babe wake up new Tempest model just dropped

babe wake up new Tempest model just dropped

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    TOTAL

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      whoops meant to say GCAP

      ?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        sexy camo

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's tempest Bro, GCAP is just for the JDM audience who think Japan can do it alone. BAE have lead design on the airframe.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >YF-23 looking fighter
        >Italian flag and colors
        >IAF
        CHE COSA?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Italy joined the ass end of Tempest, and since that is no longer happening as it merged with GCAP, Italy is now joined on the ass end of GCAP with the UK and Japan leading.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            GCAP is team tempest, the program is still running, the 2,500 people in the UK working on it are still working on it. Go listen to the official tempest podcast.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >official tempest podcast
              The future is fricking weird.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine's MoD twitter account regularly posts spicy memes, i'm totally fine with it.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Official tempest podcast

              I know this is probably well-managed by PR and diplomat types but I immediately envisioned, and now desperately want, a multinational cast of engineers arguing about pointless minutae to do with the development of this thing.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            But why

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              They want a 6th gen fighter and now they're first in line as a customer and will likely get some contracts for Italian manufacturing out of it as well as priority on orders and maybe even some influence on the design itself (better integration with existing italian air force/navy systems/weapons/etc).

              So yeah. If Italy wants a good fighter for the 2040s and beyond this is a good thing.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              why not?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly looks really fricking cool, really hope it doesn't end up with trapezoid wing like the f35

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/fD3kUlr.jpg

        babe wake up new Tempest model just dropped

        The Italian military is very aesthetic.

        >APC with a 60mm autocannon and more armor than a tracked Marder IFV

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      SHITALIAN?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        VICTORY

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks familiar

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      RCS is RCS.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/9vZA0bf.png

      Seems to be the same as the concept shown off in Japan earlier this year. The model does look more detailed though.
      Hopefully, that means they're finalizing the design

      By the way when i said it looked familiar I didn't want to look like i was b***hing or imply that they copied the other design or whatever.

      The convergent evolution between the two as the designs refine is getting hilarious. I expect levels of flamewar on part with the fiercest Rafale/Typhoon debates we got until then.

      I also find quite interesting that design teams and engineers at the scale of a whole continent are trained in such a similar way than the optimum shapes to fit all requirements are once again so close.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Rafale won that contest by a country mile and I fully expect the FCAS to win here also

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          ok

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Get your head out of your ass Nigel, Rafale F5 will be basically a 4.9 ++ Gen aircraft on par if not better than the F 35

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              ok

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Rafale won that contest by a country mile and I fully expect the FCAS to win here also

              Wow. Open your mouth and remove all doubt eh?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                He isn't wrong in saying that the Rafale is better than the Typhoon. Now, on the Rafale being better than an F35 we can have a laugh together

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >better than current EFAs
                arguable
                >better than Phase 4 upgrade EFAs
                nah

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Spergs a sperg whether he is right or wrong

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you for seeing the truth. Again, the F5 will not be rolled out beforr 2030 so we still have to wait but you will all see

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >He isn't wrong in saying that the Rafale is better than the Typhoon
                he is wrong and has been for at least a decade.

                the only edge rafale has over typhoon is a slightly higher theoretical max bomb load, which is made less relevant by typhoons greater range of PGMs, A2A is clearly in typhoons favour, having both superior aerodynamic performance and better A2A weapons, meteor with 2 way datalink being better than meteor with one way datalink and ASRAAM and IRIS-T both shitting on magic and MICA

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >superior aerodynamic performance

                No the rafale beats typhoon on several metrics inc role and turn rate. The test results were from evaluations for several countries, you can find them yourself. Typhoon does have slightly higher top speed, rate of climb and acceration due to better power/weight ratio.

                The Rafale has a far better EW suite that Typhoon is still playing catch up even with the pretorian upgrades. So much so that the Rafale was able to bomb Libyan targets without american EW help, unlike the Typhoon. Also it has AESA radar which again is still not on typhoon for a few more years (and in RAF case only around half the fleet will get them).

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Rafale has better aerodynamics at low alt while the Typhoon has the edge at high alt
                also iirc Italian and German Typhoons too will receive the ECRS mk.2 iirc

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.leonardo.com/en/news-and-stories-detail/-/detail/leonardo_raf_ecrs_mk2_delivery

                Still years away, wont even have its first flight until 2024.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Germany is only getting ECRS Mk.1 so far, and will probably stick with it because it's being made in Germany where Mk.2 has no German input.
                There are 3 concurrent AESA radars for Typhoon:
                >Mk.0 that was developed by the EuroRADAR consortium and is now being put in Kuwaiti and Qatari Eurofighters
                >Mk.1 which was mainly developed by Leonardo in Italy, but now transferred to Hensoldt in Germany who will work with Indra in Spain
                >Mk.2 which is a UK-specified radar that's being developed by Leonardo in Scotland, but now getting additional support from Leonardo personnel transferred from Italy as they prepare to join the project

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Rafale cant sustain a vertical turn, Eurofighter can, thats all we need to know.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                A good PESA is better than a shit AESA. ECRS mk2 is a huge step forward, like stupidly so when compared to RBE2, it's further ahead that the radars we currently have on 5th gens. It's an easy de-risk for Tempest which will have a more advanced (more power hungry) version.

                >https://uk.leonardo.com/en/news-and-stories-detail/-/detail/futuristic-radar-uk-future-combat-aircraft-capture-equivalent-city-worth-data-in-a-second

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tempest isn't merged with Japan for GCAP now, and the Japanese have better Radars, so expect GCAP to use a Mitsubishi radar. Japan was flying AESA radar in the F-16 (F-2) before the US was.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >isn't
                is

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't bother you're on a anglo board with absolutely abyssmal weapon and military knowledge. They've been fed the Murdock propaganda for half a century.
                Just post e-girls with guns.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why are french people such stupid, angry Black folk?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >anon makes a respectful informed post with reasonable arguments

                >wretched anglo responds with xenophobic, racist remark revealing what a classless, nasty little twerp he his.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >REEEEcism
                Okay, cheese-eating surrender monkey.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Frog makes delusional, overly self important post
                >Muh racism
                Lmao

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine thinking dogfighting capabilities are still the most important metrics.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, convergent evolution is pretty natural since there's only so many ways you can make a plane shape stealthy.

        At least, if you are not going the America direction which is making a stealth shape that can fly.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you want both fighter-tier aerodynamics and thorough stealth, your range of designs drastically narrows.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems to be the same as the concept shown off in Japan earlier this year. The model does look more detailed though.
    Hopefully, that means they're finalizing the design

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, no, this model

      https://i.imgur.com/Akx2LLP.jpg

      whoops meant to say GCAP

      ?

      doesn't have control surfaces modeled. Weird.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        where we’re going you won’t need control surfaces

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s not going to be as good as whatever america produces

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't need to be, it just needs to be domestically produced.

      It can even cost more than what the US is doing and it'll still be a win for the UK/Japan/Italy.

      Domestic production is ALWAYS preferable to export, even if the capabilities are a bit worse or it costs more.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't need to be, and the US military would agree. Some have gotten the idea in their minds that because the US is giving out F-35s like their free samples to everyone, then they'll naturally do the same for any future stealth air superiority fighter. The F-35 is a next-gen F-16 in terms of the desire to have as many partners and allies who want/need/can afford them. The F-22 is not a fighter anyone else but the US operates and to my knowledge it's intended to stay that way.

      It'll likely be the same for NGAD and as such, it would be really, really nice if Europeans partners and Allies had something that could be considered comparable in capability and performance that was domestically produced (believe it or not the US *does* actually want its allies to maintain their homegrown defense industries).

      The Tempest will probably be excellent, but it doesn't need to be jussasgud as whatever the US comes up with, just the same way the Eurofighter doesn't *need* to be an F-22. It's comparable in performance, and therefore would compliment the F-22 well, as the F-22 would well compliment the Eurofighter. This is how alliances work.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's fine. America will once again refuse to export their next air superiority fighter so the other nations of the world must produce their own. Since FCAS is a never ever, that leaves GCAP and whatever vaporware the chinks can shit out. It doesn't need to be better than NGAD, it just needs to be better than everything else (which it will be by a large margin).

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        This and I don't understand american animosity towards the project it's bizarre

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't understand american animosity towards the project
          There isn't any animosity in particular...

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          There isn't any, the more Europe invests into defending Europe the better.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm just glad it's even slightly different to the same F-22 profile that everyone is lazily reproducing

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's kind of like the F-2 and F-22 fugged

      Little bit of the X-2 in there as well.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Ld1OmRK.jpg

      It's kind of like the F-2 and F-22 fugged

      Little bit of the X-2 in there as well.

      based

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      turns out there's not too many different shapes that are both stealthy and airworthy. if you don't want to go full flying triangle you're pretty much locked into an f22/35 looking nose.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >turns out there's not too many different shapes that are both stealthy and airworthy. if you don't want to go full flying triangle you're pretty much locked into an f22/35 looking nose.
        right you are. that doesn't change that I'm relieved to see even a slight bit of variety in this area of design, at least.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          is that a super tomcat?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            technically this is the Super Tomcat, that other art is concept for a navalized ATF, so just an F-22 with variable wings

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          swing wings will never come back, adaptive engines will do that job better anyway

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy time for the cancerous bong circlejerk to jerk over a wooden mockup, reminder that France, South Korea, Turkey, Sweden and Japan also have wooden mockups of 5th gen fighters.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd be mad too if i had to wait until 2050 for my 5.5gen French/German fighter that the international market is rejecting.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are mistaken, the 2050 date is for the German-French tank, the German-French 5th gen is for 2100.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like how Sweden basically just admitted they were only paying into Tempest to spy on their R&D to see if they wanted to steal any of it for Gripen upgrades.

    They had no interest long-term in the program or buying the planes that are made from it.
    And as such they're not buying into GCAP.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're inventing your own narrative.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        > Sources also said Sweden had been interested in tracking GCAP to help support future upgrade work on its own Gripen fighter, as manufactured by Saab.

        We'll see what happens i guess :^)

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sweden isn't a joke and has some crazy good EW tech, look at their homegrown AWACS.

          They're a welcome addition to the Tempest/GCAP team and will put in as much as they take out.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well they've offered nothing but scant funding so far.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Eh, I'm sure something is happening behind the scenes.

              I hope anyway - they have some good experience with radar's and I don't think Britain can make it's own A2A radars yet (although Japan has experience).

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't think Britain can make it's own A2A radars yet
                https://www.leonardo.com/en/news-and-stories-detail/-/detail/leonardo_raf_ecrs_mk2_delivery
                and before you say
                >But Leonardo is Italian!
                The division of Leonardo that's making it up in Edinburgh is what was once the British avionics company Ferranti

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh wow, colour me surprised.
                Wasn't underestimating Britains ability btw, just wanted to counter the claim that Sweden wasn't willing put in its own research.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Japan has arguably the MOST experience in manufacturing the small GaN modules for modern AESA radars, and have had AESA radar in fighter jets since the early 2000s.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do they make their own AWACS?
                SAAB's approach to Radars is the whole "not just a radar" thing where they want to integrate basic AWACs functions into it to make it more multi-purpose.

                I'm sure they have something to offer the program and aren't just leaching off. Chances are they won't use the Tempest/GCAP and will instead make their own 5/6th gen (single engined more than likely).

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm sure they have something to offer the program and aren't just leaching off. Chances are they won't use the Tempest/GCAP and will instead make their own 5/6th gen (single engined more than likely).
                Are you talking about Japan or Sweden here?

                Japan has already settled on a twin engined air superiority fighter.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sweden.
                They make their own AWACS and will probably continue with a single engine design.

                Japan requires twin engines for greater range and ops over water.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's gripen upgrades until mars?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, the Gripen platform in it's current form is pretty much the limit of what it can do. Whilst it will continue to be produced from what I've heard the Swedes are balls deep in Flygsystem.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They are working with autonomous figher drones adjacent to tempest

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Proof?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Doesn't seam like it has made a press release yet. Its bas been something I have heard from acquaintances that work in SAAB so I expected it to be in the open.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bros...
    Imagine

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Too much of a brainlet to know if this would actually have any chance of being stealthy but it looks really cool

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Too much of a brainlet to know if this would actually have any chance of being stealthy but it looks really cool

      Looks like the F-16XL wings on an F-35.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      MY BODY IS READY

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/JC0AxzT.jpg

      MY BODY IS READY

      Soon™

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like their roundel, it seems to be quite different from the F/A-XX which is a flying wing. Why you figure that?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You reckon different doctrines?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because they're still trying to produce a 5th gen larping as a 6th gen. They took the McDonnell Douglas/BAE JSF design and added two engines to it. How original, and forward-thinking.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Japan already has and there'd be no point in designing something that doesn't fit in the battlespace of the future. They'd more likely use a similar design as the F/A-XX but cut corners if they struggled to produce it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Japan already has
          Where? Are you talking about the 5th gen MINUS japtor? Making an entry level 5th gen with US help is FAR from making a domestic 6th gen.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >with US help
            Show me on what part of the X-2 was US made. Be specific.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Most of it. Where do you think they got the design from? LM.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hahahahahahaha

                Good job confirming you have no idea what you're talking about.

                Do you REALLY think Lockheed did that and then NEVER published any media info, no PR blurbs, no web pages about Japanese/Lockheed cooperation like they do with all the F-35 and F-2 milestones and collab work.

                I mean come on. Post ANYTHING that links lockheed to the Mitsubishi X-2. I mean it, literally ANY contract or research/dev work.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you REALLY think Lockheed did that and then NEVER published any media info, no PR blurbs
                Depends on their cooperation agreements. Japan can't even make a commercial jet, or an F-16 knock-off by themselves, and you expect me to believe they jump into the 5/6th gen fighter arena? KEK. Defending nips on 4Chinz isn't going to get you laid by some flat faced nip prostitute, my obese fren. Time to go to bed, Kurt.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                So your source for Lockheed is "trust me bro, the nips couldn't do it alone"

                Wow. I'm convinced now. The fact Japan finished the X-2 flight tests and then asked Northrop and Lockheed to submit design proposals for a joint US/Japanese fighter surely means Japan was already working with Lockheed. I mean if Japan JUST finished a 10 year development project with lockheed it makes perfect sense that they'd then IMMEDIATELY go ask lockheed to work on ANOTHER decade+ long fighter development project.

                I mean come on, it doesn't even make sense lmao. Your argument isn't based in reality and contradicts basically everything we DO know about the Mitsubishi X-2 / F-X and now GCAP.

                Is lockheed also secretly involved with GCAP too?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                They've been working together since the F-2 sharing tech. You know this, though, my obese nip loving fren.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Of course, Mitsubishi supplies the GaN modules for the newest AN/SPY-6 and other radars, US defense contractor buy Japanese tech all the time.

                But you're moronic if you think Lockheed had ANYTHING directly to do with the Mitsubishi X-2. The entire point of the X-2 project was to attempt to develop a domestic 5th gen demonstrator, if they couldnt do that without Lockheeds help, then there would have been no point to even run the project in the first place, they could've just asked Northrop or Lockheed to submit design proposals (which is exactly what Japan did after the X-2 flight tests finished and Japan decided not to go forward with production).

                Again, it makes zero sense what you're saying. You're saying Japan had Lockheed develop the X-2, cancel it, just to then go back to lockheed and ask them to submit another proposal after JUST finishing the supposed Lockheed martin X-2?

                Even you know this is pure fantasy that logically doesn't even come close to making sense.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Mitsubishi supplies the GaN modules for the newest AN/SPY-6 and other radars
                No, they don't.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Mitsubishi electric makes the best GaN modules out there right now, Raytheon is using new GaN modules on SPY-6

                Maybe they're not buying them FROM Japan, but the Japanese were leading the field on that front and the US has talked specifically about cooperating with Mitsubishi in future radar development, especially for ballistic missile radars in Japan and Korea.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Mitsubishi electric makes the best GaN modules out there right now
                Proof? Even the J-2 AESA was behind what the US had then.
                >Raytheon is using new GaN modules on SPY-6
                Yeah, made by them.
                >Maybe they're not buying them FROM Japan
                You talked out of your obese greasy butthole, then?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not that anon, but SPY-7 uses Japanese produced GaN TMRs. It wouldn't shock me if SPY-6 did as well.
                > Aegis software variant Baseline 9 already tracked live targets using a prototype version of Lockheed Martin SSR hardware powered by multi-purpose Fujitsu GaN from Japan.
                https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2018-01-11-Lockheed-Martin-Demonstrates-Next-Generation-Aegis-Ashore-Solution

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                That is only because it will be used on nip AEGIS ships, and only that reason. LM has had US made GaN since 2015 from Wolfspeed. SPY-6 is Raytheon, not LM.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not that anon, but SPY-7 uses Japanese produced GaN TMRs. It wouldn't shock me if SPY-6 did as well.
                > Aegis software variant Baseline 9 already tracked live targets using a prototype version of Lockheed Martin SSR hardware powered by multi-purpose Fujitsu GaN from Japan.
                https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2018-01-11-Lockheed-Martin-Demonstrates-Next-Generation-Aegis-Ashore-Solution

                >Mitsubishi electric makes the best GaN modules out there right now
                Proof? Even the J-2 AESA was behind what the US had then.
                >Raytheon is using new GaN modules on SPY-6
                Yeah, made by them.
                >Maybe they're not buying them FROM Japan
                You talked out of your obese greasy butthole, then?

                https://www.raytheonmissilesanddefense.com/news/2021/11/18/gallium-nitride-technology-advancements

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                SPY-7 has a host of installations scheduled, Lockheed also said last year or the year before that they'd be happy to go head to head against SPY-6 as they're confident they'll perform favorably against it.

                > Lockheed Martin asserted various points of SPY-7 superiority over SPY-6 including having a larger logistics pool to support it with over 10,000 basic modules produced by the end of 2021 and that SPY-7 allows individual modules to be swapped out in under a minute while the system still radiates.

                > In a technical chart comparison between the systems, the company said unlike SPY-6, SPY-7 has polarization diversity, on-array digital beam forming, low power substates, requires a power supply of 375 volts vs. 1000 volts of direct current, has three times the search capacity, 1.2 times the raid capacity, and 1.3 times the range.

                Lockheed also said they'd be interested in offering a version of SPY-7 for refitting old Burkes.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Of course, LM would say that. Doesn't change that fact that the nip GaN modules are only used because they're going on a nip AEGIS ship.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                So are the Canadian SPY-7s using Canadian GaN TMRs?

                How about the Spanish ones?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The Japanese TMRs are higher performing, but the US wants to prop up US industry, and since Northrop has been developing GaN TMRs in the US, even though they ARE a bit worse, they're good enough to be comparable and they're made in the US by a US company. So yeah, even though Lockheeds SPY-7 is a great radar, almost all american projects are going to use Raytheon SPY-6 derivatives because of the US domestic industry ties. Also if the US pumps enough money into Raytheons GaN development, we should surpass Japanese TMRs in the next decade or two.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Northrop
                Raytheon

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The Japanese TMRs are higher performing
                Proof?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Japanese TMRs have always been higher performing, even back in the 1990s when the US was looking at Japanese TMRs they were shocked at how small they were, the kicker was japan had sent the US their early prototype and the prototype they were working on internally had even smaller TMRs than the one they sent to the US.

                That being said, I have no "proof" so to speak, just based on conversations with people in the navy (and naval contractors) about various naval radar development projects over the last 20 years.

                I happen to live just a few miles from the main navy radar testing facility in the US.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Japanese TMRs have always been higher performing
                Proof?
                >even back in the 1990s when the US was looking at Japanese TMRs they were shocked at how small they were, the kicker was japan had sent the US their early prototype and the prototype they were working on internally had even smaller TMRs than the one they sent to the US.
                No. I remember the US being impressed that they made them, though they were low powered and not of much use outside of a lab. That's what I remember from the reports released then.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The report basically says the japanese TMRs were equal to the best US ones, but again, japan was already working on even smaller TMRs at the same time the US was evaluating the first one.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The report basically says the japanese TMRs were equal to the best US ones
                Where?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who knows. They may? I doubt Canada can make them, though.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        spec ed class is that way

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cope.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            can you point out which 5th gen fighter has adaptive cycle engines, or the ability to be unmanned, or swarm technology, or any of the other countless features the Tempest will have?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >can you point out which 5th gen fighter has adaptive cycle engines
              The F-35 soon. Though, nobody else can even produce the tech themselves, so I don't know where you're going with this?
              >or the ability to be unmanned
              Tempest isn't even real. Also, the F-35 can be - if the need/want ever arises. What is ACE, and Skyborg?
              >or swarm technology
              Even the F/A-18E/F can with MUM-T, as can the F-22 and F-35
              >or any of the other countless features the Tempest will have?
              You mean the PR paper specs and wishlist? Come back once it's actually produced.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                that’s a lot of words and a lot of cope

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Paper products aren't real, and never will be. It's a wishlist.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >this multinational project by nations among the very few that can handle their shit when it comes to planes won’t have the features they defined because…ummm…because….. BECAUSE, OK???
                shut the frick up moron

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    YF-23 LIVES
    SHE LIVES

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *