ATACMS in Ukraine

Biden is expected to announce the delivery of ATACMS to Ukraine during the next Ramstein meeting on the 19th of this month. Considering how Ukraine already operates HIMARS and GMLRS it won't take them more than a few weeks to train on ATACMS, which is deployed from the same launchers as them.

By late October or early November massive three and a half thousand pound ballistic missiles will start raining all over the Russian Black Sea fleet in Crimea. The timing of this move indicates that US is finally allowing Ukraine to sink the Russian Black Sea Fleet in response to the termination of the grain deal. Just yesterday, Ukraine captured strategically located oil rigs in the Black Sea from Russia. Once the Russian Navy is destroyed, Russia will have very little incentive to continue its war in Ukraine.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ATACMS in Ukraine
    And soon in russian command posts.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And dombass children too, dont forget those

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They are still alive after 11 years of dying by billions
        FUCKIN DIE ALREADY!!1
        Their biomass would cover the planet in a layer of 200 meters if we were not bombing them.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit, the ukies will totally put atacms on those oil rigs. Sevastopol is fucked

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Location of the captured oil rigs. (in cyan)

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        +

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They didn’t "capture" anything. First of all the rigs all belong to Ukraine; they were basically stolen by Russia some 8 years ago but have since been completely abandoned because of the war. However, Russia did use one to station a radar which was snooping Black Sea airspace; the U.S. probably asked Ukraine to go pick it up, which they did, and posed for a flag photo op on the way out. Ukraine isn’t going to station forces on these things because they’re indefensible and will just get murdered trying to.

        I know PrepHole desperately wants to spin the flag photo op like a victory, but it simply isn’t. A handful of SOF on a motorboat boarded an abandoned Ukrainian oil platform to grab a radar set. That’s all there was to it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the U.S. probably asked Ukraine to go pick it up, which they did
          First act of a shill, never consider Ukraine as independent entity but controlled completely by USA/HATO

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It’s COMMON SENSE moron; Ukraine doesn’t have assets flying over the Black Sea being tracked by that radar — but the US does and frequently gets harassed by Russian air power as a result. That’s so obvious I’m stunned I have to spell it out.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukraine doesn’t have assets flying over the Black Sea being tracked by that radar
              Try telling that to ziggers dying to Ukrainian air assets flying above Black Sea

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                …what? Ukraine has no such assets unless they’re sending their TB2 out there which I haven’t heard of.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They used TB2s to track Moskva before they sunk it. This is been known for a while.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                IM LITERALLY SHOWING YOU TB2 KILLING ZIGGERS WHILE FLYING ABOVE BLACK SEA ARE YOU LITERALLY RETARDED

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                IM LITERALLY SHOWING YOU TB2 KILLING ZIGGERS WHILE FLYING ABOVE BLACK SEA ARE YOU LITERALLY RETARDED

                Jesus Christ lmao. Vatniks really are fucking braindead.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if clash report post shit about tb2 then it must be true
                >nevermind the fact that we LITERALLY have Sergey Pashinsky, saying otherwise
                https://www.defensemirror.com/news/32917/Ukrainian_Official_Lambastes_Famed_Turkish_Bayraktar_UAV_in_a_Prank_Call_with_Russians
                you probably forgot about this didnt you now

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukraine doesn’t have assets flying over the Black Sea being tracked by that radar
              This post didn't age well at all, lmao.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukraine didn’t “capture” anything
          >j-just let me explain how Russia used them throughout the last 9 years
          >they’re totally useless for Ukraine now, trust me bro
          Kek!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >here's five reasons why enemy stealing your radars and removing last observation posts west of Crimea is actually a good thing

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >if you capture your enemy’s assets, they win

            NATO cannot into electronic warfare anyways, the capture of a radar is a mere publicity stunt

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Send some ATACMS towards ind*a too if they get the chance since these curryn1ggers are begging for sum.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >if you capture your enemy’s assets, they win

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >We didnt even NEED those !!1!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I know PrepHole desperately wants to spin the flag photo op like a victory, but it simply isn’t. A handful of SOF on a motorboat boarded an abandoned Ukrainian oil platform to grab a radar set. That’s all there was to it
          The victory is that Ukraine is having more success with operations at sea than Russia is having defending warships in port.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The radar station -- defending the sea approach to a harbor that had two ship air sunk in dry dock the next day. What an odd coincidence.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They literally have no means for doing that and even if they did they wouldn’t be stupid enough to throw away critical firepower by placing it on an indefensible location.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What about AShMs?

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My only question is, why now? They could have been using them to great effect before the counteroffensive was mounted.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Honest truth: the USA was a in a transitional period between types of ammunition. The stockpile of ATACMS on hand was very low, and the USA wanted to make sure they had them on hand in case China decided to do a funny while we were distracted and had our hands full with Ukraine.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because biden is a senile fool and his handlers are a bunch of craven bureocrats

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So what was the real reason for the U.S. not handing them over sooner?
    I've seen a couple of reasons so far.
    Ex:
    >We don't want you attacking Russia directly
    >It was an inventory error

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The best reason I've seen so far:
      >Biden is still unable to ascertain how much damage he actually wants to cause Russia and is terrified of the possibility of a total collapse of the Russian Federation
      >basically, a lack of leadership at the top means Biden isn't "le based" as NCD would like to believe but rather totally afraid of the possibility of muscovy delenda est

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >NCD
        who?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you know exactly who moron

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if I did I wouldn't have asked

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          rebbit shit. polchuds are obsessed with rebbit

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Non-Credible Defense.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >how much damage he actually wants to cause Russia and is terrified of the possibility of a total collapse of the Russian Federation
        I doubt this is the case. I bet it's purely political. I imagine they have some sort of timeline of when to release weaponry in order to not look like they are 'escalating' or something.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Russians have broken every taboo short of actual WMDs. They've used magnesium/incendiary munitions, multilated and murdered POWs, murdered civilians, so exactly what are we *not* escalating towards?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's why I put escalating in single quotes. We're talking from not just an international perspective, but an American geopolitical perspective as well. 2024 is an election year, so I imagine we will be seeing more and more politically-motivated decisions with regards to Ukraine next year. I agree, the concept of escalation in this war is a farce, it's a peer war between former Soviet countries (nothing new), but that's not a universally held belief. Most people before the war didn't even know where Ukraine is let alone that it is a former Soviet state.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            do you really consider using WP to be comparable to deliberately killing civilians? serious question

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              it is a war crime, but yes, deliberate murder of civilians is the top of the list of no-nos

              Why aren’t you agitating daily, HOURLY for Biden to pick up the phone and ordering Russia kicked out of Ukraine? Don’t you care about stopping these crimes?

              because I'm not a lobbyist.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why aren’t you agitating daily, HOURLY for Biden to pick up the phone and ordering Russia kicked out of Ukraine? Don’t you care about stopping these crimes?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >so exactly what are we *not* escalating towards?
            Nukes, especially suitcase nukes that go missing.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So what was the real reason for the U.S. not handing them over sooner?
        I've seen a couple of reasons so far.
        Ex:
        >We don't want you attacking Russia directly
        >It was an inventory error

        https://i.imgur.com/3OhnJxs.jpg

        A leverage to stop russia doing something, which they've finally have done.

        There's only a small amount available to give and production isn't going to restart for a (technically) obsolete weapon, this was I think the real main reason. Why it's been given the green light is anyone's guess. Maybe the army decided PrSM is in sight and it's not going to be an issue.
        The timing isn't bad, however. GLSDB is about to drop as well, so Ukraine will have the trifecta of 80km GMLRS, 150km GLSDB and 300km ATACMS, all from the same high-mobility launcher. I expect nothing less than a total breakdown of Russian logistics.

        my guess is that the missiles are nearing the end of their life and it'd be more cost effective to have them get used to blow up ziggers than to dispose of them

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Biden is still unable to ascertain
        You actually think Biden is in control of anything? His press secretary wields more power than he does. She can literally tell him to shut up mid-speech and get the fuck off of the stage. Does that sound like a man who is in control?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >terrified of the possibility of a total collapse of the Russian Federation
        This x1000. I can't believe some of the dumb shit I read on here, like if Putin dies and the Russian government collapses it will turn into some kind of ancap utopia. No you idiot, the Russian government collapsing would be the worst geopolitical catastrophe of this century.
        >but theyre le evil
        Yes and whatever replaces them would in all likelihood be even worse, in addition to being totally unpredictable. We want to bring Russia under control, which means there has to be something TO control. We're trying to get them as weak as possible without actually collapsing, which is a very steep cliff that needs to be approached very slowly and cautiously.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia civil war is not a catastrophe as long as Japan grabs the far east and pulls the covers off the hidden IJN fleet, and all the helicopter destroyers suddenly rise out of the water revealing they are actually the control towers of much more massive submersible carriers underneath

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My reading is that the US wants to go for the holy grail of foreign policy victories; get Russia to denuclearize and move into Chinas missile umbrella instead.

        This would require a russia with a reparation debt that would take a russia a century to pay off and Russia having fuck all worth of leverage left aside from its nuke arsenal.

        So a proposal will be made; you give up your nukes, and we will take up your debt.

        And after that we can let them balkenize in peace

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A leverage to stop russia doing something, which they've finally have done.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's only a small amount available to give and production isn't going to restart for a (technically) obsolete weapon, this was I think the real main reason. Why it's been given the green light is anyone's guess. Maybe the army decided PrSM is in sight and it's not going to be an issue.
      The timing isn't bad, however. GLSDB is about to drop as well, so Ukraine will have the trifecta of 80km GMLRS, 150km GLSDB and 300km ATACMS, all from the same high-mobility launcher. I expect nothing less than a total breakdown of Russian logistics.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Trying not to overescallate. They don't want nuclear weapons to be used or go missing if Putin gets too desperate too quickly or if Russia collapses.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Gotta hand it to the british, they have given a very limited amount of fucks regarding these red lines.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Holding them to give to Ukraine if Russia got ballistic missiles from Iran. Deal reached with Iran recently probably has a secret clause that they won't give Russia its missiles. So now just cranking up the heat. Boiling the Russian frog

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there's only one real answer
      >muh escalation

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Boiling frog. Incrementalism works.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because MIC wants the war to go on a long as possible, because if they gave the Ukrainians what they needed the war would have been over a year or so ago.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Musk's contract is with USG, hence the service cut on the naval drones thing was likely at their behest (and side stepping cyber attacks, much more effective than Russian MOD). The black sea fleet isn't combat effective as it is, may as well hold its destruction over their head as a bargaining tool.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The sinking of the black sea fleet has been used as a threat in response to extreme actions from Russia, I don't see them encouraging it for general Ukranian operations. Setting up a defensive line around Ukranian waters? Maybe.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there are other threats that cannot be spoken aloud to the public, like they will destroy all vodka factories west of the Urals

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This means they are already in Ukraine.

    The minute Biden stops tongue touching the mike, the ATACMs will fire, as per history with HIMARs

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Biden is expected to announce the delivery of ATACMS to Ukraine during the next Ramstein meeting on the 19th of this month
    Then I'll wait till then. People have been breathlessly reporting the eminent transfer for over a year now.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he is only giving ATACMs now which can attack crimean harbor out of fear of Russian reaction but faults Musk for not allowing humanitarian use Starlink to be used to attack same said harbor

    also Ukrainians are slavs and also cant fight for shit, make videos is ok

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The HIMARS knows where you are at all times because it knows where you aren't. By understanding the totality of places you aren't, the HIMARS can detect with total accuracy the one place that you are. The HIMARS never lets itself get discouraged while searching, because it knows that only by constantly discovering where you aren't can it discover where you are. The HIMARS is perfectly happy. It feels content despite not knowing what being content feels like because it knows that doesn't feel discontented. Because the HIMARS knows that after discovering all the places you aren't, it will now know where you are by knowing the totality of the places you are not. With this knowledge, it can then shower you with millions of tungsten ball bearings travelling at 3,000 feet per second, transforming where you are to yet another place that you are not.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      /K is increasingly becoming the place for operators to crack jokes

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia will have very little incentive to continue its war in Ukraine
    If they didn't have senile maniac dictator yes, but in this case its question if generals , siloviks decide to ice him

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *