>Australia chose it. >Poland chose it. >Taiwan chose it. >Norway might choose it

>Australia chose it
>Poland chose it
>Taiwan chose it
>Norway might choose it
>Sweden looking at supplementing it’s IFVs with it
Who’s going to be next PrepHole? Is this the single best selling export IFV of the modern age?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard thread.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Italy is currently looking for a new IFV, but 95% they’re going for the Lynx or some joint venture

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Italy should just quit building tanks and IFV because it's really not our thing. We should focus on copters and boats.

      >T.terrone

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t think Australia decided yet and idk about the others on the list. I doubt the Swedish one is true

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    why is it riveted together

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      those are most likely mounting points for the external armour

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s been moroned together

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The absolute state of K/. Korean weapons are becoming absolutely dominant and all you can come up with is muh rivets. No wonder you’re women fantasize about the Korean BVLL

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A riveted IFV has never been sunk.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i wonder how that guy is doing

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Australia chose it
    We don’t even know that until maybe even march 2023
    >Poland chose it
    That’s probably true
    >Taiwan chose it
    Lol, they would rather procure American or Japanese stuff
    >Norway might choose it
    They have the CV90, doesn’t make any sense
    >Sweden looking at supplementing it’s IFVs with it
    Doesn’t make any sense because they have the CV90 and the Redback doesn’t replace any role

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry man. Norway is evaluating it as we speak. Considering how Norway has already chosen the K2 arty it doesn't seem too farfetched to go for a second SK weapon system.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Okay K9. That one's on me.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Iirc they also see red the k2 tank

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Norway is evaluating it as we speak
        lmao
        Norway bought new CV90s 5 fucking years ago. stop pulling shit out of your ass

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The Norwegian Army is evaluating K2NO or Leopard 2A7, for a decision in late 2022.[114]

          What do you need, a personal letter from the defense minister?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This isn't about the MBT selection you absolute mongoloid

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Norway hasn’t chosen either tho and it hasn’t been revealed anything regarding the 2A7 vs K2 competition

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Can you tell the difference between evaluating and choosing?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            "Evaluating" is what we've been doing for the last 1,5 years, including winter trials and reviewing the final offer received last month.
            "Choosing" is what we will do based on the evaluation. Should be coming around november/desember

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              does the Leopard 2A7NO include Rheinmetall APS? Looks like it on that patch

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, the APS on the A7 is the Trophy system.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Then I guess Kongsberg are the real retards. Should've read your shitty PrepHole post instead of having inside knowledge about the Norwegian military.
          https://www.thedefensepost.com/2022/10/03/south-korea-norway-unmanned-turrets-tanks/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >loose on the fields
            >tries to win by going into partnerships with local companies
            Lmao

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Nice english, Ahmed.

              what's up with all this korean mbt, artillery and ifv shilling? is it just one moron spamming it everywhere? not sure what he's trying to achieve, it's just making me dislike koreans.

              >it's just making me dislike koreans.
              That's the point, which is why I highly doubt he's korean or american. China is terrified of the fact that the US, Japan and Korea are inching closer and closer to a solid trilateral security structure, and I imagine they're absolutely livid that Russia chimping out and now North Korea going back to retarded missile tossing is accelerating that. Nothing helps to bury the hatchet like having three other violent psychopaths making ooga booga noises next door. As a result, China is throwing anything they can at the wall to try and keep the US, Japan and Korea comparatively separate
              https://thediplomat.com/2014/02/the-weakest-link-how-china-seeks-to-destabilize-the-us-rok-japan-triangle/

              It’s overly nationalistic Koreans or at least it started that way. Korean gear just isn’t very good

              Nah, it's just an overly asshurt SEA nogger.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you so keen on defending South Koreans in a South Korean shill thread?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Why are you so keen on defending South Koreans in a South Korean shill thread?
                Why are you so obsessed with spamming such low effort false flag bait threads which have been posted multiple times already? Why have your parents disowned you yet, Armatard?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      chose it
      >That’s probably true
      that's literally false though, they didn't buy a single one, or even a license

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bullshit, Australia hasn’t selected one yet. I’m starting to dislike Koreans

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Australia has selected it
    Kek not only have we not made a choice, we're going to reduce the amount we buy to free up billions of dollars

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I wish the discussion around that in the public spheres wasn't stupid.

      We had economic mismanagement for ten years. Procurement was a corrupt shitshow with everything costing way too much for basic bitch equipment. Even now it's like our small arms contract is a war of attrition against the ADF. Thank fuck the signals directorate got a bigger piece of the pie last funding cycle because maybe less bullshit spending will occur. It's a shame that the IFV once again suffers, because that capability was important, and the Redback really does look good and I think the Redback is best placed to be useful within our region. The public discussion of "Why do we need an IFV anyway?/Oh here we go, Labor is SLASHING defence spending!" is such fucking nonsense.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why do we need an ifv?
        We need a navy and an airforce, if we have to use the infantry in defence of Australia it means we’ve already failed and we might as well wait for daddy yankee to bail us out

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Picking an IFV with it's factories next to their main potential invader (China) is why I don't think AUS will pick the redback. There's a lot of scenarios where South Korea gets into a pickle with NK, too.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >only pavels forced to buy it
    >moron shill pavels thread
    >hourly

    ahahahaha give it up pavel and enjoy your shitty rice box

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >XXX
      nutted

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Sweden looking at supplementing it’s IFVs with it
    Gonna need a source on that, i have heard no such thing about it and it would be retarded to add another IFV when you have a domestic IFV which is better anyway.

    t.swede

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >when you have a domestic IFV which is better anyway.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's true and you know it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you really gona shit on the CV90?
          Not even I as a Puma lover would do that
          >t. Kraut

          It’s a cramped, slow, miniature IFV that uses a retarded 40mm cannon because Sweden had a million of them laying around. It doesn’t mount an ATGM as standard either. Redback is superior in every regard

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >retarded 40mm cannon because Sweden had a million of them laying around.
            This is what the retarded korea shill still believe despite the fact that you have been time and time again proven that the statement is not true.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              No one proved this statement wasn’t true. Sweden put on a dog and pony show competition. In other words they investigated themselves and cleared themselves of all wrong doing.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You’re a retard. No I don’t need proof, you have to prove that you’re not a fucking mong.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This is how you know I won the argument

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This is how you know I won the argument

                >uses a retarded 40mm cannon because Sweden had a million of them laying around

                See I wish more countries did shit like that. If you have the kit and it's just a matter of designing a decent turret why the fuck not?

                The armament was evaluated over the course of 6 years and 40mm was chosen for its effects on tanks and airborne targets. I don’t know who tried to start the myth that Sweden had “thousands of 40mm canons lying around but said person is clearly a retard - https://www.ointres.se/projekt_strf90.htm

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That wasn’t a real evaluation. It’s just because they had the barrels

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Prove it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Same

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The guy who wrote the article was literally one of the project managers for the CV90, i'm gonna trust him more then some korean shill on PrepHole

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >yea we totally did an trial even ask our spokesperson
                Nah

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >uses a retarded 40mm cannon because Sweden had a million of them laying around

            See I wish more countries did shit like that. If you have the kit and it's just a matter of designing a decent turret why the fuck not?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you really gona shit on the CV90?
        Not even I as a Puma lover would do that
        >t. Kraut

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No matter how hard you shill, you cannot make me hate Koreans.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's another moron shill pulls shit out of his ass and every other country comes out to call him in his bullshit thread

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >tank porn thread

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    hey bitches

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what's up with all this korean mbt, artillery and ifv shilling? is it just one moron spamming it everywhere? not sure what he's trying to achieve, it's just making me dislike koreans.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >it's just making me dislike koreans.
      That's the point, which is why I highly doubt he's korean or american. China is terrified of the fact that the US, Japan and Korea are inching closer and closer to a solid trilateral security structure, and I imagine they're absolutely livid that Russia chimping out and now North Korea going back to retarded missile tossing is accelerating that. Nothing helps to bury the hatchet like having three other violent psychopaths making ooga booga noises next door. As a result, China is throwing anything they can at the wall to try and keep the US, Japan and Korea comparatively separate
      https://thediplomat.com/2014/02/the-weakest-link-how-china-seeks-to-destabilize-the-us-rok-japan-triangle/

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It’s overly nationalistic Koreans or at least it started that way. Korean gear just isn’t very good

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There's probably one guy who is actually shilling. But most of us who are interested, are interested because Korea is an outsider doing well in a game where everyone else is same old same old. If Guatemala could offer a damn good AR or Swaziland showed up with a great attack chopper we would be all over that too. Everybody loves an underdog.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >where everyone else is same old same old
        What do you mean by this?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The big boy manufacturers of armored vehicles of any type are mainly France, England, Germany, USA and arguably Sweden and Swtizerland. They are all led by people who went to the same universities and are personal buddies with key defense politicians. There's very little exciting about which of them wins the next bidding round and we will not be told who incidentally gets free new apartments in Dubai a year later. Having Korea show up with a serious offer is like having someone from Studio Ghibli showing up in a Belgian drawing contest.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That’s all fan fiction though. Korea isn’t competitive. They have to offer domestic manufacturing and full teach transfer to even register on countries radar. That is another brand of the politics you mentioned in your reply

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Combination of typical Asian patriotism by Koreans, yellow fever moronlovers from the west, paid Korean gov/hanwha shills (online diplomats), russhits who can now only use Korean stuff to „own“ the west and probably some chinks who try to make Koreans look like overly patriotic gays (which they are but not to such a comical degree)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Look up Korean feminism, their birthrate and %of male virgins

      Nice english, Ahmed.
      [...]
      [...]
      [...]
      Nah, it's just an overly asshurt SEA nogger.

      Seethe less, Kim

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cope harder, Mohammed. You'll never be white.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Taiwan chose it
    Taiwanese here
    No we fucking didn’t
    We didn’t even consider it
    most of the armor guys don’t event know it exists
    South Korea is not in the business in exporting weapons to Taiwan due to China

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    chose it
    as a replacement for their t-72 fleet kek

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't Poland going to produce the Borsuk?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No they are going to build license redbacks for future European customers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Both I believe, kind of what they're doing with the Krab and K9

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Show me one source that says Poland is even looking at the redback. Younwont reply to me because there isn’t a source that says that

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ausfag here. OP is wrong on all counts but the redback is being demoed in Poland at the moment. It's literally one of the ones Australia just used in its LAND400 trial.

          https://defence24.com/industry/redback-in-poland-coming-soon-hanwha-we-are-ready-for-new-investments

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Well now I have egg on my face. It doesn’t look like Poland is looking at the RedBack at all. My apologies

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That Poland is trailing these was also mentioned in Australian media: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/special-reports/defence-review-expected-to-delay-decision-on-armys-ifvs/news-story/782877f2ddb6295537337caffbdd1965

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.
      The defence ministry says the Borsuk will be the "light" IFV because of it's amphibious capabiity (a design requirement for pretty much every vehicle in Poland) and moronshit is supposed to be the "heavy" IFV" that does not have this design contstraint.

      I've read that their ambitious plans is to have light armored formations with K2 tanks and Borsuk IFVs and heavy armored formations with abrams and redback to offer some "flexibility". I have no idea whether that's a good idea or not, basically just relaying the info I've read on the topic so far.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The defense ministry never said this. Provide a quote

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably not, pretty sure Ajax alone outweighs all of those. Also Poland has purchased literally every western or western-aligned AFV possible at this point, a sale to them barely counts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *