>be vanka. >18, poor as fuck. >drafted. >12 weeks training. >get to front. >cold as shit, miserable

>be vanka
>18, poor as fuck
>drafted
>12 weeks training
>get to front
>cold as shit, miserable
>see someone's science fair project flying towards you
>two dozen grenades fall out
>cyкa

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want to see drones dropping cinder blocks

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Think more comedic: bees

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Drop a beehive on some vatniks to cause a panic while you sneak by in stealth to ninja their gems

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Worked for the Germans in WW1

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        would this bee considered chemical weapon?
        if not, someone should definitely breed bees stinging with neurotoxins.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no, bees are clearly biological weapons

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the X-Files did that

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Bioweapon of mass destruction from the hohil nazi biolabs

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        a battlefield woefully underpopulated by bees?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Think more comedic: bees

      Think more practical: Lazy Dogs. 13x44mm drag stabilized cast iron bullets dropped out of planes. No UXO, can be can dug up after securing the area with a magnet, hit like a .50 cal bullet.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_Dog_(bomb)

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unironically this might be useful. Everyone has allowed their industrial capabilities to degrade so far that raw production of high explosive and shells is a limiting factor right now. But fucking any industrial nation with some level of steel production/use could churn those things out by the tens of millions.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Flechettes were already reported in Bucha a year ago.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the future of modern warfare?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IIRC isn't Australia testing drones with fuselage made out of literal cardboard?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, that's the one. Specs, cost, etc.?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            $100,000 plus tip

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I thought cardboard was out, with no string or cellotape either

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I want to be perfectly clear that it is highly unusual for the front to fall off one of these drones

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              But what about this one?

              https://i.imgur.com/LaZlF4r.jpg

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well it was hit by wind - one in a million chance of that happening in the air
                I just want to clear up that the allegations that these drones are made as cheaply as possible to drop as many grenades as possible onto vatniks to be completely nonsense

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well thank you for visiting us Senator

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's only for shipping

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Nintendo Labo expansion pack

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I can now call my foam board r/c planes military grade uavs

          Sometimes I almost don't hate this timeline.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          moron that's foamboard, and the good stuff too.

          someone decided to try and copy Flite Test's homework to get defense dollars? lmao

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/LaZlF4r.jpg

        why not?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If by "testing" you mean "actively shipping to Ukraine for use against the Russians" then yes, Australia is testing cardboard drones

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Great, given the average lifespan of a drone, that’s rather smart.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Too many man hours for something that could be made way cheaper, but yes, soon the era of cheap, man-portable anti-personnel PGMs will be upon us.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Too many man hours
        That's plywood, styrofoam, duct tape and a simple controller. That wouldn't take someone with a bandsaw more than 2 days to make.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >12 weeks training

    They'd be lucky to get 12 days before being sent to the front.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The twelve weeks includes walking from the other side of the Urals to Leningrad and then from there to the front.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eбaть))

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eбaть is the literal verb "to fuck." It is not usually used as an exclamation. блядь would be a better fit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It is not usually used as an exclamation

        It is though.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is.
        t. native russian speaker

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is an exclamation of surprise
        Synonyms:
        Eбaнyтьcя
        Ёбaный cыp нaхyй
        Oхyeть

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >two dozen grenades fall out
    Surely that thing is designed to drop grenades one by one.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Quadcopter drones are accurate because they hover. A fixed wing drone dropping unguided bombs is only getting WW1 levels of accuracy so you need to drop a lot of them at once.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        While hovering does help this
        >is only getting WW1 levels of accuracy
        is way too far anon. For one thing a slow fixed wing drone is still massively closer to the ground and moving far slower. Even guided by a human it's just plain a lot fucking easier to hit what you're aiming at from 100' up vs 12000' up. Also while given how ghetto it looks I'm assuming it's probably full manual, in principle there is no reason, even with hyper ghetto hardware, that the software can't still be fairly sophisticated. Such is the magic of software, something that took a team of phds a year to write might then still be run on any toaster in the world for zero marginal cost. Cameras and a basic 1000' laser range finder are fucking cheap too. So in priniciple it'd be perfectly feasible to rig up a plenty decent "operator highlights target, computer figures out the release timing" setup. Don't need a whole lot of math to crunch that even with pretty minimal data when you're that low. That'd get you a relatively tight cep.

        Though since grenades are also very cheap and russia favors meatwaves doesn't hurt to release a spread. Computer timed spread would be even better.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >drafted
    >12 weeks training

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >>12 weeks training
    more like 12 days training

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's no way that actually flies, right?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They didn't mount the wings for the picture.
      Even with them I still have my doubts

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see the novelty of it, really. There are already stacked mine spreading devices. For helicopters mind you, but the idea is not exactly new.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSM-1_mine_system

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *