzhal (or, rather 9-C-7760/9-C-7660) has only mach 7 and boasts isp of 350-400
                >Isp 350-400
                Why are so deeply moronic ? This isn't even funny kek.

                >? only know about payload 500kg
                Hey moron, the Kinzhal isn't a chunk of solid fuel glued to the warhead, you steel need a engine casing and everything else.
                Stop wasting oxygen dipshit.

                OPINION DISCARDED

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                *

                >Kinzhal (or, rather 9-C-7760/9-C-7660) has only mach 7 and boasts isp of 350-400
                >Isp 350-400
                Why are you so deeply moronic ? This isn't even funny kek.

                >? only know about payload 500kg
                Hey moron, the Kinzhal isn't a chunk of solid fuel glued to the warhead, you still need a engine casing and everything else (avionics, structure).
                Stop wasting oxygen dipshit.

                OPINION DISCARDED

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you steel need a engine casing and everything else
                for real bro? any other brilliant insights like the one about iskander?
                anyway, no sauce for your 2000 w/o fuel, would be glad to read up on it
                >Why are so deeply moronic ?
                >steel
                seems more like (you) tbqh
                less empty words - more numbers!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a fricking solid fueled ballistic missile second stage with no airbreathing has the same ISP as a liquid hydrogen closed cycle engine.

                i get that you're moronic but now you're delving into a specific topic i am decently knowledgeable about and it's really pissing me off.
                ONE FRICKING GOOGLE SEARCH could show you that a fricking ISP anywhere near that on a solid fueled rocket motor is fricking physically impossible.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                YOU'RE POSTING IN CAPS AND NOT GIVING LINKS MY MAN
                THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS

                >literal news about shooting down an hypersonic missile
                >n-noooo it can't beeee, lieeess
                It's going to happen again, and your shilling wouldn't stop it.

                >It's going to happen again
                on twitter? entirely possible

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                and then i read your post in full...
                >i am decently knowledgeable
                >solid fueled rocket motor
                stop typing and have a nice day now, utterly embarassing
                >The hypersonic missile is equipped with a hypersonic direct-air jet engine (GPVRD).
                >The heavy fighter-interceptor MiG-31 has a maximum speed is 3400 km/h. This is more than enough. And, indeed, on the video demonstration, which was accompanied by the message of the president, as a carrier of the "Dagger" was a modification of the interceptor MiG-31BM.
                >From a mechanical point of view, hypersonic direct-air jet engine (GPVRD) is simple. It is, very conditionally speaking, two funnels, connected in the middle by their narrow parts. Air is sucked into the front funnel, which plays the role of an oxidizer. In the center, at the point of constriction, combustion of fuel takes place. The products of combustion escape through the rear funnel, forming a jet. The "marching" engine accelerates the warhead to hypersonic speed within a few seconds. The jet will deliver the missile to the discharge zone, after which the march engine will accelerate the warhead to hypersonic speeds within a few seconds.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're just having an autistic fit, it IS a solid propellant rocket. You didn't even quote anything, you're just using greentext hoping people take your post at face value.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Kinzhal boasts isp of 350-400
                And my ass boasts the capability to shit out raw diamonds

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >my ass
                no surprises there, but, I guess, you’re about to prove me wrong

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Kinzhal (or, rather 9-C-7760/9-C-7660) has only mach 7 and boasts isp of 350-400
                Post the data, please.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Estimating its Isp with the Tsiolkovsky equation (4200 kg total weight, 2000 kg weight without fuel)
                Your number for wet mass is factually wrong and your estimate for dry mass is pulled out of your ass to make a completely unrealistic fraction. Do not lie to make a point, you're just as bad as r*ssians.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you steel need a engine casing and everything else
                for real bro? any other brilliant insights like the one about iskander?
                anyway, no sauce for your 2000 w/o fuel, would be glad to read up on it
                >Why are so deeply moronic ?
                >steel
                seems more like (you) tbqh
                less empty words - more numbers!

                Ah crybaby

                Source of the data: my ass.

                >russian forums discussing their own miltech and some extra data + calcs to get that only 50% of the weight is solid fuel AP+Al+PBAN+excip.
                The data is on the internet, stop being lazy morons that talks BS about solid fuels having an Isp of 350 - 400

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Source of the data: my ass.
                Yes, thanks, that was rather obvious.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                ISP for iskander is about 240, this is an Armatard thread

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >ze data is on the interwebz
                so you should have no problems linking it, right?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hypersonic is 1.5km/s.
                Yes it's arbitrary number kinda like Karman line but this is how it is.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not arbitrary, it's mach 5+

                Which is around 1.7km/s asl, not 1.5

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                At 30km altitude mach 1 is 305 m/s.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                And that's why super- and hyperSONIC velocities are usually defined through speed of sound, not arbitrary velocities.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                At 30km altitude mach 1 is 305 m/s.

                >mutt is bad at math and physics
                figures, took a German to make your space dreams real

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >German
                They were all American mutts. I know it's a common trope among europeans to claim mutts that accomplish something as their own. I do derive some humour out of that fact.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            So, are you a vatnik, then? You said that Patriot shot down a hypersonic.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              he's clearly mocking vatnigs for boasting about capabilities of their wunderwaffen

              but you knew that, didn't you

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >boasting about capabilities of their wunderwaffen
                >in a thread about patriots
                >which failed to stop even a fricking cruise missile
                https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29918/heres-all-the-new-info-you-need-to-know-in-the-aftermath-of-the-saudi-oil-facilities-attacks
                i'm sure you have pac-3 and/or bad operators cope ready to go

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Someone post those failed Patriot launches from Saudi Arabia.

                >arabs
                yawn

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >arabs
                >yawn
                >and/or bad operators cope ready to go
                and leos preformed like shit in Syria because roaches, I get it, sure

                your desperation is soothing to the soul

                yawn

                >The point defenses partially rely on fairly dated Shahine surface-to-air missile systems—although they were likely upgraded in some manner—a variant of the French Crotale, and arrays of Oerlikon GDF 35mm guns aided by Skyguard fire control radars. There is no indication that whoever launched the attacks even concerned themselves with attempting to destroy those defenses first. Clearly, they were not effective in repelling the attack.
                Your article doesn't name Patriots even once, moron

                >Your article doesn't name Patriots even once
                why allow me to shed some light on that
                https://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-aramco-security/costly-saudi-defenses-prove-no-match-for-drones-cruise-missiles-idUSKBN1W22FR

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >leos preformed like shit in Syria because roaches, I get it, sure
                Correct. Tanks are not mobile pillboxes or supposed to work alone like idiots believe.
                >allow me to shed some light on that
                So...
                >The main Saudi air defense system, positioned mainly to defend major cities and installations, has long been the U.S.-made long-range Patriot system.
                >It has successfully intercepted high-altitude ballistic missiles fired by the Houthis at Saudi cities, including the capital Riyadh, since a Saudi-led coalition intervened in Yemen against the group in March 2015.
                >But since drones and cruise missiles fly more slowly and at lower altitudes, they are difficult for Patriots to detect with adequate time to intercept.
                ...Patriots worked fine except for threats designed to work against it, but that's has been fixed in the ones used in Ukraine?
                I accept your concession.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Patriots worked fine except for threats designed to work against it
                do you even hear yourself?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. And he said nothing wrong, disingenuous Black person.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >And he said nothing wrong
                only stupid
                I accept your concession

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This ain't reddit. Sorry. Being witty doesn't make you right

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >This ain't reddit
                this is /k/, my man - even worse

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Unironically no. Reddit is a permanent echo chamber. At least here you have the screeching of shills from the other side, of which at least one on a million can form a coherent sentence to explain their position.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Welcome back again.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                (You) act incredulous, but clearly you're not aware that weapons and defenses are mutually designed to defeat each other when possible. This is normal, chang, they have an actual purpose.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                your desperation is soothing to the soul

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The point defenses partially rely on fairly dated Shahine surface-to-air missile systems—although they were likely upgraded in some manner—a variant of the French Crotale, and arrays of Oerlikon GDF 35mm guns aided by Skyguard fire control radars. There is no indication that whoever launched the attacks even concerned themselves with attempting to destroy those defenses first. Clearly, they were not effective in repelling the attack.
                Your article doesn't name Patriots even once, moron

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The pro patriot propaganda has made me think a lot less of it now lol
                It's starting to sound like when Russians boasted about how great their millitary is

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                the worst thing is how transparent the shilling is, like someone flipped a switch

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, someone flipped a switch that shoot down an hypersonic missile wunderwaffe, so you chink/russian shills come here to do damage control

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >someone flipped a switch that shoot down an hypersonic missile wunderwaffe
                >has troubles with even cruise missles
                >s-s-sure it shot down hypersonic bro trus ukrainian sauces
                LMAO

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                wipe your tears mong

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                i'd advise you change your pants from all the patriot cooming

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Patriots worked fine except for threats designed to work against it
                do you even hear yourself?

                >Americans do not continuosly improve their weapons like autists
                >Patriots deployed to Ukraine wouldn't have the latest upgrades to test them in real conditions.
                >Patriots used by arabs are the same as being used by ukrainians
                ok, chink

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >i-i-its totally fixed bro
                >j-j-just trust me
                cooooooool

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >literal news about shooting down an hypersonic missile
                >n-noooo it can't beeee, lieeess
                It's going to happen again, and your shilling wouldn't stop it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >literal news
                >twitter post
                This board man...

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not even Ukrainian sources
                America social media conjecture lol

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >has troubles with even cruise missles
                Doesn't look like it does, does it?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >arabs
                >yawn
                >and/or bad operators cope ready to go
                and leos preformed like shit in Syria because roaches, I get it, sure
                [...]
                yawn
                [...]
                >Your article doesn't name Patriots even once
                why allow me to shed some light on that
                https://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-aramco-security/costly-saudi-defenses-prove-no-match-for-drones-cruise-missiles-idUSKBN1W22FR

                fricking bugmen shills, i pray for another war so I can erase you soley because you type such stupid and blatant shill shit 24/7.

                >Patriots worked fine except for threats designed to work against it
                do you even hear yourself?

                yes you mongoloid that's how war works, it's a game or counters, you develop radrs to get around missiles, and stealth to get around radar, and systems to detect that stealth , it's a series of checks and balances or rock paper scissors, this is basic warfare

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The pro patriot propaganda has made me think a lot less of it now lol

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's starting to sound like when Russians boasted about how great their millitary is
                >"If I just pretend the America is just like Russia, I can pretend America will magically fall flat on their very well-known, well-accounted for capabilities, hardware, and training
                The delusion of the third world is wholly fascinating.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >All this cope

                https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/5/saudi-forces-intercept-three-ballistic-missiles-blame-houthis
                https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/28/saudi-arabia-intercepts-ballistic-missile-attack-over-riyadh
                https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/12/saudi-arabia-intercepts-ballistic-missile-over-riyadh
                https://english.alarabiya.net/News/gulf/2022/03/22/Saudi-Arabia-intercepts-destroys-ballistic-missile-launched-toward-Jazan
                https://crisis24.garda.com/alerts/2022/06/saudi-arabia-air-defense-forces-intercept-al-houthi-launched-missile-targeting-khamis-mushait-june-30
                https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2018/03/26/saudi-arabia-intercepts-missiles-abc-orig-vstop.cnn

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Nope. I'm not vatnik or a moron that talk about "china/russia hypersonic" as the definitive weapon.

              Now they're saying that wasn't a Patriot. But of course AFAIK the only missile on Ukraine capable of good kinetic kills are patriots (PAC-3).

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            What the frick are you talking about? It's still not a chink DF-17 and never will be.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >DF-17
              May I see it actually working?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >david is judea
      >goliath is everyone else
      Yes. Proxy wars are thus.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >don’t forget to laugh at china
    Well shit, I had hope I would not have to go of the grid to catch my breath from laughing at china

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >A russian hypersonic air-launched missile is the same as a chinese ballistic missile with a glide-reentry vehicle with hypersonic maneuvering capability
    Are you fricking moronic or just not paying any attention? It wasn't a chink missile and most definitely the wrong kind of "hypersonic"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and then, all of a sudden, the kinzhal wasn't a real hypersonic.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. :^)

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        B-but my chink missile totally is bro! Glorious china might not be able to build anything but crappy soviet icbm copies but trust the plan that they totally built a complex hyper missile that they refuse to let anyone actually document! It’s no vaperware bro trust

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Indeed. China never lies about anything. Velly strong just rike J-20 super stealth 5th gen fighter with the radar profile of a Cessna.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Buzzwords

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hypersonic maneuvering capability
      May I see it?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      None of those supposed hypersonic missiles currently in service are true hypersonic weapons. They all slow down close to the target.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >pic
    if you're gonna show off your implessive big missiles in a 3D render, why put them in the bike lane? Showcase its intended use to block the exists of Beijing before massacring students again?

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the US just slapped one down with a fricking Patriot
    must've missed the news, link?

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How are there so many dilusional morons on this board. The latest intel leak showed china has more than 2000(?) DF-21 ready and has already begon production on the DF-27 to which the us can not protect itself according to its own experts.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      If the war in Ukraine has taught us anything it is that the US vastly overestimates their enemy's capabilities as to over prepare

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >according to its own experts.
      According to its own experts across the decades, the US
      >Will be nuked by Soviet bombers because of the BOMBER GAP
      >Will be nuked by Soviet ICBMs because of the MISSILE GAP
      >Will be outperformed on the battlefield by the BRAND NEW SOVIET "SMG," the AK-47
      >Will be outperformed in the air by the vaunted, scary, new MiG-25 FOXBAT
      >Will face overwhelming odds and casualties on the ground against *any* well-structured Soviet Model Army
      >Will face overwhelming odds and casualties in the sky against *any* well-structured Soviet Model IADS
      >Will face 20,000 casualties in the opening weeks against Iraq's military forces in 1991
      >*WILL* see an Islamic terrorist detonate a dirty bomb or nuke before 2010 on US soil
      And now we come to the point where lmao China is le big bad boogeyman that the US MIC will use as justification to create fricking 4th-gen pure-fusion nukes and Ace Combat flying air craft carriers.

      The delusion always, ALWAYS comes from the poor dumb idiot country that's been chosen as the boogeyman. They *always* fall for the American doomerism lmao.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        jesus christ calm down you fricking sperg

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          He's right, though. The US routinely overestimates its enemies, which turns fair fights into walkovers. Then we wind up dealing with an occupation before we are prepared for it, and frick it up.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How else are you going to acquire funding? Kek. The US isn’t actually scared of the paper tiger, it’s just a matter of scaring the wallet into paying up.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      According the U.S., the soviets built a wanderwaffe calles the mig 21. You see how that turned out. Also, don't forget that the U.S. got tricked by the Soviets into thinking they have more equipment because of their parade loops. The U.S. overestimates their foes by alot.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pentagon put PrepHole on a target list for their subcontractor shills, they also have their national guard morons shilling for busywork.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't believe for a minute that the US didn't have a way to intercept hypersonic missiles. They've just not admitted it before because they prefer russians and chinese to be overconfident in this issue.
    Same reason Ukraine "doesn't have" long range HIMARs yet. They will be revealed on time to frick up the russia depots during the future offensive.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Someone post those failed Patriot launches from Saudi Arabia.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do they actually have hypersonics or are they just 'they get hypersonic at some point in their deployment therefore they are hypersonic'?
    I ask because China and Russia have all the modesty and self-control of teenagers, there's no way they'd actually have a new technology and not immediately show it off.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've got a riddle for you: What is it, it's not hypersonic and can't pierce through AA defense?
    It's a Russian hypersonic missile designed to pierce through AA defense.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    it would quite funny if we just gave regimental size of patriot systems to vietnam, taiwan, philippines for free

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Big missile trucks are so fricking cool.
    Need to bring Saddamcore back.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >those different rockets
      Wait, you can upgrade these with scavenged parts?

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    TOTAL CHINK DEATH

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the point of hypersonic weapons is the hypersonic glide vehicle part
    every ballistic missile is hypersonic in certain stages and khinzal is just the late stage of a ballistic missile strapped to a fast jet. still
    follows a ballistic trajectory, making it easy to calculate its future position and shoot down, regardless of the speed.
    hypersonic glide vehicles on the otherhand don't follow a ballistic curve so you can't predict as much their future position, thus much harder to shoot down considering how fast they are.

    russians are just full of shit so they extended the benefits of HGVs to their missile.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still no one has posted proof that a patriot missile was used

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What else could it have been? A flying Shilka, maybe?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Iris-T
        >Already confirmed shoot down of 2 Iskanders in a row
        >More of them in Ukraine
        >Ukies have more training on them

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds plausible. I still liked the aeroshilka explanation better.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stop asking questions and do not ever think about who would benefit from this misinformation

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>the US just slapped one down with a fricking Patriot

    Source: Ghost of Kiev

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >proofster vatnikposting continues
    kek

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      So, you can't? Got it. Why does CCP propaganda rely on vague wording with zero proof?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Soon you will be China's vassal, ruskie.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >ruskie
          Cope, Ling Ling. Now, answer the fricking question, you dysgenic sub-human mongrel.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    many such cases

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where did this moronic notion that advanced modern anti missile systems with mach 4-5 interceptors can't deal with hypersonic missiles even came from?

    Hypersonic missiles are easier to detect than cruise missiles because they can't fly in thick atmosphere. You will know they are coming and can just plot interception even if your interceptor is not as fast as them.

    Sure it's harder than hitting subsonic missiles but just fire 2-3 missiles at them and it's going to work.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Where did this moronic notion that advanced modern anti missile systems with mach 4-5 interceptors can't deal with hypersonic missiles even came from?
      Primarily chinks and russoids, and secondarily the thirdies that hold those nations as their personal avatars against le ebil West. The former two because they're face cultures that rely on the impression of strength (what's stronger than being able to say you can strike at the very symbol of American dominance than the Air Craft Carrier?), and the latter because *any* crumb, kernel, or nugget of even the most moronic claim that America is weak makes their c**ts wet.
      Also, don't discount how much a certain mentality that afflicted wider Russian society pre-invasion also afflicts these shitskins:
      >"These things will never actually be used, so it's free shitposting.
      >It's not like America will ever have to prove us wrong anyway."
      Most of the shills you see thirsting for war are doing the thing a lot of teenagers do, where they *act* like they're just on the cusp of kicking your ass, but they know the circumstances absolutely will not allow for either of you to come to blows right here, right now.

      tl;dr, it's all just thirdies, anon.

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand why going faster is supposed to matter against a computer.

    Wouldn't it better to trade range and size over speed?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Higher speed = more kinetic energy = more energy budget to maneuver.
      Also, it means less time to predict its trajectory and no second chance.

      To be fair, maneuver and decoys are more effective than speed only, for example the Saddam's upgraded Scuds during the Gulf War, they had trajectories that were difficult to predict (bad balance) and broke up in mid-air so Patriot missiles needed to destroy the warhead instead other fragments (a software upgrade greatly improved the kill efficiency).

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Going faster reduces time to intercept and theoretically grants a greater delta-v budget for maneuvering, but you're not gonna be doing that much fricking maneuvering at hypersonic speeds if you want your missile to stay intact. It's not like you can see very well through a plasma sheath either, if at all, so onboard targeting is going to be sketchy at best.
      These have specialist uses and unique capabilities, but I'll believe they're wunderwaffe when I see it, and not a moment before.

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Here’s the deal — they’re lying.
    1. They are calling regular ballistic and semi-ballistic (glide vehicle) "hypersonic".
    2. The nature of a hypersonic vehicle re-entering heavy atmosphere is to generate a plasma sheathing around the vehicle, making it blind and deaf so terminal guidance is basically impossible.
    3. The American hypersonic programs are developing actual, no-lying hypersonic weapons. These remain in heavy atmosphere for their entire flight, and in conjunction with advanced engineering serves to stop the plasma sheath from forming. Each one of these programs will be able to achieve true hypersonic guided weapons.
    4. The only other entity to lie about Chinese and Russian hypersonics are the people who produce Congressional security reports who repeat the lies in order to secure funding. The ballistic missiles called hypersonic for propaganda purposes, ironically, led to the funding of multiple TRUE hypersonic weapons as a result.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ignorant moron

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        literally dumbest comeback out there Chang,
        (also native english speakers wouldn't use that term) -20000 calories in rations this week

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      literally dumbest comeback out there Chang,
      (also native english speakers wouldn't use that term) -20000 calories in rations this week

      >missiles flying in thin atmosphere have plasma sheath issues, but flying in thick atmosphere remove the plasma sheath issues.
      No you are just moronic.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is never going to be WWIII. Ukie-Russia proved it.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *