Errm should we actually be kinda worried about this? Just because consumer electronics advance pretty fast and I doubt Western hardware is updated that quickly.
Cell phones/tablets are very common in civilian aviation, but I would be pretty aghast if US fighter pilots were using them in the wienerpit, both for opsec, infosec, and other reasons.
>be Russian pilot >line up your target >start your attack run >totally focused and in the zone >Ukrainian hacks your cell phone and starts blasting "Njet Vladimir" at maximum volume
>hohols replace your target coordinates and suddenly you find yourself bombing something in crimea >also 50 GB of dolphin porn made their way into your cell phone somehow
>Not defending them
Stop prefacing your posts with claims you're not doing the exact thing you're doing.
It's fine to "defend" them if you have something interesting to say.
With that out of the way, you're pretty much wrong. The presence of the phone there tells us that innacurate, slow-updating civilian hardware and software have no Russian analogue for some reason. Not to mention the security risks inherent in strapping a civilian, radio-enabled computer (of foreign manufacture, to boot) to your jets.
The frogfoot was the better plane when both were young, but the hog got so many upgrades since then that any direct confrontation is just going to end with a BLOS kill from the A-10.
Which is actually a point against the A-10. It has required so many upgrades over the years that it has become incredibly overpriced.
it doesn't look like war footage
Actually it's pretty bland and uninteresting if you're not an aviation nerd.
>uninteresting
it's interesting those rust buckets can fly
They're just flying in formation releasing flares for the camera.
Do you think these guys got killed by MANPADS, MiGs, SAMs, or on the ground in a HIMARS strike?
Lol, imagine having to use a cell phone because your instruments are 40 years out of date.
Errm should we actually be kinda worried about this? Just because consumer electronics advance pretty fast and I doubt Western hardware is updated that quickly.
Exterminate all russoids tho fr fr
Cell phones/tablets are very common in civilian aviation, but I would be pretty aghast if US fighter pilots were using them in the wienerpit, both for opsec, infosec, and other reasons.
>be Russian pilot
>line up your target
>start your attack run
>totally focused and in the zone
>Ukrainian hacks your cell phone and starts blasting "Njet Vladimir" at maximum volume
>hohols replace your target coordinates and suddenly you find yourself bombing something in crimea
>also 50 GB of dolphin porn made their way into your cell phone somehow
>because your instruments are 40 years out of date.
Not defending them, but that isn't very important on an aircraft that is pretty much just doing CAS or strikes on the front lines.
>Not defending them
Lol this place has become so reddit that you have to point out you're not doing a wrongthink
>Not defending them
Stop prefacing your posts with claims you're not doing the exact thing you're doing.
It's fine to "defend" them if you have something interesting to say.
With that out of the way, you're pretty much wrong. The presence of the phone there tells us that innacurate, slow-updating civilian hardware and software have no Russian analogue for some reason. Not to mention the security risks inherent in strapping a civilian, radio-enabled computer (of foreign manufacture, to boot) to your jets.
actually he uses that to shitpost about how great rasha is, after hes done bombing hospitals
every post represents one extra ruble on his paycheck
lol vatniks scraped off the paint to cut their krokodil
frog vs hog soon ?
The frogfoot was the better plane when both were young, but the hog got so many upgrades since then that any direct confrontation is just going to end with a BLOS kill from the A-10.
Which is actually a point against the A-10. It has required so many upgrades over the years that it has become incredibly overpriced.
cringe