AUKUS HAPPENING

https://www.twitter.com/Ben_Westcott/status/1633268421004779520
>US President Joe Biden is set to announce the details of a nuclear submarine deal with the leaders of Australia and the United Kingdom in California on Monday, people familiar with the matter said.
>Biden, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to San Diego to unveil the details during an event at a naval base, potentially aboard a submarine. The project is part of the so-called Aukus agreement, launched in 2021 to counter China’s military power in the Indo-Pacific.
Get ready for an old man, a pajeet, and an oic**t on board a Virginia-class.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >UK PM Rishi Sunak

    QUINTESSENTIALLY

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The Romans ruled Britain as a colony, then it was lorded over by the Vikings, who the Normans defeated and established its monarchy which is full of sundry Europeans, and PM Benjamin Disraeli was an Italian israelite. Britain has spent much of its history governed by non-British people.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        stop trying to make excuses for your dying political order

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not making any excuses, just stating facts. Like it or not, Britain has not had an Anglo Saxon ruler since Godwinson. And even then, said group were essentially Germanic peoples who had been invited as protectors by the 'original' Britons after the fall of the Western Roman Empire, to defend against Pictish and Gaelic (i.e. proto-Irish and Scottish) incursions

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >who the Normans defeated and established its monarchy
        The Normans were descendants of Viking settlers.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          True, but by the time of William the Conqueror they were a very distinct ethnic group from the Norse Vikings they descended from as they adopted French language, customs and Catholicism. Harold Godwinson, the last Anglo-Saxon king of England (who William defeated) also had Danish ancestors, and British royalty then was overall closely interlinked with Denmark and Norway's in general which is why Harald Hardrada felt he had a claim. Thus, if you assume anyone with Scandi heritage qualified as a 'Viking', then the entire power-struggle over Britain was Vikings vs Vikings vs Vikings...

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >vikings vs vikings vs vikings
            That is more or less how I see it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What is a "British" person then? The Scots? The Welsh?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The anglo-saxons.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            But the celts were there first

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No, they weren't. The people who built the Stonehenge, for example, were there before the Celts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No, they weren't
                The celts weren't in Britain before the anglo-saxons? Are you moronic?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The issue is that if you're going to take this into the Mesolithic and further back, then you're going to encounter the obvious problem that the concept of countries didn't exist and no place other than Africa belonged to the first humans. The Celts were the first to be described as British by the Greeks who named Britain to begin with (Prettanike), so that's why we can consider them the first British civilisations.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah but the A-S are those who outbred everyone and became the core ethnicity of the island.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Anglos interbred with the celts though.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nope. Those guys came after the Fall of Rome to protect and later rule the indigenous Celtic Britons.

            What is a "British" person then? The Scots? The Welsh?

            If you mean 'British' as the original inhabitants of the British Isles (like the Greeks and Romans did), then yes, the Gaels who would become the Scottish and Irish were original British peoples, alongside the Picts (who merged with the Gaels to become the Scots), Welsh Celtic tribes, and Britons. All of them were Celtic ethnolinguistic groups.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >British

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Normans didn’t establish anything. The Anglo-Saxon state apparatus was left intact with the officials being replaced with Normans.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      to me albanese doesnt sound quite anglo either

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He’s italian, from the most Italian part of NSW

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      tfw the only Anglo state currently ruled by an Anglo is New Zealand

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isn’t Biden’s family Irish or something? Ireland is basically an Anglosphere country after what, 800 years of occupation and intermarriage?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, but the Paddies aren't happy about it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >tfw the only Anglo state currently ruled by an Anglo is New Zealand

        Isnt the NZ premier a sephardic israeliteess?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      tfw the only Anglo state currently ruled by an Anglo is New Zealand

      English is a culture, not an ethnicity. The Danes, Celts, Saxons, Jutes, Normans etc were Anglicized and became good Englishmen. Sunak is an Englishman, he grew up in England is culturally English and supports England in football (even against his ancestors country). He has a non-English surname but so does Nigel Farage. He's a real Englishman, get over it. As an American I have more respect for him than I have for poltards

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        of course you would pajeet

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > Normans were Anglicanized
        Debateable that it wasn't more of the other way around following the Norman invasion of England.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >He's a real Englishman, get over it
        >As an American
        have a nice day. I mean this sincerely. You're not human.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        English is an ethnicity you American homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I don’t speak English, I speak American. Post guns bong

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the word you're looking for would be Anglo, you fricking dumb bong homosexual every day I bless all forms of Christ we broke free of your wretched culture (which, again, is English)
          have a nice day

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off back to red dit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >English is a culture, not an ethnicity
        Found the israelite

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why are people still seething about him? isn't the reason he's there because he just ended up being in line after everyone else who could take the job resigned?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They are seething at him because he is brown, in exactly the same way they spent 8 years seething at Obama because he was black

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This guy is clearly a British mix so it’s not the worst thing ever. Obama was the most un-Black person black in the world, to the point he may as well have been an alien.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wait for Brexit, mate, Britain will be Great again!

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >potentially aboard a submarine
    superlatively based

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Get ready for an old man, a pajeet, and an oic**t on board a Virginia-class.
    Imagine the smell

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nuclear submarines for everyone
    (EXCEPT GERMANY)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Nuclear propulsion in the baltic sea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Nuclear propulsion in the baltic sea.

      There's the North Sea, dumb amerimutt, which pretty much a stepping stone to the North Atlantic.
      There's not much sense for countries with only Baltic coastline to acquire a nook boat, but North sea is another story.
      Main problems is Krauts boomers are just a bunch of braindead morons and got scared of anything with "nuclear" in their name without any sensible reason whatsoever. Who know, maybe years of Gazprom and Vatnik Union beforehand rot their brains

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        *Gazprom and Vatnik Union propagandas

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >boomers
        The German moronation about nuclear is nearly universal. They genuinely believe it can’t be done safely, that the waste can’t be stored safely, and that it’s bad for the environment - so they replace it with coal and Russian lng KEK. Never mind that the French are next door and getting along fine with their plants.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > North Sea
        Still too shallow and too small for effective ssn operation

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >is seething about Anglos relevant to discussing submarines?
    >submarines?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Want to have a bit of a laugh?

    The Australian public servant currently in charge of the AUKUS submarine program was sent there since, in her last job as director of among other things the country's welfare program, she was so astoundingly incompetent/incredibly malicious that 2,000 people died and the government had to erase about a billion dollars worth of falsely raised debts. She was grilled in a royal commission yesterday and her greatest hits included claiming she had absolutely no knowledge of how her department was run (claiming that a now dead deputy was responsible for everything), showing absolutely no remorse for the suicide of a welfare recipient that her program caused (while their parent was in the room and staring at her) and claiming that she had basically no memory of anything in the last 10 years.

    So yeah that's how highly the Australian government views the nuclear submarine program. She is in charge.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Huh. You’d think that the Labour government would put someone with naval experience in the position. Call me crazy but maybe even a captain of a Collins Class submarine would be a good fit to oversee a submarine based project. But what do I know? I’m just a normal burger chud halfway across the world.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Oh, said public servant was in the Army Reserves becoming CO of from memory the 2nd Division, so it's not like she has no experience in military matters or military procurement. But having a person who is so incompetent their appearance in the Senate results in a fricking royal commission in charge of such a critical program isn't a good sign. From her own sworn testimony she is either very stupid or very, very malicious.

        >proven ability to kill welfare recipients
        honestly she sounds ideally qualified to work with the defense forces

        You've got me there.

        >So yeah that's how highly the Australian government views the nuclear submarine program.
        Australia has been killing it with their sub program overall, lets not stop at "nuclear"

        I'm salty because we canned our old submarine program in exchange for this shit and the absolute highest grade of public servant we can allocate to it is that c**t.

        If you'll allow me to speculate for a moment, I reckon the Albanese government wants out of the program and is sending her there as a pic related move. They want the program dead and they want her APS career to go with it.

        IMO that's not severe enough, she should be stripped of her military awards and sent to prison, but if that's what's happening then I'll take that too.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Is she that same CO2 generator from that infamous clip of some poor admiral trying to explain what a pump jet is to some braindead politician?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If you're referring to Pauline Hanson, no.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Oh, so you guys have at least two clueless knuckle draggers in charge of submarine procurement. God help you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hanson's not involved with the procurement directly, she's just a member of the senate so gets to ask questions.

                I don't think Kathryn Campbell is actually in charge of it either, she's like a diplomatic liaison.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh you're right, she's an "advisor", so an even more useless position lmao. Still far too important for her to be near and an indictment of that program.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your overall sentiment is entirely correct.
                I assumed this position was just invented for her because she's an experienced, female bureaucrat with a military link and they can't fire her for internal political reasons. Not 'politics of the public' but instead 'politics of not alienating the shadow government and quota gestapo'

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >proven ability to kill welfare recipients
      honestly she sounds ideally qualified to work with the defense forces

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >So yeah that's how highly the Australian government views the nuclear submarine program.
      Australia has been killing it with their sub program overall, lets not stop at "nuclear"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Who else in the ADF/DoD has 2,000 kills anon?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Have fun having outdated submarines delivered in 2060

    Anglo loser wienerscukers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      okay zang. have fun trying to escape the Vietnamese sea.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    S-so the UK literally elected a Pajeet as PM?
    Australia flooded with Asians
    This country is being flooded by browns and all sorts of international colored people who all know how to work work visa systems for maximum invasion volume. Canada is finished.

    Basically, the Anglo world is done for. I don’t know what to say. I have no advice. UK elected a Pajeet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The UK most notably did not elect their current PM kek

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        their elected representatives chose him, so they did elect him by proxy

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I don’t think even Tories feel that way about him.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            they should've chose someone else then

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              they did choose someone else lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yeah and then they chose him after she resigned

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                didn't choose her either

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    God I hope it's done on a submarine, if biden falls off my sides will leave the solar system.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Could /misc/ frick off so I can talk about frickign submarines
    Frick sake homosexuals frick off.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this is an announcement of an announcement thread
      CONTENT INHERENTLY LOW

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another AUKUS thread seething about Anglos

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SHUT THE FRICK UP ABOUT POLITICS
    What subs are they getting?
    Astute in the image is an attack sub.
    Are they getting the new sub the bongs were going to make? Dreadnought?
    Can they still make Vanguard?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >What subs
      likely the SSN(r). Actual trilateral effort not off the shelf shit, design input from all memebers. Hopefully Australia and Britain collaborate on more future products, lack of Australian design input has hurt us

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >
        This is actually such a moronic idea for Australia I am convinced that they will do. Nuclear submarines that we won't see for a minimum of 20 years. It will also no doubt be another typical defence procurement focused on """sovereign capability""" A.K.A welfare program for the morons in South Australia who couldn't build a working ship (god forbid a submarine) if their lives depended on it. GOD HELP US

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          US and UK shipyards are apparently too busy to take large new orders so will probably be made in Australia.
          There's also apparently 1 Trafalgar class still in service so wouldn't be surprised if that's operated by Australia as some stopgap/training vessel.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >1 Trafalgar
            There are 26 688s in service and 34 retired. Leasing a 688 as a fallback if Australia couldn't have Virginias was something that bubbled around in policy circles for a long time anyway, plus Australia has used, and will want to keep using, US combat systems on their subs. Refueled 688s make sense.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'd put more of a bet on the last astute class to be built being loaned/sold to the aussies, if not the last 2 of them. The last trafalgar class will not be a good sales platform for BAEs combat systems like I bet they're trying to get signed on to

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >NOOO YOU CANT BUILD DOMESTIC SKILLED MANUFACTURING WE HAVE TO IMPORT EVERYTHING NUKES ARE EVIL

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            moron

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              t.seething worst australian

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No I’m just an Aussie who wants actual domestic arms and industry. Here’s the thing moron - we can also be given/leased existing submarines while those are built!
              Go fricking moan to your mp that the jobs aren’t going to your local though, I’m sure they’ll definitely for real fix it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SHUT THE FRICK UP ABOUT POLITICS
      The politics are of critical importance actually.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The politics surrounding the sub aquisition sure, but that's hardly what is in this thread.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd give them Seawolf or its successor.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I reckon it's going to be an announcement of a joint project between the three to build a SSN, gonna be difficult to pull that off though.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Err... how on earth is Biden going to manage all those stairs and ladders?

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nukes arent real

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    collin class subs was under piss poor management and direction was constantly changed due to rapid capability improvements. new management with the guise of uncle sam directing the shots will be a different story.

    t. knower

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There seems to be a rumor it's 2 already built astute class initially.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >San Diego
    So they're going to lease LA boats

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So, what are the bets?
    >Virginia
    >Astute
    Or the extra super special moronic option you just know they're gonna go for:
    >Brand new sub design

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We’re going to get some existing astutes
      And we’re going to build some subs here. I think they’ll be an existing design however it’s possible it’ll leave the door open for a new joint development program. But I don’t see there being comfort with that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Los Angeles for lease with a Virginia or Astute off-shoot designed and built in Australia.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Likely a modified astute with VLS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why the larger crew on the US?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly trusting the Australians with fricking anything is a terrible idea. They are a backdoor for the Chinese.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >anon is still living in 2015
      nice

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If we go with the Astute class I'm going to blow my brains out ausbros.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >we're not going with Astute or Virginias. Marles hasnt been hiding what Australia path is. The choice will be a new design, SSN(r), hence wanking off a "truly trilateral effort".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You don't even have the manpower for your Collins class. Why would you want Virginias?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      /k/comrade...
      >An enthusiastic Rishi Sunak has told ministers to expect a positive outcome next week when he travels to San Diego to unveil a deal to supply nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as part of the Aukus pact with the US.
      >Multiple sources said they believed the UK had succeeded in its bid to sell British-designed nuclear submarines to Australia, a deal that will safeguard the long-term future of the shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Forgot link.
        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/08/uk-to-unveil-nuclear-submarines-deal-with-australia-sources-say

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >The expectation, one source indicated, was that Australia would work jointly on a design for a next generation submarine with the UK, evolving from the existing Astute submarine design, although it may not be seaworthy until the 2040s because of the complexity of the work.
        >But other speculation that the UK could even be willing to sell or lease the two Astute class submarines yet to be completed at Barrow, HMS Agincourt and HMS Agamemnon, is wide of the mark. Naval analysts say the UK’s submarine fleet is already stretched and could not afford a sudden reduction.
        So not Astutes now or in the future. Which has to mean LAs in the short term.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT. Seething indians and frenchmen

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >PM Rishi Sunak
    >PM Albert Barese

    what in the actual frick "anglo"id sphere

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >PM Albert Barese
      Not his name

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/australia-expected-buy-up-5-virginia-class-submarines-part-aukus-sources-2023-03-08/

    Looks like it's buying burgersubs for the stopgap, local basing of burgersubs before the buy is done, and building bong designed subs with burger reactors locally for the long term.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That’s based as frick. Greatest ally status: maintained

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy based! Might as well sell the Bongs and Aussies B21s while we’re at it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        DAMN YOU ETERNAL ANGLO

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No disrespect or "lol cucked" but can we at least laugh about the fact the US has an Irish head of state and England an Indian?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You can laugh. Ireland is an anglophone nation whether they want to admit it or not. It’s been 800+ years of occupation and intermarriage and mass migration to US/Australia and Canada.
          On the UK having an Indian prime minister, I can’t defend it. Nobody in the public voted for him. Seems like he’s set to lose the election and drag the “conservatives” down with him.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That explains a lot, I thought he was just too old and senile to follow directions without embarrassing himself or know anything when asked questions. Didn’t know he was Irish

          https://i.imgur.com/VSo30XZ.jpg

          >Type 26 buy
          Agree completely. I view the future as a civilization game rather than nation state.
          >Chinese civilization united
          >Indian civilization united
          >European Union the start of a united Europe
          >Anglosphere Union (we’re different/better than the continentals. Always have been always will be)
          We already have 5 eyes, speak the same language, have similar laws, etc. Might as well start freedom of movement, working rights, integration of armed forces, etc.

          Why yes fellow weapons enthusiast, the US and UK have remarkably similar laws

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        australia has been asking for b21s in every discussion that they've been brought up in. they're getting them for sure

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy frick, straight to Virginias.

      https://i.imgur.com/cytGUSe.jpg

      Holy based! Might as well sell the Bongs and Aussies B21s while we’re at it.

      Tbh this makes me wish all the more the USN could have bought Type 26 FFGs, as long as we were buying a foreign hull. With joint programs like this, we're moving in the direction of common platforms anyway. One Anglo Navy, One Anglo Future.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Type 26 buy
        Agree completely. I view the future as a civilization game rather than nation state.
        >Chinese civilization united
        >Indian civilization united
        >European Union the start of a united Europe
        >Anglosphere Union (we’re different/better than the continentals. Always have been always will be)
        We already have 5 eyes, speak the same language, have similar laws, etc. Might as well start freedom of movement, working rights, integration of armed forces, etc.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >freedom of movement
          Frick off, like we need more pom tourists waddling round our beaches. No, only the pajeet failsons and Chinese neuvo-rich for us please

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I waddled around 5 mile beach, Tasmania last month and there is nothing you can do about it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Might as well start freedom of movement, working rights,
          We can do without all your pakis and Black folk thanks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >straight to Virginias
        Good, if we're spending all this money anyway, may as well go whole hog. No sense in half measures. State of the art sub fleet means what it means.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but not until 2030. There really could be war before then.
          Luckily they’ll keep the bases in WA so if the Chinese bomb us over it we won’t lose anything of value

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Only problem is it means 10-15 years until they enter service. Will it take that long to train ausgay submariners on nuke boat operations, and to make necessary improvements to support facilities, so that the wait doesn't make a difference anyway?

            That's why the US will be forward basing in AUS before the sale you dingdongs.

            Forward basing -> bought Virginias -> local built

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Only problem is it means 10-15 years until they enter service. Will it take that long to train ausgay submariners on nuke boat operations, and to make necessary improvements to support facilities, so that the wait doesn't make a difference anyway?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >an old man, a pajeet, and an oic**t on board a Virginia-class
    And on that day, not a single word in the English language was properly pronounced. Just a deluge of consonants and vowels, all in the most incomprehensible orders and combinations.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    FACT:-

    Instead of China, AUKUS are nothing more than a paper tiger scheme devised to counter the rise of Indonesia as the leader of South East Asia. Washington, London and it's dog Canberra realize the dangerous threat towards it's colonialist sphere of influence towards poor third world country like Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei. Not to mentioned that during Borneo Liberation War scar when Indonesian pretty much destroying whole Commonwealth force from colonializing Indonesian province of Borneo. Of course these paper-thin AUKUS "alliance" will collapse and any effort by these white colonialists vermin towards South East Asia will become their next graveyard of the dying empire.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats a very hot take. However, Krika is my favorite Bionicle villain.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Amid the backdrop of global outcry against china’s attacks on democracy, AUKUS has shown that it can deliver impact where it matters most for communities under threat. This lofty conglomerate of free peoples must contain Chinese expansionism in our time. Let them have their multi polar world, led by NATO in the north and AUKUS in the south, adorned with the bulletproof legitimacy bestowed on it by our human rights and lgbtq acceptance records.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ausies so hyped to get a sub 2 generations behind what Russia has, arguably 3 behind the CCP, adorable.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *