Best delivery system for nukes.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody believes your imaginary weapon designs anymore.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Best delivery system for nukes.
    lets rock, posleen boy

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Armatard sucks donkey dicks.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Solid rocket fueled ICBMs.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The west has been silent ever since Putin unveiled these bad boys, HATO btfo forever

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >USA proposes 1970s tech as new
        >everyone claps
        >Russia unveils 2020 tech
        >boooo
        you are a shill easy

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          hypersonic missiles, night vision, etc, are all WWII tech, poseidon would be useful for North Korea to have, because they have so few of them, but Russias supposed to have proper arsenal

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Russian vaporware isn't real anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            kek in reality theres a volunteer crew inside the Russian "autonomous" suicide nuclear torpedo

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The nuclear material and fuel was probably also sold off by the entrepreneurial volunteer crew at the earliest opportunity

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Probably not. Nuclear weapons is the branch that the Kremlin probably has zero tolerance for corruption.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Nuclear weapons is the branch that the Kremlin probably has zero tolerance for corruption.
                on the other hand.. its the safest place to embezzle from, because no one is ever going to use one, right?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >in reality theres a volunteer crew inside the Russian "autonomous" suicide nuclear torpedo
              more like "volunteer" crew lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                if its not a real volunteer crew it might seek out a Russian target instead

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Russia is very good when it comes to "volunteering".

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                the rumors of t-34 crews being welded inside the tanks during battle of Moscow to prevent desertion are just propaganda!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                the T-34 crews voluntarily got welded into the tanks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry, should we laugh louder so you can hear us?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably not the best but one of the most fun.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nuke tipped LRASM's if we are talking about plane launched. nice n stealthy. ICBMs or SLBMs are still kings. MIRV is god.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What website/video game is this?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        dont worry about it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty please? I want to know, this looks pretty interesting

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Command: modern operations

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being a Russian conscript dying after a mortar shell lands in your trench on the Kherson front today, your limbs torn and mangled and as your life drips away along with your blood, you think
    >a-at least the TV man can shake his fist at america with big nukes

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What’s the point of this, isn’t an icbm or any other kind of missile better in every way ?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's way to make the US waste a lot of money in developing a counter-measure in comparation to just developing this thing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >leaks radiation as it travels
        i dont think radiation detectors around the international waters that surround russia would be super expensive, and ill bet more than a few western nations will pay for it along with the US anyways and money isnt even real.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >glowies spend a few $1000 on buying vatnik scientists and engineers drinks until they reveal that the wunderwaffen is just bullshit, instead

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But in what scenario is this thing useful ? I mean you use it and fuck some harbours, which you could have fucked with an ICBM. 20min later whole russia is glass. What’s the point ?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it is supposedly also a salted warhead, radioactive tsunami and long-term area denial.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Most likely, it is not a single drone/torpedo type but a testbed for family of them. Poseidon drones could be used to target carrier battle groups.

            ok so you fucked up a few carrier group & salted NY. Then 20min later whole russia is glass. Seems this is just a bigger boot to give a bigger kick to a hornet nest. Very stupid

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That’s not how it works and Russians are retarded for thinking it is

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Most likely, it is not a single drone/torpedo type but a testbed for family of them. Poseidon drones could be used to target carrier battle groups.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what happened to the hypervelocity missiles?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Why would you rely on just one type of weapon to counter your enemy?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you know, in reality, you want to produce your war winning weapons in large quantities, then deploy them before your enemy knows they even exist

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                name a single time this has ever happened in real life. ww2 nukes don't count because japs already knew about them

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Germans were reportedly shocked to run into the t-34

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                yes nobody thought you could make a tank that shitty. imagine if china invaded australia tomorrow and aussies fielded a MILLION bob-semple tanks. China would be shocked but that doesn't make the tank good.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The battle of cambrai is a good example.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because the US spends more on just their strategic missile forces than Russia spends on all branches combined.

                Even accounting for the difference in PPP GDP they have the funding to perhaps do ONE thing well, the fact that they claim to have *more* delivery types in service than the US makes me think we're looking at Potemkin toys, not viable delivery vehicles.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Or part of the nuclear arsenal is funded through the black budget.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I seriously doubt Putin would let any of his mansion-yacht funds go to waste on actual defence spending.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Russia can't even into palletized logistics, they're sure as fuck not making maneuvering hypersonics.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >If you can't stack 30,000 chinese-made dildos on a forklift there's NO CHANCE you can win a nuclear war!
                This is your brain on modern american culture

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                More like if you can't do something extremely cheap and easy with entire civilian manuals explaining exactly how to do it in ways an idiot could understand, and with clear, tangible benefits to a war you are currently waging there is zero chance you'll manage to do something difficult and expensive which nobody else has managed to do yet, civilian or military.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >If you can't stack 30,000 chinese-made dildos on a forklift there's NO CHANCE you can win a nuclear war!
                basically, yeah.
                If you can't do basic logistics you cannot win any kind of war

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm glad all Russians seem to be born retarded, WW3 is going to be like clubbing seals.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm glad all Russians seem to be born retarded
                plot twist: Putin has been a NATO spy all along

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Initial claim of 100 MTs turned out incorrect
    >actually 2 MTs

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so what happens if someone tracks one of these down in the ocean and yoinks it? they just get free access to a nuclear material?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i dont think any terrorist will be getting deep enough to "yoink it".

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you can just chuck a deep net and fuck it. submarines run into this how will an autonomous robot fix that?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >autonomous robot
          they will probably scuttle it remotely if it gets nabbed or crashes or breaks down, so the world doesnt find out about the hamster-vatniks, running it "autonomously", they are getting crushed like grapes in a pop-can.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        God imagine if some submarine crew went rogue and pulled this off somehow. It would be glorious.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's obviously a prototype for future nuclear-powered drones with or without a conventional warhead. The Chinese seem to be thinking developing their own Poseidon.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >This bad boy reduced the American fleet into a pile of radioactive ash.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >US super hackers hijack sub
    >take it to crush depth
    oops

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My God.
    I can't believe it.
    Russians actually managed to create completely useless nuclear weapon concept.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      angloid cope

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, I know that russians think that "physics" is a western fascist concept and does not apply to them.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't even exist
    >Y-yes it does!
    Then where is the evidence? This weapon has supposedly existed for twenty years and yet there's nothing

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Picture unrelated, I assume?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Shaped like a phallus to remind Russian conscripts of their training

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    But where is that little guy suppose to sit? They don't even have a steering wheel inside. Retarded.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      METAL GEAR?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Unquestionably true, this is definitely the best delivery system for nuclear weapons.

    But we should definitely keep looking for even better delivery systems while it is developing.

    For example, I had this weird idea the other day. What if we were to design submarines POWERED by nukes, that can launch nuclear missiles at LAND targets? That way you could deliver your nukes in the span of minutes instead of days, and attack anywhere on the continent.

    Failing that, you could just design a really big missile and strap a nuke to it. It sounds crazy, but they could actually go into SPACE and then come back down, being almost impossible to intercept. Or even just put your nukes on a plane-- I was researching on Wikipedia that planes actually can travel faster than torpedos! I thought that was an interesting fact and I'm surprised nobody's ever thought of that idea before.

    Anyway I look forward to this innovative new concept by russia, hopefully sometime after they finish the first few hundred Su-57s

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Eat shit, Paneuropeans

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i love how these threads virtually disappeared for months, only to randomly start back up again.
    you need to see a doctor, OP , who is almost definitely armatard.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    cool

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      thread was at page 10 when he bumped it with a 1 word post just like he always has

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cool

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who fucking cares? Once they're on their way that's it. One bomb is all it takes and the rest will follow. It doesn't matter if one gets there slightly faster.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    More wunderwaffe that will either never be built, or built in small numbers but won't work well due to vatnik engineering

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ups

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2000 mm diameter
    >20 m length
    >100 t mass
    Are they going to design a whole new class of submarines as well? I doubt they could fit tubes this big on current designs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They already did. They are using a modified Oscar that doubles as a spy sub.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nuclear hound dog

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    topkek, he still does it. armatard never ceases to amaze. pure unadulterated autism, not even the good kind.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    muh dick

Your email address will not be published.