>bradley this bradley that

>bradley this bradley that

is it true that there is some legal clause that stops us from seeing CV90 kino?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how many CV90s did they get? they probably don't really have enough of them to use them in any major numbers like bradley-chan

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Around 50, and I hear that Sweden doesn't want footage out. USA gave Ukraine like 189 Bradleys, and the 47th Mechanized brigade is using them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >and I hear that Sweden doesn't want footage ou
        this is what im talking about
        its just hearsay unless someone can provide actual proof of it
        they are also gonna get 35 more soon so a total of 85 ( minus a few that have been lost)

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >they are also gonna get 35 more soon

          They are not even built yet and they will be CV9035 because Sweden cannot make 40 mm bofors guns any more due to deindustrialization.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >because Sweden cannot make 40 mm bofors guns any more due to deindustrialization.
            seems legit

            pretty sure those 9035's we already on order and whoever ordered them (denmark? netherlands?) just changed the delivery location to ukraine instead

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >pretty sure those 9035's we already on order and whoever ordered them (denmark? netherlands?) just changed the delivery location to ukraine instead

              They were ordered very recently so they were not diverted, they were intentionally ordered for Ukraine.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >pretty sure those 9035's we already on order and whoever ordered them (denmark? netherlands?) just changed the delivery location to ukraine instead

              They were ordered very recently so they were not diverted, they were intentionally ordered for Ukraine.

              Isn't it the CV9035NL that they are getting? So the brand new ones with ATGM's?
              I don't see the problem, Sweden will probably swap to the 35mm version too eventually now that they are in NATO.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Sweden cannot make 40 mm bofors guns any more due to deindustrialization
            the L/70 is being made as i am typing this

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >the L/70 is being made as i am typing this

              In Serbia, not Sweden. They still make new builds.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            thats obvious bs, bofors is still making plenty of them for nava l applications. the IFV version of the gun has howevcer not been produced for a while since it hasnt been popular on the export market. It makes more sense to go with a commercial in current production option

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I vaguely recall some footage with CV90.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Probably from the one Russia captured.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There is one video where a cv90 unloads troops to clear a trench

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          i remember 3

          1: doing some troop transport stuff together with a m113
          2. maneuvering in a treeline and firing a few shots at whatever
          3. russians poking it with a stick and examining a can of surströmming

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i think there was some that was hit with an rpg unless that's included in yours

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah I think that was the one that they captured and poked with a stick.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >and I hear that Sweden doesn't want footage ou
        this is such horseshit on the level of "switchblade footage is banned"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          [...]

          You have to understand that there are a lot of peaceniks in Sweden.
          Remember when a Carl Gustaf heemed a T-90 and it made the news? Yeah well I remember people on the radio shitting and pissing themselves over Swedish weapons being used in a fight that isn't in the defense of Sweden.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You have to understand that there are a lot of peaceniks in Sweden.

            Yeah, and in Canada it's likely one key reason we haven't done as much as we should. We give ammo, and support vehicles, and some ATGM's, but no IFV. We could start up production of the LAV-6 and have our own lightly armored 25mm chaingun IFV out there smoking vatniks, but I think Canadians might have a freak out about it, especially the left leaning parties. Though thankfully Jagmeet Singh has said Canada will support Ukraine militarily as long as needed to secure victory which is a good sign.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Wouldnt be surprised, sweden stopped selling weapons to america during vietnam war because war is bad killing is bad etc..

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Switchblade
          Not banned, the first person view from the controller requires a dedicated laptop or something chunky acting as a recorder which adds bulk and is another thing to charge in the field.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Based MIC saving Western soldiers from lawyers demanding autorecorded footage of "war crimes."

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, your moms wiener in your mouth.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    whats most likely is that the cv90 hasnt seen as much combat as the bradleys have. they got like 4 times as many bradleys as cv90s.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      so when enough bradleys are destroyed we'll start seeing cv90 kino you say?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not while theyre still being replaced 1:1 by the USA

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >still
          keyword

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because they're mostly deployed on the Kupyansk/Lyman front, the one where most footage manifests itself into arty/drone strikes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      source? on where they are mostly deployed part

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i think all 5 cv90 that we know are knocked out were knocked out around there. no offical source sry

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          kk

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      maybe i'm just coping but i think that the 47th mech brigade just has a decent media department that make sure they get combat footage and that the opposite is true for the 21st mech brigade

      source? on where they are mostly deployed part

      >Kupyansk/Lyman
      Yeah that's true, btw, here's some new cv90 footage from last week recorded near the village Terny which is located near Lyman.
      sorry no webm https://files.catbox.moe/7wbbol.mp4

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous


        Cool thanks. Not sure if I'm seeing airbust action or if that's just the big 40mm kicking up a lot of dirt.

        >doing a 3-point turn instead of just throwing that b***h in reverse
        >doing a 3-point turn instead of just throwing that b***h in reverse without popping any smoke

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The thread was deleted minutes later dispite being a perfectly normal chadley thread.

    theres been a bias for some time now. possibly due to pro-russian posters completely destroying their public trust with their spam threads.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >50 40mm shells
    Probably because it always runs out of ammo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      uh? it got 234.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The 40mm CV90's can carry 232 shells.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >that hilarious ejection

        dude those would absolutely knock a dude out if they weren't wearing a helmet tf were they thinking?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If you are standing in front of a firing CV90 without a helmet on you have more problems than falling brass.
          I can't find what an empty casing weighs but the entire shell doesn't even weigh 1 kg.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            More danger for the enemy you pussy whipped b***hboi.

            it just seems needlessly dangerous, a deflector would solve this problem easily.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Seeing how Swedes are autistic about ergonomics and safety I'm sure they have looked at it and decided its not an issue. The casings landing in front seems safer than them later on the side or behind where there is more likely to be friendly infantry.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Are you serious.
              They are being deflected. Upwards.
              Flinging them out vertically makes them conveniently lose energy and fall downwards at no more than terminal velocity.
              Deflecting them horizontally would be more dangerous to anything in their path.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                yeah and as you can see from the video, they fall pretty much wherever they want instead of reliably in one direction.

                you're acting like im saying they need to attach little parachutes to each casing for safety. the bradley ejects out the front and the casings just trickle down the hood.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Might not want searing hot casings rolling around on the Barracuda camo netting.
                Shit man we can't answer you why this is the way that it is, email Bofors or something.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Shit man we can't answer you why this is the way that it is

                no but you sure were quick to make personal attacks because i made an observation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're talking to 2 people, I'm not

                Are you serious.
                They are being deflected. Upwards.
                Flinging them out vertically makes them conveniently lose energy and fall downwards at no more than terminal velocity.
                Deflecting them horizontally would be more dangerous to anything in their path.

                or

                More danger for the enemy you pussy whipped b***hboi.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >two competely different autocannons of vastly different calibers and actions
                >hmm yes i think i will demand they should have identical ejection for reasons
                Ok.

                https://i.imgur.com/FglQMDI.jpg

                You're talking to 2 people, I'm not [...] or [...]

                That makes it 3 people.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >i think i will demand

                never said that. i just gave an example of a less bombastic ejection system. if you say im moving goalposts i will know with certainty you aren't here to have a real discussion.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                does it really matter though? it might hurt getting bonked by a casing but its not like you have troops just hanging around the ifv

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >but its not like you have troops just hanging around the ifv

                no actually i think you would have troops hanging around the infantry fighting vehicle

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                not that close.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Right in front of the turret where the shells fall?
                Maybe you shouldn't.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Right in front of the turret

                the second burst falls to the side because of the wind.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Soldiers wear helmets.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          More danger for the enemy you pussy whipped b***hboi.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That was actually a problem. There is a certain speed range where the vehicle will overtake the ejected casing and hit the commanders hatch if its open

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >helmet
          Even with that I would expect a concussion the very least.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            or take one to the shoulder, probably not fun.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >The 40mm CV90's can carry 232 shells.

        Its clip fed like the warrior.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Its tracked like the warrior.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it's nice firepower, but it can't consistently supress a treeline (what ukraine is all about) like the chadley does

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >but it can't consistently supress a treeline

          firing fewer, larger shells at a treeline is just as suppressing, anon.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    anon the bradley minefield aftermath pic was spammed harder than ANY other thing ive seen spammed on /k/ since ever.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    >The thread was deleted minutes later dispite being a perfectly normal chadley thread.

    theres been a bias for some time now. possibly due to pro-russian posters completely destroying their public trust with their spam threads.

    Ah yes, you are totally oppressed by moderation, it's not the fact that you're the shitsniffer spammer.
    When are you killing yourself? We've been asking for years now we'd like an answer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >any objective observation is automatically seen as pro-russian because its not pro-ukrainian

      great mindset, im sure you wont get whipped into a controlled frenzy this election season.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the bradley is getting such rave reviews because stabilized autocannons with modern-ish optics are incredibly powerful.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the bradley is getting such rave reviews because stabilized autocannons with modern-ish optics are incredibly powerful.

      Duh. And it's 40 year old technology at this point. Other IFV: are you even trying?

      The 40mm CV90's can carry 232 shells.

      CV90 is a wannabe tank. Bradley can lay down the pain with 25mm chaingun.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being from a respectable neighborhood

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Relevant to K as what are you fighting for

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Anons in this thread, feeding the troll.
    He doesn't want to discuss the CV90. He's latched onto one thing about it, and he's desperately trying to wind you up about it.
    Just leave him to get drunk, talk to himself, then fall asleep crying.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >is it true that there is some legal clause that stops us from seeing CV90 kino?
    Yeah, the legal clause of they haven't done anything

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Found a handful of press photos of a Swedish CV9040 command vehicle (Stripbv 90) in Ukrainian service. From August 2023.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      thats the ones with the fake cannon right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sauce if you care. In Ukrainian.
      >What secrets does the Swedish BMP CV90 hold?
      https://armyinform.com.ua/2023/08/13/yaki-tayemnyczi-pryhovuye-shvedska-bmp-cv90/

      The text basically just lists the vehicle's specs (including the all-important electric kettle), no anecdotes from the crew or anything interesting. Just praise for how war machines from *civilized countries* actually care about the crew, totally unlike soviet/russian shit.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        that... doesn't look as cramped like everyone says it is...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ukies praise the crew comfort. Same as every western vs soviet vehicle comparison.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It still has a turret cage and a turret despite having no gun.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          the gun is a decoy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >the gun is a decoy.

            Yes it has no gun, but it still has a turret cage because it has a useless turret. Why not just have some fixed superstructure that looks like a turret ?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              im pretty sure they are just rebuilt regular cv90s so they probably didnt want to be bothered.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Stripbv 90
      People complain about german words, but here we've got the stridsledningspansarbandvagn 90 and nobody bats an eye

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >stridsledningspansarbandvagn
        i like it almost as much as the Granatkastarpansarbandvagn. Which is the longest work i know with only one kind of vowel

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Granatkastarpansarbandvagnarna
          (plural, definite article)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what the frick is this language. Is that a curse?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Is that a curse?
              For the guys downrange it is.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Granatkastarpansarbandvagn
          I love those things, wish we could see them in Ukraine

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Pansarvärnsrobotbandvagn 551 just rolls of the tungue in comparison

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Børk Børk Børk!
        There, satisfied?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >is it true that there is some legal clause that stops us from seeing CV90 kino?

    There is no ukrainan sourced strv 122 / archer footage either. So yes, its likely true that the ukies have been told to not make any footage.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There is Archer footage.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes of it firing but as far as I know no credited footage of targets being assploded.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >nords
      >humbly ask you not to garishly flaunt their vehicles
      >americans
      >OUR SHIT KILLING RUSSIANS? FRICK YEAH FILL THE INTERNET WITH THAT SHIT
      Ah, cultural differences.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >bradley this bradley that
    we see Bradley just because the brigade in the hottest area of responsibility of the Russian offensive has a Bradley at its disposal, that has good media (47th brigade), that's all. Defensive positioning is key, you saw Bradley offensively and it was horrible, as it is for any other equip

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >you saw Bradley offensively and it was horrible, as it is for any other equip

      Any armored vehicle, including the CV90 running head first into mines is gonna fail and be bogged down. Anti-tank mines are very good.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    On the topic of media, I found some recent translated snippets from the 21st who use them.
    https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/cv9040_is_the_deadliest_ifv_against_russians_soldiers_of_ukrainian_21st_mech_brigade_about_the_swedish_combat_vehicle-9657.html
    Notable things are that they like the barracuda camo, the CV90 survived a 120mm shell to the ass, it's maneuverable enough to act as a recovery vehicle, and russians are willing to use two T-90s to engage a single CV90.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >barracuda camo
      whats stopping them from putting that shit on bradleys

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ooo that's a nice find.

      I wonder how the 40mm compares to smaller autocannons?
      I mean there are videos of Bradleys and BTR-4s engaging rus tanks and the CV90 firepower is getting high praise
      >Because they cannot reach them with anything, they did not hesitate to send out two T-90s to get just one CV. At the beginning, as we heard from interceptions, they confused them with tanks very often. Spent two Grad salvos per CV. The 120mm mortars, artillery — everything is firing at just one "box." Because they understand: if it reaches its [firing] point and starts working, then they will immediately have 200s and 300s (deceased and wounded - ed.)
      bofors stronk

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >that little boot brush on the glacis
    How polite!

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Bradley is designed and built by a British company.
    The Brits for whatever reason are just more eager to see their shit below up Russians.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Brits
      >no warriors
      >only 14 challengers

      brit-bros...

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You've had your first warrior thread deleted.
    This abomination is still up, so is your "Why do the British police have such silly loadouts?" thread.
    Do I need to break out 'the pasta', or are you going to behave tonight?

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Even worse, I'm not getting to see better footage of the Ukrainian bootleg m113 they've developed. The Gavinchencko, if you will.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard, why are you always such a homosexual?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *