Bong tank wins NATO competition

Bongs beat all comers in latest NATO competition (Iron Spear competition held in Latvia).
For months everyone has been saying the Challenger 2 was the worst tank in NATO, and I understand the arguments here. So is this more down to the crews than the vehicles?
It should also be noted that Spanish crews took three out of six prize places in two categories, so power to based Paella people.

https://www.forces.net/nato/challenger-2-tank-wins-nato-competition-ahead-leopard-and-abrams-tanks
https://en.defence-ua.com

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bong tanks are best tanks.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its probably just a gunnery test and they probably won because of the rifled gun. Its not a real test of anything

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      cope and seethe you fricking yank/frog/kraut c**t

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hit a nerve lol it's obvious who is coping & seething

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Challenger was just proven to be the best tank in the world. Check the OP for NATO trials

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Everything I've read on the subject suggests that to be the case. It seems that it's just a shooting competition. Not that that's an unimportant thing for a tank to be tested on, but I didn't see anyone disputing the accuracy of the challenger to begin with so I'm forced to conclude that op is a homosexual.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Not that that's an unimportant thing for a tank to be tested on, but I didn't see anyone disputing the accuracy of the challenger to begin
        heres the thing i dont get with the poster who do shit on the Chally, what exactly is it they think is so bad about it?

        its very very well armoured, has decent speed, very very good off road mobility, its very accurate as far as the gun is concerned,

        I know the gun is rifled instead of the standard smooth bore but its still capable of wrecking every likely opponent

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >very
          >very very
          >very good
          >likely
          Wow
          Such descriptive
          Almost as good as the cope updates

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It’s very slow and uses 2 piece ammo

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It’s very slow
            Meme metric
            It's still faster than a Bradley and the off road speed isn't appreciably worse than other tanks
            Drag races on concrete are not a valid comparison for tanks

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >it’s 2 mph faster than a Bradley
              That’s terrible for a tank meant to breakthrough enemy lines.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The bongs brought the best crew this year I'd wager. These competitions are usually more about the people than the hardware. Challenger 2 needs some love and is long in the tooth, but its good to see some fight still in her.

                Not really. MBTs shouldn't be outrunning their support. An advance is only sustainable at the speed of the slowest vic within it, which is probably the logistics end of things. Nor is it a tank's job to break through enemy lines alone. Its the entire formation's job.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The challenger is the slowest vic in the formation. They don’t roll with bradleys

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It also stores ammo with the crew which is a massive drawback

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It’s very slow
            its the same speed as a abrams off road, slower on a road sure but the whole point of having tracks in the first place is off road mobility. it also has a greater operational range

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              But it stores ammo with the crew. It makes me sick

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                in water filled bins, anything that sets those off has already killed the crew.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Not a real test of anything
                Maybe, but the Challenger is a well battle tested tank unlike the rest aside from the Abrams.
                [...]
                The few rounds stored in the hull are in individual armored containers.
                Are you the moron that tried to sow division in the last thread but got btfod?

                It stores ammo with the crew. Huge no no

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It stores ammo with the crew in an armored individual compartments
                Ftfy moron

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                That’s infinitely worse than how the abrams stores ammo

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If what your saying is true how come there are so many rekt abrams? Seems like you've been cheated.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                They’ve seen an order of magnitude more combat, have run over massive mines, and have been used by shitty Arab countries. The challenger 2 just straight up hasn’t seen a lot of combat. That doesn’t make it a bad tank it just doesn’t have a lot of real world experience

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/GJZQ3rU.jpg

                The posts are less than a minute apart. Your delusions are manifesting

                What made you come back from your hiatus?
                Autism?
                Lack of life?
                Or was it much simpler than that, the Warrior living rent free in your head

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is objectively false. Its seen more combat than most MBTs, and has been hit by enemy fire and survived many times also

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It’s been hit by rpgs and penetrated by a kornet frontally. It’s a safe queen

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The challenger 2 has seen very little combat

                >Wins every war its been in
                The outcome of the 2003 invasion would've been the same even if the bongs drove mark Vs into battle because they didn't really matter.

                The Bradley ifv is:
                Fat
                Slow
                Vulnerable
                Has bad mobility
                Is accident prone
                Has bad visibility for the driver

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What sort of cope is this

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Post your shit toolbag so we can all laugh again

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Not a real test of anything
      Maybe, but the Challenger is a well battle tested tank unlike the rest aside from the Abrams.

      But it stores ammo with the crew. It makes me sick

      The few rounds stored in the hull are in individual armored containers.
      Are you the moron that tried to sow division in the last thread but got btfod?

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    So?
    Russia dominated their tank competitions and come to find out, it literally doesn't matter in real combat.
    Goes to show how important strategy is over individual unit skill.

    Go home and come back when you can make a quality thread.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia dominated their tank competitions and come to find out, it literally doesn't matter in real combat.
      >Russia dominated their scripted tank displays
      Gee, what a totally interesting, shocking, and relevant point!

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes considering that it's just a gunnery competition and there is no reason to suggest it is indicative of general tank performance.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Wins Gunnery comps
          >Wins every war its been in
          >Wins never being destroyed by enemy fire
          Damn Challenger, you win all of that

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            So we're counting the sandbox as a win now?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              The challenger 2 has seen very little combat

              >Wins every war its been in
              The outcome of the 2003 invasion would've been the same even if the bongs drove mark Vs into battle because they didn't really matter.

              Lmao warriortard, your too easy to bait.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The posts are less than a minute apart. Your delusions are manifesting

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The challenger 2 has seen very little combat

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >The challenger 2 has seen very little combat
              but more than any western MBT but the abrams and with more tank kills than anything but the abrams as well, with no loses to enemy action

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just because it’s second doesn’t mean it’s seen any meaningful combat because it hasn’t

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is just the product of not bothering to google shit

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                but it has demonstrated that it can resist most russian ATGMs, and despite some criticism of its ammo storage it seems to have worked in action, the friendly fire kill involved a significant blast entering the turret and hull via a open hatch, the storage protected the crew long enough to abandon the tank.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Wins every war its been in
            The outcome of the 2003 invasion would've been the same even if the bongs drove mark Vs into battle because they didn't really matter.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia dominated their tank competitions
      but those were just a dozen T-72 clones doing some stunts, plus russia rigged it every time

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do HATO tanks make ballet too?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      What a cultured nation. And those sweet bow ties on the armored vehicle, such grace.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      can the F-15E dance like that? I don't think so

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >national surrealism

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The challenger 2 is the best armoured MBT in service, pretty much. Other than that it's old in tooth. However it shows that British soldiers can do a lot with a little

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      So which one is it? Is the chally the best MBT, or are british soldiers forced cope with poor equient?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        As in we don't need many tanks

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The challenger 2 is the best armoured MBT in service, pretty much.
      Mate, what? I’m a Brit and this is fricking mental. The Chally 2 is slow and extremely unreliable, we could barely keep them running in the Middle East, we kept having to cannibalise other tanks back home for their engines.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Mate, what? I’m a Brit and this is fricking mental
        If you were a Brit you would have said, THAT is fricking mental, you disgusting ESL turdie way to out yourself with a terrible false flag.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody can read. The best armoured, as in its armoured protection is best. Armour.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          > as in its armoured protection is best
          Surely you’re about to back this up

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Google it warriortard

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/2908679.stm
            14 RPGs and a Milan, pretty good going.
            There's an official claim of one tank sustaining approx. 70 rpg hits. This could be baloney of course but we have little to go on. The point is chally 2s have found themselves stuck and surrounded by enemies firing RPGs at them for hours and have gone back into battle after minor repairs on a couple of occasions

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Bongs aren’t a reliable source.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Equally the armour is classified but it was enticing enough for the tanks to license it from us

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yanks* and tanks I guess.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Abrams ditched chobham

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                so did challenger 2 but both are using a derivative of Chobham

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The US is using its own brand new armor. The fact that it used to have chobham isn’t relevant

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The US uses a proprietary armor suite with multiple components including depleted uranium. it’s about as british as civilian gun ownership is

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >armoured
      Check out the bonghole sucking his own dick.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just wish you could tag armatard in posts like this. I was hoping he'd come in here and get stuck for several days. In fact I've not seen him on here for ages, I hope he's alright

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I didn't feel like pretending to be "him" today.
      Maybe next time.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        didn't felt like sucking all them donkey dicks, eh?

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >bongs finally win a single time
    >CHALLENGER BEST TNAK!!!!!!!!!!
    kek

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The British care so much about stuff like this that they send the best crews. The challenger is the worst of the big 3 western tanks

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Challenger the hedgehog says “gotta go fast”

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I demand a recount

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh morons and Russians ever said chally is shit. I won't argue its the best tank ever, but its pretty good and can do the job its expected to do. Russia has the luxury of having like 6 different MBT's of varying quality in service, so they can always say "well t-90tbfuv has x capability on paper so it's better"

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard tried to get new material but defaulted back to his factory settings of mobik peasantry

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is the way of the warriortard

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is the way of the warriortard

      You are a giant homosexual

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *