Azov

>almost completely destroyed Spetsnaz already - something even the Chechens couldn't do
>also defeats Chechens
>also defeats Russian proxy guerilla fighters in DPR/LPR
>also mauls Russian mercenaries (including Wagner, Syrians, Afghanis, Kazakhs, etc
>distracted Russia in certain battles where there was intense fighting (like Bakhmut, Severodonetsk, Lysychansk and Mariupol) that Russia effectively dumped most of their precision missiles
>fought so hard that Russia's entire stockpile of unguided munitions were even drained
>Russia lost air superiority late last year and their Navy just hides behind Crimea
>went from a Regiment to a Brigade
How the frick has nobody mentioned this?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone know they are nazis so the western media pretends they don't exist.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      Someone post the photos of the azov twins getting ran through by wagners

      [...]

      Why don't you get fricked up your ass? Ukraine has been doing good, why dont you settle with that. Actual "Azov" is little more than some Facebook group

      Good morning sirs!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But that actually intrigues me, why is that they are supporting Russia? The smartest indians know their country got screwed in so many ways after tried to follow the soviet state run economy style.

        And truth be told the whole Bengali famine was their own ruling and merchant classes fricking over the common man to get as much cash as possible, one thinks they should be rooting for USA with them having China and Pakistan as their main local enemies.

        And now they decided to make entire programs with the russians, it's like they didn't learn the lesson, if they had a bit of self-awareness they should feel Ukraine's cause is theirs.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >one thinks they should be rooting for USA
          The USA is the most unreliable partner in every possible historic angle. The US is straight out traitorous to any nation foolish enough to even listen to them

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Unless you're the UK, then our politicians worm out a little deal. Come to think of it, we should really drop the shit and only help each other and no one else. Obviously our country and people can't commit to defending any others, not even our own.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Your post is incomprehensible. I've tried, I did my best, but your thoughts came out completely unintelligible

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Russians calling USA traitorous

            Is that why your allies all end up shitholes, lol?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          gotta outsource the chillin when your old employers are sent to the trenches

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >why is that they are supporting Russia?
          Because they're moronic. They've been larping as a global superpower for decades but still haven't even managed to mass produce their own domestic fighter jet, which is barely an improvement over their Mirage 2000s.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >They've been larping as a global superpower for decades
            Huh. India is more like Russia than I thought.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You have no idea how close you are to the truth. From pretending to be the sole source of civilization, to openly preparing to attack every single neighboring country, to open defecation, Russia and India are like sister nations.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Everyone know they are nazis so the western media pretends they don't exist.
      They are not nazis nor do they commit warcrimes.
      Meine Ehre isst meine Treue, Sieg Heil!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Geez that's a bad german translation. It is "ist" not "isst"
        You just wrote that your honor eats your loyalty

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Its written with big concat double S in original, morononaut

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Then type ctrl-alt-s to do ß, braindead subhuman?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Ich bin ein berliner

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We literally kicked out all the Nazis like 7 years ago.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Post picks of Azov-chan, I want to make a gallery, also, well, I don't know, werent they dissolved into the regular army?

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Someone post the photos of the azov twins getting ran through by wagners

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      source? sounds hot

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't you get fricked up your ass? Ukraine has been doing good, why dont you settle with that. Actual "Azov" is little more than some Facebook group

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >48 hours
    lol, lmao even

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      3 months = 48 hours (Russian time).

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They've spent too much time in Chornobaivka time loop.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        We’re still on track for the 2 weeks
        Trzzt thz qlzn

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Be skinhead Slavic untermensch LARPing as Wiking-SS
    >israeli president lets your gang get surrounded at the start of the war
    >Lose to Donbabwe militias after hiding in the sewers for weeks

    Pic related are the actual people fighting and winning the war for Ukraine: the 93rd mechanized brigade was there every time the situation was critcal and turned the tide.

    This unit likely saved Ukraine at the start of the war when things were in chaos.

    Fricking kys OP, spreading moronic disinformation.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >gets encircled
    >dies en masse
    There are PLENTY of very successful Ukrainian units. Why use the one that has only lost as an example?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >gets encircled in a surprise attack and since they are literally right next to enemy territory
      >successfully fights the enemy for 3 months without resupply while effectively destroying the enemy’s offensive potential and draining their momentum
      ftfy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol the south was the only place where Russia's momentum held up. Whatever way you want to slice it getting 6k+ men encircled and destroyed is BAD. Theres a reason every POW swap since has been about 2 Ukrainians for every 1 Russian

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Remind me again what happened at the end of march? Oh yeah, the entire northern offensive collapsed and the remaining troops had to be redistributed to the eastern and southern axes which had completely stalled, all the while Russia was still trying to take Mariupol. The defenders of Mariupol unironically saved Ukraine with their sacrifice and had they not tied up and attrited 10s of 1000s of Russian troops the war would be going very differently right now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What are you implying? That if Mariupol hadn't held down 15k or so Russians they would of been redeployed to the northern sector? That's moronic

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Holy shit, you are unironically moronic. Do you think each Russian offensive axis existed in a vacuum? Russians never planned on spending three months using 10s of 1000s of their best men (even if the 15k is true, which I think is a lowball estimate, the units were still rotated) and a shitload of resources to capture a single city. The siege of Mariupol blunted the Russian offensive in the East, effectively allowing Ukrainians to consolidate their defense in that region while not putting any demand on the defense forces in the North or far South. As well, by eating so much Russian offensive potential in the East it forced the Russians to do a cost benefit analysis and drop the Northern offensive and reintegrate those troops who had been fighting in the North into Eastern and Southern offensives. Had the Russians retained their momentum and man power they would have been able to use that 15k to press towards Mykolaiv and Zaporizhzhia in the first month of the war and threaten to collapse the entire Ukrainian defensive posture in the South and East of the country, but instead that 15k was tied down and attrited for what the Russians thought would be a quick propaganda victory.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >each Russian offensive axis existed in a vacuum?
                Yes. The northern one and the southern one had nothing to do with eachother.
                >using 10s of 1000s of their best men
                Their best men were in the north. The south were regular contractors and a huge contingent of dpr guys
                >effectively allowing Ukrainians to consolidate their defense in that region while not putting any demand on the defense forces in the North or far South
                In hindsight what did this save exactly? A couple of villages? Do you really think they could of surrounded Zaporizhzhia or Mykolaiv? They couldn't even take SUMY.
                >cost benefit analysis
                This was because of the failure and later pointlessness of the northern offensive, not because of struggles in the south.
                The truth is that sacrificing 6k+ men for some time was moronic and judging how long it took and the resources spent taking Severodonetsk I really really doubt they could of taken any other city if the siege never happened.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                > The northern one and the southern one had nothing to do with eachother.
                Lol. You’re not a serious person

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Azov has multiple regiments

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why does Azov trigger /misc/jeets so hard? They seethe as much as troony you called manly man.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because /misc/ is nothing but mutts (in the true sense of the word, just look at their meetup, it was all mystery meat) and thirdies. The thought of a real wignat unit fighting for the West makes them absolutely seethe.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think thats the other way around, with how the ukraine is puling people off the streets to replenish its losses

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >How the frick has nobody mentioned this?
    Russias been talking about the gene-engineered super soldiers all the time

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Spetsnaz only means special forces. Literally means nothing when border guards are considered Spetsnaz.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Spetnutz gets BTFO by regular Ukrainian forces in many such cases
      >"uhh akshually Spetnutz isn't even real"
      >mfw

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The only ones that truly told Ukrainians to get fricked were India and China.
    by abstaining in votes at the UN? they won't even vote in support of Russia...lmao even

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >How the frick has nobody mentioned this?
    Because if you talk about Azov for too long there is risk of mentioning thier political views.
    Which is inconvenient for west at the moment.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And what exactly are their political views?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pro-White, anti-communist, anti-israelite. Basically the diametric opposite of Russia.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        mostly anti communist national socialist views or at the very least signs of classical fascist beliefs.
        however they have been accepting lots o volunteers so who knows if they rock with the boat too or are ''moderates''

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >As of 2016, the National Corps favoured the restoration of Ukraine's nuclear power status, and also support the re-nationalization of enterprises and industries formerly owned by the Ukrainian SSR upon Ukraine's declaration of independence in 1991.[5] The party wants Ukraine to become a neutral country. The National Corps are staunchly opposed to Russia and its foreign policy, and they strongly support breaking off all diplomatic, economic and cultural ties with Russia.[5] The party also opposes the entry of Ukraine into the European Union, and is vocally opposed to fostering closer ties with NATO.[14] In addition, the National Corps favours the creation of a new Intermarium superstate, which would hypothetically comprise the entirety of Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.[14][5] The party also advocates the expansion of the right to bear arms and a public referendum regarding the restoration of capital punishment for treason and the embezzlement of government funds.[5] The party is strongly opposed to the rights of Romanians in their old historical regions, currently located in Ukraine (Northern Bukovina, Northern Bessarabia, Budjak and Hertsa region).[15] The National Corps support economic nationalism and protectionism, oppose free trade and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and also supports the cultivation of Ukraine's domestic industry and exports.[16]

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think their most esoteric ones are they want a giant European land war where they burst north and seize lots of territory. I think they are more pagan than they are israelite hating

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    First 48 hours?!

    Do you Vatniks even REMEMBER how long Mariupol held out, lol? It was like 2 fricking months.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand the "football hooligan"->militant pipeline that exists in Europe. We have fans of soccer in America too but there is not a violent aspect to it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but there is not a violent aspect to it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I've heard it claimed that they are cultivated by FSB to destabilize ex Warsaw Pact countries. Since the goal was destabilization, they had both pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian far right elements that split into opposing militias once the fighting started.

      My only source for this is schizoposts here and on /misc/, but it seems plausible given how much Russian shills focus on Azov.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      we have the football heads---->nazi pipeline here in the states

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is Azov even still operational, I thought the majority of their guys got either captured or killed in Mauripol.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think largely because none of those things are true.

    [...]

    Yes.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >azov
    You mean Delta Force and SAS in disguise?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >any ukie unit achieves something
    >"Today, Ukrainian forces did this and that"
    >azov achieves something
    >"Today, Azov unit did this and that"

    This is why it looks like they do that much stuff anon. Unlike other units, they have political agenda and try to use military achievments to shill themselves

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Is Azov even still operational, I thought the majority of their guys got either captured or killed in Mauripol.

    >Amnesia copium
    Are you forgetting the 200 odd Azov POWs from Mauripol who were returned back to Ukraine.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You forgot to add:
    >managed to survive Dombabwean concentration camps
    >received priority medical care from Russian medics unlike Dombabwe subhumans who are seen as lower than even passive homosexuals
    >cause so much butthurt with their mere existence than no vatnik can bear to face reality

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Circa a 100 deaths
    >All from mariupol
    For a 3 month peer to peer urban combat with no way out, that's pretty damn good. Shame the Russians can't say the same about their units.
    Hell, at least 50-60 Russians were recorded dying in mariupol and that's just the kills we can confirm via Azov videos.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *